Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Where Your Contribution Counts!
    eNewsletter
    Support Us!

Blood Test Results - 2 Weeks In To Gluten Challenge


charlie76

Recommended Posts

charlie76 Newbie

Hi all,

 

As I mentioned in a thread a few weeks ago, I've recently started a gluten challenge after 3 years of very strict gluten free eating. 

 

I've got a biopsy in 2 weeks time (after which I will have been eating gluten for 5 weeks and 2 days in total - I've been eating around 6 slices of bread per day or equivalent).

 

2 weeks into the gluten challenge I had blood tests done.

 

Deamidated Gliadin IgA        * 99  U/mL    ( <15 )

Deamidated Gliadin IgG          <1  U/mL    ( <15 )

Tissue Transglutaminase IgA     <1  U/mL    ( <15 )

Tissue Transglutaminase IgG     <1  U/mL    ( <15 )

 

My results from 2010 are as follows (following many years of low gluten, but not gluten free eating):

 

Gliadin IgA Abs               * 47  U/mL    ( 0 - 20 )

tTG IgA/IgG                   * 52  U/mL    ( 0 - 20 )

 

When I had a biopsy in 2010, there wasn't any sign of Villous atrophy.

 

I was wondering after my latest blood test if I might be going for a biopsy too soon?

 

I understand that the 99 U/mL result for Gliadin IgA suggests that there's something going on, but am I understanding correctly that the other results (the IgG and the tissue results) suggest that there's no sign of damage being done?

 

Again, whatever the result I will be going back to strict gluten free eating. I'm definitely intolerant to the stuff. 

 

Thanks...!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Mum in Norway Contributor

I think thats a very short challange for a biopsi? Sins you have been glutenfree for some time, it will take a while to get your gutts nice and damaged... If you want to be sure the test result is as accurat as posible, you should probably put the biopsi of for a bit.

 

Me, I'v been eating very little gluten for many years, but not been glutenfree. I did a blodtest (that wasen't planed), came back with DGP IgG of 9, when <7 is normal and >10 is positive. After two weeks of not very heavy challange, about 3 slices of bread a day, it came back 10. So doctor orderd biopsy, and I was told to eat 'normaly' (3 bread based meals a day and some pasta etc several times a week) for AT LEAST two months prior to the biopsy. And I have not been glutenfree, just glutenfree lightat best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nvsmom Community Regular

I can't remember why you are doing a biopsy...You had a positive AGA IgA, which means a gliadin/gluten intolerance; and a positive tTG IgA, which means your body is making autoantibodies against the mucosal lining of your small intestine - so damage was being attempted; and you had a very positive result to the gluten-free diet. Did some other health issues come up so that you need to revisit the fact that you most likely are a celiac (of whom doctors missed the damage)?

 

Now you also have a positive DGP IgA  after only 2 weeks of gluten - pretty impressive by the way because many people need two months in order make enough DGP antibodies to register on tests. Your other tests were negative at 2 weeks, but that is quite the norm.  Not many people have so many positive celiac tests; most only have one or two.  The only one you are missing is the EMA IgA but that only shows up after advanced damage has happened and will definitely need more than 2 weeks to raise it.... Not that you'd want to.  ;)

 

Anyway, back to your question... Many doctors only require a two week gluten challeng for a biopsy so 4 weeks will probably be enough. If you want to be sure, you could delay it for another month and that should be enough time to do plenty of damage to yourself (these tests are quite barbaric). If the challenge is getting too difficult, then do it after the four weeks. you don't want to make yourself too sick. There are a few board members around here who did gluten challenges but they set themselves back many many months and more than one member apparently ("coincidentally") set off a permenent health problem. It's good to have a diagnosis but not if you are going to make yourself have longterm problems.  KWIM?

 

Good luck with that biopsy.  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
charlie76 Newbie
Thanks Nicole.
 
I didn't specifically get any more health issues come up, but I went back to speak to my doctor as I still get "IBS" symptoms when I deviate from my diet (my normal diet is somewhere between gluten free with some gluten-free grains and paleo. I avoid dairy most of the time and try to avoid all grains where possible). 
 
I often have issues when I eat out at restaurants (even when being careful that what I'm eating is gluten free). I can get gas, having to make a dash for the bathroom and even fatigue and a headache thrown in for good measure the next day! I am assuming that there is either cross contamination occurring, leaky gut, intolerance to soy, preservatives, processed oils etc. or something else happening.
 
When I spoke to the doctor about these continuing "IBS" symptoms, he explained that it would be an idea to re-check for celiac disease because the biopsy is the gold standard. I also understood from the consultation that if I have a definite celiac diagnosis then my health might be monitored more closely in the future for any related conditions. 
 
Anyway, now that I have done more research (and this forum has been really helpful) I might have decided again the gluten challenge if I was making the decision again right now. But I'm so close to the biopsy now that I'll carry on. I don't think I'll delay it ... I want to get back to feeling well again :)
 
I'm considering doing an elimination diet like Whole30 and/or seeing a dietician once I'm done with the challenge. 
 
Thanks again.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
nvsmom Community Regular

Understandable. After putting in so much time on the gluten challenge, I would probably continue through with it too.

 

Dairy is a good first food to eliminate for celiacs. Because the intestinal area attacked is where lactase is made, many celiacs are lactose intolerant for 6 months until they heal, sometimes much longer.

 

A food journal is helpful when trying to figure out sensistivities, as is posting your diet here. The people around here helped me figure out that apples and pears cause me some gas issues and bloating - I never would have figured that one out on my own.

 

Good luck.  :) Let us know how it goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 9 months later...
charlie76 Newbie

It's been quite a while since my last update. I did in fact finish my gluten challenge and had a biopsy in September 2013. 

 

The outcome of my "gluten challenge" last year was a negative biopsy. The gastroenterologist who I was referred to came to the conclusion (despite the blood tests and symptoms) that I don't have coeliac disease and that it's okay for me to continue to eat gluten.

 

In a way it was disappointing as I (and others) think that I do have celiac disease and I believe other doctors would give me a positive diagnosis on the blood work and symptoms. 

 

Obviously I returned to a gluten free diet (I think this is especially important as there are other autoimmune issues in my immediate family).

 

And on to my family... unfortunately my brother who has terrible "gastrointestinal symptoms" at times (to put it politely) still refuses to get tested for coeliac. My elderly mother has quite advanced MS and other issues so even if she were tested and it were a positive result, I doubt she would be able to change her diet. 

 

My only concern for myself in the future is that Open Original Shared Link which might be developed will only be available to those who have been diagnosed with a biopsy. Also my doctor mentioned that they wouldn't be as concerned with screening for other associated conditions in the future without the positive biopsy / diagnosis. 

 

Whatever happens, the gluten-free diet is for life for me. 

 

Anyway, that's the end of my very late update - thanks for listening and the advice :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nvsmom Community Regular

I'm glad you are doing so well!  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      120,503
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    PBunny39
    Newest Member
    PBunny39
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • powerofpositivethinking
      I haven't been on this forum for a long time, but it was absolutely wonderful during the diagnostic process!  My path for celiac disease diagnosis was the following: -Had normal IgA level, and my only serology positive test was the DGP IgG -Deficiencies in both Vitamins D and K that did not increase at first despite massive supplementation -Diagnosis of fat malabsorption both total and neutral -Diagnosis of severe exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) -Testing was completed to rule out causes of EPI, and the only one not ruled out was celiac. -Both traditional endoscopy and pill capsule endoscopy yielded negative results for biopsy confirmation, but my GI doctor said that both procedures simply could have missed the damaged spots. -EPI and fat malabsorption resolved after taking Creon for 6 months since my EPI was caused by celiac -23 and Me said I don't have either of the two prominent genes for celiac disease   Remember that you might not have 'textbook' symptoms, but you still may have celiac disease.   Also, I am SO incredibly grateful for this site for all the learning it has allowed me to do. I have a senior dog, and these last few weeks with her were very scary! After two hospital stays, she finally received an IBD diagnosis after having gastroenteritis and pancreatitis. I know that celiac disease is not IBD, however, through reading this site, I learned more about it. I was relieved when I found out she had IBD and not cancer this past Wednesday. I know IBD can be managed thanks to what I've learned here!  So celiac.com, not only did you help me, but you helped my pup too! Thank you ❤️  
    • SuzanneL
      It was tTG IGG that was flagged high. I'm not sure about the other stuff. I'm still eating my normal stuff. 
    • cristiana
      Thank you for your post, @Nedast, and welcome to the forum. It is interesting to read of your experiences. Although I've not had TMJ, from time to time I have had a bit of mild pain in my jaw, sharp stabbing pains and tingling in my face which appears to have been caused by issues with my trigeminal nerve.  I read that sometimes a damaged trigeminal nerve in coeliacs can heal after adopting a gluten free diet.  I try to keep out of cold winds or wear a scarf over my face when it is cold and windy, those conditions tend to be my 'trigger' but I do think that staying clear of gluten has helped.  Also, sleeping with a rolled up towel under my neck is a tip I picked up online, again, that seems to bring benefits. Thank you again for your input - living with this sort of pain can be very hard, so it is good to be able to share advice.
    • Julie Riordan
      I am going to France in two weeks and then to Portugal in May   Thanks for your reply 
    • Nedast
      I made an account just to reply to this topic. My story resembles yours in so many ways that it is truly amazing. I also suddenly became lactose intolerant, went a little under 10 years attributing all my symtoms to different body parts, never thinking it was something systemic until much later. I had the same mental problems - anxiety, depression, fatigue, etc. In fact, the only real difference in our story is that I was never formally diagnosed. When I discovered that my myriad symtoms, that had been continuous and worsening for years, all rapidly subsided upon cessation of consuming gluten, I immediately took it upon myself to cut gluten out of my diet completely. I live in America, and had lost my health insurance within the year prior to my discovery, so I could not get tested, and I will never willingly or knowingly consume gluten again, which I would have to do in order to get tested now that I have insurance again. But that is not the point of this reply. I also had extreme TMJ pain that began within months of getting my wisdom teeth out at - you guessed it - 17 years old. I was in and out of doctors for my various symptoms for about 5 years before I gave up, but during that time I had also kept getting reffered to different kinds of doctors that had their own, different solutions to my TMJ issue, an issue which I only recently discovered was related to my other symptoms. I began with physical therapy, and the physical therapist eventually broke down at me after many months, raising her voice at me and saying that there was nothing she could do for me. After that saga, I saw a plastic surgeon at the request of my GP, who he knew personally. This palstic surgeon began using botox injections to stop my spasming jaw muscles, and he managed to get it covered by my insurace in 2011, which was harder to do back then. This helped the pain tremendously, but did not solve the underlying problem, and I had to get repeat injections every three months. After a couple of years, this began to lose effectiveness, and I needed treatments more often than my insurance would cover. The surgeon did a scan on the joint and saw slight damage to the tissues. He then got approved by insurance to do a small surgery on the massseter (jaw) muscle - making an incision, and then splicing tissue into the muscle to stop the spasming. It worked amazingly, but about three months later it had stopped working. I was on the verge of seeing the top oral surgeon in our city, but instead of operating on me, he referred me to a unique group of dentists who focus on the TMJ and its biomechanical relationship to teeth occlusion (i.e. how the teeth fit together). This is what your dentist did, and what he did to you was boderline if not outright malpractice. There is a dental field that specializes in doing this kind of dental work, and it takes many years of extra schooling (and a lot of money invested into education) to be able to modify teeth occusion in this manner. Just based on the way you describe your dentist doing this, I can tell he was not qualified to do this to you. Dentists who are qualified and engage in this practice take many measurments of your head, mouth, teeth, etc., they take laboratory molds of your teeth, and they then make a complete, life-size model of your skull and teeth to help them guide their work on you. They then have a lab construct, and give you what is called a "bite splint." It looks and feels like a retainer, but its function is entirely different. This is essentially a literal splint for the TMJ that situates on the teeth. The splint is progressively modified once or twice per week, over several months, in order to slowly move the joint to its correct position. The muscles spasm less, stress is taken off the joint, as the joint slowly moves back into its proper position. The pain reduces each month, each week, sometimes even each day you go in for a visit. The joint has to be moved in this manner with the splint BEFORE the modification to the teeth begins. They then add to your tooth structure with small bits of composite, to keep the joint in its proper place after it has been sucessfully repositioned. Subtracting from your teeth, by grinding down bits of your natural tooth structure, is done very conservatively, if they have to do it at all. This process worked for me - after six months, my face, jaw, neck all felt normal, and I had no more pain - a feeling I had not had in a long time. It also made my face look better. I had not realized the true extent that the spasming muscles and the joint derangement had effected the shape of my face. The pain began to return after a few months, but nowhere near where it had been before. This immense reduction in pain lasted for a little over two years. The treatment still ultimately failed, but it is not their fault, and it is still the treatment that has given me the most relief to this day. Later on, I even went about three years with very, very good pain reduction, before the joint severely destabilized again. This field of dentistry is the last line treatment for TMJ issues before oral surgery on the TMJ. There aren't as many denists around who practice this anymore, and the practice is currently shrinking due to dentists opting for less espensive, additional educations in things like professional whitening, which have a broader marketability. Getting this treatment is also very expensive if not covered by insurance (in America at least). My first time was covered by insurance, second time was not, though the dentist took pity on me due to the nature of my case and charged like a quarter of usual pricing. Most cases seen by these dentists are complete successes, and the patient never has to come back again. But occasionally they get a case that is not a success, and I was one of those cases. A little over a year ago, I began seeing the second dentist who keeps my TMJ stable in this manner. The first dentist retired, and then died sadly. A shame too, because he was a truly amazing, knowledgable guy who really wanted to help people. The new dentist began to get suspicious when my joint failed to stay stable after I was finished with the bite splint and his modifications, so he did another scan on me. This is ten years after the first scan (remember, I said the surgeon saw "slight" damage to the tissue on the first scan). This new scan revealed that I now no longer have cartilage in the joint, on both sides - complete degeneration of the soft tissues and some damage to the bone. The dentist sat me down and had a talk with me after these results came in, and said that when he sees damage like this in cases like mine, that the damage to the joint is most likely autoimmune, and that, in his experinece, it is usually autoimmune. He has sent patients with cases like mine to Mayo Clinic. He said he will continue to see me as long as the treatment continues to offer me relief, but also said that I will probably have to see a dentist for this type of treatment for the rest of my life. He is not currently recommending surgery due to my young age and the fact that the treatment he provides manages my symptoms pretty well. I still see this dentist today, and probably will see this kind of dental specialist for the rest of my life, since they have helped with this issue the most. I did not inform him that I am 100% sure that I have celiac disease (due to my complete symptom remission upon gluten cessation). I didn't inform him because I thought it would be inappropriate due to not having a formal diagnosis. I was disappointed, because I had believed I had caught it BEFORE it had done permanent damage to my body. I had never suspected that my TMJ issues may be related to my other symptoms, and that the damage would end up complete and permanent. Luckily, I caught it about 6 months after my other joints started hurting, and they stopped hurting right after I went gluten free, and haven't hurt since. I of course did the necessary research after the results of the second scan, and found out that the TMJ is the most commonly involved joint in autoimmune disease of the intestines, and if mutliple joints are effected, it is usually the first one effected. This makes complete sense, since the TMJ is the most closely related joint to the intestines, and literally controls the opening that allows food passage into your intestines. I am here to tell you, that if anyone says there is no potential relationship between TMJ issues and celiac disease, they are absolutely wrong. Just google TMJ and Celiac disease, and read the scientific articles you find. Research on issues regarding the TMJ is relatively sparse, but you will find the association you're looking for validated.
×
×
  • Create New...