Jump to content
  • You are not alone. Join Celiac.com for trusted gluten-free answers and forum support.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

The glue foods theory, and Celiacs in Dogs


Anniehall

Recommended Posts

Anniehall Enthusiast

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/lactose-intolerance-by-country

This is on lactose intolerance by country dated 2022. Fits into that theory about what people traditionally ate. The least lactose intolerant countries are in Europe.  When you think about how long Indians have been eating wheat it's about half the amount of time that Europeans have. So with the theory I have about traditional foods of different cultures being linked to the current intolerances of those cultures it still makes sense that Indians would have a higher rate of celiacs.  I was surprised that Indians haven't been eating grains for longer because wheat originated 75, 000 years ago near Iraq which isn't right next to India but still I'd think it would have made its way over sooner. I guess transportation was much more difficult for so long than what it has been in the last hundred years though.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



trents Grand Master
(edited)
14 hours ago, Anniehall said:

The neadranthal idea fits into thinking that what people's ancestors ate traditionally may effect their bodies ability to tolerate what they eat today. Wouldn't it he nice if celiacs blood testing was routine for everyone? If that was the case I would have been saved years of suffering. Also then people wouldn't act like it's just some dieting fad. Even I was in such denial for so many years. I had a room mate with celiacs but I just didn't think I could have it. Things had to get progressively worse for me to realize. The health problems I've had that were persistent before I figured it out make sense now, and all I can do is be thankful I figured it out at all.

Routine testing for celiac disease of children entering school is being done in Italy and perhaps other European countries. The problem with that is that you can develop celiac disease at any stage of life. So testing school-aged children will still miss a lot of people. The other problem with it is that children's immune systems are immature so there may be false positives and false negatives.

Edited by trents
Anniehall Enthusiast

Yeah. They should just make it a standard blood work up at yearly check ups. That would maybe lead to some clues on why people develop it later on in life when they do as well. I honestly think I've had it since I was a kid though.  Just didn't know what was happening.  I had skin issues young. The kids would make fun if me because I already had acne all over my face at 7 years old.  

Scott Adams Grand Master
On 5/8/2022 at 6:29 AM, Anniehall said:

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/lactose-intolerance-by-country

This is on lactose intolerance by country dated 2022. Fits into that theory about what people traditionally ate. The least lactose intolerant countries are in Europe.  When you think about how long Indians have been eating wheat it's about half the amount of time that Europeans have. So with the theory I have about traditional foods of different cultures being linked to the current intolerances of those cultures it still makes sense that Indians would have a higher rate of celiacs.  I was surprised that Indians haven't been eating grains for longer because wheat originated 75, 000 years ago near Iraq which isn't right next to India but still I'd think it would have made its way over sooner. I guess transportation was much more difficult for so long than what it has been in the last hundred years though.

If you look at Native Americans they got wheat in their diets only in the last ~500 years or less...probably closer to the last 100-200 years. I've not seen many good studies done on celiac disease prevalence among Native Americans, but going from memory do recall one study that indicated that up to 6% of them could have celiac disease. More research needs to be done to find the actual rate.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - CC90 replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    2. - Wheatwacked replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    3. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Origins of Celiac Disease
      19

      Do Antibiotics in Babies Increase Celiac Disease Risk Later in Life? (+Video)

    4. - trents replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    5. - cristiana replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Coeliac or not coeliac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,187
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442

    Dennis E. Schertz
    Newest Member
    Dennis E. Schertz
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • CC90
      Hi Cristiana   Yes I've had the biopsy results showing normal villi and intestinal mucosa.  The repeat endoscopy (requested by the gastro doc) would be to take samples from further into the intestine than the previous endoscopy reached.      
    • Wheatwacked
      Transglutaminase IgA is the gold-standard blood test for celiac disease. Sensitivity of over 90% and specificity of 95–99%. It rarely produces false positives.  An elevated level means your immune system is reacting to gluten.  Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS) does not typically cause high levels of tTG-IgA. Unfortunately the protocols for a diagnosis of Celiac Disease are aimed at proving you don't have it, leaving you twisting in the wind. Genetic testing and improvement on a trial gluten free diet, also avoiding milk protein, will likely show improvement in short order if it is Celiac; but will that satisfy the medical system for a diagnosis? If you do end up scheduling a repeat endoscopy, be sure to eat up to 10 grams of gluten for 8 - 12 weeks.  You want  to create maximum damage. Not a medical opinion, but my vote is yes.
    • trents
      Cristiana asks a very relevant question. What looks normal to the naked eye may not look normal under the microscope.
    • cristiana
      Hello @CC90 Can I just ask a question: have you actually been told that your biopsy were normal, or just that your stomach, duodenum and small intestine looked normal? The reason I ask is that when I had my endoscopy, I was told everything looked normal.  My TTG score was completely through the roof at the time, greater than 100 which was then the cut off max. for my local lab.  Yet when my biopsy results came back, I was told I was stage 3 on the Marsh scale.  I've come across the same thing with at least one other person on this forum who was told everything looked normal, but the report was not talking about the actual biopsy samples, which had to be looked at through a microscope and came back abnormal.
    • trents
      My bad. I should have reread your first post as for some reason I was thinking your TTG was within normal range. While we are talking about celiac antibody blood work, you might not realize that there is not yet an industry standard rating scale in use for those blood tests so just having a raw number with out the reference scale can be less than helpful, especially when the test results are marginal. But a result of 87.4 is probably out of the normal range and into the positive range for any lab's scale. But back to the question of why your endoscopy/biopsy didn't show damage despite significantly positive TTG. Because they took the trouble to take seven samples, it is not likely they missed damage because of it being patchy. The other possibility is that there hasn't been time for the damage to show up. How long have you been experiencing the symptoms you describe in your first post? Having said all that, there are other medical conditions that can cause elevated TTG-IGA values and sometimes they are transient issues. I think it would be wise to ask for another TTG-IGA before the repeat endoscopy to see if it is still high.  Knitty kitty's suggestion of getting genetic testing done is also something to think about. About 35% of the general population will have one or both genes that are markers for the potential to develop active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develop celiac disease. So, having a celiac potential gene cannot be used to definitively diagnose celiac disease but it can be realistically used to rule it out if you don't have either of the genes. If your symptoms persist, and all testing is complete and the follow-up endoscopy/biopsy still shows no damage, you should consider trialing a gluten free diet for a few months to see if symptoms improve. If not celiac disease, you could have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). 
×
×
  • Create New...