Jump to content
  • You are not alone. Join Celiac.com for trusted gluten-free answers and forum support.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

Ghirardelli Chocolate Chips


WinterSong

Recommended Posts

WinterSong Community Regular

Hey guys, 

I emailed Ghirardelli to ask about their updated allergen information because I had heard that people stopped recommending most of their products. I was specifically asking about their chocolate chips because my understanding is that they are free of gluten and not made on the same lines as that one bar/square that contains barley. This is what I received back:


"Thank you for contacting Ghirardelli Chocolate Company.  We appreciate your interest in finding out about the ingredients in our products and your interest in a gluten free product.

At this time we do not offer any "gluten free" products, but appreciate your interest in seeing whether Ghirardelli offers one.  Our products are not certified as being gluten free. FDA requires products to be tested to confirm that gluten level is below 20ppm. Currently, Ghirardelli products have not been tested to this requirement and therefore, we do not make any gluten free claims for our products.

Please reference the ingredient information, on our packaging for any Ghirardelli product that you are interested in, to determine if it is suitable for you.

Please know you are a valued consumer and we do appreciate your interest in our products.

Sincerely,

Consumer Affairs Response Team"

 

I asked them to please clarify - are your products testing over 20ppm? Or you don't test them at all? I also asked about the lines that the chocolate chips are made on because the ingredients do not indicated any problems. The customer service rep sent me the exact same message back with one of the lines underlined. I emailed again, and they don't seem to want to disclose any more information. :(

 

Has anyone else had any luck talking with them lately? Insights on the chocolate chips?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



RMJ Mentor

They seem to be good about saying things may contain wheat when their products are made on shared equipment, for example their ground chocolate which I no longer use.  

This is the reply I got a year ago (March 2015) when asking about their 60% cacao chips.

"Dear Consumer,

There is no wheat in our 60% chips and no wheat in our chips facility, as such, no wheat is run on the same line as any of our chips.

Sincerely,

Consumer Affairs Response Team"

 

WinterSong Community Regular

Well, that is just wheat. Their bars/squares might be wheat free, as well, but the culprit there is barley. 

 

Also I just got this reply:

For legal reasons the information that has been provided is the only information we are authorized to provide you with. 

To reiterate, our products are not certified as being gluten free. FDA requires products to be tested to confirm that gluten level is below 20ppm. Currently, Ghirardelli products have not been tested to this requirement and therefore, we do not make any gluten free claims for our products.

Sincerely, 

Ghirardelli Consumer Services

Gemini Experienced

I have been eating the Ghirardelli squares and using their chocolate chips for YEARS and have never had any problems.  I think the white chocolate chips are not gluten-free  and I do not use those but all the rest are safe.  I am extremely sensitive and if there were any gluten in them, from any of the 3 grains, I would not be this well. I recently had my antibody levels checked and they were perfect so that wouldn't happen if they contained gluten.  Read the labels.  Just because they do not test does not mean the product contains gluten.  I would recommend these to any diagnosed Celiac.

Feelgr8 Newbie

Good to know they didn't make you sick. How much and how often did you eat it?

Gemini Experienced
10 hours ago, Feelgr8 said:

Good to know they didn't make you sick. How much and how often did you eat it?

I have been using the chocolate chips and eating the squares since I was diagnosed with Celiac 11 years ago.  The squares I have regularly because it is one of my safe, go-to treats.  I mean, way more regularly than most people.....I am one of those skinny Celiac's.  I have to not buy them and take a break because they are so good, if there is a bag in the house, they will not last long.  ;)  I usually eat no more than 2 squares per day, when I am well stocked. Not for gluten worries but too much sugar is bad for the teeth.

The disclaimer the company gave in no way means their product is not safe.  It means they do not test and they really don't have to.  They make chocolate products and very little of what they sell are products we cannot eat. They are straightforward, at least in the past, about safe manufacturing practices so you can make the ultimate decision. If they tested for gluten content, it would very likely be well within limits of safeness but the products would cost a lot more than they already do. This is not the same thing as buying a product which is untested but comes from a factory where there is a lot of wheat flying around!

RMJ Mentor

I eat their chips but not their cocoa.  I used to, but then the cocoa label changed to say that it may contain wheat (or is made in a facility with wheat, I forget which).  When I asked them about it they said they had changed where the cocoa was manufactured.  But since the chips don't say that I feel safe with them.  Always good to read the label every time.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



  • 2 years later...
Jane Murphy Newbie

I emailed Ghirardelli today. they will not state that ANY of their products or processing lines are gluten free.  Ive been sick and tested positive recently..the only items that are different in my diet are Ghirardelly peppermint bark bar, and Sprouts brand raspberry frozen fruit bar.

the fruit bar has very few ingredients nothing that would suggest gluten.

Beverage Proficient

I recommend never eating anything processed unless it is marked Gluten Free at a minimum, and Certified Gluten Free is much much better. 

I haven't had problems since I was more strict in what I buy, my last blood test was almost 0 in gluten antibodies. 

I was surprised to figure out that I was having problems with pickles and relishes,  No obvious gluten ingredients, but I should have  known better, that they were not marked gluten free.  I found out that the vinegar can be derived from GLUTEN grains!!!  OH GEEZ!!!  I have found that I can easily make these myself with apple cider vinegar and found a few brands that I can buy from Amazon.  Anything can be bought on the internet.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - cristiana replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    2. - CC90 replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    3. - Wheatwacked replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    4. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Origins of Celiac Disease
      19

      Do Antibiotics in Babies Increase Celiac Disease Risk Later in Life? (+Video)

    5. - trents replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,189
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442

    Lhughes327
    Newest Member
    Lhughes327
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      Hi @CC90 Ah... that is very interesting.  Although it is very annoying for you to have to go through it all again, I would say that almost sounds like an admission that they didn't look far enough last time?   I could be wrong, but I would not be at all surprised if they find something on the next attempt.  Coeliac damage can be very patchy, as I understand it, so that's why my own gastroenterologist always likes to point out that he's taken lots of samples!  In the kindest possible way (you don't want to upset the person doing the procedure!) I'd be inclined to tell them what happened last time and to ask them in person to take samples lower down, as  if your health system is anything like the one in my country, communication between GPs, consultants and hospitals isn't always very good.  You don't want the same mistake to be made again. You say that your first endoscopy was traumatic?  May I ask, looking at your spelling of coeliac, was this done at an NHS hospital in England?  The reason for the question is that one of my NHS diagnosed friends was not automatically offered a sedative and managed without one.  Inspired by her, I tried to have an endoscopy one time, in a private setting, without one, so that I could recover quicker, but I had to request sedative in the end it was so uncomfortable.    I am sorry that you will have to go through a gluten challenge again but to make things easier, ensure you eat things containing gluten that you will miss should you have to go gluten free one day. 😂 I was told to eat 2 slices of normal wholemeal bread or the equivalent every day in the weeks before , but I also opted for Weetabix and dozens of Penguin chocolate biscuits.  (I had a very tight headache across my temple for days before the procedure, which I thought was interesting as I had that frequently growing up. - must have been a coeliac symptom!)  Anyway, I do hope you soon get the answers you are looking for and do keep us posted. Cristiana  
    • CC90
      Hi Cristiana   Yes I've had the biopsy results showing normal villi and intestinal mucosa.  The repeat endoscopy (requested by the gastro doc) would be to take samples from further into the intestine than the previous endoscopy reached.      
    • Wheatwacked
      Transglutaminase IgA is the gold-standard blood test for celiac disease. Sensitivity of over 90% and specificity of 95–99%. It rarely produces false positives.  An elevated level means your immune system is reacting to gluten.  Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS) does not typically cause high levels of tTG-IgA. Unfortunately the protocols for a diagnosis of Celiac Disease are aimed at proving you don't have it, leaving you twisting in the wind. Genetic testing and improvement on a trial gluten free diet, also avoiding milk protein, will likely show improvement in short order if it is Celiac; but will that satisfy the medical system for a diagnosis? If you do end up scheduling a repeat endoscopy, be sure to eat up to 10 grams of gluten for 8 - 12 weeks.  You want  to create maximum damage. Not a medical opinion, but my vote is yes.
    • trents
      Cristiana asks a very relevant question. What looks normal to the naked eye may not look normal under the microscope.
    • cristiana
      Hello @CC90 Can I just ask a question: have you actually been told that your biopsy were normal, or just that your stomach, duodenum and small intestine looked normal? The reason I ask is that when I had my endoscopy, I was told everything looked normal.  My TTG score was completely through the roof at the time, greater than 100 which was then the cut off max. for my local lab.  Yet when my biopsy results came back, I was told I was stage 3 on the Marsh scale.  I've come across the same thing with at least one other person on this forum who was told everything looked normal, but the report was not talking about the actual biopsy samples, which had to be looked at through a microscope and came back abnormal.
×
×
  • Create New...