Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Paid To Be Celiac!


Claire

Recommended Posts

Grimbol Newbie

I registered on the web site, at least I hope I did! I haven't heard back yet, and have been perusing this site as I lost the info, so now I've found it and will call them tomorrow to check. I have been celiac for about 28 years, dx by biopsy, but in UK, hope that counts.

I'd be really interested in this, so anyone who's 'in' I'd love to hear from you.

Margaret


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Claire Collaborator
I'm also wondering if the drug and its effectiveness is being gauged only by determining whether villi damage is occurring or not. Since we know that gluten affects other areas of the body i.e. tissues, brain function, causes AI diseases...etc...how do we know that gluten is not still causing damage to other areas?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Hi Rachel - So you wonder a lot, too - I see.

If they are going to administer a Zonulin antagonist then they expect to prevent gluten from crossing the intestinal wall into the blood stream. Gluten can only damage tissues, cells, neurons etc. if it gets into the blood stream where the immune system can 'see' it. That's when the mimicry thing kicks in - when the immune systems attacks body cells etc. that resemble' that thing' in the blood that is being attacked. Block the passage into the blood stream - and no immune response is mounted - because there is nothing there to trigger an attack.

Does this make sense? Claire

laurelfla Enthusiast

hello, all!

just in case anyone is still interested, i'm pursuing getting involved with the study, and after a couple of emails and whatnot, this is what i found out from Alba:

"For information regarding the clinical trial that will be starting in Dec. please contact Parexel at 1-800-296-0052. Parexel will be handling all recruitment for this trial. To be contacted regarding clinical trials in the future please complete the questionnaire at the site below...Please note that you will find a link on the University of Maryland Center for Celiac Research website that will provide you with further related information (on the left side of the home page, click on the “Research/Clinical Trials” link).

www.celiaccenter.org

laurelfla Enthusiast

i'm in! i just got off the phone with Parexel and i have an appointment in Baltimore Dec. 3. is anyone else still pursuing this? i'm a little nervous now, mostly about the $... i know they will compensate but if the compensation is not like immediate, i'm going to have problems! but i hope that it all works out. i'll continue to keep you guys posted, if you're interested.

hugs,

Laurel.

Claire Collaborator
i'm in! i just got off the phone with Parexel and i have an appointment in Baltimore Dec. 3. is anyone else still pursuing this? i'm a little nervous now, mostly about the $... i know they will compensate but if the compensation is not like immediate, i'm going to have problems! but i hope that it all works out. i'll continue to keep you guys posted, if you're interested.

hugs,

Laurel.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Interested! Keep the info coming. Claire

laurelfla Enthusiast

ok, so i have an appointment and now i have a letter... but still no info on exactly what the study encompasses. these people are elusive! still trying to decide if i'm really going to do this... i hadn't realized it could be a long time before reimbursement, but i have to hurry up if i'm going to get a flight! Turtle and i have been in contact, but if anyone else is involved in this, let me know! maybe we could meet up or something. ~Laurel.

lovegrov Collaborator

I also applied to be in the study and they called me, but I was rejected, I assume because of two medications I'm taking.

richard


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



RiceGuy Collaborator

I'm surprized how many actually would take a drug. I mean, it would still be for life, and the drug would cost more than a change in diet I'm sure. Then there are inevitable side-effects. Even if the gluten doesn't make it through into the rest of the system, what about the immune system? If they inhibit such an immune response, that will lead to other diseases because the body won't be putting up any defenses to them. We all know how every drug back-fires. I'd never do it no matter what they paid or how promising it seemed.

I also am worried about the gluten-free market. It could have a large impact, but with the cost of the drug likely to be much higher than just being gluten-free, that could help keep the market intact. I think it is very likely though that people would take a pill for special occasions and stuff, like taking lactaid or something.

Now, as for celiac disease finally getting recognized and properly diagnosed, it could be a good thing for that. But like it has already been pointed out, they will likely lump bunches of people in who have some other problems, just because they don't yet recognize those diseases yet.

All in all I think it's not a good thing really. Since we are talking about something people are born with, not something you catch like the flu. I wasn't born with gills, but I don't think I need them either. I just breath air. I wasn't born to eat gluten, so I won't eat it. It's like taking a pill to get curly hair, or a tan, or to make all your freckles disappear.

Claire Collaborator
I'm surprized how many actually would take a drug. I mean, it would still be for life, and the drug would cost more than a change in diet I'm sure. Then there are inevitable side-effects. Even if the gluten doesn't make it through into the rest of the system, what about the immune system? If they inhibit such an immune response, that will lead to other diseases because the body won't be putting up any defenses to them. We all know how every drug back-fires. I'd never do it no matter what they paid or how promising it seemed.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Just addressing your first paragraph. It is my understanding of At-1001 that it is not working against the immune system but is acting as an antagonist against Zonulin (celiacs have higher than average levels of this). Zonulin works at the tight junctions in the intestinal wall - regulating their opening and closing. Apparently in the case of celiac these junctions open and stay open.

This is far less than a scientific description but the best I can do right off.

Does that mean I think it is a good idea. Generally, I have reservations about this. I am with the '"it's not nice to fool mother nature"folks. . Having working in health care facilities, I am convinced that most medications turn out to be worse than what you are taking them for. While this new find may well do what they expect it to do, what about what it does that they don't expect it to do?

I am sure the jury will be out on this for awhile but in the end I suspect many if not most will go the way of the pill. Claire

lovegrov Collaborator

I'm not sure I would ever take the pill myself, but I was willing to submit to the trial if it helped others who might need it for whatever reason. Is that all right?

richard

Claire Collaborator
I'm not sure I would ever take the pill myself, but I was willing to submit to the trial if it helped others who might need it for whatever reason. Is that all right?

richard

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Certainly it's alright. A good thought. I am thinking more about those who will rely on a pill (if one becomes available) so they can eat all the goodies they miss. Some people already use Lactaid and the spinoffs to do that. A body process is being interfered with - on a regular basis. It may be harmless. It may not.

AT-1001 sounds like a Lactaid type 'something' that you do not have to take 'three times a day and at bedtime' In that case its' use could be controlled. Some people would. Some wouldn't.

Claire

RiceGuy Collaborator
Just addressing your first paragraph.  It is my understanding of At-1001 that it is not working against the immune system but is acting as an antagonist against Zonulin (celiacs have higher than average levels of this). Zonulin works at the tight junctions in the intestinal wall - regulating their opening and closing.  Apparently in the case of celiac these junctions open and stay open.

This is far less than a scientific description but the best I can do right off.

I see. That's interesting. But I am also in the "It's not nice to fool mother nature" crowd. I figure it's better to work with it than against it.

Now, that brings up a related issue: I have read that in "the old days" wheat didn't have the amount of gluten it does today. It seems that they have been cultivating/pollenating or whatever to make it have more gluten. So essentially the wheat commonly produced today isn't what nature actually intended. I guess gluten intolerance isn't what nature intended either though. With these slow changes to the genetic structure of living things, I'm left wondering just what will life on this planet look like (if there's any left) say 10,000 years from now. Some might say it's evolution. Others might say it's our fault for screwing things up. Diseases and disorders like diabetes, heart disease, cancer, etc were not anywhere near as common as they are today. The US population seems to be paying the highest price in terms of health and wellness. Maybe we just took it too far with all our pollution, plastics, chemicals, etc. Funny how it always comes back to get us sooner or later.

jenvan Collaborator

I will be fascinated to see what comes from all of this... I think a large portion of Celiacs would jump on the chance for a pill. Probably b/c it would appear easier for one... At this point, I would have to say I would not choose it myself...but not exploring the possibly would be foolish I think...

laurelfla Enthusiast
At this point, I would have to say I would not choose it myself...but not exploring the possibly would be foolish I think...

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

that's exactly why i'm participating in the study. will i take the pill if it is effective and becomes available? i don't know yet. but i think that it is worth a shot to figure out if it works -- and they need people for that. what if it were really wonderful? we'll only know if they try it out.

now, if i can just get the @#$@^%@ people from Parexel to call me back! :P

happygirl Collaborator

I had originally been contacted, had been approved, blah blah blah....but talking w/one of the people involved in the study, turns out I can't participate bc of issues w/my biopsy. :(

But good luck to those who do!

KaitiUSA Enthusiast

I definitely would not take a pill at this point. I am against meds unless necessary because of side effects and so forth..I am perfectly content with staying on the diet. I think something that would be nice to have is a pill that helps with accidental gluten ingestions...not something to keep taking over and over...just my opinion.

Claire Collaborator
I see. That's interesting. But I am also in the "It's not nice to fool mother nature" crowd. I figure it's better to work with it than against it.

Now, that brings up a related issue: I have read that in "the old days" wheat didn't have the amount of gluten it does today. It seems that they have been cultivating/pollenating or whatever to make it have more gluten. So essentially the wheat commonly produced today isn't what nature actually intended. I guess gluten intolerance isn't what nature intended either though. With these slow changes to the genetic structure of living things, I'm left wondering just what will life on this planet look like (if there's any left) say 10,000 years from now. Some might say it's evolution. Others might say it's our fault for screwing things up. Diseases and disorders like diabetes, heart disease, cancer, etc were not anywhere near as common as they are today. The US population seems to be paying the highest price in terms of health and wellness. Maybe we just took it too far with all our pollution, plastics, chemicals, etc. Funny how it always comes back to get us sooner or later.

This excerpt from 'A History of Wheat'may interest you:

THE NATURAL HISTORY OF WHEAT

The Roman Empire was built on Egyptian wheat, which they called "korn". It was Einkorn, which is the ancestor of modern wheats. (In Latin, this was the earliest form of Triticum, not to be confused with what we call "corn", which is Zea.)

It had two sets of chromosomes like human beings and is described as 2N or diploid. There were also some naturally occurring wheat that had four sets of chromosomes, or 4N or tetraploid. This was the wheat that the Roman Emperor, Eqyptian pharoahs and Christ were eating.

But what is on our table has been selectively bred over time to increase the gluten content for baking or pasta-making. Most are hexaploid, octoploid, double hexaploid, or hexaploid-octoploid hybrids. This means that they have 6, 8, 12, or more sets of chromosomes. Some of this extra DNA is coding for amino acid sequences that human beings cannot break down, including a 33-amino acid sequence named 33-MER. This 33-MER is what is causing the problem for celiac. Our immune systems are attacking this chain as though it were an invader or parasite. But this sequence is also similar to human tissue, and this inflammation can progress into an auto-immune disease. This auto-immune phase is really damaging, and largely incurable. Control is the only treatment, and life-long gluten free diet is the only control.

Open Original Shared Link

Someone of this forum shared this with me some time ago so I am passing it along. Claire

RiceGuy Collaborator
This excerpt from 'A History of Wheat'may interest you:

THE NATURAL HISTORY OF WHEAT

The Roman Empire was built on Egyptian wheat, which they called "korn". It was Einkorn, which is the ancestor of modern wheats. (In Latin, this was the earliest form of Triticum, not to be confused with what we call "corn", which is Zea.)

It had two sets of chromosomes like human beings and is described as 2N or diploid. There were also some naturally occurring wheat that had four sets of chromosomes, or 4N or tetraploid. This was the wheat that the Roman Emperor, Eqyptian pharoahs and Christ were eating.

But what is on our table has been selectively bred over time to increase the gluten content for baking or pasta-making. Most are hexaploid, octoploid, double hexaploid, or hexaploid-octoploid hybrids. This means that they have 6, 8, 12, or more sets of chromosomes. Some of this extra DNA is coding for amino acid sequences that human beings cannot break down, including a 33-amino acid sequence named 33-MER. This 33-MER is what is causing the problem for celiac. Our immune systems are attacking this chain as though it were an invader or parasite. But this sequence is also similar to human tissue, and this inflammation can progress into an auto-immune disease. This auto-immune phase is really damaging, and largely incurable. Control is the only treatment, and life-long gluten free diet is the only control.

Open Original Shared Link

Someone of this forum shared this with me some time ago so I am passing it along. Claire

Ah, so I did read correctly...

Thanks for confirming that. Now, what does this say about gluten intolerance? I think it's the same as for air pollution. Man screwed up once again!

So, how do we get wheat like it used to be? Since they know the DNA sequence stuff, the plants obviously still exist. Someone should be producing it for the consumer market, in particular the gluten-free market if it really doesn't hurt us. And according to the info, it's safe.

Claire Collaborator
Ah, so I did read correctly...

Thanks for confirming that. Now, what does this say about gluten intolerance? I think it's the same as for air pollution. Man screwed up once again!

So, how do we get wheat like it used to be? Since they know the DNA sequence stuff, the plants obviously still exist. Someone should be producing it for the consumer market, in particular the gluten-free market if it really doesn't hurt us. And according to the info, it's safe.

Now there's a business opportunity for you! Riceguy/wheat farmer! Claire

laurelfla Enthusiast

well, i'm out of the study. it turns out that reimbursement would not be in full for me, so that doesn't work for me right now. maybe someone else will keep up posted.

VydorScope Proficient
I definitely would not take a pill at this point. I am against meds unless necessary because of side effects and so forth..I am perfectly content with staying on the diet. I think something that would be nice to have is a pill that helps with accidental gluten ingestions...not something to keep taking over and over...just my opinion.

I agree.. it be nice to take a pill then know I can safely order gluten free foods in a resturant and not worry about cross conatmination for example. The vast majority of gluten foods I just do not eat, and realy the only danger (should my test prove postive) to me is hidden gluten in things that should not have it.. and be nice to have some kind of recoruse against that.

mswift Newbie
well, i'm out of the study. it turns out that reimbursement would not be in full for me, so that doesn't work for me right now. maybe someone else will keep up posted.

Hi Laurel,

I'm scheduled to participate in the study and was given the impression that all travel related expenses were going to be reimbursed. Based on what you've sayed I'm a little worried myself now. May I ask what they told you that would not be refunded?

Thanks,

Mike

jenvan Collaborator

am eager to hear what happens for those of you in the study!

VydorScope Proficient
am eager to hear what happens for those of you in the study!

Im intrested to hear what hapens TO them. Whish I could take part!

jenvan Collaborator
Im intrested to hear what hapens TO them. Whish I could take part!

That too!! :D

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - TheDHhurts posted a topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      0

      Prana Organics no longer GFCO-certified

    2. - cristiana replied to Dizzyma's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      2

      Newly diagnosed mam to coeliac 11 year old

    3. - trents replied to Dizzyma's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      2

      Newly diagnosed mam to coeliac 11 year old

    4. - Dizzyma posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      2

      Newly diagnosed mam to coeliac 11 year old

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,927
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    drw80whz
    Newest Member
    drw80whz
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • TheDHhurts
      I've been buying my seeds and nuts from Prana Organics for a number of years because the products have been GFCO-certified. I just got a new order delivered of their flax and sunflower seeds, and it turns out that they are no longer GFCO-certified. Instead, it just has a generic "Gluten Free" symbol on the package. I reached out to them to ask what protocols/standards/testing they have in place. The person that wrote back said that they are now certifying their gluten free status in-house, but that she couldn't answer my questions related to standards because the person with that info was on vacation. Not very impressed, especially since it still says on their website that they are GFCO-certified. Buyer beware!
    • cristiana
      Hi @Dizzyma I note what @trents has commented about you possibly posting from the UK.  Just to let you know that am a coeliac based in the UK, so if that is the case, do let me know if can help you with any questions on the NHS provision for coeliacs.    If you are indeed based in the UK, and coeliac disease is confirmed, I would thoroughly recommend you join Coeliac UK, as they provide a printed food and drink guide and also a phone app which you can take shopping with you so you can find out if a product is gluten free or not. But one thing I would like to say to you, no matter where you live, is you mention that your daughter is anxious.  I was always a bit of a nervous, anxious child but before my diagnosis in mid-life my anxiety levels were through the roof.   My anxiety got steadily better when I followed the gluten-free diet and vitamin and mineral deficiencies were addressed.  Anxiety is very common at diagnosis, you may well find that her anxiety will improve once your daughter follows a strict gluten-free diet. Cristiana 
    • trents
      Welcome to the celic.com community @Dizzyma! I'm assuming you are in the U.K. since you speak of your daughter's celiac disease blood tests as "her bloods".  Has her physician officially diagnosed her has having celiac disease on the results of her blood tests alone? Normally, if the ttg-iga blood test results are positive, a follow-up endoscopy with biopsy of the small bowel lining to check for damage would be ordered to confirm the results of "the bloods". However if the ttg-iga test score is 10x normal or greater, some physicians, particularly in the U.K., will dispense with the endoscopy/biopsy. If there is to be an endoscopy/biopsy, your daughter should not yet begin the gluten free diet as doing so would allow healing of the small bowel lining to commence which may result in a biopsy finding having results that conflict with the blood work. Do you know if an endoscopy/biopsy is planned? Celiac disease can have onset at any stage of life, from infancy to old age. It has a genetic base but the genes remain dormant until and unless triggered by some stress event. The stress event can be many things but it is often a viral infection. About 40% of the general population have the genetic potential to develop celiac disease but only about 1% actually develop celiac disease. So, for most, the genes remain dormant.  Celiac disease is by nature an autoimmune disorder. That is to say, gluten ingestion triggers an immune response that causes the body to attack its own tissues. In this case, the attack happens in he lining of the small bowel, at least classically, though we now know there are other body systems that can sometimes be affected. So, for a person with celiac disease, when they ingest gluten, the body sends attacking cells to battle the gluten which causes inflammation as the gluten is being absorbed into the cells that make up the lining of the small bowel. This causes damage to the cells and over time, wears them down. This lining is composed of billions of tiny finger-like projections and which creates a tremendous surface area for absorbing nutrients from the food we eat. This area of the intestinal track is where all of our nutrition is absorbed. As these finger-like projections get worn down by the constant inflammation from continued gluten consumption before diagnosis (or after diagnosis in the case of those who are noncompliant) the efficiency of nutrient absorption from what we eat can be drastically reduced. This is why iron deficiency anemia and other nutrient deficiency related medical problems are so common in the celiac population. So, to answer your question about the wisdom of allowing your daughter to consume gluten on a limited basis to retain some tolerance to it, that would not be a sound approach because it would prevent healing of the lining of her small bowel. It would keep the fires of inflammation smoldering. The only wise course is strict adherence to a gluten free diet, once all tests to confirm celiac disease are complete.
    • Dizzyma
      Hi all, I have so many questions and feel like google is giving me very different information. Hoping I may get some more definite answers here. ok, my daughter has been diagnosed as a coeliac as her bloods show anti TTG antibodies are over 128. We have started her  on a full gluten free diet. my concerns are that she wasn’t actually physically sick on her regular diet, she had tummy issues and skin sores. My fear is that she will build up a complete intolerance to gluten and become physically sick if she has gluten. Is there anything to be said for keeping a small bit of gluten in the diet to stop her from developing a total intolerance?  also, she would be an anxious type of person, is it possible that stress is the reason she has become coeliac? I read that diagnosis later in childhood could be following a sickness or stress. How can she have been fine for the first 10 years and then become coeliac? sorry, I’m just very confused and really want to do right by her. I know a coeliac and she has a terrible time after she gets gluttened so just want to make sure going down a total gluten free road is the right choice. thank you for any help or advise xx 
    • xxnonamexx
      very interesting thanks for the info  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.