Jump to content
  • You are not alone. Join Celiac.com for trusted gluten-free answers and forum support.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

Enterolab


JerryK

Recommended Posts

barbara3675 Rookie

Had the full panel and it was the best money I could have spent as I was one of the ones that came up negative in testing at the doctor's office. I also found out I carry a gene which can explain where my granddaughter came up with full-blown celiac disease. I am gluten-intolerant. There have been some symptoms that have plagued me all my life that have gotten worse in later life/now they are gone due to eating gluten-free. It is my feeling that this disease can manifest itself in many ways other than the typical ones. I have had times when I have been so sick that I could not stand up, and I will call them gluten incidents.....I just had to go to bed and sleep it off or wear it off. I can relate it to being very tired and having some major gluten food, like a sub sandwich and an ice cream cone or lot of pizza or something like that. I am 61 now, but looking back, it is very clear. I was diagnosed when I was 59. It can come anytime. Do not hesitate to use Enterolab. Barbara


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



celiacgirls Apprentice
I have to say that I'm still a bit skeptical of enterolab. I've taken a printout of the website to 3 drs. - pediatrician, ped. GI and an allergist - and all said it wasn't a good test. I'm NOT saying Drs. are always right, but it concerns me that I can't find anyone in the med. community that thinks enterolab really works. Anyone else come up against this?

I was concerned about this so I e-mailed Enterolab to see if they could recommend a doctor in my area. There is a doctor here in Austin who uses their lab so I made an appointment with him. Interestingly, I hear from someone who knows this doctor that his wife has celiac.

I also asked them about a pedi GI and there is a doctor who has used them in the past so I may make an appointment with him for one of my daughters and see what he has to say about Enterolab.

In my extended family, 10 people have been tested by Enterolab and 10 have been positive. Except for my sister, I am not at all surprised by any of them being positive. 4 of them are very short and skinny and 1 has stomach problems. So my family is understandably somewhat skeptical. But for me, the results speak for themselves.

CarlaB Enthusiast
I was concerned about this so I e-mailed Enterolab to see if they could recommend a doctor in my area. There is a doctor here in Austin who uses their lab so I made an appointment with him. Interestingly, I hear from someone who knows this doctor that his wife has celiac.

I also asked them about a pedi GI and there is a doctor who has used them in the past so I may make an appointment with him for one of my daughters and see what he has to say about Enterolab.

In my extended family, 10 people have been tested by Enterolab and 10 have been positive. Except for my sister, I am not at all surprised by any of them being positive. 4 of them are very short and skinny and 1 has stomach problems. So my family is understandably somewhat skeptical. But for me, the results speak for themselves.

One of my daughters and I tested positive, but another one of my daughters tested negative. So, not everyone tests positive!! I think the reason so many do is that most of us are pretty sure gluten is what's making us sick before we shell out the money for the tests!

AndreaB Contributor

My husband has 2 celiac genes but he is not gluten intolerant.

Myself, my oldest son and my daughter are all intolerant and either have 2 celiac genes or 1 celiac and 1 gluten sensitivitly gene. My baby hasn't been tested yet.

We got all our results from enterolab. So that is 3 positive and 1 negative for us.

My husband and I are also soy intolerant.

carrielynn Apprentice
I have to say that I'm still a bit skeptical of enterolab. I've taken a printout of the website to 3 drs. - pediatrician, ped. GI and an allergist - and all said it wasn't a good test. I'm NOT saying Drs. are always right, but it concerns me that I can't find anyone in the med. community that thinks enterolab really works. Anyone else come up against this?

We see very good doctors who we trust who could not figure out what our (now) 6 year old was allergic to that was causing his severe eczema. We took our child to 4 doctors in our city and to one doctor in another city that has several medical hospitals with top doctors in the state. No-one could figure anything out.

Then we went to see a PhD nutritionist in our city who ordered a celiac workup. This guy seems to have a dual-reputation, depending on who you talk to. If you talk to the doctors who we respect, they think he's a quack, especially our allergist, who we really like a lot. If you talk to people who have seen him for their problems, they think he's a godsend.

Anyway, this guy told us that our son had celiac disease based on the test results and had us take him off of gluten and dairy. Within 3 weeks our child's personality had changed dramatically. He went from being a moody tired little guy to being a happy energetic little boy. We'd been so focused on the state of his skin that we hadn't noticed the personality problems until they went away. (Life was unhappy all the way around in our household because of his problem.)

His skin did get better, but he still itches and scratches constantly, so he's still tearing his skin up. We've since added dairy back and in and we don't notice any difference with the itching... if he's on it or off of it.

We decided to do some more research on the celiac situation, since the only person who told us he had it was the Phd nutritionist. We did the Enterolab genetic test for him and it came back positive for a celiac gene and positive for a gluten sensitive gene. So my husband and I are getting tested to see who has these genes. Based on those results we'll do further testing. Either one of us (or both) could have the celiac gene. It could be me because I have all these little health quirks and he doesn't. However, he has relatives who have similar skin problems that my son has, as well as depression issues and migraines and other things.

Anyway, back to the point of your message. I feel like I'm in the middle here. I really do respect all these doctors and I think they are smart. But the reality is, the only thing they ever offered my son was steroids, both oral and topical. The steroids definitely treated the symptoms and made his skin look better, but they didn't treat the cause. These doctors are not trained to find the cause. It doesn't mean they aren't smart or they don't care. But their training is oriented towards treating symptoms.

mart Contributor

My son had the complete Enterolab celiac panel done. We did because I was still worried about malabsorption issues after almost one year gluten free. The results showed no sensitivity whatsoever to gluten (but then again, he's been gluten-free for almost a year). Also, no problems with malabsorption. However, the swab dna test was positive with 2 celiac genes. I don't know, but this tells me the test is accurate.

Anyway, I freaked out about putting poop in the freezer too. We wrapped it in many layers of plastic bags overnight and then put the container in the DHL package in the freezer in the morning of the day it was to be picked up. When the DHL guy came to get it, the package was in the freezer and even now I have to smile when I remember what he asked me. He took the cold package and said, "wow, what's in here, flowers?" I told him there were in fact flowers in there...lovely and fragrant.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - cristiana replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    2. - CC90 replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    3. - Wheatwacked replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    4. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Origins of Celiac Disease
      19

      Do Antibiotics in Babies Increase Celiac Disease Risk Later in Life? (+Video)

    5. - trents replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,188
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442

    Lhughes327
    Newest Member
    Lhughes327
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      Hi @CC90 Ah... that is very interesting.  Although it is very annoying for you to have to go through it all again, I would say that almost sounds like an admission that they didn't look far enough last time?   I could be wrong, but I would not be at all surprised if they find something on the next attempt.  Coeliac damage can be very patchy, as I understand it, so that's why my own gastroenterologist always likes to point out that he's taken lots of samples!  In the kindest possibly way (you don't want to upset the person doing the procedure!) I'd be inclined to tell them what happened last time and to ask them in person to take samples lower down, as  if your health system is anything like the one in my country, communication between GPs, consultants and hospitals isn't always very good.  You don't want the same mistake to be made again. You say that your first endoscopy was traumatic?  May I ask, looking at your spelling of coeliac, was this done at an NHS hospital in England?  The reason for the question is that one of my NHS diagnosed friends was not automatically offered a sedative and managed without one.  Inspired by her, I tried to have an endoscopy one time, in a private setting, without one, so that I could recover quicker, but I had to request sedative in the end it was so uncomfortable.    I am sorry that you will have to go through a gluten challenge again but to make things easier, ensure you eat things containing gluten that you will miss should you have to go gluten free one day. 😂 I was told to eat 2 slices of normal wholemeal bread or the equivalent every day in the weeks before , but I also opted for Weetabix and dozens of Penguin chocolate biscuits.  (I had a very tight headache across my temple for days before the procedure, which I thought was interesting as I had that frequently growing up. - must have been a coeliac symptom!)  Anyway, I do hope you soon get the answers you are looking for and do keep us posted. Cristiana  
    • CC90
      Hi Cristiana   Yes I've had the biopsy results showing normal villi and intestinal mucosa.  The repeat endoscopy (requested by the gastro doc) would be to take samples from further into the intestine than the previous endoscopy reached.      
    • Wheatwacked
      Transglutaminase IgA is the gold-standard blood test for celiac disease. Sensitivity of over 90% and specificity of 95–99%. It rarely produces false positives.  An elevated level means your immune system is reacting to gluten.  Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS) does not typically cause high levels of tTG-IgA. Unfortunately the protocols for a diagnosis of Celiac Disease are aimed at proving you don't have it, leaving you twisting in the wind. Genetic testing and improvement on a trial gluten free diet, also avoiding milk protein, will likely show improvement in short order if it is Celiac; but will that satisfy the medical system for a diagnosis? If you do end up scheduling a repeat endoscopy, be sure to eat up to 10 grams of gluten for 8 - 12 weeks.  You want  to create maximum damage. Not a medical opinion, but my vote is yes.
    • trents
      Cristiana asks a very relevant question. What looks normal to the naked eye may not look normal under the microscope.
    • cristiana
      Hello @CC90 Can I just ask a question: have you actually been told that your biopsy were normal, or just that your stomach, duodenum and small intestine looked normal? The reason I ask is that when I had my endoscopy, I was told everything looked normal.  My TTG score was completely through the roof at the time, greater than 100 which was then the cut off max. for my local lab.  Yet when my biopsy results came back, I was told I was stage 3 on the Marsh scale.  I've come across the same thing with at least one other person on this forum who was told everything looked normal, but the report was not talking about the actual biopsy samples, which had to be looked at through a microscope and came back abnormal.
×
×
  • Create New...