Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

My First Celaic Panel Lab Results


Random Guy

Recommended Posts

Random Guy Apprentice

here they are:

Endomysial AB IGA Positive (Reference Negative)

Endomysial AB Titer 1:160 High (Ref Less than 1:5)

Gliadin AB (IGA) 43 High (Ref Neg <11, Equivicol 11-17, Pos >17

IGA, Serum 114 Normal (Ref 81-463 mg/dL)

TTG AB, IGA > 100 High (Ref Neg <5, Equivicol 5-8, Pos >8)

TTG AB, IGG - test not performed (why not?!?!)

so it looks like my labs are pretty out of whack (sorry if i'm being to technical)

but i don't know, since it's my first celiac panel, if it really means anything

my current plan is to eat all the pizza i can now (i have no symptoms) while i still can (sorry if that's like waving a drink in front of an alcoholic, really, i am sorry), and call a GI.

what's a good way to figure out if a GI is well versed in Celiac?

thanks

-rg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Canadian Karen Community Regular

Yep, you got it......... the numbers don't lie!!!! ;)

I can't really tell you how to go about finding a Gastro guy, here in Canada, we get referred by our GP.

Pig out while you can, and please, have a Whopper for me. At least I can live vicariously through someone else!!!! :P

Karen

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Yes, from those results it's like almost definite you have it. The EMA and tTG are the best tests for celiac ..very accurate and sensitive so...you have it.

The tTG IgG was not performed but that does not matter because that is not as sensitive of a test as the tTG IgA

If you go to the home page of this site and scroll to the bottom you have a link to recommended doctors from other celiacs. This may help you find one near you.

Remember though, biopsies can rule celiac in but not out..I know it may be hard to realize you have it since you do not have symptoms but the numbers just do not lie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Random Guy Apprentice

ok katie,

so if a biopsy can't rule it out, are you saying that i will definitely not find out that i don't have it, or that i won't not find out that i don't not have it or not?

:unsure:

i checked the list, and there's no one listed on long island.

did i mention that i live on long island?

(for those not from long island, it's part of new york state. it's an island. and takes a long time to drive across it)

thanks

-rg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Canadian Karen Community Regular
ok katie,

so if a biopsy can't rule it out, are you saying that i will definitely not find out that i don't have it, or that i won't not find out that i don't not have it or not?

:unsure:

:huh::blink: Huh?

I know it's been too long of a day when I read a paragraph three times and still can't wrap my mind around it!!! ;)

Karen

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cornbread Explorer

I think RG's question pretty much meant, why bother with a biopsy? In his case, with positive bloodwork, all the biopsy could do is maybe rule Celiac in. If the biopsy was negative he could still have celiac disease, and based on the other tests, probably does.

I have the same question - my Dad just got his results back and had positive antibodies all around, plus double Celiac genes. He can't afford a biopsy - I'm urging him to just presume this is celiac disease (he's asymptomatic, but I'm not and I only have one celiac disease gene...)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KaitiUSA Enthusiast

I'm saying that you can't just rely on the biopsy...there are very accurate blood tests that also play a key role in diagnosis and you just had those done..some doctors use certain blood tests in place of biopsies while others require them to be done.

Basically, now if you have a biopsy that they say comes back negative you still most likely have celiac due to the way your blood results came back. You see if you have it in beginning stages you may have little damage or sporadic damage that they can easily miss. They only take a few samples so it's very easy to miss a diagnosis.

If you want to get a biopsy to see how much damage, that they can see, is done at this point then that's fine...but diagnosis doesn't lay with whether that comes back positive or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Canadian Karen Community Regular

Okay, makes sense now - I either have brain fog right now or am suffering from lack of sleep (my collagenous colitis has it's own internal clock - wakes me up at 2:00 a.m., and constantly going to the can/having cramps until 5 or 6 a.m.). Those are my nights on a regular basis pretty much....... <_<:(

The only reason I could think of that he would HAVE to have the biopsy (especially with those numbers!) would be insurance purposes? I am not sure how it goes in the U.S.........

Hugs.

Karen

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Random Guy Apprentice

thanks katie, i was really just kind of having a little fun with the oddness of it, but thanks for clarifying.

-rg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nantzie Collaborator

I think we've found our class clown! :lol:

I totally thought at first you were serious too RG and I was trying to figure out what exactly you were trying to ask.

:lol:

Nancy

Link to comment
Share on other sites
VydorScope Proficient

IMO, skip the biopsy, you have celiac disease. The biospy is just extra expense and risk and get you no additional information. Welcom to the elite celiac disease club :D

Thats just my opinion and I am not a doctor just some geek with a PC an t1 line :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
VydorScope Proficient
my current plan is to eat all the pizza i can now (i have no symptoms) while i still can (sorry if that's like waving a drink in front of an alcoholic, really, i am sorry), and call a GI.

HORRIBLE PLAN. Worst one I have seen on this board a a while. Your plan now should be to go gluten-free right way. You have postive blood work, the bispoy is pointless, and doing what you suggest could have serious negative medical impact.

IMO thats like saying "I know drinking battery acid is bad, but I will dirnk as much as I can till some one tells me to stop!" :D

Agian, as I mention above, I am not a doctor nor do I play on on the internet. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nettiebeads Apprentice

I agree that the biopsy would probably be a waste of time and money. It can rule in celiac disease, but not rule it out - false negatives can happen. At one time biopsy was the golden rule, but not so much any more. But of course, if your curious as to if damage has been done and if so, how much, go for it. But the biopsies can miss the damaged area or be so slight that only a highly trained experience tech could accurately read the results. Your choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
floridanative Community Regular

To pick a GI, I'd ask how many cases of Celiac they see a year. My GI said he'd seen only a few in his career (he's 50+). When he talked about the biopsy, I knew he didn't know how to do one correctly, saying he'd take a biopsy IF he saw something. You can't see all damage, even with the scope. So now I'm with another practice that explained that they had to take several biopsies during the endoscopy in order to get an accurate result. Good luck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FaithInScienceToo Contributor

Hi, Guy from Loooooong Island....

I will write my answer in 'parts:'

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PART I

Definitey gotta 'vote' for the biopsy isn't worth it UNLESS:

1) you NEED one for insurance, or to officially write-off costs of gluten-free foods (which typically amounts to very little in the USA, due to IRS rules).

2) your GI doc can convince you that there is a possibility that 'something else' might be wrong with you... that's how my doc got me to get both an endoscopy with biopsies, AND a colonoscopy with biopsies, even though he knew I was already 70 days post gluten-free at time of biopsies - I'm glad that I went through with it, though, since at age 47, it wasn't a bad decision to go ahead and get a full check.

3) you want to find out how much damage has been done (BUT, even that can vary from time-to-time in Celiacs).

[There may be add'l reasons...those are the ones I know of]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PART IA

"False negatives," in case you do not know yet, occur when there is current damage that should have been detected via biopsy, but one of the following 'went wrong:'

Not enough areas were bisopsied, if damage is not 'complete' [which is how the damage typical occurs - "in patches"]

Cuttings were not done at the proper angle (the doc doesn't know how to do it)

The person 'reading' the biopsy 'blew it'

[There may be more problems that can go wrong - these are the ones I am aware of.]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PART II:

Summary of reasons I can think of to NOT get the biopsies done:

1) Your test results are "POSITIVE" already

2) You can go gluten-free ASAP

3) You will never have to tell your insurance company that you got diagnosed with 'a disease' and, in the USA, that may very well mean lower LTC insurance costs (long term care insurance), and possibly lower costs of independent insurance in case you ever need to buy that, etc...

4) You will save time and money by not having it done...

5) It's an invasive medical procedure and so has real risks involved.

Good luck with your decision. I know it's not an easy one -

Gina

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jajus100 Apprentice

I would have the biopsy done. Jut for the fact that it is the "gold standard." It might also lead other family members to go ahead and be checked. It would also be good to know how much damage you have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
julie5914 Contributor

I did not have biopsy. Your numbers are all high and all positive - you have it. I ate lots of gluten and felt like crap for a month after getting lab work higher than that while waiting for a GI appointment because I though he would want to do a biopsy. Waste of time. They took one look at the results and put me on the diet that day. I shouldn't have waited a month. Sounds like you don't have many symptoms, but you do have celiac, and there may be things you think are unrelated that will be better when you start the diet. Just decreasing the extremely higher chances of cancer that come with consuming gluten when you have celiac should be some good motivation.

The only reason to do biospy (IMO) would be out of curiosity to see how much damage is done, to get a definitive diagnosis if your GI is one of those gold standard types, to make sure nothing else is wrong if that is suspected, or to get a baseline in case you still have or develop symptoms on the diet and they need to check out what has or hasn't changed in there.

These are decent reasons, but knowing what I know now, I would have started the diet the day I got my lab results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
elonwy Enthusiast

My blood tests were very positive as well, but my doc demanded a biopsy. I hadn't found this place yet, so I went ahead with it. It was horrible and there was "no gross evidence of sprue" which means he couldn't tell.

The good part was, they foud some ulcers caused by my taking so much alleve for my pain for so long. So now I can't take alleve or advil.

He diagnosed me with celiac disease anyway, because I went gluten-free the day after the biopsy and felt better after about three days ( not 100% but alot better) and because my blood tests were so high.

I did SPLURGE on gluten up until the biospy though, cause there was a two week lapse, and although it made me horribly horribly sick for those two weeks, it really helped me pyschologically because I "said goodbye" to all my favorite gluten foods. Kinda like going on that last bender before going on the wagon, to continue with your alchoholic reference.

Welcome.

Elonwy

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jenvan Collaborator

Lots of good input here. Your blood work definitely looks like Celiac... I don't blame some peeps for opting out of the biopsy/endoscopy, but I wanted to go ahead and do the procedure...I didn't have to wait very long for it either. I have had 4 endoscopies and they all went fine. If you read and ask around you will see that the majority of people here had endoscopies that went very smoothly. The hardest part is usually not being able to eat for a day! It is really not a biggie. Once I had a slight sore throat for the day, but that was it. As I said, I understand why some do not choose to have a biopsy, and that choice can make sense based on your circumstances. One of the reasons I like the biopsy is because it is a great tool for measuring progress and healing. Blood work doesn't always correlate with whats going on in the intestines...so the biopsy gives you an initial point of reference and a helpful marker for the future. The information comes in handy especially if someone has trouble with intestinal healing...or something like refractory sprue. It is also handy in some practical ways like making you eligible for case studies etc...as we found recently.... Good luck making your decision :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Random Guy Apprentice

see, this is why i love open forums to discuss medical issues.

without this discussion, i wouldn't have thought about some of the things that you are all bringing up regarding the great shakesperian question:

to B(iopsy)e or not to B(iopsy)e

instead i just would've shook my head and said "uh, okay dr. whatever you say"

not that I won't do what a doctor suggests, but you've brought up questions to ask.

so thanks very much. very good to hear different perspectives.

I have an appointement with a GI on Wednesday, the day before thanksgiving. I hope that I'm not told to go gluten free at that appointment.

For if this is what I am told, i shall cry out, in as dramatic a way as you can imagine

"Oh , but please, great doctor, Please! One more day of Gluten is all I beg of this life"

:blink:

thanks

-rg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jajus100 Apprentice

LOL

For what it is worth, IMO, waiting one or two days to go gluten free wouldn't be the end of the world for you... If he tells you to start on Thanksgiving, I think I would start the day after....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FaithInScienceToo Contributor

LOL...people sure do take you VERY seriously...

Enjoy your feast, and good luck at your doc appt -

'To be or not to be' - good one.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
floridanative Community Regular

Sorry to tag on but I don't want to start a new post over this.

My results were just faxed over (Celaic panel) and the doctor didn't call, his nurse fill in just faxed them over and said it looks like everything is negative. I don't think she knows what she's looking at.

Antigliadin Abs, IgA - negative (no number given)

Antigliadin Abs, IgG - negative (no number given)

T-Transglutaminase (tTg) IgA - 7 *flagged as high, 4-10 being weak positive*other GI ran this test too and it was an 11 in Sept. So I'm not sure why it's gone down - anyone? Under this part there is some info regarding that this antibody is 99% specific for gluten sensitive enteropathy.

Reticulin IgA Ab - negative (no number given)

Reticulin IgG Ab - negative (no number given)

Immunoglobulin A, Serum - 197 (70-400 normal)

Help! I asked the doc to call back but I'm not sure he will do so today and I don't want to stress all weekend over this.

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to Nacina's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      1

      14 year old with Celiac & EOE still suffering...

    2. - Nacina posted a topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      1

      14 year old with Celiac & EOE still suffering...

    3. - trents replied to Fluka66's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      5

      Waiting for urgent referral.

    4. - Fluka66 replied to Fluka66's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      5

      Waiting for urgent referral.

    5. - Moodiefoodie replied to Moodiefoodie's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      9

      Joint swelling when ill even on gluten-free diet


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,065
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Deebatger
    Newest Member
    Deebatger
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      It sounds like you've been through a lot with your son's health journey, and it's understandable that you're seeking answers and solutions. Given the complexity of his symptoms and medical history, it might be beneficial to explore a few avenues: Encourage your son to keep a detailed journal of his symptoms, including when they occur, their severity, any triggers or patterns, and how they impact his daily life. This information can be valuable during medical consultations and may help identify correlations or trends. Consider seeking opinions from specialized medical centers or academic hospitals that have multidisciplinary teams specializing in gastrointestinal disorders, especially those related to Celiac disease and Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EOE). These centers often have experts who deal with complex cases and can offer a comprehensive evaluation. Since you've already explored alternative medicine with a nutrition response doctor and a gut detox diet, you may want to consider consulting a functional medicine practitioner. They take a holistic approach to health, looking at underlying causes and imbalances that may contribute to symptoms. Given his low vitamin D levels and other nutritional markers, a thorough nutritional assessment by a registered dietitian or nutritionist specializing in gastrointestinal health could provide insights into any deficiencies or dietary adjustments that might help alleviate symptoms. In addition to routine tests, consider asking about more specialized tests that may not be part of standard screenings. These could include comprehensive stool analyses, food intolerance testing, allergy panels, or advanced imaging studies to assess gut health.
    • Nacina
      Hello, I am a 45 year old mom, who was diagnosed at 29 with Celiac. My now 14 year old son was diagnosed just before his 4th birthday. Needless to say, we are old pros with the diet. He was experiencing some issues, overall health took a major plummet a year ago, and through a bit of work, was diagnosed with EOE. Tried diet alone, but his follow up endoscopy didn't show the improvements his DR. wanted to see, so I tried the medication. (Steroid). He became extremely backed up, and they had him taking Miralax daily. His health plummeted. He is a straight A honor's 8th grader who plays club soccer very competitively. His health continued to decline and at 13 had a colonoscopy and another upper gi. (He was still compacted even with the prep). I finally pulled him off all meds and mira lax, after reading much negative literature online, and put him on a gut detox diet and took him to a nutrition response dr. Finally things have improved. However...over a year later and he is having relapse stomach pain, debilitating stomach pain. Missing a day of school a week, to three this week. This is where we downward spiral with him. He says it doesn't feel the same as when he has gotten backed up before. He is eating prunes, taking his supplements, drinking water...all of the things. Yet, he is feeling horrible. Pain is abdomen, headache, lethargy, diarrhea . He is on a strict gluten dairy, egg free diet. He has adapted well in regards to diet. But I feel like we are missing something here. He is too active, too outgoing to be feeling sick all of the time. His Bilirubin is constantly high. His white blood count always runs slightly low. His vitamin D was very low last time he ran tests, (last month) when he was sick for a week. His celiac markers show negative, so it isn't that. His last endoscopy showed no Eosinaphils in his esophagus.  I have taken him to multiple Ped. Gastro specialists. They run tests, and we get zero answers. I meticulously go through labs, hoping to make some sense and maybe catch something. Any thoughts or ideas would greatly be appreciated. 
    • trents
      But if you have been off of wheat for a period of weeks/months leading up to the testing it will likely turn out to be negative for celiac disease, even if you actually have celiac disease. Given your symptoms when consuming gluten, we certainly understand your reluctance to undergo  the "gluten challenge" before testing but you need to understand that the testing may be a waste of time if you don't. What are you going to do if it is negative for celiac disease? Are you going to go back to merrily eating wheat/barley/rye products while living in pain and destroying your health? You will be in a conundrum. Do I or do I not? And you will likely have a difficult time being consistent with your diet. Celiac disease causes inflammation to the small bowel villous lining when gluten containing grains are consumed. This inflammation produces certain antibodies that can be detected in the blood after they reach a certain level, which takes weeks or months after the onset of the disease. If gluten is stopped or drastically reduced, the inflammation begins to decrease and so do the antibodies. Before long, their low levels are not detectable by testing and the antibody blood tests done for diagnosing celiac disease will be negative. Over time, this inflammation wears down the billions of microscopic, finger-like projections that make up the lining and form the nutrient absorbing layer of the small bowel where all the nutrition in our food is absorbed. As the villi bet worn down, vitamin and mineral deficiencies typically develop because absorption is compromised. An endoscopy with biopsy of the small bowel lining to microscopically examine this damage is usually the second stage of celiac disease diagnosis. However, when people cut out gluten or cut back on it significantly ahead of time before the biopsy is done, the villous lining has already experienced some healing and the microscopic examination may be negative or inconclusive. I'm not trying to tell you what to do I just want you to understand what the consequences of going gluten free ahead of testing are as far as test results go so that you will either not waste your time in having the tests done or will be prepared for negative test results and the impact that will have on your dietary decisions. And, who are these "consultants" you keep talking about and what are their qualifications? You are in the unenviable position that many who joint this forum have found themselves in. Namely, having begun a gluten free diet before getting a proper diagnosis but unwilling to enter into the gluten challenge for valid testing because of the severity of the symptoms it would cause them.
    • Fluka66
      Thank you very much for your reply. I hadn't heard of celiac disease but began to notice a pattern of pain. I've been on the floor more than once with agonising pain but this was always put down to another abdominal problem consequently I've been on a roundabout of backwards and forwards with another consultant for many years. I originally questioned this diagnosis but was assured it was the reason for my pain. Many years later the consultant gave up and I had a new GP. I started to cut out certain food types ,reading packets then really started to cut out wheat and went lactose free. After a month I reintroduced these in one meal and ended screaming in agony the tearing and bloating pain. With this info and a swollen lymph node in my neck I went back to the GP.  I have a referral now . I have also found out that acidic food is causing the terrible pain . My thoughts are this is irritating any ulcers. I'm hoping that after a decade the outlook isn't all bad. My blood test came back with a high marker but I didn't catch what it was. My GP and I have agreed that I won't go back on wheat just for the test due to the pain , my swollen lymph node and blood test results.  Trying to remain calm for the referral and perhaps needed to be more forceful all those years ago but I'm not assertive and consultants can be overwhelming. Many thanks for your reply . Wishing you all the best.
    • Moodiefoodie
      Wow! Fascinating info. Thanks so much! I really appreciate the guidance. @Spacepanther Over the years I have had rheumatologists do full lab work ups on me. They told me they had screened me for arthritis, lupus, and Lyme disease (all negative). In addition to joint pain and stiffness I had swelling in both knees that later moved to my elbow as well.  I also experience stiffness and pain in my neck and shoulders when it flares. I vomited fairly often growing up, but there wasn’t a real pattern to it and I didn’t know it wasn’t normal (thought people caught stomach viruses often).  I don’t usually have stomach symptoms immediately after eating gluten that I notice.  The only other joint condition I know of is fibromyalgia. Good luck! Hope you can get it figured out. I only assumed my joint symptoms were due to the celiac’s because it is under control for the most part on a gluten-free diet.  The rheumatologist also mentioned that some inflammatory/autoimmune diseases can be slow-moving and not detectable until they progress.
×
×
  • Create New...