Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

10 Year Old With Osteoporosis


researchmomma

Recommended Posts

researchmomma Contributor

I was here a few years back when I was trying to get testing for my daughter and you all were very helpful.  Especially Irish Heart and a few others and I am still very grateful for their help.  The GI did a gene test to rule out Celiac because of her GI issues with a negative Celiac blood panel.  She does not carry the DQ2 or DQ8 genes.  She was diagnosed as Non-Celiac Gluten Intolerance after we removed gluten even though the GI said there was no reason to go gluten-free.  The transformation when she went gluten-free was simply amazing and the GI was shocked so she gave her that diagnosis.  However, she cheats now and then because she isn't Celiac (we get to suffer with her bad moods because she feels lousy).  

 

I have a son who has been having GI issues and frequent non-traumatic fractures (6 in arm and 1 in his heel).  His Celiac blood work was negative (full panel) but his DEXA came back as 3 STD below normal which is Osteoporosis. He is low in Vit D but not critcally and all other blood work seems fine.

 

He is being tested for Osteogenesis Imperfecta Type V (types I-IV were ruled out by gene testing).  I have a feeling this will come back negative.

 

If that test comes back as negative, I want the GI to do an EGD (without gene testing) because one of the clinical reasons to do an EGD when a Celiac blood panel is negative, is unexplained osteoporosis.  This will be a battle since the GIs at Children's (where we have to go for insurance reasons) really rely on the blood panels (they do run a full blood panel).  

 

My question is this: is there anyone on this forum that had a similar situation with their child? I would love to be able to give the GI some examples of kids with negative blood work but diagnosed osteoporosis and then had positive biopsy for celiac disease.  Shooting for the moon, I am sure.  :rolleyes: 

 

We had planned to make my son gluten-free in Janaury regardless but now that he has been testing negative for Osteogenesis Imperfecta, I want to get that EGD to help rule out Celiac first.

 

Thank you in advance for your help.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



SMRI Collaborator

Have they ruled out other causes as well?  I know most go right to Celiac when there are GI issues involved but there are other conditions that could cause this.  Does he have any other symptoms--joint pain??  Have they tested him (and your daughter) for Cushings?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fimac Newbie

My oldest had low bone density growing up which had no known cause. He responded to calcium supplements and vit D. The vitamin D supplement had to be quite high to get him to absorb the calcium. He was tested for celiac when he was 12 with a biopsy, which came back negative although he had been on a low gluten diet , which although we did try to give him more gluten may not have been enough. His blood test at that time was negative although in the past he had a positive with the IGG test. 

He did test positive when he turned 16 so I suspect that he has a problem with absorption but not enough damage to get a positive test when he was younger. His younger brother is celiac so there is limited gluten in the house. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
MitziG Enthusiast

Curious to see what you find out. He certainly can have a negative panel and still be celiac. I would push for an endoscopy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
researchmomma Contributor

Just an update, all his tests for osteogenesis were negative but because he didn't have significantly low VitD and his is tall (albeit very thin), the endocrinologist didn't tihnk he could have Celiac.  

 

My son's blood work was indeed negative but he also is on a 70% gluten-free diet because he sister is intolerant.  There are days when he is gluten-free completely.

 

We contacted his GI to tell him we were going to put him on a gluten-free diet just to cover our bases and he wanted to see him first.  He was very concerned that he has unexplained osteoporosis as a 10 year old. Honestly, it is the first time I have felt like someone was actually concerned.   So he ordered an EGD and we are loading him with gluten.  The GI wants to do it soon but I would like him to be eating a lot of gluten for at least 2 months before he has it.  

 

I am praying this is celiac disease because the other reasons for osteoporosis in a child aren't all that great and Celiacs with osteo-p that go on GFD reverse their low bone density within a few years. That is a much better outcome.

 

I will keep you posted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cyclinglady Grand Master

Thanks! Please do keep us posted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
squirmingitch Veteran

Here is what the U of Chicago Celiac Disease Center (1 of the leading celiac centers) says about the gluten challenge for endoscopy:

Open Original Shared Link

 

"Prior to an endoscopic biopsy we recommend 2 weeks of eating gluten."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

I think your Endo is wrong. Just guessing that because your son is tall, he can not have celiac disease. Is this guy still in the dark ages? My friend is tall and slender and has celiac disease! Some folks are over weight and they have celiac disease. BTW, my Vitamin D levels were normal at my diagnosis. Everyone presents differently!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
researchmomma Contributor

Cyclinglady, I have to agree with you completely.

 

Well the endo is now fully engaged since my sons dexa scan showed osteoporosis.  It just seems that if he got osteo-p from Celiac he would have low calcium and vit D levels.  He has low vit D levels but normal calcium so that has confounded things with other physicians.

 

Anyway, still waiting for the EGD to be scheduled.

 

I am praying for Celiac. For once, I would like the easy button.  His sister is so clearly affected by gluten and I am betting he is too.

 

Thank you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
researchmomma Contributor

I just found this and it oddly gave me hope that he may have celiac disease:

 

Low Bone Mass and celiac disease Individuals with bone mineral density more than 2.5 standard deviations below the sexspecific peak bone mass are presumed to have osteoporosis. Low bone mass is common in subjects with newly diagnosed celiac disease. The mechanism for this effect may be due to malabsorption of vitamin D and calcium and decreased intake of calcium due to lactose intolerance. However, low bone mass may be due not only to osteoporosis but also to osteomalacia. While osteomalacia would therefore be expected to be the bone consequence of malabsorption, osteoporosis been described in celiac disease on bone biopsy. A raised alkaline phosphatase and other stigmata of osteomalacia may not always be present. It is possible that low bone mass is the only manifestation of celiac disease in a significant proportion of patients with this disorder and consequently, celiac disease may be an underdiagnosed cause of low bone mass in the general population. There are two ways in which the epidemiology of celiac disease and osteoporosis has been examined. The first is the screening of patients with osteoporosis for celiac disease. A limited number of screening studies for celiac disease among patients with low bone mass have been performed in Europe. celiac disease was found in 3.4 percent of adults with low bone mass. One Scandinavian study screened a pediatric population with low bone density and demonstrated a 5 percent prevalence of celiac disease. However, a carefully performed Canadian study in predominantly postmenopausal women with osteoporosis has not identified an increased prevalence of celiac disease. Why the difference? The early studies were predominantly based in serology alone without biopsy confirmation. It is also not clear if referral bias may have been factor. Our studies in a population-based setting have not identified an increased rate of celiac disease in over 290 patients with osteoporosis. Initial serological tests had a high rate of low-level positivity to tissue transglutaminase antibodies, however followup serological tests and biopsies only conformed celiac disease in 2/25 initially seropositive persons. This yielded an overall positive rate of only 2/290, which is close to the expected general population by screening but greater than that of the diagnosed rate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RMJ Mentor

 He has low vit D levels but normal calcium so that has confounded things with other physicians.

 

The body tries very hard to maintain calcium levels within the proper range - it does this by removing calcium from the bones if necessary. Normal calcium blood levels with low calcium in bones (osteoporosis) is explainable.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
researchmomma Contributor

My sons biopsy came back normal.  I don't have any other info but I will meet with the doctor next week to discuss other reasons for osteoporosis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,079
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Martyg24
    Newest Member
    Martyg24
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Tanner L
      Yes and variations in their sources for natural and artificial flavors could be the culprit as well.  I might be on the more sensitive side, but I do fine with McDonald's fries and burgers if I take the bun off, and other foods that have certified gluten free ingredients and only cross contamination risk preventing the gluten-free certification. 
    • trents
      Yes, the yeast could have been cultured on a wheat substrate. But another batch may use a yeast extract cultured on something else that did not contain gluten. These food companies will switch suppliers according to what is the cheapest source at any given time. I take it you are a pretty sensitive celiac.
    • Tanner L
      The regular cheddar and sour cream Ruffles have yeast extract, which is probably the source of gluten.  Pinpointing the exact cause of gluten exposure is always tricky, but I've come to learn my initial reaction to gluten compared to the ongoing symptoms that will occur days, weeks, and sometimes months later.  
    • plumbago
      Yes, that's probably best. (Honestly, that is an extraordinarily high number, I've never seen anything like that. I repeated my blood tests (not taken while pregnant BTW); before giving up cake, pizza, and beer, I wanted to know for sure! You don't wanna mess around with anything while pregnant. Congratulations and best of luck!
    • trents
      Here are the ingredients listed for the regular sour cream and cheddar Ruffles: Potatoes, Vegetable Oil (Canola, Corn, Soybean, and/or Sunflower Oil), Maltodextrin (Made from Corn), Salt, Whey, Cheddar Cheese (Milk, Cheese Cultures, Salt, Enzymes), Onion Powder, Monosodium Glutamate, Natural and Artificial Flavors, Buttermilk, Sour Cream (Cultured Cream, Skim Milk), Lactose, Butter (Cream, Salt), Sodium Caseinate, Yeast Extract, Citric Acid, Skim Milk, Blue Cheese (Milk, Cheese Cultures, Salt, Enzymes), Lactic Acid, Garlic Powder, Artificial Color (Yellow 6, Yellow 5), Whey Protein Isolate, and Milk Protein Concentrate. CONTAINS MILK INGREDIENTS. Here are the ingredients listed for the baked ones: INGREDIENTS: DRIED POTATOES, CORN STARCH, CORN OIL, SUGAR, MALTODEXTRIN (MADE FROM CORN), SALT, SOY LECITHIN, DEXTROSE, WHEY, WHEY PROTEIN CONCENTRATE, ONION POWDER, CHEDDAR CHEESE (MILK, CHEESE CULTURES, SALT, ENZYMES), MONOSODIUM GLUTAMATE, BLUE CHEESE (MILK, CHEESE CULTURES, SALT, ENZYMES), CITRIC ACID, ARTIFICIAL COLOR (YELLOW 6 LAKE, YELLOW 5 LAKE, YELLOW 5, YELLOW 6), SKIM MILK, NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL FLAVORS, GARLIC POWDER, LACTIC ACID, DISODIUM INOSINATE, AND DISODIUM GUANYLATE. CONTAINS MILK AND SOY INGREDIENTS   They look a lot the same except for the baked product contains soy. What do you suppose is the hidden source of gluten in the regular Ruffles that is not found in the baked ones? Could you be mistaken in attributing your reaction to the Ruffles? Could it have been from gluten in something else you ate around the same time or even a non-gluten tummy event?
×
×
  • Create New...