Jump to content
  • You are not alone. Join Celiac.com for trusted gluten-free answers and forum support.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

Testing for/diagnosing celiac


pokey449

Recommended Posts

pokey449 Enthusiast

This past summer I was diagnosed with SIBO and received treatment. The SIBO got killed off but I kept having nausea and other symptoms. I also have a history of GERD. I had stopped my PPI because of the association between PPI use and SIBO. My GERD sxs started coming back along with persistent nausea. My GI doc decided to do an upper endoscopy and while doing so did biopsies to test for H pylori and celiac. MY endoscopy showed visually normal appearing esophagus, stomach and duodenum. The biopsies showed no H pylori, but did show mild villous blunting which per the path report said it might be an indication for celiac if confirmed with serology. Now my GI doc wants me to have blood work done for celiac. The thing is though when I got diagnosed with SIBO I went on a low FODMAP diet and a gluten free diet. Ive been on gluten free diet for 5 months. Now I am informed to do the blood tests I have to go back on gluten for 4 weeks for the test to be accurate. Im not sure I want to do that as it seems my overall gut and constitutional symptoms are slowly improving. And as I understand a biopsy the gold std that is used to confirm celiac and to prove or disprove blood tests for celiac, blood tests are not used to prove or disprove results of a biopsy. That said Are there any other blood tests for celiac that could substantiate or disprove the the biopsy that dont require being on a gluten diet. Ive been having a pretty miserable time these past 5-6 months getting to where I am at this point, Id hate to "fire things up" all over for one blood test. thanks

Pokey449


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Scott Adams Grand Master

Actually for a blood test you really need to eat around a slice of wheat bread a day for 12 weeks:

 If you are happily on a gluten-free diet, and it is relieving your symptoms, then do you really need to get an official diagnosis? The villi blunting, even after being gluten-free for so long, combined with your symptom improvement, might be enough for you to realize that gluten and you don't mix too well.

However, I've seen many people come back here after a few years being gluten-free who went back to eating gluten because they weren't sure of their diagnosis, only to have the same issues come back, then have to go through testing, the results of which may be inconclusive because they have non-celiac gluten sensitivity.

It's really your call if you want to get a diagnosis or not, and there can be positives and negatives to doing this. Negatives include possible higher life and health insurance rates. Positives include follow up testing, although my doctor any many others don't actually do this unless you ask them for it.

trents Grand Master

Also, research has shown that there are other foods and also medications that can cause villi blunting.

pokey449 Enthusiast
24 minutes ago, Scott Adams said:

Actually for a blood test you really need to eat around a slice of wheat bread a day for 12 weeks:

 If you are happily on a gluten-free diet, and it is relieving your symptoms, then do you really need to get an official diagnosis? The villi blunting, even after being gluten-free for so long, combined with your symptom improvement, might be enough for you to realize that gluten and you don't mix too well.

However, I've seen many people come back here after a few years being gluten-free who went back to eating gluten because they weren't sure of their diagnosis, only to have the same issues come back, then have to go through testing, the results of which may be inconclusive because they have non-celiac gluten sensitivity.

It's really your call if you want to get a diagnosis or not, and there can be positives and negatives to doing this. Negatives include possible higher life and health insurance rates. Positives include follow up testing, although my doctor any many others don't actually do this unless you ask them for it.

If I go back on a gluten diet, even just a slice  of bread once a day isn't there a chance those symptoms will come roaring back

knitty kitty Grand Master

Would a genetic test for the most common Celiac Disease genes be a possibility? 

If you've got the genes and the villi damage from the biopsy, would that be enough for your doctor to make a definite Celiac diagnosis?

 

pokey449 Enthusiast

Scott: I just saw the link to the discussion on "Gluten Challenge" INteresting that my GI doc says to eat bread for 4 weeks, not 12. Ill talk over the pros/cons with my PCP and decide what to do. I have a tendency stay away from gluten now now to just try and feel better and get well and revisit this down the road

2 minutes ago, knitty kitty said:

Would a genetic test for the most common Celiac Disease genes be a possibility? 

If you've got the genes and the villi damage from the biopsy, would that be enough for your doctor to make a definite Celiac diagnosis?

 

Kitty: I dont know, I will ask about genetic tests. This is all very new and confusing, especially when I add in all my GI sxs and trying to decide whats causing what

Scott Adams Grand Master
6 minutes ago, pokey449 said:

If I go back on a gluten diet, even just a slice  of bread once a day isn't there a chance those symptoms will come roaring back

To me this makes it a pretty clear cut case of gluten sensitivity, and likely celiac disease. Personally if it is this black and white for you I would not undergo the torture of a gluten challenge. The gene test could be done at any time, but would not confirm diagnosis.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Kate333 Rising Star
29 minutes ago, trents said:

Also, research has shown that there are other foods and also medications that can cause villi blunting.

Such as.....??

knitty kitty Grand Master
pokey449 Enthusiast

I have just learned that the oatmeal that I have been eating while supposedly on a gluten free diet the past 5 months is not gluten free. I eat it at least every other day and sometimes 2x per day. So given that my GI doctor wants me to have a TTG IGA blood test to compare with my biopsy results would this level of gluten ingestion be enough to create enough antibodies to consider the blood test to be accurate? 

trents Grand Master

Does the oatmeal give you any symptoms? Not sure if that level of cross contamination would be enough to produce a valid blood antibody test.

And did you know that about 10% of celiacs react to oat gluten like they do wheat, barley and rye gluten? Maybe not the best choice of hot breakfast cereals.

And how did you find out it was not gluten free?

pokey449 Enthusiast

It’s hard to tell. I don’t notice any additional sxs from the oatmeal. Actually it tends to settle my stomach. I don’t know  if all the sxs I have been having lately  are from SIBO, reflux or gluten. It seems they are all interrelated and it’s hard to tell what’s causing what.  This possible celiac is a new twist for me. At this point I don’t know for sure if I even have celiac. I found out the oatmeal was not gluten free by calling the company that produced the oatmeal and they said it was not gluten free. You mentioned “ oat gluten”. I didn’t think oats contained gluten per se. I’ve contacted my GI doc to ask if he thinks the oatmeal is enough to make the blood test valid. 

Scott Adams Grand Master

My guess is that the oatmeal would be pretty low in gluten, and would not be enough, since they recommend a slice of wheat bread per day for a gluten challenge.

trents Grand Master
6 hours ago, pokey449 said:

It’s hard to tell. I don’t notice any additional sxs from the oatmeal. Actually it tends to settle my stomach. I don’t know  if all the sxs I have been having lately  are from SIBO, reflux or gluten. It seems they are all interrelated and it’s hard to tell what’s causing what.  This possible celiac is a new twist for me. At this point I don’t know for sure if I even have celiac. I found out the oatmeal was not gluten free by calling the company that produced the oatmeal and they said it was not gluten free. You mentioned “ oat gluten”. I didn’t think oats contained gluten per se. I’ve contacted my GI doc to ask if he thinks the oatmeal is enough to make the blood test valid. 

In common use the term "gluten" has come to refer to the particular kind of gluten found in wheat, barley and rye that is famous for causing inflammation in the gut of those with active celiac disease. But all cereal grains contain some form of gluten. The gluten in oats is biochemically different enough from that in wheat, barley and rye that it is safe for most celiacs, but not all. 

GFinDC Veteran
12 hours ago, pokey449 said:

It’s hard to tell. I don’t notice any additional sxs from the oatmeal. Actually it tends to settle my stomach. I don’t know  if all the sxs I have been having lately  are from SIBO, reflux or gluten. It seems they are all interrelated and it’s hard to tell what’s causing what.  This possible celiac is a new twist for me. At this point I don’t know for sure if I even have celiac. I found out the oatmeal was not gluten free by calling the company that produced the oatmeal and they said it was not gluten free. You mentioned “ oat gluten”. I didn’t think oats contained gluten per se. I’ve contacted my GI doc to ask if he thinks the oatmeal is enough to make the blood test valid. 

Yes, absolutely your symptoms can become worse.  Some people don't finish the gluten challenge because of the symptoms it causes.

We can become sensitive to many foods besides gluten.  Until your gut heals and your immune system settles down you will probably continue to have symptoms.  Especially if you have developed additional food intolerances.  The best test for additional food intolerances is to do an elimination diet,

pokey449 Enthusiast

Wel I’m going to go ahead and get the blood test in hopes of unfortunatelynot being on a strict gluten free diet when I thought I was will yield accurate results. I’m not willing to go thru another possible 12 weeks of misery for one lousy blood test. I’ll go gluten free and hopefully after feeling well I can reconsider or just stay gluten free. Whatever all is going on with my gut is affecting my whole being and has been going on far to long without resolution. I need to find relief gluten or no gluten. 

Scott Adams Grand Master

Let us know how it turns out.

pokey449 Enthusiast

I heard back from my GI doc. He wants me to go ahead and get the blood test as well claiming I’ve likely had gluten sneaking into my diet more than just the oatmeal I’ve been eating. 

trents Grand Master

That sounds like a good plan. It is extremely challenging to eat truly gluten free.

pokey449 Enthusiast

Ok go results back on IGA test saying 327mg/dL. This is a normal level. However the report said there was a glitch in that the sample was partially centrifuged upon arrival to the lab and had to be re-centrifuged. To interpret the results with caution. So should I ask that it be repeated at no charge?? 

Other question. The lab order said to do a test for TTG IGA. Are they one in the  same or is that two different tests, TTG and IGA??? 

Scott Adams Grand Master

If they will do the test again without charge, why not? Here is more info on the typical recommended blood testing protocol:

 

trents Grand Master
47 minutes ago, pokey449 said:

Ok go results back on IGA test saying 327mg/dL. This is a normal level. However the report said there was a glitch in that the sample was partially centrifuged upon arrival to the lab and had to be re-centrifuged. To interpret the results with caution. So should I ask that it be repeated at no charge?? 

Other question. The lab order said to do a test for TTG IGA. Are they one in the  same or is that two different tests, TTG and IGA??? 

The TTG IGA is one test, not testing for two different antibodies. The TTG is the most specific for celiac disease and the most important one. Absolutely, you should be retested and have this one included for sure.

pokey449 Enthusiast

Ok I got two blood test results back. 
TTG IGA 0.4u/ml and IGA 327 u/dL. Both noted as “normal” So I have mild villi blunting with normal blood tests thus far. I understand these test results indicate that I might, I might not have celiac. Villi blunting apparently can be caused by PPIs which I was on for 17 years or can be caused by SIBO which I was diagnosed with this past summer. There are other causes of villi blunting but which I don’t think apply to me. So what does one do with all this? Go gluten free and see if it helps with sxs given one can be gluten sensitive w/o having celiac?? Retest for SIBO?? Go back on a PPI??  It’s all very baffling. 

trents Grand Master

There are some other medications and medical conditions that can cause villi blunting. Some blood pressure meds, some NSAIDS, and an antibiotic or so. I think Chron's maybe. Someone posted a link the other day addressing this issue. I would suggest googling something like, "What can cause villous atrophy besides celiac disease?"

Beverage Proficient

I did not get the endoscopy and I do have an official written diagnosis from a doctor. I'm in the U.S. 

We had to satisfy 3 criteria:  1. positive antibody test  2. positive DNA test  and  3. good response to a gluten free diet.

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - cristiana replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    2. - CC90 replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    3. - Wheatwacked replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    4. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Origins of Celiac Disease
      19

      Do Antibiotics in Babies Increase Celiac Disease Risk Later in Life? (+Video)

    5. - trents replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,189
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442

    Lhughes327
    Newest Member
    Lhughes327
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • cristiana
      Hi @CC90 Ah... that is very interesting.  Although it is very annoying for you to have to go through it all again, I would say that almost sounds like an admission that they didn't look far enough last time?   I could be wrong, but I would not be at all surprised if they find something on the next attempt.  Coeliac damage can be very patchy, as I understand it, so that's why my own gastroenterologist always likes to point out that he's taken lots of samples!  In the kindest possible way (you don't want to upset the person doing the procedure!) I'd be inclined to tell them what happened last time and to ask them in person to take samples lower down, as  if your health system is anything like the one in my country, communication between GPs, consultants and hospitals isn't always very good.  You don't want the same mistake to be made again. You say that your first endoscopy was traumatic?  May I ask, looking at your spelling of coeliac, was this done at an NHS hospital in England?  The reason for the question is that one of my NHS diagnosed friends was not automatically offered a sedative and managed without one.  Inspired by her, I tried to have an endoscopy one time, in a private setting, without one, so that I could recover quicker, but I had to request sedative in the end it was so uncomfortable.    I am sorry that you will have to go through a gluten challenge again but to make things easier, ensure you eat things containing gluten that you will miss should you have to go gluten free one day. 😂 I was told to eat 2 slices of normal wholemeal bread or the equivalent every day in the weeks before , but I also opted for Weetabix and dozens of Penguin chocolate biscuits.  (I had a very tight headache across my temple for days before the procedure, which I thought was interesting as I had that frequently growing up. - must have been a coeliac symptom!)  Anyway, I do hope you soon get the answers you are looking for and do keep us posted. Cristiana  
    • CC90
      Hi Cristiana   Yes I've had the biopsy results showing normal villi and intestinal mucosa.  The repeat endoscopy (requested by the gastro doc) would be to take samples from further into the intestine than the previous endoscopy reached.      
    • Wheatwacked
      Transglutaminase IgA is the gold-standard blood test for celiac disease. Sensitivity of over 90% and specificity of 95–99%. It rarely produces false positives.  An elevated level means your immune system is reacting to gluten.  Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS) does not typically cause high levels of tTG-IgA. Unfortunately the protocols for a diagnosis of Celiac Disease are aimed at proving you don't have it, leaving you twisting in the wind. Genetic testing and improvement on a trial gluten free diet, also avoiding milk protein, will likely show improvement in short order if it is Celiac; but will that satisfy the medical system for a diagnosis? If you do end up scheduling a repeat endoscopy, be sure to eat up to 10 grams of gluten for 8 - 12 weeks.  You want  to create maximum damage. Not a medical opinion, but my vote is yes.
    • trents
      Cristiana asks a very relevant question. What looks normal to the naked eye may not look normal under the microscope.
    • cristiana
      Hello @CC90 Can I just ask a question: have you actually been told that your biopsy were normal, or just that your stomach, duodenum and small intestine looked normal? The reason I ask is that when I had my endoscopy, I was told everything looked normal.  My TTG score was completely through the roof at the time, greater than 100 which was then the cut off max. for my local lab.  Yet when my biopsy results came back, I was told I was stage 3 on the Marsh scale.  I've come across the same thing with at least one other person on this forum who was told everything looked normal, but the report was not talking about the actual biopsy samples, which had to be looked at through a microscope and came back abnormal.
×
×
  • Create New...