Jump to content
  • You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

Possible False Negative? Need Advice


lenzipam

Recommended Posts

lenzipam Newbie

Hello. New here and looking for some advice on this:

I recently did a 4 week gluten challenge and got blood work done for celiac. Everything came back normal except for the DQ8 gene, which I tested positive for. I’d be fine accepting that I have NCGS, but the problem is I’ve got symptoms that are only explainable by celiac (joint pain after eating gluten, sudden intolerances to dairy and soy while on the challenge, fat in stool etc) and I’m at a loss if they aren’t. Adding in the fact that my GI told me a 4 week challenge should be fine when I see a number of sources online say it should be 6 at least and I’m worried that I’ve got a false negative here. So I’ve got two options I’m weighing here. Should I—

A) Continue doing the gluten challenge and try for blood work again? I’ve only been off it for a week, can I just pick it up again and do another two or three weeks? Or does taking a break wipe away all signs of antibodies and I’ll need to start over from scratch?

B)Try to get referred for an endoscopy / biopsy instead and give up on the blood work? Thought this might be an easier way of going about it, since a challenge for this is only two weeks.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cristiana Veteran

Hello Lenzipam and welcome to the forum

You are right in stating that 6 weeks seems to be the minimum recommended time period for the trial.     Here in the UK it's usually recommended that one consumes at least two slices of glutenous bread per day through that period.

Out of interest, were you totally gluten free before the trial? 

Also, how debilitating are your symptoms when you consume gluten?  Would you find it very difficult to consume gluten for a few more weeks?

Cristiana

Scott Adams Grand Master

Can you share your test results with us? I’m just curious because your levels may have been high enough to demonstrate that you’re reacting to gluten.

lenzipam Newbie
2 hours ago, cristiana said:

Hello Lenzipam and welcome to the forum

You are right in stating that 6 weeks seems to be the minimum recommended time period for the trial.     Here in the UK it's usually recommended that one consumes at least two slices of glutenous bread per day through that period.

Out of interest, were you totally gluten free before the trial? 

Also, how debilitating are your symptoms when you consume gluten?  Would you find it very difficult to consume gluten for a few more weeks?

Cristiana

I was strictly gluten-free for just over a month before the trial. My symptoms aren’t absolutely debilitating, but they’re certainly uncomfortable and make it hard to function. Lots of brain fog, joint pain, nausea, headaches and stomachaches, constipation, etc etc. I could probably do it, wouldn’t be great though lol

lenzipam Newbie
24 minutes ago, Scott Adams said:

Can you share your test results with us? I’m just curious because your levels may have been high enough to demonstrate that you’re reacting to gluten.

Sure-

IgA Quant - 100 mg

TTG IgA - <2 u/ml

DgP IGG - 3 units

Nothing here to really suggest anything off, they’re all in normal range as far as I know. But with that DQ8 and some of my symptoms I can’t help but worry.

cristiana Veteran

Thanks for posting those.

I guess the difficulty which we face in this sort of situation is that is possible to have negative blood tests and still be a coeliac - either because one hasn't been consuming enough gluten to generate a sufficiently strong reaction, or despite gluten consumption, a small minority of coeliacs have negative blood tests but their endoscopies show villous damage.  

If you are happy to have an endoscopy, which could also be useful to find out if you have other issues like gastritis, it would be the best way of ruling in/out coeliac disease, as long as you are consuming enough gluten to generate a reaction.  

1 hour ago, Scott Adams said:

Can you share your test results with us? I’m just curious because your levels may have been high enough to demonstrate that you’re reacting to gluten.

Scott - I just wanted to check with you, would you agree that two weeks of consuming gluten is sufficient prior to an endoscopy?

lenzipam Newbie
19 hours ago, cristiana said:

Thanks for posting those.

I guess the difficulty which we face in this sort of situation is that is possible to have negative blood tests and still be a coeliac - either because one hasn't been consuming enough gluten to generate a sufficiently strong reaction, or despite gluten consumption, a small minority of coeliacs have negative blood tests but their endoscopies show villous damage.  

If you are happy to have an endoscopy, which could also be useful to find out if you have other issues like gastritis, it would be the best way of ruling in/out coeliac disease, as long as you are consuming enough gluten to generate a reaction.  

Scott - I just wanted to check with you, would you agree that two weeks of consuming gluten is sufficient prior to an endoscopy?

I think the endoscopy’s probably the best idea. I’ll be seeing my GI doc again later this week, so I’ll ask him about it. Thanks so much for your help!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Scott Adams Grand Master

The Mayo Clinic recommendation is to eat two slices of wheat bread daily before the biopsy.

Also, you could have non-celiac gluten sensitivity, and currently there is no way to test for it. If your tests end up negative for celiac disease, you may still not find relief until you go gluten-free, and if this relieves your symptoms it's likely you have NCGS.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Aretaeus Cappadocia commented on Scott Adams's article in Summer 2026 Issue
      1

      New Study Finds 1 in 10 Celiac Patients May Have Additional Autoimmune Disorders (+Video)

    2. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      11

      1 Year Elimination Diet journey

    3. - xxnonamexx replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      11

      1 Year Elimination Diet journey

    4. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      11

      1 Year Elimination Diet journey

    5. - xxnonamexx replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      11

      1 Year Elimination Diet journey

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,058
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442

    Sandi Barnes
    Newest Member
    Sandi Barnes
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      makes sense. sometimes you learn one path and never question it until you see someone take a different path
    • xxnonamexx
      Interesting I read that toasted kasha groats have nutty flavor which I thought like oatmeal with banana and yogurt. Yes quinoa I have for dinner looking to switch oatmeal to buckwheat for breakfast. I have to look into amaranth 
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      I've never tried bananas or yogurt with kasha. It would probably work but in my mind I think of kasha as being on the savory side so I always add butter, peanut butter, or shredded cheddar cheese. Next time I make it I will try yogurt and banana to see for myself. Amaranth has a touch of sweet and I like to pair it with fruit. Quinoa is more neutral. I eat it plain, like rice, with chicken stock or other savory things, or with coconut milk. Since coconut milk works, I would think yogurt would work (with the quinoa). I went to the link you posted. I really don't know why they rinse the kasha. I've eaten it for decades and never rinsed it. Other than that, her recipe seems fine (that is, add the buckwheat with the water, rather than wait until the water is boiling). She does say something that I forgot: you want to get roasted/toasted buckwheat or you will need to toast it yourself. I've never tried buckwheat flakes. One potential issue with flakes is that there are more processing steps and as a rule of thumb, every processing step is another opportunity for cross-contamination. I have tried something that was a finer grind of the buckwheat than the whole/coarse and I didn't like it as much. But, maybe that was simply because it wasn't "normal" to me, I don't know.
    • xxnonamexx
      The basic seems more like oatmeal. You can also add yogurt banana to it like oatmeal right. I see rinsing as first step in basic recipes like this one https://busycooks.com/how-to-cook-toasted-buckwheat-groats-kasha/ I don't understand why since kasha is toasted and not raw. What about buckwheat flake cereal or is this better to go with. 
    • Scott Adams
      Celiac disease can have neurological associations, but the better-described ones include gluten ataxia, peripheral neuropathy, headaches or migraine, seizures, cognitive symptoms, and, rarely, cerebral calcifications or white-matter changes. Some studies and case reports describe brain white-matter lesions in people with celiac disease, but these are not specific to celiac disease and can have many other explanations. A frontal lobe lesion could mean many different things depending on the exact wording of the report: a white-matter spot, inflammation, demyelination, a small old stroke, migraine-related change, infection, trauma, vascular change, seizure-related change, tumor-like lesion, artifact, or something that resolved on repeat imaging. The word “transient” usually means it changed or disappeared, which can happen with some inflammatory, seizure-related, migraine-related, vascular, or imaging-artifact situations.  Hopefully they will find nothing serious.
×
×
  • Create New...