Jump to content
  • You are not alone. Join Celiac.com for trusted gluten-free answers and forum support.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

Help vetting HLA-DQ typing provider


John1

Recommended Posts

John1 Newbie

My doctor said it is not available to them so I am looking for a private company to get it done.

I found "Intolerances & Sensitivities DNA Test" advertised by a well known pharmacy in the country I live.

Quote

What's analysed in our food sensitivities test

Gluten intolerance

rs2187668
rs2395182
rs4639334
rs4713586
rs7454108
rs7775228

Does this look right, are they testing for the correct genes, are there any that are missing?

I am not good with biology and really do not have a clue when it comes to this kind of stuff. I do know that HLA-DQ typing is not a diagnosis, I would like the test as a chance to exclude it as a possibility.

Any wisdom would be greatly appreciated!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Wends Apprentice

I’ve done quite a bit of research reading and the science is ongoing, there’s new genes associated with Coeliac being discovered. It may come down to genetic ancestry as recently HLADQ7 is a new one that is not tested for in the standard test. This may account for the less than 1% of coeliacs without DQ2 or DQ8 high risk alleles. It’s true most Northern European Coeliacs (90%) have the HLADQ2, and HLADQ8 (9%). Its fascinating research and it just reinforces the gold standard of a biopsy in diagnosis at present in the absence of the standard DQ2 and 8 typing as the less than 1% may be missed. 

According to this company, these are the full susceptible genes presently known and tested for in the extended test. They do the standard test of the 2 markers (same as NHS hospital testing, I’ve had this done) most common high risk genes, HLADQ2 and HLADQ8.

16 markers in addition to the standard ones.

DQA1*01, DQA1*02:01, DQA1*03, DQA1*05, DQA1*06, DQB1*02, DQB1*03:01, DQB1*03:02,
DQB1*03:03, DQB1*03:04, DQB1*03:05, DQB1*04, DRB1*03, DRB1*04, DRB1*07, DRB1*11

Hope that’s helpful!

Wends Apprentice

Hi John1.

My first reply was moderated because I mentioned a different company that test to the one you asked about. Not sure why. I’m newbie on here too! Anyway. And the one I was referring to is what lead me to research and read recent papers on Pubmed on the HLADQ7 allele, which is rarer. I’m awaiting results.

The markers are quoted from a different company, not the one you refer to (just so the first reply makes sense).

I only understand the celiac disease gene typing as referenced. And how the NHS hospital reported it. Sorry don’t know enough on how that relates to the genes beginning with rs… you list.

Hopefully you get some more replies on this one.

 

Scott Adams Grand Master

At this point all celiac disease markers haven't yet been discovered, so no genetic test could completely rule out celiac disease, although you might be 98%+ sure that you don't carry the genes if you tested negative. As for non-celiac gluten sensitivity, the research on this is just beginning, and as far as I know there may not yet be genetic markers identified for it, and they currently don't have an agreed upon way to diagnose it, other than with an elimination diet. 

John1 Newbie
On 8/11/2024 at 8:31 PM, Wends said:

Hi John1.

My first reply was moderated because I mentioned a different company that test to the one you asked about. Not sure why. I’m newbie on here too! Anyway. And the one I was referring to is what lead me to research and read recent papers on Pubmed on the HLADQ7 allele, which is rarer. I’m awaiting results.

The markers are quoted from a different company, not the one you refer to (just so the first reply makes sense).

I only understand the celiac disease gene typing as referenced. And how the NHS hospital reported it. Sorry don’t know enough on how that relates to the genes beginning with rs… you list.

Hopefully you get some more replies on this one.

 

Thanks for your sharing what you've learned so far, you have definitely gone deeper into the biological side of things than I have.

I emailed the company I'm looking into and they told me that they check for the following HLA alleles.

  • HLA-DQA1
  • HLA-DQB1
  • HLA-DQ7
  • HLA-DQB1
  • HLA-DQ 2.2
  • HLA-DQ 2.2

Any incite as to whether this is above or below what the average HLA typing checks for would very helpful.

On 8/12/2024 at 5:53 PM, Scott Adams said:

At this point all celiac disease markers haven't yet been discovered, so no genetic test could completely rule out celiac disease, although you might be 98%+ sure that you don't carry the genes if you tested negative. As for non-celiac gluten sensitivity, the research on this is just beginning, and as far as I know there may not yet be genetic markers identified for it, and they currently don't have an agreed upon way to diagnose it, other than with an elimination diet. 

Thanks for confirming!

I don't have a very strong suspicion of Celiac, I'm leaning more towards a fructan sensitivity at the moment as I have been reacting to certain fructan foods.

I know that HLA typing isn't a diagnosis, or even an absolute disqualifier, although having a completely negative result would definitely give me the extra confidence I need to attempt the gluten challenge, knowing that it's much more than likely not doing damage. Obviously if my symptoms don't go away even with small amounts I will have to ask my doctor for a referral.

Wends Apprentice
23 hours ago, John1 said:

Thanks for your sharing what you've learned so far, you have definitely gone deeper into the biological side of things than I have.

I emailed the company I'm looking into and they told me that they check for the following HLA alleles.

  • HLA-DQA1
  • HLA-DQB1
  • HLA-DQ7
  • HLA-DQB1
  • HLA-DQ 2.2
  • HLA-DQ 2.2

Any incite as to whether this is above or below what the average HLA typing checks for would very helpful.

Hi John,

yes they are the alleles currently known that are associated with risk of Coeliac disease. So a useful test to know your susceptibility, including the newer DQ7 rarer allele.

I’m personally interested in the newer HLA-DQ7, as wasn’t tested for that on the NHS; they test for the standard High Risk alleles - HLA-DQA1, HLA-DQB1 (DQ2.5 and DQ8, and the DQ2.2 which is technically half and lower risk than having two copies. I’m not a geneticist but that was my understanding of reading scientific papers on it. The higher risk is HLA-DQ2.5, followed by DQ8 alleles - as reported in Europe and the US. Hope that makes sense. I’m still learning about this myself and just starting to get my head round it so to speak. I was never satisfied with the unconfirmed diagnosis of less than 1% risk of it being coeliac disease when I was so ill on a gluten containing diet and gluten challenge. I have a science and research background and love reading journals so started to look into it. It’s quoted from a European review study that 0.7% of biopsy diagnosed coeliacs disease patients do not have the DQ2 and DQ8 high risk alleles. In an Italian study the newer DQ7 quoted to be associated in patients not having the standard alleles. In addition the DQ7 is associated with milk protein sensitivity. (Research shows about 50% of coeliacs react to milk the same as gluten. I’m waiting for more research to be done on that one!).

Good luck and hope you get answers you are looking for.

  • 10 months later...
cameo674 Rookie

So those rs numbers tell researchers where the dbSNP is located in a Genome so that other reasearchers or an AI system can look in that specific spot for that Snip of information.  You can look those rs # s by pasting the numbers after rs into the lookup on this page https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/ right under the Blue header bar at the top of the webpage.  Since you are not a researcher, I do not know how this will help you though.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Diagnosis, Testing & Treatment
      5

      New Study Reveals Hidden Gut Damage in Celiac Disease—Even Without Gluten (+Video)

    2. - Wheatwacked replied to Ginger38's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      6

      The Struggle Has Overtaken Me

    3. - cristiana replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    4. - CC90 replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    5. - Wheatwacked replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,197
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442

    Caron Ervin
    Newest Member
    Caron Ervin
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      Hi @Ginger38, By now you know that these things improve without gluten. I once saw an interview with a corporation executive where he proudly declared that his wheat products are more addictive than potato chips. Dr Fuhrman (Eat to Live) said find foods that are friendly to you to be friends with.  
    • cristiana
      Hi @CC90 Ah... that is very interesting.  Although it is very annoying for you to have to go through it all again, I would say that almost sounds like an admission that they didn't look far enough last time?   I could be wrong, but I would not be at all surprised if they find something on the next attempt.  Coeliac damage can be very patchy, as I understand it, so that's why my own gastroenterologist always likes to point out that he's taken lots of samples!  In the kindest possible way (you don't want to upset the person doing the procedure!) I'd be inclined to tell them what happened last time and to ask them in person to take samples lower down, as  if your health system is anything like the one in my country, communication between GPs, consultants and hospitals isn't always very good.  You don't want the same mistake to be made again. You say that your first endoscopy was traumatic?  May I ask, looking at your spelling of coeliac, was this done at an NHS hospital in England?  The reason for the question is that one of my NHS diagnosed friends was not automatically offered a sedative and managed without one.  Inspired by her, I tried to have an endoscopy one time, in a private setting, without one, so that I could recover quicker, but I had to request sedative in the end it was so uncomfortable.    I am sorry that you will have to go through a gluten challenge again but to make things easier, ensure you eat things containing gluten that you will miss should you have to go gluten free one day. 😂 I was told to eat 2 slices of normal wholemeal bread or the equivalent every day in the weeks before , but I also opted for Weetabix and dozens of Penguin chocolate biscuits.  (I had a very tight headache across my temple for days before the procedure, which I thought was interesting as I had that frequently growing up. - must have been a coeliac symptom!)  Anyway, I do hope you soon get the answers you are looking for and do keep us posted. Cristiana  
    • CC90
      Hi Cristiana   Yes I've had the biopsy results showing normal villi and intestinal mucosa.  The repeat endoscopy (requested by the gastro doc) would be to take samples from further into the intestine than the previous endoscopy reached.      
    • Wheatwacked
      Transglutaminase IgA is the gold-standard blood test for celiac disease. Sensitivity of over 90% and specificity of 95–99%. It rarely produces false positives.  An elevated level means your immune system is reacting to gluten.  Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS) does not typically cause high levels of tTG-IgA. Unfortunately the protocols for a diagnosis of Celiac Disease are aimed at proving you don't have it, leaving you twisting in the wind. Genetic testing and improvement on a trial gluten free diet, also avoiding milk protein, will likely show improvement in short order if it is Celiac; but will that satisfy the medical system for a diagnosis? If you do end up scheduling a repeat endoscopy, be sure to eat up to 10 grams of gluten for 8 - 12 weeks.  You want  to create maximum damage. Not a medical opinion, but my vote is yes.
    • trents
      Cristiana asks a very relevant question. What looks normal to the naked eye may not look normal under the microscope.
×
×
  • Create New...