Jump to content
  • You are not alone. Join Celiac.com for trusted gluten-free answers and forum support.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

Can treatment for Giardia reverse active Celiac


Sugarcube

Recommended Posts

Sugarcube Rookie
(edited)

Hi,

In a nutshell, encouraged by a >84% reduction in my tTg IgA level (4 weeks after treating giardia), I was wondering if celiac can reverse into latent celiac after treating Giardia? If so over what time period?

I’m a male in my 30s, with no family history of Celiac and I have not experienced any major celiac related symptoms.

In December 2015, I was diagnosed with Giardia (after a biopsy) and completed a course of a antibiotics

Although only a month has passed since taking the antibotics, I have noticed a major change in my blood tests results.  Does it seem possible that my celiac is becoming gradually latent rather than active? Perhaps Giardia led me to become temporarily gluten sensitive?

July 2015: Contracted Giardia from Asia.

August 2015: Blood tests (With Giardia) , whilst on a normal gluten diet

  • Endomysial AB IGA: Positive
  • Gliadin IgG: Negative: 4.5 U/ml (Negative reference range <7)
  • Gliadin IgA:  Borderline/Equivocal:  8.8 U/ml (Negative reference range <7, Equivocal: 7 - 10)
  • t-Transglutaminase IgA:Positive: >128 U/ml (Normal reference range 0 - 10)
  • Reticulin IgA:  Positive
  • IGA: 3.35 g/L (Reference range 0.70-4.00)

January 2016: (Post treatment for Giardia), whilst on a normal gluten diet

  • Endomysial AB IGA:  Positive
  • Gliadin IgG:  Negative: 5.0 U/ml (Negative reference range <7)
  • Gliadin IgA:  Negative:  3.7 U/ml (Negative reference range <7)
  • t-Transglutaminase IgA: Positive:  21 U/ml (Normal reference range 0 - 10)
  • Reticulin IgA: Negative
  • IGA: 2.89 g/L (Reference range 0.70-4.00)

Background Research:

"An active coeliac disease status, with intestinal mucosa atrophy, may regress to a latent coeliac"
"Serum anti-endomysial and anti-tTG antibody behaviour is not a permanent, life-long feature"

 

Edited by Sugarcube
Typo
  • 3 months later...

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

SugarCube,

I saw your other posting today.  I can not believe that I missed your original posting!  Maybe I was doing something super fun that week (oh, my parents were visiting!).  

Your celiac blood panel was positive and you had intestinal damage that was caused by both celiac disease and Giardia?  After treating the Giardia, your CD resolved or went into remission?  Are you consuming a diet containing gluten still?  Have you had a follow-up biopsy?  

I read your link to the study, but that feature just one patient (a child).  Have you found any other larger studies?  Inquiring minds want to know!  ;)

  

 

Sugarcube Rookie

I haven’t found any large scale studies on this, but only a handful of individual case reports suggesting that in rare cases giardia can temporarily mimic celiac (both the serology & villous atrophy) until it is treated.   I think this is a  complex matter as giardia effects patients differently (most are asymptomatic whilst others suffer from chronic symptoms including malabsorption) for reasons that may not be well understood.

In my case - My GI agrees that Giardia can directly cause villous atrophy that cannot be distinguished from Celiac.  As the healing of the villi can be a slow process, I will schedule a repeat endoscopy 6-12 months after my giardia was treated.  

Ttg antibodies can also take 6-12+months to completely normalise, especially if the starting levels are high. 6 months would have elapsed at the end of this month, so will schedule a repeat test, hoping for a normal Ttg result to prove the theory.  

I have decided to remain on a normal gluten diet until it can be proven that I’m a celiac and not just suffering from a giardia infection.  I have reason to be optimistic as my Gliadin IgA levels are negative (not iga deficient) and also given the sharp decrease in ttg levels 4 weeks after giardia was treated.

cyclinglady Grand Master

So interesting!  Please keep us posted!  

Fenrir Community Regular

I'm not a doctor or expert but I've done a lot of reading and I believe anything that causes major inflammation for the small intestine can cause false positives for celiac antibodies. Sometimes people with Crohn's will have positive celiac tests as well.  I wouldn't be surprised in the least that someone with a bad case of Giardia would come up positive.  Now, eventually, as you fully recover from the giardia infection you should go back to normal levels but if you don't you most likely have Celiac as well. 

From what I understand, Celiac doesn't go into remission though it can be latent in people for years. 

  • 2 years later...
Sugarcube Rookie

Just to update this thread. I recently had a repeat ttg test (on a normal gluten diet). My ttg are now within the normal range.  This proves the theory that other conditions e.g. parasites (especially Giardia) can temporarily mimic celiac until they cleared.

 

 

  • 4 years later...
Ramncats Newbie

I highly doubt that the damage done to the intestines by giardia lamblia infection can ever be undone. I am 72 year old female who contracted giardia lamblia in Mexico at the age of 17.  The giardiasis was successfully treated several months later. However, decades later I became first lactose intolerant, and then gluten-intolerant. I suffer from fructose intolerance, must adhere to strict gluten free diet. If I am recovering from accidental gluten cross contamination as I am currently, I simply cannot digest dairy (even with lactase supplements) or fructose. It will take months for my small intestines to heal from the gluten. After that, if I am lucky and take plenty of lactase enzyme I will be able to digest dairy. Also after my guts heal from accidental gluten ingestion, I should be able to again eat some fruit. 
The idea that damage done by giardiasis can ever go away is a pipe-dream in my opinion. 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Scott Adams Grand Master

This is an older thread, but @Ramncats I don't believe that giardia lamblia could cause such issues--especially decades after it was treated. However, the use of antibiotics in children has been linked to an increased risk for celiac disease. Were treated with antibiotics for this, or something else when you were younger?

Ramncats Newbie

Scott, there are medical articles on the internet affirming that celiac disease, micro-colitis and other digestive issues can set up shop later in life after treated giardia lamblia. I believe my Giardia was probably treated with metronidazole. And like most Americans I have been treated with various antibiotics over the course of my lifetime. Once a person has celiac disease or gluten intolerance, that condition will be lifelong. 
I believe in the value of vaccines and of medical pharmaceuticals. I hope you do too. 

knitty kitty Grand Master

@Ramncats,

Metronidazole is a type of antibiotic that destroys Thiamine Vitamin B 1 in the body.  

Undiagnosed thiamine deficiency and the toxicity of Metronidazole effect ones health. 

Replacing thiamine improves health even years after being treated.  

Learn more here....

https://www.hormonesmatter.com/metronidazole-mitochondrial-nightmare/

Hope this helps!

Scott Adams Grand Master

I think my point here is that anyone who gets celiac disease later in life may look back and blame various illnesses or treatments for their bad luck, but so far I've seen no scientific research that links a prior giardia lamblia infection and treatment with an increased risk of celiac disease. I have seen studies that link certain viral infections, and antibiotic treatments in childhood, with an increased risk. You mentioned "I highly doubt that the damage done to the intestines by giardia lamblia infection can ever be undone," and of you only had this for a few weeks, once treated this infection should not cause any lifelong issues.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - CC90 replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    2. - Wheatwacked replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    3. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Origins of Celiac Disease
      19

      Do Antibiotics in Babies Increase Celiac Disease Risk Later in Life? (+Video)

    4. - trents replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    5. - cristiana replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Coeliac or not coeliac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,187
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442

    Dennis E. Schertz
    Newest Member
    Dennis E. Schertz
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • CC90
      Hi Cristiana   Yes I've had the biopsy results showing normal villi and intestinal mucosa.  The repeat endoscopy (requested by the gastro doc) would be to take samples from further into the intestine than the previous endoscopy reached.      
    • Wheatwacked
      Transglutaminase IgA is the gold-standard blood test for celiac disease. Sensitivity of over 90% and specificity of 95–99%. It rarely produces false positives.  An elevated level means your immune system is reacting to gluten.  Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS) does not typically cause high levels of tTG-IgA. Unfortunately the protocols for a diagnosis of Celiac Disease are aimed at proving you don't have it, leaving you twisting in the wind. Genetic testing and improvement on a trial gluten free diet, also avoiding milk protein, will likely show improvement in short order if it is Celiac; but will that satisfy the medical system for a diagnosis? If you do end up scheduling a repeat endoscopy, be sure to eat up to 10 grams of gluten for 8 - 12 weeks.  You want  to create maximum damage. Not a medical opinion, but my vote is yes.
    • trents
      Cristiana asks a very relevant question. What looks normal to the naked eye may not look normal under the microscope.
    • cristiana
      Hello @CC90 Can I just ask a question: have you actually been told that your biopsy were normal, or just that your stomach, duodenum and small intestine looked normal? The reason I ask is that when I had my endoscopy, I was told everything looked normal.  My TTG score was completely through the roof at the time, greater than 100 which was then the cut off max. for my local lab.  Yet when my biopsy results came back, I was told I was stage 3 on the Marsh scale.  I've come across the same thing with at least one other person on this forum who was told everything looked normal, but the report was not talking about the actual biopsy samples, which had to be looked at through a microscope and came back abnormal.
    • trents
      My bad. I should have reread your first post as for some reason I was thinking your TTG was within normal range. While we are talking about celiac antibody blood work, you might not realize that there is not yet an industry standard rating scale in use for those blood tests so just having a raw number with out the reference scale can be less than helpful, especially when the test results are marginal. But a result of 87.4 is probably out of the normal range and into the positive range for any lab's scale. But back to the question of why your endoscopy/biopsy didn't show damage despite significantly positive TTG. Because they took the trouble to take seven samples, it is not likely they missed damage because of it being patchy. The other possibility is that there hasn't been time for the damage to show up. How long have you been experiencing the symptoms you describe in your first post? Having said all that, there are other medical conditions that can cause elevated TTG-IGA values and sometimes they are transient issues. I think it would be wise to ask for another TTG-IGA before the repeat endoscopy to see if it is still high.  Knitty kitty's suggestion of getting genetic testing done is also something to think about. About 35% of the general population will have one or both genes that are markers for the potential to develop active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develop celiac disease. So, having a celiac potential gene cannot be used to definitively diagnose celiac disease but it can be realistically used to rule it out if you don't have either of the genes. If your symptoms persist, and all testing is complete and the follow-up endoscopy/biopsy still shows no damage, you should consider trialing a gluten free diet for a few months to see if symptoms improve. If not celiac disease, you could have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). 
×
×
  • Create New...