Jump to content

  • You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

No Serology Needed?

Emmadax

Recommended Posts

Emmadax Newbie
Emmadax
Posted

Hi Everyone,

 

So, I was diagnosed with celiac disease following an endoscopy (x2) and a colonoscopy because of loose stool. It was found that I had a small peptic ulcer which has since healed and the GI doc. told me that I had celiac disease and microscopic colitis. I went on a Gluten free diet but the loose stool hasn't stopped. I go 2-3 times a day. Because of "life" I was delayed in getting the serology done and read that one should really be on a normal diet in order for a proper result for the serology. I called the doc to ask her if I should go back to a normal diet and then get the blood test done but she told me that, despite my still having the very loose stool and being on a gluten free diet, I could forget about the serology test and that what I experiencing was "normal'. It never used to be loose...it was always normal and formed.

Now I am confused. I feel that having the serology blood work done would be definiative but that would mean going onto a regular diet for 6 weeks.

I'm asking what you all think. She told me that my disease is benign and to just keep going with the gluten free diet.

Does anyone have "normal' bowel movements or should I consider my loose, sometimes watery stools "normal"?

Thanks

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

Welcome to the board. Are you on any medication for the MC? Some meds cause loose stool and if that is the case then things should improve a bit more when you are off the medication. Do be sure to check and make sure that any meds you take are gluten free.

That said it can take some time to heal. How long have you been gluten free? It is a good idea to drop dairy products at first if you haven't already. Most of us can add them back in after we have healed a bit.

 Be sure to read the Newbie 101 thread at the top of the Coping section as there is more to being gluten free that just foods. There are things we need to do to prevent cross contamination and stuff that has to be replaced in the kitchen like the toaster and cutting boards, as one example.

I hope you are feeling better soon. 

murphy203 Rookie
murphy203
Posted

Hi Emma, I am new at this, but I am in sort of the same boat with positive biopsies. Both my PC and GI suggested HLA genetic tests, which cant rule celiac disease in but can rule it out. Its also indicated in national and international journal articles. There is no need to be on a gluten diet for these tests.

Emmadax Newbie
Emmadax
Posted
  • Author

Welcome to the board. Are you on any medication for the MC? Some meds cause loose stool and if that is the case then things should improve a bit more when you are off the medication. Do be sure to check and make sure that any meds you take are gluten free.

That said it can take some time to heal. How long have you been gluten free? It is a good idea to drop dairy products at first if you haven't already. Most of us can add them back in after we have healed a bit.

 Be sure to read the Newbie 101 thread at the top of the Coping section as there is more to being gluten free that just foods. There are things we need to do to prevent cross contamination and stuff that has to be replaced in the kitchen like the toaster and cutting boards, as one example.

I hope you are feeling better soon. 

Hi raven,

I'm not on any meds for the MC as it's microscopic and the Doc felt that it was so benign that it wasn't worth worrying about. I was on a PPI (Protonix...a proton pump inhibitor) for the ulcer and read that it could cause loose BMs. I am now off of it as the ulcer is healed. I've been on a gluten-free diet for about 6 weeks but did not get the serology done. It was a "duh" on my part because I should have realized that moving so quickly to a gluten-free diet would result in a false negative. That's why I called my GI doc. Now she doesn't think that having the serology test done is necessary. Thanks so much for your input!

Emmadax Newbie
Emmadax
Posted
  • Author

Hi Emma, I am new at this, but I am in sort of the same boat with positive biopsies. Both my PC and GI suggested HLA genetic tests, which cant rule celiac disease in but can rule it out. Its also indicated in national and international journal articles. There is no need to be on a gluten diet for these tests.

Hi Murphy,

Thanks for your reply. No-one suggested HLA genetic testing but I doubt it would show much. There is a history of GI troubles in my family but not celiac disease. I may just have to live with the loose BMs as my GI thought it was "perfectly normal". I must say that I'm tempted to go back to a normal diet but it would have to be for 6 weeks for the serology to be somewhat accurate...but then I'd be back to square one.

Thanks again.

kareng Grand Master
kareng
Posted

6 weeks isn't very long. It can take a year to get the whole system healed and balanced and working again. And then there is the colitis causing issues.....

nvsmom Community Regular
nvsmom
Posted

Some frank poop talk:

 

Poops can can a long time to change.  In my case, I had C for my entire life but I thought it was normal.  Everything was well formed but in hindsight, it was packed way too tightly.  Take a look at the Bristol Stool Form Scale to check and see if your BM's were actually normal.  Open Original Shared Link

 

As I said, I thought I was normal, and managed to go evry day or so, but looking at the chart, I was usually a 2 who switched to 1 or 3 on occassion.  When I was gluten-free for about 9 months, my BM's changed to a 4 or 5, with a 6 once in a while... I honestly thought I had D.  And going a couple of times a day was just odd.  My toilet paper bill quadrupled.  LOL  ;)

 

I babbled.  My point is that you should make sure that your BMs are actually abnormal.  Maybe it is just a new normal that you aren't used to.

 

You could always try testing now even though you are gluten-free.  The tTG IgA and tTG IgG are the slowest tests to get back to normal; in some it can remain elevated for weeks, months, or even a year or so after going gluten-free.   The EMA IgA, DGP IgA and DGP IgG tend to reflect a gluten-free diet faster. 

 

It sounds like you already have a diagnosis of celiac disease, so you don't need to put yourself through a 2-3 month gluten challenge (and sickness) to re-confirm your diagnosis.  Maybe try the tissue transglutaminase (tTG) tests now, and see it it shows anything. It may be normal, indicating that you are starting to heal, or it may still be elevated which means your recovery will take more time... As Kareng said, 6 weeks isn't very long, and some celiacs (like me) tend to feel worse before they get better.  Hang in there.

 

Hi Emma, I am new at this, but I am in sort of the same boat with positive biopsies. Both my PC and GI suggested HLA genetic tests, which cant rule celiac disease in but can rule it out. Its also indicated in national and international journal articles. There is no need to be on a gluten diet for these tests.

 

Unfortunately negative HLA (DQ2 and DQ8) tests will not rule out celiac disease, but it would make it unlikely that you could contract it.  About 97% of all celiacs have one of the two HLA types, the remaining 3% of celiacs do not.  It is possible to have celiac disease wih a negative HLA test, it is just very unusual.... We do have a couple of board members in that situation though.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


murphy203 Rookie
murphy203
Posted

nsv, I am challening you on a point cautiously as you are a moderator, but both the national and international guidelines (which are both frequently referenced on this site, and hugely informative) recommend HLA for those of us with ambiguous testing, especially those of us with biopsy positive results. There are many things that can lead to a positive biopsy, and it is important to rule OUT what ISN'T, just like with neuro testing.

nvsmom Community Regular
nvsmom
Posted

Hi Murphy 203,

You are correct that HLA testing can help rule things out, but with a positive test, or biopsy, you probably have your answer... probably. You are correct that the HLA can help clarify some questionable test results, but from what I have read, and heard from a minority of celiacs, I believe there are a very small number celiacs who do not have the HLA genes.  I could be completely wrong...  I'm waiting for more information to sway me, but I haven't been inclined to change my mind yet. Many don't agree with me, and that is fine with me since they very well may be correct. You may be right, and most will probably agree with you. :)

 

 It's a shame that all of our celiac disease tests aren't 100% specific to celiac disease.  Knowing there is a 5% or so chance of a positive not being caused by celiac disease can make trusting a diagnosis of celiac disease difficult for some. It would do away with some of the need for the HLA tests.

 

I do firmly believe that a positive test is almost always positive for a reason though, and that reason is celiac disease almost all of the time.  I think of it like a pregnancy test.  Some people get the very dark lines whereas others get a faint line but 9 months later it will almost always mean the same thing.  

 

Best wishes.

nvsmom Community Regular
nvsmom
Posted

nsv, I am challening you on a point cautiously as you are a moderator, but both the national and international guidelines (which are both frequently referenced on this site, and hugely informative) recommend HLA for those of us with ambiguous testing, especially those of us with biopsy positive results. There are many things that can lead to a positive biopsy, and it is important to rule OUT what ISN'T, just like with neuro testing.

 

Hi Murphy 203,

You are correct that HLA testing can help rule things out, but with a positive test, or biopsy, you probably have your answer... probably. You are correct that the HLA can help clarify some questionable test results, but from what I have read, and heard from a minority of celiacs, I believe there are a very small number celiacs who do not have the HLA genes.  I could be completely wrong...  I'm waiting for more information to sway me, but I haven't been inclined to change my mind yet. Many don't agree with me, and that is fine with me since they very well may be correct. You may be right, and most will probably agree with you.  :)

 

 It's a shame that all of our celiac disease tests aren't 100% specific to celiac disease.  Knowing there is a 5% or so chance of a positive not being caused by celiac disease can make trusting a diagnosis of celiac disease difficult for some. It would do away with some of the need for the HLA tests.

 

I do firmly believe that a positive test is almost always positive for a reason though, and that reason is celiac disease almost all of the time.  I think of it like a pregnancy test.  Some people get the very dark lines whereas others get a faint line but 9 months later it will almost always mean the same thing.  

 

Best wishes.

 

ps.  Please feel free to challenge me.   :)  I think I was made a mod because I like to talk a lot around here, and have a propensity towards spewing out facts and questioning the medical community.   ;) LOL

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,077
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442
    terrificterry
    Newest Member
    terrificterry
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      Edy's and Dreyer's ice cream

      By Aretaeus Cappadocia · Posted

      Sigh. I posted this yesterday based on the Safeway website. I went back again today to their website to double check. On the page where they are selling Vanilla Bean flavor, it has a distinct Certified Gluten Free label. Other flavors on the Safeway website didn't have the gluten-free statement. Today I went into the store. None of the flavors I looked at, including Vanilla Bean, have a Gluten Free statement. Is it safe? Who knows. The ingredients are either safe or nearly safe (some have "natural flavor"). There are warnings about "contains milk and soy" but not about wheat - this implies they are safe, but again, who knows. On the other hand, every flavor I checked of their Slow Churn line of ice creams has wheat as an ingredient. 100% not safe.
    • knitty kitty
      Edy's and Dreyer's ice cream

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      Do keep in mind that many of the newly diagnosed have lactose intolerance.  This is because the villi lining the intestinal tract are damaged, and can no longer make the enzyme lactAse which breaks down the milk sugar lactOse.  When the villi grow back (six months to two years), they can again produce the enzyme lactAse, and lactose intolerance is resolved.  However, some people (both those with and without Celiac Disease) are genetically programmed to stop producing lactase as they age.   Do be aware that many processed foods, including ice cream, use Microbial Transglutaminase, a food additive commonly called "meat glue," used to enhance texture and flavor.  This microbial transglutaminase has the same immunogenicity as tissue transglutaminase which the body produces in response to gluten in people with Celiac Disease.  Tissue Transglutaminase (tTg IgA) is measured to diagnose Celiac Disease in blood tests.  Microbial Transglutaminase acts the same as Tissue Transglutaminase, causing increased intestinal permeability and inflammation.   New findings show that microbial transglutaminase may be able to trigger Celiac Disease and other autoimmune and neurodegenerative diseases.   Microbial Transglutaminase is not required to be listed on ingredients labels as it's considered a processing aid, not an ingredient in the U.S.  Microbial Transglutaminase has been GRAS for many years, but that GRAS standing is being questioned more and more as the immunogenicity of microbial transglutaminase is being discovered. Interesting Reading:  Microbial Transglutaminase Is a Very Frequently Used Food Additive and Is a Potential Inducer of Autoimmune/Neurodegenerative Diseases https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8537092/
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      Edy's and Dreyer's ice cream

      By Aretaeus Cappadocia · Posted

      There is a 10 year old post in this forum on Edy's and Dreyer's ice cream. The information is somewhat outdated and the thread is closed to further comment, so here is a new one. Edy's And Dreyer's Grand Vanilla Bean Ice Cream - 1.5 Quart is labeled "Gluten Free". This is a different answer than years gone by. I don't know the answer for any other flavor at this moment. On 1 May, 2026, Edy's website says: "As a general rule, the gluten in Edy's and Dreyer's® frozen dessert products is present only in the added bakery products, such as cookies, cake or brownies. We always label the eight major food allergens on our package by their common name. We recommend to always check the label for the most current information before purchasing and/or consuming a product. The exception to this rule is our Slow Churned French Silk frozen dairy dessert, which contains gluten in the natural flavors." https://www.icecream.com/us/en/brands/edys-and-dreyers/faq It seems that Edy's and Dreyer's are more celiac-friendly than they were 10 years ago. Once I found enough information to make today's buying decision, I stopped researching.
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      EDG 3 years ago fine, now it shows focal villous blunting,

      By Aretaeus Cappadocia · Posted

      probably not your situation @Mimiof2, but allow me to add one more to @trents list of celiac-mimics: "olmesartan-induced sprue-like enteropathy"  
    • knitty kitty
      Terrible Neurological Symptoms

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      My dad had an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.  Fortunately, it was discovered during an exam.  The doctor could feel my dad's heart beating in his stomach/abdomen.  The aneurysm burst when the doctor first touched it in surgery.  Since he was already hooked up to the bypass machine, my dad survived ten more years.  Close call! Triple A's can press on the nerves in the spinal cord causing leg pain.  I'm wondering if bowing the head might have increased the pressure on an aneurysm and then the nerves.   https://gulfcoastsurgeons.com/understanding-abdominal-aortic-aneurysm-symptoms-and-causes/ Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Presenting as a Claudication https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4040638/
×
×
  • Create New...