Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Diagnosed as poison ivy, then contact dermatitis now eczema


JJ May

Recommended Posts

JJ May Rookie

Ok I would love to not have a gluten issue but I can't ignore some of the symptoms.  But every dermatologist is a hard no on DH.  What do those of you actually  who have been diagnosed with DH  think?  Symptoms are as follows.

I lived with the rash for about 4 months.  I tried creams, anti fungals, Benadryl.....nothing even made a dent in this rash.  First dermatologist tells me I have poison ivy.  I have been an outdoors type all my life.  I know what poison ivy looks like but I went along with it.  Nothing worked.  Next step was going to an allergist.   Apparently I am allergic to EVERYTHING that grows in Texas but no animal allergies or  food allergies other than IgA suggesting intolerance to gluten.  None of the allergy shots or antihistamines they gave me helped.  I ended up with a never ending sinus infection which went away when I quit doing allergy shots.   I have a thyroid condition that is most likely Hashimoto's but other than doctors wanting me to take synthyroid and go away, I can't get a diagnosis for that either.   I have been tested for Lupus and it was negative.  I have autoimmune markers that are similar to SLE but the rheumatologist ruled out Lupus.   Basicially she was like "well you definitely have an autoimmune disease but it's not RA and it's not Lupus so I can't help you".  And the endocrinologist that she referred me to without a diagnosis told me they only see patients who have been diagnosed and do treatments so since I had no diagnosis.....they wouldn't see me.   I have constipation and bloating but no real symptoms of celiac according to the allergist ("you would be doubled over in pain if you had celiac").  My rash is on both arms (heavier on the left), across my chest but more on the left side, on both thighs (heavier on the right)  and the fronts of both of my lower legs and just a little bit on my lower back (my own itchy little tramp stamp....good times!).  But the dermatologist I saw today was very adamant that it couldn't possibly be DH because it wasn't on the backs of my elbow and on my hair line.   She said it was definitely eczema.   Then she asked me if I needed to talk to someone about my stress.  The last time I had someone ask me about my stress in relation to a complaint I had was when I was a kid.  When I finally got a diagnosis for that, turns out I had recurrent respiratory papilloma and good thing I finally got that diagnosis because I had barely any room to breathe and could have died.  I mean seriously.....doctors think you are crazy if you haven't gotten a solution and consulted Dr. Google.    I have had this rash mostly on for the last 2 years.  I think that is stress enough.  If I don't have DH, the first thing I am doing is going to get myself a big ole ice cold Shiner Boch!   So what do you guys think? Eczema?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



squirmingitch Veteran

I'm surprised one or more hasn't told you it was bed bugs or scabies or psoriasis or, or, or.... or it's all in your head, or you scratch & make the rash happen because of scratching.

You need a derm who is experienced in dh & doing the dh biopsy. Uh, the one who said it couldn't possibly be dh b/c it wasn't on the backs of your elbows or your hairline is an ass & doesn't know what she's talking about. Apparently she thinks those are the only places dh occurs. The stupidity!!

DH can & does appear anywhere on the body. Sure there are places it appears more commonly like knees & elbows but it does present anywhere. Almost always bilaterally. For me, it does seem to favor one side or the other more heavily depending on where we're talking about.

60% of people with dh test negative on the celiac blood tests but we still get the damage to our villi although it tends to be patchier. We tend to have fewer, milder GI issues although there are those who have terrible GI issues as well as the rash. 

Oral steroids, steroid shots within 2 months prior to a dh biopsy (or other celiac testing) can produce false negatives. Topical steroids should be avoided for roughly 2 weeks prior to a dh biopsy.

Here are some links for you:

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

 

VERY IMPORTANT!!!!!! Where a dh biopsy is done. On clear skin ADJACENT to an active lesion. Not ON a lesion.

Open Original Shared Link

 

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

Pay particular attention to the last 2 lines of this link:

Open Original Shared Link

As to the Dapsone....... plenty here have tried it; almost all have had terrible side effects, some have not & it has been a great help to them. If you are dx'd with dh and Dapsone is offered to you, just do your due diligence & learn about the side effects of Dapsone. Also, regular blood tests (I think every 2 weeks) should be done as long as you are on Dapsone.

 

JJ May Rookie

Yeah this derm doctor I saw last pretty much quoted the Heath line website on the areas DH can be like it was a set thing.  And she did suggest that it was in my head and maybe I should talk to someone about my stress....I think she was not happy I brought her info and voiced an opinion.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

"other than IgA suggesting intolerance to gluten"

IGE tests are the ones for allergies. IgA is a celiac test. I have to wonder why the doctor ignored this positive result.

Can you get your GP to run a full celiac panel for you? You do sound like one of us. My Mom was told when I was young that my rash was 'poison ivy in my bloodstream' and I would suffer for another almost 40 years before I was diagnosed.  Doctors can be clueless. I hope you can get some relief soon.

 

JJ May Rookie
7 hours ago, ravenwoodglass said:

"other than IgA suggesting intolerance to gluten"

IGE tests are the ones for allergies. IgA is a celiac test. I have to wonder why the doctor ignored this positive result.

Can you get your GP to run a full celiac panel for you? You do sound like one of us. My Mom was told when I was young that my rash was 'poison ivy in my bloodstream' and I would suffer for another almost 40 years before I was diagnosed.  Doctors can be clueless. I hope you can get some relief soon.

 

The allergist is the one who said I couldn't possibly have any form of celiac because I didn't have painful stomach/intestinal symptoms.  I guess the bloating and constipation didn't really count as intestinal symptoms.  And because it wasn't a big number, he said that a gluten free diet "might" help.

squirmingitch Veteran
33 minutes ago, JJ May said:

The allergist is the one who said I couldn't possibly have any form of celiac because I didn't have painful stomach/intestinal symptoms.  I guess the bloating and constipation didn't really count as intestinal symptoms.  And because it wasn't a big number, he said that a gluten free diet "might" help.

Over 50% of diagnosed celiacs did NOT present with any GI symptoms. They had plenty of other symptoms but not GI symptoms. 99% of the doctors out there think you have to be dying with the big "D" continuously and in massive pain AND be skinny as a toothpick. This is far from the case. Celiacs come in all sizes including toothpick & gargantuan, all ages as celiac can present at any age, and GI symptoms are only ONE of the some 300 symptoms associated with celiac disease. There is also something called "silent celiac" where the person has NO symptoms at all yet their villi can be non existent. We've had a few of those on here. There was one gal whose sister was dx'd & so all her 1st degree relatives got tested. Our gal had no symptoms at all & yet upon testing her blood was off the charts & the endoscopic biopsy showed that she had zero villi. She was in much worse shape than her dx'd sister was! Why don't those people have any symptoms? It's a mystery. Personally, I think if they go long enough undiagnosed then symptoms will present; if nothing else, in the form of malnutrition from malabsorption. 

mark790 Newbie

After all this testing and different diagnoses that have not helped you, I think you should take control and this point and find out if gluten is the culprit.  I am not a medical person of any sort but had the pleasure of ending 10 years of misery involving rashes and hives by accidentally going gluten free by going on the Atkins diet.  There is nothing to stop you from trying a gluten free diet for 3-4 months or longer to see if your symptoms start to clear up.  I also did not have what would be classified as classic celiac symptoms. But when I went gluten free in 2002, there was not much info on celiac disease and gluten available.  Gluten free diet was the best thing that ever happened to me and since I am gluten free and stay that way, cannot be tested reliably other than genetics.  Good luck and hope you find some relief.  


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



JJ May Rookie

Well the punch biopsies both came back as spongiotic dermatitis.  So I really don't know what to do.  It improves on a gluten free diet but it's hard to tell what causes the actual flare ups since I have been pretty much gluten free since the beginning of the year.  I don't know if I accidently got into some gluten eating out or if gluten isn't actually the culprit and it's coincidence?  I thought I was doing way better and it's back and all over.  And all I got was a prescription steroid cream FML....that doesn't seem to make a difference one way or another.

squirmingitch Veteran
43 minutes ago, JJ May said:

Well the punch biopsies both came back as spongiotic dermatitis.  So I really don't know what to do.  It improves on a gluten free diet but it's hard to tell what causes the actual flare ups since I have been pretty much gluten free since the beginning of the year.  I don't know if I accidently got into some gluten eating out or if gluten isn't actually the culprit and it's coincidence?  I thought I was doing way better and it's back and all over.  And all I got was a prescription steroid cream FML....that doesn't seem to make a difference one way or another.

It's no wonder the biopsies came back negative for dh. You state yourself that you have pretty much been gluten free since the beginning of the year. You won't get a positive if you've been gluten free. In order to really find out, you would have to eat gluten every day for 12 weeks & THEN get a dh biopsy.

JJ May Rookie

Ugh!  So I need to eat gluten for 12 weeks?  Would it be the same for a blood test?  I started eating gluten last night.  I don't have any new rash yet but I find mine takes 24 hours minimum to show up.  I have talked to my doctor about doing the celiac panel and if I need to eat gluten longer, I will postpone the appointment.  On the bright side?  Beer and bagels are on the menu LOL 

squirmingitch Veteran

For the blood test or the dh biopsy you need to eat gluten for 12 weeks. For an endoscopic biopsy, you need to eat gluten for 2 weeks.

Yep, eat hearty! You might just be saying goodbye to gluten forever so eat all your favorite things. However, there are gluten-free replacements for everything!:)

JJ May Rookie
1 hour ago, squirmingitch said:

For the blood test or the dh biopsy you need to eat gluten for 12 weeks. For an endoscopic biopsy, you need to eat gluten for 2 weeks.

Yep, eat hearty! You might just be saying goodbye to gluten forever so eat all your favorite things. However, there are gluten-free replacements for everything!:)

Awesome!  I think I will be enjoying my favorite beer for the next few weeks then.

Jmg Mentor
1 hour ago, JJ May said:

Awesome!  I think I will be enjoying my favorite beer for the next few weeks then.

And the cakes, and the pies and the pastries, and the chinese takeaways and the...

Ok, I'll stop now!

I'll just add that given what you've posted above, ONLY once testing is over (because a positive blood test may lead to an endoscopy) then give the gluten free diet a proper go REGARDLESS of result. You may be like me and others, test negative but react positively to the diet. Non celiac gluten sensitive. 

Now go enjoy that beer!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,960
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    PMcCauley
    Newest Member
    PMcCauley
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cameo674
      So those rs numbers tell researchers where the dbSNP is located in a Genome so that other reasearchers or an AI system can look in that specific spot for that Snip of information.  You can look those rs # s by pasting the numbers after rs into the lookup on this page https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/ right under the Blue header bar at the top of the webpage.  Since you are not a researcher, I do not know how this will help you though.
    • cameo674
      So I posted here once before, and everyone advocated that I get into a GI doc.  I finally got into my functional health appointment on 6/16 to get my blood results evaluated and get the Gastro referral. I was told that I would be fortunate to see a gastro doctor by December, because of the number of people waiting to get in, but they did believe that I needed to see a GI doc among others.  Well, the stars aligned. I got home. I looked at MyChart and it showed an appointment available for later that same day. I never clicked so fast on an appointment time. The gastro doc ran some additional blood work based off the December values that had confirmed my daughter's suspicion that I have undiagnosed stomach issues.  Gastro has also scheduled me to get an upper endoscopy as well as a colonoscopy since it has been 8 years since my last one. She said it would rule out other concerns if I did not show Celiac per the biopsies.  Those biopsies will not occur until August 29th and like everyone here stated, Gastro wants me to keep gluten in my diet exactly as everyone suggested. To be honest, I was barely eating any gluten since I figured I would have plenty of time to do so before testing.  Doc is also looking for the cause of the low level heartburn that I have had for 30 years.  I have mentioned the heartburn to PCPs in the past and they always said take a tums or other OTC drug.  The upper endoscopy is for ruling out eosinphilic esophagitis, h. pylori, and to biopsy the duodenal bulb and second portion to confirm or exclude celiac. The colonoscopy will have random biopsies to rule out microscopic colitis. I didn't really catch her reasoning for the bloodwork.  Doc looked at the December numbers and said they were definitely concerning for Celiac.  She also said, “Hmm that’s odd; usually it’s the reverse”, but I did not catch which result made her say that. She seems very through.  She also asked why I had never bothered to see a GI before.  To be honest, I told her I just assumed that the heartburn and loose stool were a part of aging.  I have been gassy since I was born and thought constantly passing gas was normal?  Everyone I know with Celiac have horrible symptoms that cannot be attributed to other things.  They are in a lot of stomach pain.  I do not go through that.  I attribute my issues to the lactose intolerance that comes with aging, but have slowly been eliminating foods from my diet due to the heartburn or due my assumption that they did not agree with a medication that I was prescribed. I have already eliminated milk products especially high fat ones like ice cream; fats like peanut butter; acids like citrus and tomatoes; chocolate in all forms; and breads more because it is so hard to get in 100 grams of protein if I eat any foods that are not a protein.  I would not have even done the testing if my daughter had not brought up the fact that she thought I might have an undiagnosed condition since she has issues with bloating and another sibling has periodic undiagnosed stomach pain that GI docs throw pills at instead of helping.  Who knew that Bristol scale 5 and 6 were not considered normal especially multiple times a day? I watched my MIL go through basically the same bowel changes starting at 50 so to be honest, I really did think it was normal before this week's appointment.   December 2024's blood tests ran through Quest Labs were:  Deamidated Gliadin (IgA) 53.8 U/mL Above range >15.0 U/mL; Deamidated Gliadin (IgG) >250.0 U/mL Above Range >15.0 U/mL; Tissue Transglutaminase (IgA) 44.0 U/mL Above range >15.0 U/mL; Tissue Transglutaminase (IgG) <1.0 In range <15.0; Immunoglobulin A (IgA) 274 mg/dL In range 47-310 mg/dL 6/16/25 bloodwork:  Until today, I did not really know what all the four tubes of blood were for and since I did not understand the results, I got into the clinical notes to see what was ordered, but it did not exactly explain why for everything. Immunoglobulins IGG, IGA, IGM all came back in range:  IGG 1,010 mg/dL In range 600-1,714; IgA 261 mg/dL In range 66-433 mg/dL; IGM 189 mg/dL In range 45-281.  How do these numbers help with diagnosis? Google says she checked these to see if I have an ongoing infection? I do have Hashimoto's and she did say once you have one autoimmune disease others seem to follow. Celiac Associated HLD-DQ Typing: DQA1* Value: 05; DQA1*DQA11 Value: 05; DQB1* Value: 02; DQB1-DQB11 Value: 02; Celiac Gene Pairs Present Value: Yes; Celiac HLA Interpretation Value: These genes are permissive for celiac disease.  However, these genes can also be present in the normal population. Testing performed by SSOP.  So google failed me.  I think these results basically say I have genes, but everybody has these genes so this test was just to confirm that there is a vague possibility?  Maybe this test result explains why I do not have the horrible symptoms most individuals with celiac have?  I told the GI my assumption is that I am just gluten intolerant since I do not have the pain? So maybe this test explains why I have antibodies? Comprehensive Metabolic Panel: Everything was in the middle of the normal range.  Google says this just says I am metabolically healthy. Tissue Transglutaminase ABS test results – Done by the Mayo Clinic’s Labs –  T-Transglutaminase IGA AB --Value: 3.1 U/mL – Normal Value is <4.0 (negative) U/mL; Tissue Transglutaminase, IgG -- Value: 15.3 U/mL High -- Normal Value is <6.0 (Negative) U/mL – Interpretation Positive (>9.0) – These are the only labs the GI did that have been labeled Abnormal.  I am confused at how/why these came back different than the December labs? Because these numbers seem to be the opposite of what the were in December and I know I have eaten less gluten.  They were definitely measured differently and had different ranges. This must be why she said they are usually opposite? Molecular Stool Parasite Panel said I was Negative for Giardia Lamblia by PCR; Entamoeba Histolytica by PCR and Cryptosporidium Parvum/Hominis by PCR.  So at least I do not need to do a parasite cleanse like everyone on TikTok seems to be doing. So I guess, I am just really asking why the Tissue Transglutaminase numbers are different.  Was it because they were truly different tests? Is it because I have not consumed the crazy amount of gluten one is suppose to eat prior to testing? To be honest, I thought that was only for the biopsy testing. I generally only eat twice a day, and the thought of eating the equivalent of 6 slices of bread is daunting. Even in my youth, I probably only consumed the equivalent of maybe 3 slices a day. Like I said before, now I usually focus on trying to eat 60 gram of protein.  I am suppose to consume 100 grams, but have failed to succeed. I will focus on eating gluten starting in July now that I know my procedure date.
    • Scott Adams
      I agree with @trents and wiping down the spot you eat your lunch, and eating the food your brought from home should be safe for even sensitive celiacs. Gluten can jump on your food, so it would likely better better for you to continue eating where you prefer.
    • Scott Adams
      This article might also be helpful, as you could have DH: https://www.celiac.com/celiac-disease/understanding-dermatitis-herpetiformis-the-skin-manifestation-of-celiac-disease-r6361/
    • trents
      I would think that as long as you keep your food on a wrapper or on a paper plate you would not be at risk for cross contamination. You may be overthinking it all which is common for those in the first year of the celiac journey. But let me ask you. Are you feeling self-conscious about having a celiac diagnosis? I notice the term "isolated" in your thread title. Do you fear being shunned? I offer this video clip for your consideration:  
×
×
  • Create New...