Jump to content
  • You are not alone. Join Celiac.com for trusted gluten-free answers and forum support.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

Negative test results!!! Unsure where to go from here


iwant2believe

Recommended Posts

iwant2believe Newbie

Hi, my first post here, I hope I'm doing this right... It's probably going to be long, sorry! A lot has happened!

I've lurked this board for a while and after deliberating on it decided to try and pursue a possible celiac diagnosis. For context, I'm female, 23, and have a lot of the textbook symptoms. Chronic bloating, fatigue, acne, underweight without trying and struggling to gain weight now that I'm trying to, haven't had a period in 5 months, etc. All of these are things that only really picked up and became noticeable over the last couple of years.

While experimenting with FODMAPS and such, trying to see if I could associate my bloating to any particular foods (which I didn't really have any success with...) I decided to cut out gluten for 5 days or so, just to see if there was a noticeable difference, and there was- it wasn't drastic, but my bloating seemed a bit less than usual and I had energy to spare. At that point I was aware about celiac testing, the gluten challenge, etc and told my GP that I was interested in getting a blood test. She instructed me to eat gluten daily for 3-4 weeks beforehand...

So I did, and I couldn't even make it 3 weeks. I had flu-like symptoms (???!) the first few days, awful fatigue, and the bloating was the worst I have ever had it. I was also suicidally depressed and breaking down into random crying fits several times a day the entire time this was going on. When I told my GP she told me to just come in early, so I caved and had the blood draw done after eating gluten for only 18 days, because it was affecting my ability to work and there was really no other option, IMO. Still don't think I was being unreasonable by deciding that.

Anyway, the results were negative. I kind of expected it. I know the gluten challenge period before blood testing is supposed to be longer than 3-4 weeks, but I told the GP about how I only went gluten-free for 5 days and figured that was why her given time was shorter. But after thinking on it more, I feel like before that, I may not have had enough gluten in my diet for it to really contribute to a strong result? Before gluten became a thing that I paid attention to at all, I definitely ate it regularly, but not every day. It was more like a few times a week, not deliberate, just a result of my food preferences shifting over time. Conversely, there was a point in late 2020/early 2021 where my fatigue was so bad I could barely function, and at that time there were multiple gluten-containing products that were part of my diet every single day.

All of this to say... I think I may have messed up my panel results for myself, and I don't really know what to do now. I feel like it didn't bring me any closer to an answer. Further future testing is of course an option but doesn't feel viable at all considering how badly I've been messed up from just a ~2 week gluten challenge. I was fairly sure my results would be at least borderline since I was still eating gluten kinda regularly before this but they seem so thoroughly negative and normal that now I'm worried I'm making all of this up or something, even though I should be happy I apparently don't seem to have it! 

Does anyone have any advice or has anyone else been in a situation similar to this? What would you do or what did you do? I just feel so lost. I can share the test results too if anyone is interested in interpreting them, I admittedly don't understand what the individual parts really means that well. 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master
(edited)

Welcome to the forum, iwant2believ!

Have you considered the possibility of having NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity)? Many of the same symptoms as celiac disease but since it does produce antibodies or damage the villi. There is no test for NCGS so celiac diseae must first be ruled out. It is 10-12x more common than celiac disease. Some experts consider it to be a precursor to celiac disease. Anyway, the antidote is the same for both, total avoidance of gluten.

Edited by trents
iwant2believe Newbie
56 minutes ago, trents said:

Welcome to the forum, iwant2believ!

Have you considered the possibility of having NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity)? Many of the same symptoms as celiac disease but since it does produce antibodies or damage the villi. There is no test for NCGS so celiac diseae must first be ruled out. It is 10-12x more common than celiac disease. Some experts consider it to be a precursor to celiac disease. Anyway, the antidote is the same for both, total avoidance of gluten.

Thanks trents!!! NCGS was one of my first thoughts too. At this point I feel like it's super likely that I have "at least" NCGS. Definitely going to commit to a GFD in any case, the gluten challenge was enough to convince me!

I didn't know that about some considering it to be a precursor to celiac disease though. That is really interesting and makes a ton of sense.

Is NCGS known to cause other food sensitivities (fructose, lactose, etc) the way celiac disease is able to?

trents Grand Master
6 hours ago, iwant2believe said:

Is NCGS known to cause other food sensitivities (fructose, lactose, etc) the way celiac disease is able to?

Not sure I would say that it "causes" other food sensitivities but it may be associated with other food sensitivities in the sense of any and all of them being related to immune system dysfunction. I know people who have NCGS but also cannot handle dairy. And keep in mind that not all dairy sensitivities are due to the lactose in milk. For some people, it's not the lactose but the protein casein that is the issue.

Scott Adams Grand Master

Welcome to the forum! I just want to mention that for blood tests the Mayo clinic recommends eating 2 slices of wheat bread for 6-8 weeks, otherwise the blood test results may be false negative. Since you are unable to manage doing this for even 4 weeks due to severe symptoms, I think it is safe to assume that you have either undiagnosed celiac disease, or non-celiac gluten sensitivity (no tests for this yet, but ~10x more have this than CD), and either of this conditions require a gluten-free diet. It seems like you have your answer, and should try the diet for a few months to see how it goes.

Wheatwacked Veteran
(edited)

Hello, @iwant2believe,

First, I'll just say that there are industries spending tons of money to convince you not to believe. You are lucky to have found a doctor who listens and takes you seriously. Can't breathe? There's a pill for that and you can dance your children off to the school bus. High blood sugar? There's an app for that.

On first read through I saw Vitamin D deficiency (depression), Thiamine (B1) deficiency (no energy), Choline deficiency (bloating), Folate (menstrual irregularity) and Iodine deficiency. (Muscle tone, and menstrual irregularity).

The only one with a reliable blood test for status is vitamin D.  The problem is as that as far as the health boards are concerned, they only look at the minimum needed to avoid Rickets and soft bones, >29 ng/ml. Our species developed living and working in the sun most of the day. A Lifeguard in August has a D blood plasma measurement of 80 ng/ml. My lifetime of Seasonal Affective disorder, progressively worse as I got older until it became permanent, was reversed when I started taking 250 mcg (10,000 IU (a day) of vitamin D. Despite dire warnings of impending doom from hypervitaminosis from too much D, it is rarely seen. As to safety, controlled studies on kidney transplant patients were done, using various doses, up to a one-time bolus of 1.25 million IU (1,250,000 IU) with no ill effects. On the other hand, my son who is a lifeguard and was diagnosed with Celiac Disease as an infant, was tested last August with the result of Low D <29 ng/ml and >19 ng/ml).

Thiamin is essential for breaking down carbohydrates to be used in the mitochondria for energy.

Choline is essential for DNA, Cell membrane and mitochondria structure, and acetylcholine (nerve synapse transmission). It is estimated that only 10% of Western Diet consumers ingest the Adequate Intake (AI). Choline also works with B6, B12 and folate to metabolize homocysteine. High Homocysteine blood level tests can be an indicator of cardiovascular inflammation so in my opinion might indicate a deficiency in one or all of those vitamins.

When you stop eating wheat flour you are no longer getting the folate it is fortified with. Folate and choline deficiencies have been linked to neural tube birth defects.

The first effect on me of a sheet of Nori a day for iodine was improved muscle tone. My brother mentioned that I look like I've been working out. I am the ultimate couch potato. In one study, 66% of the childbearing age women tested for iodine (urine test) were deficient.

Until I started the GFD at 63 I was a mouth breather. Now I breath through my nose like normal people. The doctors, when I would mention it, all said it is what it is, some people are like that. They are sadly misinformed and have bought into the advertising. After GFD, if I ate gluten my first symptom was sniffling and sinus congestion. Lately, it does not affect me if I occasionally contaminate but I take 11 different vitamins and a B-complex daily. It is a pain, but my health is constantly improving. Smoking cessation never helped but gluten cessation did.

Vitamin D and Depression: Where is all the Sunshine?

Choline deficiency increases lymphocyte apoptosis and DNA damage in humans

How Folic Acid Can Improve Your Menstrual Cycle

Iodine and fertility: do we know enough?

The Wolff-Chaikoff Effect: Crying Wolf?

Edited by Wheatwacked
typo's
RedFacedJock Rookie

Regardless of the test result. If Gluten is making you that unwell, then simply avoid it. You don't need a doctors confirmation. You simply need to listen to your own body and how it responds to certain things. That's where you should go from here.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - CC90 replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    2. - Wheatwacked replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    3. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Origins of Celiac Disease
      19

      Do Antibiotics in Babies Increase Celiac Disease Risk Later in Life? (+Video)

    4. - trents replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    5. - cristiana replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Coeliac or not coeliac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,187
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442

    Dennis E. Schertz
    Newest Member
    Dennis E. Schertz
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • CC90
      Hi Cristiana   Yes I've had the biopsy results showing normal villi and intestinal mucosa.  The repeat endoscopy (requested by the gastro doc) would be to take samples from further into the intestine than the previous endoscopy reached.      
    • Wheatwacked
      Transglutaminase IgA is the gold-standard blood test for celiac disease. Sensitivity of over 90% and specificity of 95–99%. It rarely produces false positives.  An elevated level means your immune system is reacting to gluten.  Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS) does not typically cause high levels of tTG-IgA. Unfortunately the protocols for a diagnosis of Celiac Disease are aimed at proving you don't have it, leaving you twisting in the wind. Genetic testing and improvement on a trial gluten free diet, also avoiding milk protein, will likely show improvement in short order if it is Celiac; but will that satisfy the medical system for a diagnosis? If you do end up scheduling a repeat endoscopy, be sure to eat up to 10 grams of gluten for 8 - 12 weeks.  You want  to create maximum damage. Not a medical opinion, but my vote is yes.
    • trents
      Cristiana asks a very relevant question. What looks normal to the naked eye may not look normal under the microscope.
    • cristiana
      Hello @CC90 Can I just ask a question: have you actually been told that your biopsy were normal, or just that your stomach, duodenum and small intestine looked normal? The reason I ask is that when I had my endoscopy, I was told everything looked normal.  My TTG score was completely through the roof at the time, greater than 100 which was then the cut off max. for my local lab.  Yet when my biopsy results came back, I was told I was stage 3 on the Marsh scale.  I've come across the same thing with at least one other person on this forum who was told everything looked normal, but the report was not talking about the actual biopsy samples, which had to be looked at through a microscope and came back abnormal.
    • trents
      My bad. I should have reread your first post as for some reason I was thinking your TTG was within normal range. While we are talking about celiac antibody blood work, you might not realize that there is not yet an industry standard rating scale in use for those blood tests so just having a raw number with out the reference scale can be less than helpful, especially when the test results are marginal. But a result of 87.4 is probably out of the normal range and into the positive range for any lab's scale. But back to the question of why your endoscopy/biopsy didn't show damage despite significantly positive TTG. Because they took the trouble to take seven samples, it is not likely they missed damage because of it being patchy. The other possibility is that there hasn't been time for the damage to show up. How long have you been experiencing the symptoms you describe in your first post? Having said all that, there are other medical conditions that can cause elevated TTG-IGA values and sometimes they are transient issues. I think it would be wise to ask for another TTG-IGA before the repeat endoscopy to see if it is still high.  Knitty kitty's suggestion of getting genetic testing done is also something to think about. About 35% of the general population will have one or both genes that are markers for the potential to develop active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develop celiac disease. So, having a celiac potential gene cannot be used to definitively diagnose celiac disease but it can be realistically used to rule it out if you don't have either of the genes. If your symptoms persist, and all testing is complete and the follow-up endoscopy/biopsy still shows no damage, you should consider trialing a gluten free diet for a few months to see if symptoms improve. If not celiac disease, you could have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). 
×
×
  • Create New...