Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Iga Question


GlutenFreeAustinite

Recommended Posts

GlutenFreeAustinite Contributor

So I'm curious...if a person is IgA deficient, is it possible that they could have a positive blood test on gliadin IgAs/IgGs, but test negative on tTg? Or would all tests be negative?

My numbers were out of the normal range (on a scale of 0-15, mine were a 23 and 17 on gliadin IgAs/IgGs), but within normalcy on tTgs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



beachbirdie Contributor

So I'm curious...if a person is IgA deficient, is it possible that they could have a positive blood test on gliadin IgAs/IgGs, but test negative on tTg? Or would all tests be negative?

My numbers were out of the normal range (on a scale of 0-15, mine were a 23 and 17 on gliadin IgAs/IgGs), but within normalcy on tTgs.

The same thing could happen regardeless of your IgA status. The reason they check for total serum IgA is to make sure the IgA tests that they do are valid. If you are IgA deficient, you would most likely test negative on the IgA version of gliading antibodies, but not necessarily. There are two subclasses and you could theoretically have higher than normal of one of them, even with insufficient IgA. Of course if you were down in the "zero" range I would expect ALL IgA testing, whether for TtG or anti-gliading, to be negative.

You could still get a positive TtG IgG, but your TtG IgA would most likely show negative. They don't routinely test TtG IgG.

Are you IgA deficient? If you are, and still have high IgA gliadin antibodies, means you are reacting to gluten. But not getting the tissue damage that would be indicated by positive TtG.

TtG is the "self" antibody, the body is attacking itself (autoimmunity). Gliadin antibodies are the body mounting an immune reaction against an invader (gluten).

Hope that makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GlutenFreeAustinite Contributor

Thank you for explaining that!

I'm not sure if I am IgA deficient. The doctor didn't run a total IgA serum, at least not to my knowledge. Thing is, I match up to a lot of symptoms...chronic infections, etc. They did test TtG IgG and it was negative, as was the TtG IgA, I think. I haven't seen a copy of the results--the first time I was tested, the gliadin IgA/IgG were high but still normal, so I am assuming those were the two that came back "out of the normal range."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beachbirdie Contributor

Thank you for explaining that!

I'm not sure if I am IgA deficient. The doctor didn't run a total IgA serum, at least not to my knowledge. Thing is, I match up to a lot of symptoms...chronic infections, etc. They did test TtG IgG and it was negative, as was the TtG IgA, I think. I haven't seen a copy of the results--the first time I was tested, the gliadin IgA/IgG were high but still normal, so I am assuming those were the two that came back "out of the normal range."

Sooo...if I read correctly, you've had testing at two different times, and the second test gave you higher anti-gliadin antigodies than the first test.

I haven't gone to find any of your other posts, but it sounds to me like you ARE reacting to gluten because you are making antibodies against it. You do not have the antibodies that indicate your body is attacking "self" but it does not mean "no celiac".

Are you still trying to iron out a diagnosis?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GlutenFreeAustinite Contributor

Yes, I have been tested twice...I was gluten free for eighteen months (self diagnosed), then ate it for a month, got tested, was negative, and ate it for another month. My doctor says I'm definitely gluten intolerant, but we don't know for sure if it's celiac yet. I go to see a GI doctor in a couple weeks and will get biopsied/endoscopied then. I'm definitely reacting to gluten, but it's odd that the tTgs aren't present. Or does that happen sometimes with celiac?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beachbirdie Contributor

Yes, I have been tested twice...I was gluten free for eighteen months (self diagnosed), then ate it for a month, got tested, was negative, and ate it for another month. My doctor says I'm definitely gluten intolerant, but we don't know for sure if it's celiac yet. I go to see a GI doctor in a couple weeks and will get biopsied/endoscopied then. I'm definitely reacting to gluten, but it's odd that the tTgs aren't present. Or does that happen sometimes with celiac?

You can be negative for TtG and still have celiac. You can also be negative on all the blood tests and still have celiac. Something in the range of 20-30% of negative tests are actually false negatives. That's a large number to slip "through the cracks".

You are aware that the biopsy can be negative, and you could still be celiac? Sometimes damage is patchy, and they sometimes don't take enough samples from the right locations. It is also possible you are in an early stage and haven't developed the damage.

Diagnosis is not cut and dried with celiac!

You might need a longer period of glutening...say, 3 months...in order to give your body a chance to raise up antibodies. And, how much are you eating? You need the equivalent of 3 to 4 slices of bread a day to do a really thorough job!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GlutenFreeAustinite Contributor

You can be negative for TtG and still have celiac. You can also be negative on all the blood tests and still have celiac. Something in the range of 20-30% of negative tests are actually false negatives. That's a large number to slip "through the cracks".

You are aware that the biopsy can be negative, and you could still be celiac? Sometimes damage is patchy, and they sometimes don't take enough samples from the right locations. It is also possible you are in an early stage and haven't developed the damage.

Diagnosis is not cut and dried with celiac!

You might need a longer period of glutening...say, 3 months...in order to give your body a chance to raise up antibodies. And, how much are you eating? You need the equivalent of 3 to 4 slices of bread a day to do a really thorough job!

Yeah, I'm getting biopsied because the GI doctor thinks I should be. I'm also getting a gallbladder sonogram, because my family has a history of gallbladder problems. I also have been having lots of muscle pain and weakness, so they blood tested me for muscle inflammation and degeneration.

I'm eating lots of gluten (usually in several different items per day..bread at lunch, some sort of gluten-containing dessert). Today for example, i'll eat a sandwich for lunch, and hot dog/hamburger buns tonight, and a cupcake. Good and glutened! I get biopsied on July 24th, and that will be almost exactly three months since I started eating it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Sarah Grace's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      1

      Sarah Grace

    2. - Sarah Grace posted a topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      1

      Sarah Grace

    3. - trents replied to J1707's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      5

      False reading as of right now

    4. - Jammer replied to Kate1990's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      2

      gluten-free supplements in Canada

    5. - J1707 replied to J1707's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      5

      False reading as of right now


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      125,033
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Dwn2rthcntrygrl
    Newest Member
    Dwn2rthcntrygrl
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.8k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Have you tried a diet with a lower carb, higher fat content, something similar to the Keto diet? Are you familiar with the ketogenic diet? Fat satisfies and so curbs hunger and levels out blood sugar.
    • Sarah Grace
      I've was diagnosed celiac over 10 years ago when in mid 50s.  For a long time I have been getting headaches at night and in the morning and I suffer a lot of insomnia.  The headaches can be very severe and sometimes develop into a full migraine but other times they wear off within an hour of getting up and eating breakfast.  I have self diagnosed this a hypoglycaemia.  The medical profession in UK, where I live, does not seem to know anything of this and simply tests me for diabetes, which I do not have.  I know this condition is diet related and caused by carbohydrates, I avoid eating in the evenings.  Whatever I do, this condition seems to be getting worse and is very difficult to control.  Any advice would be much appreciated.
    • trents
      But that's the point Scott is trying to make. It is up to you. You do not have to go forward with another biopsy simply because your doctor wants you to. They work for you, not the other way around.
    • Jammer
      Hi Kate,   I am unsure if this is helpful or not. I have Webber calcium citrate everyday. I also react to less than 20 ppm of gluten. I have not reacted to Webber ever. (Fingers crossed it stays that way). Also, I get my blood tested every 6 months to ensure I have zero gluten exposure. It consistently comes back negative(0) to gluten.  A few years ago, my stomach would feel nauseous after taking Ca+  but thankfully that doesn’t happen anymore. Good luck and I hope you find something that works for you.    all the best,    J 
    • J1707
      Honestly that's a good question, but I would like an official answer since I'm not a professional and my doctor's in my opinion no offense to them I'd say gone about it in a unprofessional way unless other's have been told to go gluten free, get a biopsy, just to go back gluten due to a possible false reading and then gotta go back for another biopsy But if it really was up to me per say then I'd definitely stay gluten free like this diet change has really helped me a lot in a lot of ways, not just for health reasons, but discipline toward not indulging to much on things i used too, not to mention being more aware of what I'm intaking by reading labels more and calling the manufacturers to find more answers if needed.
×
×
  • Create New...