Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Paid To Be Celiac!


Claire

Recommended Posts

Grimbol Newbie

I registered on the web site, at least I hope I did! I haven't heard back yet, and have been perusing this site as I lost the info, so now I've found it and will call them tomorrow to check. I have been celiac for about 28 years, dx by biopsy, but in UK, hope that counts.

I'd be really interested in this, so anyone who's 'in' I'd love to hear from you.

Margaret

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Claire Collaborator
I'm also wondering if the drug and its effectiveness is being gauged only by determining whether villi damage is occurring or not. Since we know that gluten affects other areas of the body i.e. tissues, brain function, causes AI diseases...etc...how do we know that gluten is not still causing damage to other areas?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Hi Rachel - So you wonder a lot, too - I see.

If they are going to administer a Zonulin antagonist then they expect to prevent gluten from crossing the intestinal wall into the blood stream. Gluten can only damage tissues, cells, neurons etc. if it gets into the blood stream where the immune system can 'see' it. That's when the mimicry thing kicks in - when the immune systems attacks body cells etc. that resemble' that thing' in the blood that is being attacked. Block the passage into the blood stream - and no immune response is mounted - because there is nothing there to trigger an attack.

Does this make sense? Claire

Link to comment
Share on other sites
laurelfla Enthusiast

hello, all!

just in case anyone is still interested, i'm pursuing getting involved with the study, and after a couple of emails and whatnot, this is what i found out from Alba:

"For information regarding the clinical trial that will be starting in Dec. please contact Parexel at 1-800-296-0052. Parexel will be handling all recruitment for this trial. To be contacted regarding clinical trials in the future please complete the questionnaire at the site below...Please note that you will find a link on the University of Maryland Center for Celiac Research website that will provide you with further related information (on the left side of the home page, click on the “Research/Clinical Trials” link).

www.celiaccenter.org

Link to comment
Share on other sites
laurelfla Enthusiast

i'm in! i just got off the phone with Parexel and i have an appointment in Baltimore Dec. 3. is anyone else still pursuing this? i'm a little nervous now, mostly about the $... i know they will compensate but if the compensation is not like immediate, i'm going to have problems! but i hope that it all works out. i'll continue to keep you guys posted, if you're interested.

hugs,

Laurel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Claire Collaborator
i'm in! i just got off the phone with Parexel and i have an appointment in Baltimore Dec. 3. is anyone else still pursuing this? i'm a little nervous now, mostly about the $... i know they will compensate but if the compensation is not like immediate, i'm going to have problems! but i hope that it all works out. i'll continue to keep you guys posted, if you're interested.

hugs,

Laurel.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Interested! Keep the info coming. Claire

Link to comment
Share on other sites
laurelfla Enthusiast

ok, so i have an appointment and now i have a letter... but still no info on exactly what the study encompasses. these people are elusive! still trying to decide if i'm really going to do this... i hadn't realized it could be a long time before reimbursement, but i have to hurry up if i'm going to get a flight! Turtle and i have been in contact, but if anyone else is involved in this, let me know! maybe we could meet up or something. ~Laurel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lovegrov Collaborator

I also applied to be in the study and they called me, but I was rejected, I assume because of two medications I'm taking.

richard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



RiceGuy Collaborator

I'm surprized how many actually would take a drug. I mean, it would still be for life, and the drug would cost more than a change in diet I'm sure. Then there are inevitable side-effects. Even if the gluten doesn't make it through into the rest of the system, what about the immune system? If they inhibit such an immune response, that will lead to other diseases because the body won't be putting up any defenses to them. We all know how every drug back-fires. I'd never do it no matter what they paid or how promising it seemed.

I also am worried about the gluten-free market. It could have a large impact, but with the cost of the drug likely to be much higher than just being gluten-free, that could help keep the market intact. I think it is very likely though that people would take a pill for special occasions and stuff, like taking lactaid or something.

Now, as for celiac disease finally getting recognized and properly diagnosed, it could be a good thing for that. But like it has already been pointed out, they will likely lump bunches of people in who have some other problems, just because they don't yet recognize those diseases yet.

All in all I think it's not a good thing really. Since we are talking about something people are born with, not something you catch like the flu. I wasn't born with gills, but I don't think I need them either. I just breath air. I wasn't born to eat gluten, so I won't eat it. It's like taking a pill to get curly hair, or a tan, or to make all your freckles disappear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Claire Collaborator
I'm surprized how many actually would take a drug. I mean, it would still be for life, and the drug would cost more than a change in diet I'm sure. Then there are inevitable side-effects. Even if the gluten doesn't make it through into the rest of the system, what about the immune system? If they inhibit such an immune response, that will lead to other diseases because the body won't be putting up any defenses to them. We all know how every drug back-fires. I'd never do it no matter what they paid or how promising it seemed.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Just addressing your first paragraph. It is my understanding of At-1001 that it is not working against the immune system but is acting as an antagonist against Zonulin (celiacs have higher than average levels of this). Zonulin works at the tight junctions in the intestinal wall - regulating their opening and closing. Apparently in the case of celiac these junctions open and stay open.

This is far less than a scientific description but the best I can do right off.

Does that mean I think it is a good idea. Generally, I have reservations about this. I am with the '"it's not nice to fool mother nature"folks. . Having working in health care facilities, I am convinced that most medications turn out to be worse than what you are taking them for. While this new find may well do what they expect it to do, what about what it does that they don't expect it to do?

I am sure the jury will be out on this for awhile but in the end I suspect many if not most will go the way of the pill. Claire

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lovegrov Collaborator

I'm not sure I would ever take the pill myself, but I was willing to submit to the trial if it helped others who might need it for whatever reason. Is that all right?

richard

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Claire Collaborator
I'm not sure I would ever take the pill myself, but I was willing to submit to the trial if it helped others who might need it for whatever reason. Is that all right?

richard

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Certainly it's alright. A good thought. I am thinking more about those who will rely on a pill (if one becomes available) so they can eat all the goodies they miss. Some people already use Lactaid and the spinoffs to do that. A body process is being interfered with - on a regular basis. It may be harmless. It may not.

AT-1001 sounds like a Lactaid type 'something' that you do not have to take 'three times a day and at bedtime' In that case its' use could be controlled. Some people would. Some wouldn't.

Claire

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RiceGuy Collaborator
Just addressing your first paragraph.  It is my understanding of At-1001 that it is not working against the immune system but is acting as an antagonist against Zonulin (celiacs have higher than average levels of this). Zonulin works at the tight junctions in the intestinal wall - regulating their opening and closing.  Apparently in the case of celiac these junctions open and stay open.

This is far less than a scientific description but the best I can do right off.

I see. That's interesting. But I am also in the "It's not nice to fool mother nature" crowd. I figure it's better to work with it than against it.

Now, that brings up a related issue: I have read that in "the old days" wheat didn't have the amount of gluten it does today. It seems that they have been cultivating/pollenating or whatever to make it have more gluten. So essentially the wheat commonly produced today isn't what nature actually intended. I guess gluten intolerance isn't what nature intended either though. With these slow changes to the genetic structure of living things, I'm left wondering just what will life on this planet look like (if there's any left) say 10,000 years from now. Some might say it's evolution. Others might say it's our fault for screwing things up. Diseases and disorders like diabetes, heart disease, cancer, etc were not anywhere near as common as they are today. The US population seems to be paying the highest price in terms of health and wellness. Maybe we just took it too far with all our pollution, plastics, chemicals, etc. Funny how it always comes back to get us sooner or later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jenvan Collaborator

I will be fascinated to see what comes from all of this... I think a large portion of Celiacs would jump on the chance for a pill. Probably b/c it would appear easier for one... At this point, I would have to say I would not choose it myself...but not exploring the possibly would be foolish I think...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
laurelfla Enthusiast
At this point, I would have to say I would not choose it myself...but not exploring the possibly would be foolish I think...

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

that's exactly why i'm participating in the study. will i take the pill if it is effective and becomes available? i don't know yet. but i think that it is worth a shot to figure out if it works -- and they need people for that. what if it were really wonderful? we'll only know if they try it out.

now, if i can just get the @#$@^%@ people from Parexel to call me back! :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites
happygirl Collaborator

I had originally been contacted, had been approved, blah blah blah....but talking w/one of the people involved in the study, turns out I can't participate bc of issues w/my biopsy. :(

But good luck to those who do!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KaitiUSA Enthusiast

I definitely would not take a pill at this point. I am against meds unless necessary because of side effects and so forth..I am perfectly content with staying on the diet. I think something that would be nice to have is a pill that helps with accidental gluten ingestions...not something to keep taking over and over...just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Claire Collaborator
I see. That's interesting. But I am also in the "It's not nice to fool mother nature" crowd. I figure it's better to work with it than against it.

Now, that brings up a related issue: I have read that in "the old days" wheat didn't have the amount of gluten it does today. It seems that they have been cultivating/pollenating or whatever to make it have more gluten. So essentially the wheat commonly produced today isn't what nature actually intended. I guess gluten intolerance isn't what nature intended either though. With these slow changes to the genetic structure of living things, I'm left wondering just what will life on this planet look like (if there's any left) say 10,000 years from now. Some might say it's evolution. Others might say it's our fault for screwing things up. Diseases and disorders like diabetes, heart disease, cancer, etc were not anywhere near as common as they are today. The US population seems to be paying the highest price in terms of health and wellness. Maybe we just took it too far with all our pollution, plastics, chemicals, etc. Funny how it always comes back to get us sooner or later.

This excerpt from 'A History of Wheat'may interest you:

THE NATURAL HISTORY OF WHEAT

The Roman Empire was built on Egyptian wheat, which they called "korn". It was Einkorn, which is the ancestor of modern wheats. (In Latin, this was the earliest form of Triticum, not to be confused with what we call "corn", which is Zea.)

It had two sets of chromosomes like human beings and is described as 2N or diploid. There were also some naturally occurring wheat that had four sets of chromosomes, or 4N or tetraploid. This was the wheat that the Roman Emperor, Eqyptian pharoahs and Christ were eating.

But what is on our table has been selectively bred over time to increase the gluten content for baking or pasta-making. Most are hexaploid, octoploid, double hexaploid, or hexaploid-octoploid hybrids. This means that they have 6, 8, 12, or more sets of chromosomes. Some of this extra DNA is coding for amino acid sequences that human beings cannot break down, including a 33-amino acid sequence named 33-MER. This 33-MER is what is causing the problem for celiac. Our immune systems are attacking this chain as though it were an invader or parasite. But this sequence is also similar to human tissue, and this inflammation can progress into an auto-immune disease. This auto-immune phase is really damaging, and largely incurable. Control is the only treatment, and life-long gluten free diet is the only control.

Open Original Shared Link

Someone of this forum shared this with me some time ago so I am passing it along. Claire

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RiceGuy Collaborator
This excerpt from 'A History of Wheat'may interest you:

THE NATURAL HISTORY OF WHEAT

The Roman Empire was built on Egyptian wheat, which they called "korn". It was Einkorn, which is the ancestor of modern wheats. (In Latin, this was the earliest form of Triticum, not to be confused with what we call "corn", which is Zea.)

It had two sets of chromosomes like human beings and is described as 2N or diploid. There were also some naturally occurring wheat that had four sets of chromosomes, or 4N or tetraploid. This was the wheat that the Roman Emperor, Eqyptian pharoahs and Christ were eating.

But what is on our table has been selectively bred over time to increase the gluten content for baking or pasta-making. Most are hexaploid, octoploid, double hexaploid, or hexaploid-octoploid hybrids. This means that they have 6, 8, 12, or more sets of chromosomes. Some of this extra DNA is coding for amino acid sequences that human beings cannot break down, including a 33-amino acid sequence named 33-MER. This 33-MER is what is causing the problem for celiac. Our immune systems are attacking this chain as though it were an invader or parasite. But this sequence is also similar to human tissue, and this inflammation can progress into an auto-immune disease. This auto-immune phase is really damaging, and largely incurable. Control is the only treatment, and life-long gluten free diet is the only control.

Open Original Shared Link

Someone of this forum shared this with me some time ago so I am passing it along. Claire

Ah, so I did read correctly...

Thanks for confirming that. Now, what does this say about gluten intolerance? I think it's the same as for air pollution. Man screwed up once again!

So, how do we get wheat like it used to be? Since they know the DNA sequence stuff, the plants obviously still exist. Someone should be producing it for the consumer market, in particular the gluten-free market if it really doesn't hurt us. And according to the info, it's safe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Claire Collaborator
Ah, so I did read correctly...

Thanks for confirming that. Now, what does this say about gluten intolerance? I think it's the same as for air pollution. Man screwed up once again!

So, how do we get wheat like it used to be? Since they know the DNA sequence stuff, the plants obviously still exist. Someone should be producing it for the consumer market, in particular the gluten-free market if it really doesn't hurt us. And according to the info, it's safe.

Now there's a business opportunity for you! Riceguy/wheat farmer! Claire

Link to comment
Share on other sites
laurelfla Enthusiast

well, i'm out of the study. it turns out that reimbursement would not be in full for me, so that doesn't work for me right now. maybe someone else will keep up posted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
VydorScope Proficient
I definitely would not take a pill at this point. I am against meds unless necessary because of side effects and so forth..I am perfectly content with staying on the diet. I think something that would be nice to have is a pill that helps with accidental gluten ingestions...not something to keep taking over and over...just my opinion.

I agree.. it be nice to take a pill then know I can safely order gluten free foods in a resturant and not worry about cross conatmination for example. The vast majority of gluten foods I just do not eat, and realy the only danger (should my test prove postive) to me is hidden gluten in things that should not have it.. and be nice to have some kind of recoruse against that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mswift Newbie
well, i'm out of the study. it turns out that reimbursement would not be in full for me, so that doesn't work for me right now. maybe someone else will keep up posted.

Hi Laurel,

I'm scheduled to participate in the study and was given the impression that all travel related expenses were going to be reimbursed. Based on what you've sayed I'm a little worried myself now. May I ask what they told you that would not be refunded?

Thanks,

Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jenvan Collaborator

am eager to hear what happens for those of you in the study!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
VydorScope Proficient
am eager to hear what happens for those of you in the study!

Im intrested to hear what hapens TO them. Whish I could take part!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jenvan Collaborator
Im intrested to hear what hapens TO them. Whish I could take part!

That too!! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,042
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LindaCef
    Newest Member
    LindaCef
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      @Katiec123 Welcome to the forum. I started to have symptoms related to coeliac disease (mouth ulcers, aura migraines etc) but no gastric symptoms during my first pregnancy.  That went to term, in fact, I was 10 days over and had to be induced.  But my second baby, born 21 months later, arrived at 33 weeks.  He's now doing well, and taller than all of us - it was just an earlier than expected arrival! I think if you can, you should ask for an urgent referral to the gastroenterologist from your GP.   See if that works. By the way you spell 'coeliac' I'm guessing you are posting from the UK?  If that is the case, the NHS may rush things along for you, I suspect they will.  If it appears that they cannot refer you urgently, if you have the money for a private consultation it might be well worth it, as there is a trend here in the UK (I'm British) to diagnose coeliacs without the need for an endoscopy if the blood test results are compelling. Sounds like this is the case for you.  If you can see a consultant gastroenterologist privately s/he might be able to diagnose you without going any further.  Once you get a formal diagnosis, there is a lot of support for coeliacs through the NHS, with nutritionist support, annual reviews and blood tests to check for diet compliance and health related issues, DEXA scans to check bone density, extra vaccinations where indicated and in some areas, certain gluten free food available on prescription. I hope all goes well with your appointment, let us know how you get on.
    • Shireen32
      Hi , since being gluten free I am still having bad stomach problems . Such as constant gas in my stomach 24/7 ,burning, constant bubbling noises coming from my stomach and gurgling sounds that never stop .Pain under the left side of my rib cage when ever I eat and just always there’s pain there  .  My symptoms have not improved at all since being gluten free.  Could this be refractory coeliac disease ?? How is that even diagnosed or confirmed  ?  I had tests recently and this is what they say :Endomysial abs (IgA) -Positive  TTG abs (IgA)U/ml : My result is : 0.9 U/ml The Range:0 - 10 U/ml What does this mean pls ??? How can I still test positive for Endomysial abs when I am gluten free and am very careful about cross contamination? Do I even have coeliac disease I’m convinced some other digestive disorder is causing these symptoms .   I also have not had a endoscopy and now the gastroenterologist calls me after one year ( I’m from the uk and have free healthcare which has been such a nightmare with all this and never help me  )  so as I am gluten free the gastroenterologist advised me to start eating gluten again to be referred for a biopsy .. Is a biopsy even worth me doing ? The only proof I have is when I was eating gluten I could never get my ferretin , vitamin d and folate levels up . And since being gluten free these have gone up a little bit  . But that doesn’t always mean coeliac as I know gluten stops absorption in even normal people  . Pls can anyone shed some light it’s much needed ! And share some advice or answer my questions above . I have no idea with this whole coeliac stuff and am very much struggling .Much Appreciated .  
    • knitty kitty
      Vitamin D deficiency.  Not enough Omega Threes. Another autoimmune disease like arthritis, maybe.    
    • Eldene
      Any Naturopaths on this site?
    • Katiec123
      @RMJ it makes sense as it’s something I’ve experienced more than once. Currently 24 weeks and baby is doing well! Will be seeking more medical advice today 
×
×
  • Create New...