Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Test Results - Celiac or Gluten Sensitivity


we4kings

Recommended Posts

we4kings Newbie

The results of my celiac panel to me are not "clear cut" enough for me to confirm Celiac, but my PCP said it is enough for her (high IGG, IgA).  I have not had any other testing besides this panel.  Wouldn't TtG need to be high to confirm diagnosis?  Also shouldn't an upper endoscopy be done?  Thank you for your input.

My results are below: 

GLIADIN IGG 31 UNITS <20 UNITS

H

 

Gliadin Ab IgA 42 UNITS <20 UNITS

 

TISSUE TRANSGLUTAM AB IGA 3 U/ML <4 U/ML

 

RETICULIN AB (IGA) SCREEN Negative   Negative
     
     

 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

You are right that the next step is an endoscopy, which still is the "gold standard" in diagnosing celiac disease.   However, for various reasons the endoscopy is not done because financial contraints  or long wait times (up to a year!), or too ill to proceed.  

You have two positives.  You only need one positive to move forward.    The TTg tests  do not need to be positive for a diagnosis (which requires a positive on an antibodies test which you had and an endoscopy).  My TTg tests were negative and I only had a positive on the DGP IGA, yet biopsies revealed a Marsh Stage IIIB (moderate to severe damage.

Open Original Shared Link

Unless your PCP is a celiac expert (unlikely), I would insist on a GI consult.   Please find one who is celiac-savvy.  

keep eating gluten daily until all testing is complete (biopsies done).  You never know if lab results are going to get lost.  Besides any celiac testing requires the patient to be on a gluten diet. 

In the meantime, keep on researching.  Only YOU can be your best health advocate!  

squirmingitch Veteran

Ditto what cyclinglady said.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,514
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kaylag
    Newest Member
    Kaylag
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Newhere19
      Thank you both. I haven't had access to the test results but will get them and post here.
    • jjiillee
      The ulcers are prepyloric ulcers. Not sure if that makes any difference. 
    • trents
      Duodenal ulcers are not uncommon either and often result from H.Pylori infections. https://www.healthdirect.gov.au/duodenal-ulcer
    • trents
    • Scott Adams
      I had what was termed "lesions," and normally ulcers are in the stomach, rather than the small intestines. I'm not sure why they would want you to have her continue to eat gluten, since she had a positive blood test, but as her doctor said, if she is uncomfortable and having symptoms why not have her go gluten-free at this point? If her symptoms improve, it would be another indicator that she has celiac disease and/or gluten sensitivity. This article has some detailed information on how to be 100% gluten-free, so it may be helpful (be sure to also read the comments section.):    
×
×
  • Create New...