Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood Work Negative...but Not By Much...


Momto2girls

Recommended Posts

Momto2girls Rookie

My daughter just turned 4 in March. We've had GI issues since she was 2.5. In Aug. her ped tested her Transglutiminase IgA, and it was only .6 (reference range <4). This month we started with a ped GI specialist and she ran the same test again and now she's 3.72. (still ref range <4). So it is still within normal. (And her total IgA appears to be normal, too). Those are the only tests she ran. We do not go back until June, but in the meantime she's getting worse, not better.

I have a call into the GI but they are so slow to get back to us. Do you all think this is a good, solid negative, and we should accept it and move on? Or will it just be a matter of time before that number goes over 4? (Since she's just 4 years old?)

The GI said in June when we visit we'll see how she's doing and decide about scoping at that time. It seems biopsies aren't even that great, though. WWYD?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Bubba's Mom Enthusiast

My daughter just turned 4 in March. We've had GI issues since she was 2.5. In Aug. her ped tested her Transglutiminase IgA, and it was only .6 (reference range <4). This month we started with a ped GI specialist and she ran the same test again and now she's 3.72. (still ref range <4). So it is still within normal. (And her total IgA appears to be normal, too). Those are the only tests she ran. We do not go back until June, but in the meantime she's getting worse, not better.

I have a call into the GI but they are so slow to get back to us. Do you all think this is a good, solid negative, and we should accept it and move on? Or will it just be a matter of time before that number goes over 4? (Since she's just 4 years old?)

The GI said in June when we visit we'll see how she's doing and decide about scoping at that time. It seems biopsies aren't even that great, though. WWYD?

It's a tough call. With her numbers rising, I would be concerned that she may have a gluten problem?

Were you told to try taking her off gluten to see how she does..or do they want to see if her numbers continue to rise?

If you're not sure what the reason for the wait is..call and ask them?

Skylark Collaborator

I have a call into the GI but they are so slow to get back to us. Do you all think this is a good, solid negative, and we should accept it and move on? Or will it just be a matter of time before that number goes over 4? (Since she's just 4 years old?)

There is no possible way to distinguish between a true rise in her TTG and statistical noise within the "negative" range of the test. I would ask her doctor to run the more sensitive deamidated gliadin IgA and IgG.

TeknoLen Rookie

I would encourage you to have her retested, Full celiac panel, sooner rather than later. Good luck.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,225
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    KmaF
    Newest Member
    KmaF
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @TerryinCO! Do you know what blood tests were ordered? Was it for like you would have done for an annual physical (CBC/CMP) or celiac disease specific antibody tests? I find it interesting that your GI doc did the endoscopy and biopsy before he/she ordered blood tests to check for celiac disease, assuming the blood tests ordered were indeed specific for celiac disease. Normally, the sequence is the other way around. Was the GI doc doing the endoscopy for some other reason in the first place? The endoscopy/biopsy is considered the gold standard for celiac diagnosis so I also find it interesting that the doc reflexively felt a need to order blood work as well.  Just a heads up in case the bloodwork ordered was not specific for celiac antibodies: Going on a gluten-free diet before the blood draw for celiac antibody testing is done will likely invalidate the testing. You probably know this already but hypothyroidism (Hashimoto's disease) is common in the celiac population and there is a statistical correlation. And then there is the weight loss. And I assume you have suffered with GERD for a long time and that is what led to the Barret's. All symptoms of celiac disease.
    • TerryinCO
      ...so lotsa questions and unknowns for me.  Gastro Doc did an endoscopy and found villi damaged so Celiac is suspect/known.  Subsequent blood work done and am awaiting evaluation from  NP or Doc. I've started gluten free diet and that's going well.  I don't have any real symptoms but have lost ~ 10# over last year or so....180 down to 170 ( I'm about 6'0 and always been on the scrawny side).  I'm 76 and up to now have not  had Celiac/gluten issues, but do take hypothyroid meds, and diagnosed/treated for Barret's Esophigus. I'm exploring the site here - looks like a lot of info available.  Talk with you later. Make yourself a great day! Terry    
    • Scott Adams
      @EricaFilpi, please tell us more about your recovery...did you need to take iron infusions or supplements? What other supplements are you taking? I'll assume you've been gluten-free since August.
    • joleenrae
      We have been tested and tested negative. But we have not done the gene testing. 
    • cristiana
      So true, @trents, I was a skeptic myself!  
×
×
  • Create New...