Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Do You Have To Have "specific" Celiac Genes?


freeme808

Recommended Posts

freeme808 Apprentice

I received my enterolab results, and low and behold I am gluten intolerant. I also have two genes, but it said it is not specific to Celiac. I have a horrible rash(everything leads to DH), and I have some kind of inflammation/infection in my intestines-when you feel them they are very hard(I am working with my holistic doctor). Here are my results:

 

Gluten Sensitivity Stool Panel
Fecal Anti-gliadin IgA      53 Units   (Normal Range is less than 10 Units)

Fecal Anti-tissue Transglutaminase IgA      11 Units   (Normal Range is less than 10 Units)

Quantitative Microscopic Fecal Fat Score      285 Units   (Normal Range is less than 300 Units)

Gluten Sensitivity Gene Test
HLA-DQB1 Molecular analysis, Allele 1      0502   

HLA-DQB1 Molecular analysis, Allele 2      0602   

Serologic equivalent: HLA-DQ   1,1  (Subtype 5,6)

 

Although you do not possess the main HLA-DQB1 genes predisposing to celiac sprue (HLA-DQB1*0201 or HLA-DQB1*0302), HLA gene analysis reveals that you have two copies of a gene that predisposes to gluten sensitivity (any DQ1, DQ2 not by HLA-DQB1*0201, or DQ3 not by HLA-DQB1*0302). Having two copies of a gluten sensitive gene means that each of your parents and all of your children (if you have them) will possess at least one copy of the gene. Two copies also means there is an even stronger predisposition to gluten sensitivity than having one gene and the resultant immunologic gluten sensitivity may be more severe.

 

Im confused because of my rash and intestinal problems. Everything I read says if you have gluten sensitivity and not celiac, you usually don't have these two problems and if you do- it's celiac. But I don't have the "specific" gene.

 

I am also very happy to report after so much suffering that I am gluten, dairy, and sugar free. :) However, my rash has flared up...I figured it would get worse before it gets better. And as I mentioned earlier, I'm still figuring out what's going on in my intestines. Thank you for your help!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

I have had DH since childhood and although it was a long road was finally firmly diagnosed celiac about 10 years ago. I don't have either of the two most commonly associated 'celiac' genes either. Gene testing is IMHO interesting and can be helpful but is not the be all and end all of celiac diagnosis. Whether you are labeled celiac or gluten intolerant the script is the same. Lifelong adherence to the gluten free diet. Glad to hear you are feeling better and I hope you continue to improve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
freeme808 Apprentice

Thank you so much. :)

I should of searched the forums first before posting. I did find this, which I found very interesting:

"When the GI Dr.'s are running their tests....they are looking for Celiac Disease specifically. A person can have leaky gut and as a result the immune system is producing antibodies (since gluten would be recognized as "foreign" in the bloodstream) but this is a completely different situation then Celiac Disease.


In my opinion those with DQ1 may be more susceptible to leaky gut (for whatever reason) and the gluten intolerance is a consequence of that. Since the condition is not the same as Celiac the immune response is not ocurring in the gut (as it does with Celiac).....instead the immune system is responding to undigested gluten which has left the gut and entered the bloodstream. Its the same scenario with other other food proteins such as dairy, soy, eggs, etc....leaky gut allows those foods to leave the gut and enter the bloodstream undigested.

Under normal circumstances gluten, other foods, toxins, bacteria, parasites, etc. would not pass through the gut wall...they would not have access to other areas of the body. Its only when the gut is leaky that this becomes a problem which ultimately can lead to autoimmunity.

Possibly every person that I've come across with DQ1 and gluten intolerance.....also has other food intolerances (usually lots of them) which is more indicative of leaky gut. The symptoms are more neurological (although there may also be some GI symptoms) and they generally do not solve their health issues by eliminating gluten alone. The DQ1 symptoms are described as being more "severe" in some ways worse than those with DQ2 or DQ8....but really in my opinion its comparing apples and oranges. We're comparing two different conditions....which is why its rare for a person with DQ1 to be diagnosed with Celiac."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
IrishHeart Veteran

The Enterolab fecal fat and stool tests are not considered valid tests for celiac. I have not seen anyone (including people in my family and circle of friends) who have not received a  similar report like the one you have posted. Word for word. Makes me skeptical. IMO.

 

The Univ. of Chicago Celiac Center has this posted on their website: 

 

 

Why don’t you recognize tests (stool tests or otherwise) for
non-celiac gluten sensitivity that are currently available through
companies like Enterolab or Cyrex?

    
                    

"We only embrace tests that have endured rigorous
scientific evaluations. So far, these tests have received no
evidence-based support.


Enterolab has never successfully published anything on the accuracy
of stool tests (nor have any other stool test manufacturers, to our
knowledge) making it difficult to confirm the research results. Because
of this, we must make our decisions based on what has been
published; Harvard, UCSD, and the American College of Gastroenterology
all agree that stool tests are simply not sensitive or specific enough
methods in screening for celiac disease.


We can say therefore with confidence that the test currently being
used by these labs is not good enough. In fact, while it is true that
about 40% of people with proven gluten sensitivity have elevated
AGA-IgG, it is also true that about 15-25% of the healthy individuals
who have absolutely nothing wrong also have elevated AGA-IgG. Hence,
about 60% of gluten sensitive people do not have elevated AGA-IgG
(making the test not sensitive enough); and about 20% of normal,
non-gluten sensitive people have elevated AGA-IgG for no apparent reason
(making the test not specific enough)."


Further reading: Open Original Shared Link at BMJ.com

 

 

 

Why not have celiac panels run or a biopsy of the area around those lesions to rule out DH?

Just a suggestion, but in either case, yes the gluten free diet is still the recommended treatment, celiac or gluten intolerant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
freeme808 Apprentice

Thanks for responding.

The doctors in my area(my insurance) are not educated enough about celiac to do the right tests-some weren't in the system, and every derm I've ever been to in the pass just doesn't listen- so, I didn't want to waste anymore time. It's just too depressing. Then I ordered enterolab, hoping it would shed a little light. I am however seeing an holistic/MD now who is helping me with my conditions. After reading a lot today about gene and stool testing and everything in between...lol, very exhausting, I'm kind of over all the facts now.

I know my body and it's reactions, the problems I've had since I was a child....lol. Why couldn't I have this mindset a month ago!? I'm sticking to my clean diet...I feel so much better.  :wub:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lisa Mentor

 I'm sticking to my clean diet...I feel so much better.  :wub:

 

I, too, am not a fan of Enterolabs, for many of the reasons Irish quoted. Do you have a family history of digestive issues or other autoimmune disorders?

 

I think you are wise.  Your pursuit of  good health, will find your conclusions.  Welcome!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gatita Enthusiast

I do trust Enterolab's gene test, however... it's done by the Red Cross, and not in question as far as I know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



IrishHeart Veteran

FreeMe, if you feel better off gluten, then do what you think is best. I just wanted to make you aware of the testing procedures, if you had not

considered all of them yet. You know what's best..

 

Best wishes to you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lisa Mentor

I do trust Enterolab's gene test, however... it's done by the Red Cross, and not in question as far as I know.

<grimace> No, don't think so.  Enterolab is a  "for profit" lab = The End.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gatita Enthusiast

They are indeed for profit.

 

However: "For the purpose of gene testing, our gene testing partner, The American Red Cross,...." Etc. They do farm out the gene testing to the Red Cross.

 

Anyway, I didn't mean to veer off topic.... :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
freeme808 Apprentice

Thank you everyone. Sorry I didn't mean to start a debate. I do feel that the results have shed some more light on my condition. I only had two tests done via blood(the rest weren't in the system)..and although it was elevated, as far as "there" standard range goes they said I was negative. But I believed otherwise. My new doctor also said, if you were negative...it would be 0. The stool test has shown my raised antibodies...just like my skin does everyday(slowly getting better). I am also very anemic, and deficient and also have something going on in my intestines. However, there is a bright light at the end of the tunnel for me. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,088
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Aventine
    Newest Member
    Aventine
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Anmol
      Thanks this is helpful. Couple of follow -ups- that critical point till it stays silent is age dependent or dependent on continuing to eat gluten. In other words if she is on gluten-free diet can she stay on silent celiac disease forever?    what are the most cost effective yet efficient test to track the inflammation/antibodies and see if gluten-free is working . 
    • trents
      Welcome to the community forum, @Anmol! There are a number of blood antibody tests that can be administered when diagnosing celiac disease and it is normal that not all of them will be positive. Three out of four that were run for you were positive. It looks pretty conclusive that you have celiac disease. Many physicians will only run the tTG-IGA test so I applaud your doctor for being so thorough. Note, the Immunoglobulin A is not a test for celiac disease per se but a measure of total IGA antibody levels in your blood. If this number is low it can cause false negatives in the individual IGA-based celiac antibody tests. There are many celiacs who are asymptomatic when consuming gluten, at least until damage to the villous lining of the small bowel progresses to a certain critical point. I was one of them. We call them "silent" celiacs".  Unfortunately, being asymptomatic does not equate to no damage being done to the villous lining of the small bowel. No, the fact that your wife is asymptomatic should not be viewed as a license to not practice strict gluten free eating. She is damaging her health by doing so and the continuing high antibody test scores are proof of that. The antibodies are produced by inflammation in the small bowel lining and over time this inflammation destroys the villous lining. Continuing to disregard this will catch up to her. While it may be true that a little gluten does less harm to the villous lining than a lot, why would you even want to tolerate any harm at all to it? Being a "silent" celiac is both a blessing and a curse. It's a blessing in the sense of being able to endure some cross contamination in social settings without embarrassing repercussions. It's a curse in that it slows down the learning curve of avoiding foods where gluten is not an obvious ingredient, yet still may be doing damage to the villous lining of the small bowel. GliadinX is helpful to many celiacs in avoiding illness from cross contamination when eating out but it is not effective when consuming larger amounts of gluten. It was never intended for that purpose. Eating out is the number one sabotager of gluten free eating. You have no control of how food is prepared and handled in restaurant kitchens.  
    • knitty kitty
      Forgot one... https://www.hormonesmatter.com/eosinophilic-esophagitis-sugar-thiamine-sensitive/
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum community, @ekelsay! Yes, your tTG-IGA score is strongly positive for celiac disease. There are other antibody tests that can be run when diagnosing celiac disease but the tTG-IGA is the most popular with physicians because it combines good sensitivity with good specificity, and it is a relatively inexpensive test to perform. The onset of celiac disease can happen at any stage of life and the size of the score is not necessarily an indicator of the progress of the disease. It is likely that you you experienced onset well before you became aware of symptoms. It often takes 10 years or more to get a diagnosis of celiac disease after the first appearance of symptoms. In my case, the first indicator was mildly elevated liver enzymes that resulted in a rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross at age 37. There was no GI discomfort at that point, at least none that I noticed. Over time, other lab values began to get out of norm, including decreased iron levels. My PCP was at a complete loss to explain any of this. I finally scheduled an appointment with a GI doc because the liver enzymes concerned me and he tested me right away for celiac disease. I was positive and within three months of gluten free eating my liver enzymes were back to normal. That took 13 years since the rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross. And my story is typical. Toward the end of that period I had developed some occasional diarrhea and oily stool but no major GI distress. Many celiacs do not have classic GI symptoms and are "silent" celiacs. There are around 200 symptoms that have been associated with celiac disease and many or most of them do not involve conscious GI distress. Via an autoimmune process, gluten ingestion triggers inflammation in the villous lining of the small bowel which damages it over time and inhibits the ability of this organ to absorb the vitamins and minerals in the food we ingest. So, that explains why those with celiac disease often suffer iron deficiency anemia, osteoporosis and a host of other vitamin and mineral deficiency related medical issues. The villous lining of the small bowel is where essentially all of our nutrition is absorbed. So, yes, anemia is one of the classic symptoms of celiac disease. One very important thing you need to be aware of is that your PCP may refer you to a GI doc for an endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel lining to confirm the results of the blood antibody testing. So, you must not begin gluten free eating until that is done or at least you know they are going to diagnose you with celiac disease without it. If you start gluten free eating now there will be healing in the villous lining that will begin to take place which may compromise the results of the biopsy.
    • Anmol
      Hello all- my wife was recently diagnosed with Celiac below are her blood results. We are still absorbing this.  I wanted to seek clarity on few things:  1. Her symptoms aren't extreme. She was asked to go on gluten free diet a couple years ago but she did not completely cut off gluten. Partly because she wasn't seeing extreme symptoms. Only bloating and mild diarrhea after a meal full of gluten.  Does this mean that she is asymptomatic but enormous harm is done with every gram of gluten.? in other words is amount gluten directly correlated with harm on the intestines? or few mg of gluten can be really harmful to the villi  2. Why is she asymptomatic?  3. Is Gliadin X safe to take and effective for Cross -contamination or while going out to eat?  4. Since she is asymptomatic, can we sometimes indulge in a gluten diet? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deamidated Gliadin, IgG - 64 (0-19) units tTG IgA -  >100 (0-3) U/ml tTG IgG - 4   (0-5) Why is this in normal range? Endomysial Antibody - Positive  Immunoglobulin A - 352 (87-352) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Thanks for help in advance, really appreciate! 
×
×
  • Create New...