Jump to content
  • You are not alone. Join Celiac.com for trusted gluten-free answers and forum support.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

Doctor Visit Today - Totally Mortified (:


JaneWhoLovesRain

Recommended Posts

Hopeful1950 Explorer

Me 5!! When my DH was at it's worst with oozing lesions I never got a secondary infection either. I have always tried to keep hands/nails clean, but as you all know sometimes when the itch was sooooo bad I didn't care about stuff like that.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



pricklypear1971 Community Regular

Steroids and antihistamines both suppress the immune system to a degree. I don't know exactly how it works with dh, but personally, I got in a vicious cycle with antihistamines and steroids - and it did a lot of damage to my adrenals and not much for my rash. My rash receded with prednisone and steroid shots but I also was tripping 24/7, and my blood sugar became unstable.

Topical steroids will keep the rash dampened. Multiple antihistamines will do the same. In combination it may help. But you can't keep it up forever.

I had success with going gluten-free (rash didn't get worse, and reduced quite a bit), and then got off the steroid cream after a few months. My rash healed and then blew up when I added an iodine containing multivitamin. In the interim, I was sensitive to other things like msg or artificial preservatives in gluten-free food. Then I tried low iodine and it worked instantly. My rash (which looked like someone had burned my skin with a curling iron) healed in 2 weeks and I was able to add back iodine foods slowly.

If you are already mostly gluten-free, try going all the way. Do you screen your beauty and bath products? People with DH seem to be particularly sensitive to topical gluten. I'd also try limiting iodine - I know it sounds hard especially with other limitations but it can be very effective and worth it.

You may be in the middle of an autoimmune "flare", for lack of better terminology. That's what happened to me- it all came crashing down and my body became covered in a rash, I was dizzy, hypoglycemic, etc. I don't know what was triggered by Celiac/autoimmune and what was my body reacting to the steroids but it was one big mess. I cleaned up my diet, got off the meds and slowly I'm bouncing back. I sincerely hope the same for you, too.

Di2011 Enthusiast

Seems a lot us 'bad' cases of DH have been similar experiences. Lots of ups & downs on the roller coaster road but some definite "indicators" along the way.

I have always avoid medications etc so I can't comment on topical or oral medications but the two dermatitis specific cream/lotions I tested early in my journey made my skin scream like a cornered crazy psycho. After that I chose to go with my instinct that this was no typical skin condition that was known in traditional medicine. Call it 'dermatitis' herpetiformis if you like but it was certainly not 'dermatitis'.

I wonder if in 20+ years time it will be renamed to remove its association with dermatitis altogether - I pray that it is known and understood well enough to be so.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - cristiana replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    2. - CC90 replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    3. - Wheatwacked replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    4. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Origins of Celiac Disease
      19

      Do Antibiotics in Babies Increase Celiac Disease Risk Later in Life? (+Video)

    5. - trents replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,188
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442

    Lhughes327
    Newest Member
    Lhughes327
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      Hi @CC90 Ah... that is very interesting.  Although it is very annoying for you to have to go through it all again, I would say that almost sounds like an admission that they didn't look far enough last time?   I could be wrong, but I would not be at all surprised if they find something on the next attempt.  Coeliac damage can be very patchy, as I understand it, so that's why my own gastroenterologist always likes to point out that he's taken lots of samples!  In the kindest possibly way (you don't want to upset the person doing the procedure!) I'd be inclined to tell them what happened last time and to ask them in person to take samples lower down, as  if your health system is anything like the one in my country, communication between GPs, consultants and hospitals isn't always very good.  You don't want the same mistake to be made again. You say that your first endoscopy was traumatic?  May I ask, looking at your spelling of coeliac, was this done at an NHS hospital in England?  The reason for the question is that one of my NHS diagnosed friends was not automatically offered a sedative and managed without one.  Inspired by her, I tried to have an endoscopy one time, in a private setting, without one, so that I could recover quicker, but I had to request sedative in the end it was so uncomfortable.    I am sorry that you will have to go through a gluten challenge again but to make things easier, ensure you eat things containing gluten that you will miss should you have to go gluten free one day. 😂 I was told to eat 2 slices of normal wholemeal bread or the equivalent every day in the weeks before , but I also opted for Weetabix and dozens of Penguin chocolate biscuits.  (I had a very tight headache across my temple for days before the procedure, which I thought was interesting as I had that frequently growing up. - must have been a coeliac symptom!)  Anyway, I do hope you soon get the answers you are looking for and do keep us posted. Cristiana  
    • CC90
      Hi Cristiana   Yes I've had the biopsy results showing normal villi and intestinal mucosa.  The repeat endoscopy (requested by the gastro doc) would be to take samples from further into the intestine than the previous endoscopy reached.      
    • Wheatwacked
      Transglutaminase IgA is the gold-standard blood test for celiac disease. Sensitivity of over 90% and specificity of 95–99%. It rarely produces false positives.  An elevated level means your immune system is reacting to gluten.  Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS) does not typically cause high levels of tTG-IgA. Unfortunately the protocols for a diagnosis of Celiac Disease are aimed at proving you don't have it, leaving you twisting in the wind. Genetic testing and improvement on a trial gluten free diet, also avoiding milk protein, will likely show improvement in short order if it is Celiac; but will that satisfy the medical system for a diagnosis? If you do end up scheduling a repeat endoscopy, be sure to eat up to 10 grams of gluten for 8 - 12 weeks.  You want  to create maximum damage. Not a medical opinion, but my vote is yes.
    • trents
      Cristiana asks a very relevant question. What looks normal to the naked eye may not look normal under the microscope.
    • cristiana
      Hello @CC90 Can I just ask a question: have you actually been told that your biopsy were normal, or just that your stomach, duodenum and small intestine looked normal? The reason I ask is that when I had my endoscopy, I was told everything looked normal.  My TTG score was completely through the roof at the time, greater than 100 which was then the cut off max. for my local lab.  Yet when my biopsy results came back, I was told I was stage 3 on the Marsh scale.  I've come across the same thing with at least one other person on this forum who was told everything looked normal, but the report was not talking about the actual biopsy samples, which had to be looked at through a microscope and came back abnormal.
×
×
  • Create New...