Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Where Your Contribution Counts!
    eNewsletter
    Support Us!

3.5 Year Old Test Results, New Issues, Food Allergies? Ugh.


omgmegg

Recommended Posts

omgmegg Newbie

Last January-March our 3 year old was complaining of headaches and his stomach hurting. Plus he was having extremely loose and frequent and stinky stools (so much it was almost impossible to potty train him). We took him to a GI doctor who said he had toddler diarrhea  and to cut out almost all bread, sugar, certain fruits, and dairy. But we never did much dairy or sugar..but we followed the food list. We then took him to a ped. and they wanted to do a celiac test screen on him. They did and said it was normal.

 

So we went about our business and his stools firmed up.

 

About three or so months ago he began complaining about his stomach hurting after eating certain things (usually breads, even though they were rare) but I can't really put my finger on any specific food or meal. He also complains of being dizzy and that his legs hurt.

 

Most recently he complained of "bee bites" (itchy skin) and I saw small bumps all over his butt, lower back, upper back, and two on his face near his mouth (not cold sores). Around thanksgiving he had two peanut butter sandwiches and yogurt that morning and had explosive diarrhea so bad he couldn't get his pants off. It was all over the floor, on the wall in the bathroom, all over the toilet, and base of the sink.

 

I took him to his allergist and asthma doctor (he has asthma). And they told me the bumps are eczema. They ordered food allergy blood tests (waiting for those back). But she didn't even seem concerned! She seemed to think if he had any issues that I would see it immediately (shortness of breath, hives). Even thought he diarrhea happened less than an hour after eating the sandwiches. But the more research I do I discovered that reactions to food allergies can happen hours sometimes up to a day after the food has been digested and they have more subtle affects (bloating, joint pain, eczema, upset stomach, diarrhea).

 

So I called the lab to get them to mail me the results of my sons celiac blood screening from February and in the mean time I called his ped. office to get the numbers. She told me she didn't have time to explain it to me (whatever, we're moving to Seattle in January) and here are the numbers from February '14:

g6PBD- 14

 

IGA- 3

Reference: 4-7 years: 27-195 mg/dL 

 

IGG- 5

Reference: 8 days -4 years: 453-916 mg/dL

 

Transglutaminase IGA less than 20 (no number given)

 

IGG- 2 (not sure what this is...because I have the IGG result above)

 
I have no idea what they really mean. I'm waiting on the food allergy results.
 
I'm just wondering what our next steps are. Someone I know who has a son with severe allergies said a biopsy would be our best bet. We're moving to Seattle in January and so I'm thinking of waiting to get it done there.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



StephanieL Enthusiast

A food caused allergic reaction happens within 2 hours of ingesting and includes things such as vomiting, hives, breathing difficulty, other GI issues.  A biopsy does not give any indication of a food allergy. If the allergist did testing, was it blood testing or skin testing? If they said those were normal- they are 90% accurate for a negative result.

 

I would want clarification on the IgA and IgG numbers.  See if that's something worth checking into.  If he was not eating gluten on a regular basis AND if there is an IgA deficiency then the Celiac testing would not be accurate anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cyclinglady Grand Master

I got that he was not eating gluten prior to getting the celiac test (or only eating tiny amounts). That would make the celiac test invalid.

Here is a link to the University of Chicago's celiac website. It contains testing information and information on symptoms, etc.

Open Original Shared Link

Search through our DH (rash) section on this forum for photos and valuable information. Sounds like he may have DH. Remember, celiac disease is an autoimmune disorder and not an allergy. Though he may have some food intolerances or allergies on top of celiac disease.

Get copies of all test results and post them. We have some pretty knowledgable folks on this forum.

Do not give up! Keep on researching. And I hope you find a good celiac-savvy doctor in Seattle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
omgmegg Newbie

I know that celiac is not a foods allergy, spey if my post was confusing. We originally grayed for it, now he's being tested for allergies.

Alergic reactions can happen up to two hours of ingesting, but can also happen next day (one example:Open Original Shared Link )

When I go to the doctor tomorrow I'm going to have them explain the numbers and tests more. When he was tested, we weren't keeping him away from gluten, we just don't consume a ton as a family.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
omgmegg Newbie

Typos! Sorry, on my phone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
beth01 Enthusiast

Once you get those lab results, post them here. It will help so much more for us to interpret them. Don't let the doctors try and tell you nothing is to be worried about. This is not normal. Keep bothering them and if you don't get the answers you think are correct, see another doctor. My previous doctor didn't want to test my children after I was diagnosed, told me not to worry, he was sure they didn't have it. I insisted. My daughter had been having weird fainting issues at school, a few times a month. He sent her for testing for her heart to specialists, but didn't want to do a simple blood test? She was positive. Got rid of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
StephanieL Enthusiast

A "true" IgE mediated allergic reaction happens within 2 hours of ingestions.  Things like eczema and the like are NOT allergic reactions but more an intolerance. There is a big difference between those two things  (though the treatment is the same- avoidance).  Again, if the allergist tested for those things, a negative result is 90% accurate that it is not an IgE mediated allergy.  

 

 

Again, with the low IgA and IgG levels the Celiac testing isn't going to be accurate either plus if there wasn't enough gluten being consumed as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



omgmegg Newbie

I see, but in my post I stated I was waiting for those results. I suppose I'm wondering what patents do who have gotten negative test results but have children still experiencing issues.

The rare occasion that my son has yogurt and peanut butter sandwiches he explodes. Was it the yogurt, peanuts, or the bread? Or something else. So now we're diving deeper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
StephanieL Enthusiast

If you suspect those are the three things that it could be, you give them one at a time (potentially for several days in a row) and see what happens. 

When the results are unclear then a food diary is typically they way these things are figured out.  It may take some detective work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nvsmom Community Regular

I agree, if those serum IgA and IgG numbers are correct, they are incredibly low and it will be impossible to get an accurate celiac disease blood test.  Those parts of his immune system are under functioning so even if his body is having a celiac reaction to foods, his autoantibody levels will not be elevated because there is not enough Immunoglobulin (IgA or IgG) to be testable.

 

5% of all celiacs are low in IgA (compared to about 1 in 700 in the regular population) so they test that control test along with the celiacs tests.  Low IgG is not linked to celiac disease (as far as I know) but that will invalidate the the celiac disease tests normally used for celiacs who are IgA defiecient.

 

Just in case those numbers are innaccurate, these are the tests you would want

  • tTG IgA and tTG IgG (tissue transglutaminase) - most common tests
  • DGP IgA and DGP IgG (deaminated gliadin peptids) - new tests which are the best for young kids and early celiac disease
  • EMA IgA (endomysial antibodies) - detects more advanced celiac disease and is similar to the tTG IgA
  • AGA IgA and AGA IgG (anti-gliadin antibodies) - older and less reliable test which has largely been replaced by the DGP tests

For these tests to be accurate, he must be eating 1-2 slices of bread per day, or equivalent, in the 8-12 weeks prior to testing.... Even then, toddlers have a highe rate of false negatives so they may not be accurate even if you do eveything right.

 

If his IgG and IgA are low, his only celiac disease testing option is the endoscopic biopsy. He would need to be eating gluten in the 2-4 weeks prior to the procedure.

 

Genetic tseting could also be done (DQ2 and DQ8) but that will only tell you if he is in the 30% of the population that is at increased risk of getting celiac disease (1 in 30ish rather than 1 in 133) and not if he actually has celiac disease.

 

You asked what people do if their kids are negative but they still have (gluten) issues... Really there are only two things you can do:

  1. Ignore it and hope it goes away. That sounds bad but in some cases it works...
  2. Try the gluten-free diet for about 6 months, and keep a food and symptoms journal to record changes. If improvements are seen in the first 6 months then you know you are doing the right thing. He will need to be gluten-free for many months if you want to judge the diet's effectiveness. Some symptoms take months or even years before they improve. Going gluten-free is not a quick fix like avoiding allergens are for those with allergies.

I followed option number 2 with my boys.  They had symptoms so I made them gluten-free even though their (one and only) celiac disease test was negative. They are doing much better now so we have never regretted trying the diet even though our doctor advised against the "difficult and restrctive diet".  Pshaw!  LOL  :rolleyes:

 

Good luck with the doctors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
omgmegg Newbie

I agree, if those serum IgA and IgG numbers are correct, they are incredibly low and it will be impossible to get an accurate celiac disease blood test.  Those parts of his immune system are under functioning so even if his body is having a celiac reaction to foods, his autoantibody levels will not be elevated because there is not enough Immunoglobulin (IgA or IgG) to be testable.

 

5% of all celiacs are low in IgA (compared to about 1 in 700 in the regular population) so they test that control test along with the celiacs tests.  Low IgG is not linked to celiac disease (as far as I know) but that will invalidate the the celiac disease tests normally used for celiacs who are IgA defiecient.

 

Just in case those numbers are innaccurate, these are the tests you would want

  • tTG IgA and tTG IgG (tissue transglutaminase) - most common tests
  • DGP IgA and DGP IgG (deaminated gliadin peptids) - new tests which are the best for young kids and early celiac disease
  • EMA IgA (endomysial antibodies) - detects more advanced celiac disease and is similar to the tTG IgA
  • AGA IgA and AGA IgG (anti-gliadin antibodies) - older and less reliable test which has largely been replaced by the DGP tests

For these tests to be accurate, he must be eating 1-2 slices of bread per day, or equivalent, in the 8-12 weeks prior to testing.... Even then, toddlers have a highe rate of false negatives so they may not be accurate even if you do eveything right.

 

If his IgG and IgA are low, his only celiac disease testing option is the endoscopic biopsy. He would need to be eating gluten in the 2-4 weeks prior to the procedure.

 

Genetic tseting could also be done (DQ2 and DQ8) but that will only tell you if he is in the 30% of the population that is at increased risk of getting celiac disease (1 in 30ish rather than 1 in 133) and not if he actually has celiac disease.

 

You asked what people do if their kids are negative but they still have (gluten) issues... Really there are only two things you can do:

  1. Ignore it and hope it goes away. That sounds bad but in some cases it works...
  2. Try the gluten-free diet for about 6 months, and keep a food and symptoms journal to record changes. If improvements are seen in the first 6 months then you know you are doing the right thing. He will need to be gluten-free for many months if you want to judge the diet's effectiveness. Some symptoms take months or even years before they improve. Going gluten-free is not a quick fix like avoiding allergens are for those with allergies.

I followed option number 2 with my boys.  They had symptoms so I made them gluten-free even though their (one and only) celiac disease test was negative. They are doing much better now so we have never regretted trying the diet even though our doctor advised against the "difficult and restrctive diet".  Pshaw!  LOL  :rolleyes:

 

Good luck with the doctors.

 

Thank you so much for this information! This is helpful to know so when we move to Seattle and find a new doctor, I can ask for these tests before anything invasive. Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nvsmom Community Regular

Thank you so much for this information! This is helpful to know so when we move to Seattle and find a new doctor, I can ask for these tests before anything invasive. Thank you.

No problem.  :)

 

Along with the celiac disease tests I listed, if you are testing again, have the total serum IgA and total serum IgG run again as well. Those are the ones that appeared low in the results you posted. If they are indeed low, your only testing option is the endoscopic biopsy because the blood test results will be (possibly falsely) negative.

 

Best wishes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mommida Enthusiast

I have read articles that have stated up to 30% of Celiacs are IGA deficient.

 

I suggest that you 1 keep a food journal and 2 get to the best pediatric gastroenterologist in Seattle.

 

Invasive tests that are appropriate are Celiac blood panel and stool testing for parasites.

 

Unfortunately for conclusive diagnoses your son will probably have to have an endoscopy with biopsy. 

 

Children present with these symptoms for a number of illnesses and disorders. 

 

*as an example* Eosinophilic disorders of the GI track,  an "allergen"/"trigger" starts the immune system to make eosinophils (white blood cells that usually are reserved for parasite infections)

the eosinophils attack normal healthy body tissue

eosinophils are active for up to 12 days

So you can understand why some of the food related "allergens" (using this term to describe adverse affect on the body not as a true allergic reaction) can be causing adverse auto immune reactions and yet be difficult to pinpoint an exact cause.  (and it seems you might have eliminated a wheat allergy)

 

In some cases gluten has been identified as "triggers" in Eosinophilic cases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mommida Enthusiast

That being said....

We have had parents on here that were searching desperately for answers for sick children.  One child was diagnosed with Kawasaki and went on to have open heart surgery.  We can only really tell you what is consistent for Celiac and/or other diagnoses for our children.  My daughter has been diagnosed for both Celiac and Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Help Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - cristiana replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      16

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    2. - Julie Riordan replied to Julie Riordan's topic in Traveling with Celiac Disease
      3

      Any ideas for travelling

    3. - Nedast replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      16

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - trents replied to SuzanneL's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Weak Positive Test

    5. - SuzanneL posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Weak Positive Test


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      120,498
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kim.cervone513
    Newest Member
    Kim.cervone513
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      Thank you for your post, @Nedast, and welcome to the forum. It is interesting to read of your experiences. Although I've not had TMJ, from time to time I have had a bit of mild pain in my jaw, sharp stabbing pains and tingling in my face which appears to have been caused by issues with my trigeminal nerve.  I read that sometimes a damaged trigeminal nerve in coeliacs can heal after adopting a gluten free diet.  I try to keep out of cold winds or wear a scarf over my face when it is cold and windy, those conditions tend to be my 'trigger' but I do think that staying clear of gluten has helped.  Also, sleeping with a rolled up towel under my neck is a tip I picked up online, again, that seems to bring benefits. Thank you again for your input - living with this sort of pain can be very hard, so it is good to be able to share advice.
    • Julie Riordan
      I am going to France in two weeks and then to Portugal in May   Thanks for your reply 
    • Nedast
      I made an account just to reply to this topic. My story resembles yours in so many ways that it is truly amazing. I also suddenly became lactose intolerant, went a little under 10 years attributing all my symtoms to different body parts, never thinking it was something systemic until much later. I had the same mental problems - anxiety, depression, fatigue, etc. In fact, the only real difference in our story is that I was never formally diagnosed. When I discovered that my myriad symtoms, that had been continuous and worsening for years, all rapidly subsided upon cessation of consuming gluten, I immediately took it upon myself to cut gluten out of my diet completely. I live in America, and had lost my health insurance within the year prior to my discovery, so I could not get tested, and I will never willingly or knowingly consume gluten again, which I would have to do in order to get tested now that I have insurance again. But that is not the point of this reply. I also had extreme TMJ pain that began within months of getting my wisdom teeth out at - you guessed it - 17 years old. I was in and out of doctors for my various symptoms for about 5 years before I gave up, but during that time I had also kept getting reffered to different kinds of doctors that had their own, different solutions to my TMJ issue, an issue which I only recently discovered was related to my other symptoms. I began with physical therapy, and the physical therapist eventually broke down at me after many months, raising her voice at me and saying that there was nothing she could do for me. After that saga, I saw a plastic surgeon at the request of my GP, who he knew personally. This palstic surgeon began using botox injections to stop my spasming jaw muscles, and he managed to get it covered by my insurace in 2011, which was harder to do back then. This helped the pain tremendously, but did not solve the underlying problem, and I had to get repeat injections every three months. After a couple of years, this began to lose effectiveness, and I needed treatments more often than my insurance would cover. The surgeon did a scan on the joint and saw slight damage to the tissues. He then got approved by insurance to do a small surgery on the massseter (jaw) muscle - making an incision, and then splicing tissue into the muscle to stop the spasming. It worked amazingly, but about three months later it had stopped working. I was on the verge of seeing the top oral surgeon in our city, but instead of operating on me, he referred me to a unique group of dentists who focus on the TMJ and its biomechanical relationship to teeth occlusion (i.e. how the teeth fit together). This is what your dentist did, and what he did to you was boderline if not outright malpractice. There is a dental field that specializes in doing this kind of dental work, and it takes many years of extra schooling (and a lot of money invested into education) to be able to modify teeth occusion in this manner. Just based on the way you describe your dentist doing this, I can tell he was not qualified to do this to you. Dentists who are qualified and engage in this practice take many measurments of your head, mouth, teeth, etc., they take laboratory molds of your teeth, and they then make a complete, life-size model of your skull and teeth to help them guide their work on you. They then have a lab construct, and give you what is called a "bite splint." It looks and feels like a retainer, but its function is entirely different. This is essentially a literal splint for the TMJ that situates on the teeth. The splint is progressively modified once or twice per week, over several months, in order to slowly move the joint to its correct position. The muscles spasm less, stress is taken off the joint, as the joint slowly moves back into its proper position. The pain reduces each month, each week, sometimes even each day you go in for a visit. The joint has to be moved in this manner with the splint BEFORE the modification to the teeth begins. They then add to your tooth structure with small bits of composite, to keep the joint in its proper place after it has been sucessfully repositioned. Subtracting from your teeth, by grinding down bits of your natural tooth structure, is done very conservatively, if they have to do it at all. This process worked for me - after six months, my face, jaw, neck all felt normal, and I had no more pain - a feeling I had not had in a long time. It also made my face look better. I had not realized the true extent that the spasming muscles and the joint derangement had effected the shape of my face. The pain began to return after a few months, but nowhere near where it had been before. This immense reduction in pain lasted for a little over two years. The treatment still ultimately failed, but it is not their fault, and it is still the treatment that has given me the most relief to this day. Later on, I even went about three years with very, very good pain reduction, before the joint severely destabilized again. This field of dentistry is the last line treatment for TMJ issues before oral surgery on the TMJ. There aren't as many denists around who practice this anymore, and the practice is currently shrinking due to dentists opting for less espensive, additional educations in things like professional whitening, which have a broader marketability. Getting this treatment is also very expensive if not covered by insurance (in America at least). My first time was covered by insurance, second time was not, though the dentist took pity on me due to the nature of my case and charged like a quarter of usual pricing. Most cases seen by these dentists are complete successes, and the patient never has to come back again. But occasionally they get a case that is not a success, and I was one of those cases. A little over a year ago, I began seeing the second dentist who keeps my TMJ stable in this manner. The first dentist retired, and then died sadly. A shame too, because he was a truly amazing, knowledgable guy who really wanted to help people. The new dentist began to get suspicious when my joint failed to stay stable after I was finished with the bite splint and his modifications, so he did another scan on me. This is ten years after the first scan (remember, I said the surgeon saw "slight" damage to the tissue on the first scan). This new scan revealed that I now no longer have cartilage in the joint, on both sides - complete degeneration of the soft tissues and some damage to the bone. The dentist sat me down and had a talk with me after these results came in, and said that when he sees damage like this in cases like mine, that the damage to the joint is most likely autoimmune, and that, in his experinece, it is usually autoimmune. He has sent patients with cases like mine to Mayo Clinic. He said he will continue to see me as long as the treatment continues to offer me relief, but also said that I will probably have to see a dentist for this type of treatment for the rest of my life. He is not currently recommending surgery due to my young age and the fact that the treatment he provides manages my symptoms pretty well. I still see this dentist today, and probably will see this kind of dental specialist for the rest of my life, since they have helped with this issue the most. I did not inform him that I am 100% sure that I have celiac disease (due to my complete symptom remission upon gluten cessation). I didn't inform him because I thought it would be inappropriate due to not having a formal diagnosis. I was disappointed, because I had believed I had caught it BEFORE it had done permanent damage to my body. I had never suspected that my TMJ issues may be related to my other symptoms, and that the damage would end up complete and permanent. Luckily, I caught it about 6 months after my other joints started hurting, and they stopped hurting right after I went gluten free, and haven't hurt since. I of course did the necessary research after the results of the second scan, and found out that the TMJ is the most commonly involved joint in autoimmune disease of the intestines, and if mutliple joints are effected, it is usually the first one effected. This makes complete sense, since the TMJ is the most closely related joint to the intestines, and literally controls the opening that allows food passage into your intestines. I am here to tell you, that if anyone says there is no potential relationship between TMJ issues and celiac disease, they are absolutely wrong. Just google TMJ and Celiac disease, and read the scientific articles you find. Research on issues regarding the TMJ is relatively sparse, but you will find the association you're looking for validated.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @SuzanneL! Which tTG was that? tTG-IGA? tTG-IGG? Were there other celiac antibody tests run from that blood draw? Was total IGA measured? By some chance were you already cutting back on gluten by the time the blood draw was taken or just not eating much? For the celiac antibody tests to be accurate a person needs to be eating about 10g of gluten daily which is about 4-6 pieces of bread.
    • SuzanneL
      I've recently received a weak positive tTG, 6. For about six years, I've been sick almost everyday. I was told it was just my IBS. I have constant nausea. Sometimes after I eat, I have sharp, upper pain in my abdomen. I sometimes feel or vomit (bile) after eating. The doctor wanted me to try a stronger anti acid before doing an endoscopy. I'm just curious if these symptoms are pointing towards Celiac Disease? 
×
×
  • Create New...