Jump to content
  • You are not alone. Join Celiac.com for trusted gluten-free answers and forum support.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

Six Years After Diagnosis - 2nd Endoscopy Results


Chuck1004

Recommended Posts

Chuck1004 Apprentice

Hi all,

Sort of a crazy question.  Six years ago, I was sent to a GI specialist to followup on an elevated liver enzyme.  It turned out to be simple fatty liver, although the specialist ordered a battery of tests that were suggestive of celiac disease.  I was non-symptomatic at the time, followed up with an endoscopy and biopsy, was diagnosed as a celiac, followed up six months later after adopting a gluten free diet, had normal blood labs, and was told to maintain it indefinitely.

Six years later, I just had a followup endoscopy from my new GI doc to followup on the celiac progression.  They thought I had Barrett's esophagus after the endoscope and the office called at 4:55 on Friday with my test results.  It was only the secretary left and she was reading from their letter that was being sent out to me.  I didn't have Barrett's esophagus and everything else looked fine, and I asked her how the celiac disease read.  She was a bit over the place, but she said, "It says no celiac."  I told her I was diagnosed six years ago.  She said it looked like there was a word missing in the letter and she'd have to followup with the doctor on Monday.

So I'm half wondering if the point of the letter was since adopting the gluten free diet and maintaining it for six years, there's no active traces of damage from celiac disease, or if it's possible I was misdiagnosed all those years ago, especially given I'm non-symptomatic.  At the very least, I have the weekend to fantasize about going back to my favorite pizza place!

These were the relevant results I received six years ago.  Could anyone give guidance as to how they read, and especially how your followup endoscopies may have gone?

January 2012-

ANTINUCLEAR ANTIBODY see comment    
Positive at 1:40. Negative at 1:80 and 1:160
*** Normal Value: Negative at 1:40 and 1:160 ***
ANA PATTERN SPECKLED    
A positive test for antinuclear antibody does not necessarily identify a
patient as having a systemic connective tissue disease. Serum from 25% of
healthy individuals yields a positive test for ANA at a titer of 1:40 and
serum from 5% of healthy individuals yields a positive test at a titer
equal to or greater than 1:160.
Serum from 95% of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and
systemic sclerosis (SSc) and 75% with Sjogren's syndrome (SS) yields a
positive test for ANA in titer equal to or greater than 1:40. The test for
ANA is positive at titers equal to or greater than 1:160 in about 90% of
patients with SLE and SSc and about 70% with SS.
Mandakolathur R. Murali, M.D., Director Clinical Immunology Laboratory
Method is fluorescent non-infectious agent antibody test with microscopic
evaluation.
Anti tTG IgA AB 45.63 U/mL 0 - 15 U/mL
Positive
Result checked

February 2012 - biopsy results

FINAL PATHOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS:
A. DUODENUM BIOPSY:
Duodenal mucosa with increased intraepithelial lymphocytes and normal villous
architecture, (see note).
Note: A CD3 immunostain demonstrates increased intraepithelial lymphocytes
throughout most of the architecturally preserved villi. Although non-specific,
in conjunction with the known positive serum IgA TTG, the findings support a
diagnosis of celiac disease.

September 2012, April 2013 - lab followup

tTG AB, IGA <1.2 U/mL <4.0 Negative U/mL

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GF-Cheetah Cub Contributor

If you were diagnosed 6 years ago, and have maintained a gluten free diet, your blood tests and endoscopy are supposed to be normal.    It means your body has healed, but Celiac is a lifelong disease, you can not go back to eating gluten.   Sorry.

My daughter is also a non-symptomatic celiac.    She was diagnosed by blood test, followed by the endoscopy.   We further confirmed that she has Celiac gene.   Until they found us a cure.    My daughter can not eat gluten, even though she is non-symptomatic.

Chuck1004 Apprentice

That’s very helpful.  As I wasn’t able to talk to the doctor it turned into a game of telephone and all I got was “no celiac.”  I was at the very early stages then, it looks like, and have maintained the diet, so that answers my question.  As I read the initial biopsy results as almost a diagnosis of exclusion and never had the genetic test I was curious how to interpret the message.

kareng Grand Master

If you have been been gluten-free, you shouldn't have no evidence of Celiac now.  That does not mean you don't have Celiac.  

As an example, if you have high blood pressure and take medicine to lower it, you don't stop taking the medication because your blood pressure is now good.  In Celiac, food is the medication.  You don't stop the gluten-free diet just because your intestines have healled.  

Chuck1004 Apprentice

I suppose it makes sense that it would heal fully given how little damage I had in the first place!

lisas11lisa Apprentice

You and I were diagnosed at the same time...I too just had another endoscopy and colonoscopy...I too have been diagnosed.with Barratts Esophagus..I really do have it though...My intestines look good..no visible sign of Celiac..BECAUSE I AM DILIGENT!!..Please DO NOT GO BACK TO EATING GLUTEN..we are supposed to heal....My Dr said.."this is what we want to see..so many people cheat..and don't read labels"..I personally will never knowingly eat gluten EVER AGAIN...Goodluck.

 

Chuck1004 Apprentice

I'm sorry to hear about your diagnosis but I'm hoping it didn't show any precancerous cells?  I have a friend who has it as well and it's regular endoscopies.  From what I read few people who have it see it develop into anything.   Since I was told I was not a celiac maybe I have it after all!

It's funny you say that.  I know of at least one celiac who eats gluten free on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays.   I suppose that's like being allergic to peanuts but partaking once or twice a week??  I've only purposefully cheated a couple of times in six years.  Knowing I was non-symptomatic and that any contamination would essentially fire up my immune system anyway, if I was out of the country or on vacation I would confine my cheating to the same timespan, get it out of my system, and then get back on the wagon.  I had actually been nervous because a restaurant I frequented was apparently not as contamination free as I thought, but luckily, no harm done.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

I also just had a recent repeat endoscopy after five years.   The “latest and greatest” camera revealed a healed small intestine (pathologist’s report also supported this fact).  This time I was experiencing some issues (had no GI issues at the time of my diagnosis), but it turned out to be chronic autoimmune gastritis.   It is so nice to have confirmation that I am adhering to the gluten free diet.  

I think you were lucky that your celiac disease was caught in the early stages before causing further damage to not just your gut leading to intolerances (e.g. lactose or soy) or osteoporosis, but in possibly avoiding other autoimmune issues.  

Keep up the good work!  ?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,166
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442

    Harry Jones
    Newest Member
    Harry Jones
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      For people of European ancestry, 2% is about average, depending on which study you look at. For Asian ancestry it can be higher. For full Sub-Saharan African ancestry it is zero, but in practice they tend to have trace amounts due to migration back into Africa. While each individual may have 1-3% Neanderthal DNA, it is not always the same DNA that is Neanderthal. Estimates are 20-70% for which parts of the human genome might be Neanderthal in any given individual. Another way of saying this is that 20-70% of the Neanderthal genome survives in the human population. The HLA genotypes that confer susceptibility to celiac (necessary but not sufficient) are known to be of human in origin. There are some other genes known to be associated with a higher probability for getting celiac (with the right HLA genotype) that are associated with Neanderthal DNA. However, there is no correlation between quantity of Neanderthal DNA and probability of getting celiac. Neanderthal DNA is associated with other autoimmune diseases. Lupus, Crohn's disease, and rheumatoid arthritis are probably the most strongly associated diseases.
    • suek54
      I believe most of us have tiny but still traceable neanderthal components in our DNA. If you have 2% it is considered high. It would be interesting to test the DNA of those with coeliacs and other autoimmune conditions to see whether we have a high neanderthal percentage. ? Sue
    • BelleDeJour
      Thank you @suek54!  @trents she did mention doing it and asked if I had any of the little bumps left. I only had a few on my feet which I can feel but they are not very visible. She couldn't really see them but I said it was okay for her to touch me and when she did, she said she could feel them. My feet in particular were covered in them a few weeks ago but I now have very few left. I can still feel them slightly on the backs of my calves. I should have taken photographs but looking at my skin for the last year, well, I just haven't been able to, I found it too upsetting.  I think she just was in no doubt that all my symptoms matched dermatitis herpetiformis. My gastro symptoms (now also getting much better) seemed to confirm it for her. She was satisfied that my new diet is the cure and was very impressed that I am already taking all the vitamins and minerals that she would usually recommends. Actually, except Turmeric - does any take that? I am not sure what it does so will look into that today.  She has given me an 'open' appointment for 6 months time (I guess that means I can cancel it if I feel that I don't need it by then).
    • knitty kitty
      Dutch processing (alkalization) reduces the polyphenols!   Do check the labels on cocoa powder and avoid those stating it has been through Dutch processing. Hershey's and Nestles don't use Dutch processing.   Ghirardelli's does use Dutch processing.
    • suek54
      Hi Ginger38,  Huge sympathies, so very hard to do alone. Are there any groups locally where you could meet others face to face to share your struggles and to encourage each other with diet? I'm a foodie too and love baking. I found it very hard facing the fact that I could never again eat homemade bread still warm from the oven or cakes or pastry. I tried a few gluten free recipes but they were pretty miserable by comparison and I gave up. Lately however I have gone back to it and am finding a few recipes which are pretty good to eat and enjoyable to make. . (For what its worth, I  think the secret is finding a good general purpose gluten free flour and embracing the use of xanthem gum) If you can find just one gluten free receipe you can make and enjoy, it might just help you break out of the struggle you are in?  Sometimes though, you simply have to ask for help to get you through the tough times...a friend, a neighbour, a doctor, a work colleague? I hope you find someone to help. Sue
×
×
  • Create New...