Jump to content
  • You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

Gluten Free For 6 Years- Retest Came Back Negative


Manda Herndon

Recommended Posts

Manda Herndon Newbie

Hi! This is my first online post ever. I am in need of some help. I was diagnosed with celiac disease when I was a senior in high school (about 7 years ago) and I have been gluten free for 6 solid years.

I went to get retested about 2 years ago- the Dr. only did a blood test and he told me it came back negative. I did some research which let me know that a blood test would come back negative if I had no gluten in my system bc my insides were calm. False negative - makes sense.

Well just a couple of months ago I went to a different Dr - he did a flex sig and something else and checked my insides. He also said the tests came back negative for celiac disease. Buuutttt - once again I didn't have any gluten in my system. Could that affect the tests? I've been gluten free for 6 years.

I had a slip up about a few months ago and ate some gluten and it felt like I was being stabbed in the stomach all over again. Also had the major lower back and stomach pains that I used to get before I was diagnosed. That makes me think I still have it.

I guess I just have tons of questions. I'm married now and we're thinking about having a baby in about a year. If I don't have celiac disease I'd love to get super healthy by eating a well balanced diet and incorporating wheat back in it. But I'm not even sure if that's necessary. I'm even thinking about going on a mission trip soon and it would be a lot easier I'm sure if I didn't need my gluten free food.

Please help. Any advice is appreciated.

Thanks!!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



dilettantesteph Collaborator

Once you have celiac, you always have celiac. It isn't outgrown. The tests look for response to gluten. If you aren't eating any gluten, they will be negative even if you have celiac disease. You can get a balanced diet without eating wheat. Wheat was developed relatively late in the evolution of man. We don't need it. You can eat other grains.

mushroom Proficient

Yep. The negative test shows you are doing a good job of avoiding gluten :)

kareng Grand Master

To add to the other posters: The negative endoscopy means you have healed you intestines. If you start eating gluten, you will damage it again. It may take a year or 2 to have a lot of damage but you wouldn't want that. Also, if your pregnant, the antibodies that attack your intestines when you eat gluten, could attack the baby or the placenta.

cassP Contributor

ditto. you were diagnosed with celiac, you are a celiac. the recent negative tests show that you have healed your villi and are not actively producing antibodies.

like said above- you can still eat the food pyramid/carb heavy if you like- just without gluten.

GlutenFreeManna Rising Star

yep, I agree with what everyone else has said. Just to add to it, once you are diagnosed, doctors often retest as a measure of how well you are avoiding gluten. If it come back negative after you have been eating gluten free that means you are doing a good job avoiding it. Also, just the fact that you said you felt sick from ingesting some gluten on accident means that you still react and will make yourself very sick again if you go back to eating it. I know "healthy" can be a confusing concept when the world is saying you have to eat whole wheat things, but in the case of diagnosed celiac you need to avoid wheat (and rye and barley) to be healthy and especially to have healthy pregnancy. You can eat lots of other whole grains like brown rice, quinoa (if it agrees with you), flax, buckwheat, corn (grits, polenta), etc if you want to have a more whole grain diet.

Reba32 Rookie

You have Celiac disease. Eating wheat is not part of a healthy diet for you. And I would even argue that it is not needed by the general population either. It is more than possible to have a "healthy diet" that does not contain grains.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



T.H. Community Regular

Just out of curiosity - why were you tested again? And did the doctor who was testing you know you had a positive test previously when he tested? There should be no reason for either of them to be checking to see if you have celiac disease with a positive diagnosis already. It's not a disease like chicken pox that you 'get over.'

It's more... It's kind of like being born deaf and having the doctor check to make sure you're still deaf a few years later. Some things are simply part of us.

Right now, my doctor gives me the blood test to make SURE it's coming back negative, so he can check that going gluten free is working. Sounds like it's doing well for you if it's negative. That's a good thing.

Regarding the diet and having a baby? A gluten free diet is not inherently healthy or unhealthy for a normal person. Wheat ain't a required food group, you know? But for a celiac, a gluten free diet is the ONLY healthy diet for you (sorry for the mission trip. It's not gonna be easy. Although maybe you'll luck out and it'll be one of the island countries where no one eats wheat. :) ). But back to the pregnancy: if you have celiac disease, pregnancy is the time you want to be really strict about staying away from gluten. If you eat gluten while you are pregnant, you could be putting the baby at serious risk. Many women suffer miscarriages when they get pregnant and have undiagnosed celiac disease, because the body can't absorb enough nutrients to support both mommy and baby. Definitely something to completely avoid.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,075
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442

    Nan7472
    Newest Member
    Nan7472
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      There is a 10 year old post in this forum on Edy's and Dreyer's ice cream. The information is somewhat outdated and the thread is closed to further comment, so here is a new one. Edy's And Dreyer's Grand Vanilla Bean Ice Cream - 1.5 Quart is labeled "Gluten Free". This is a different answer than years gone by. I don't know the answer for any other flavor at this moment. On 1 May, 2026, Edy's website says: "As a general rule, the gluten in Edy's and Dreyer's® frozen dessert products is present only in the added bakery products, such as cookies, cake or brownies. We always label the eight major food allergens on our package by their common name. We recommend to always check the label for the most current information before purchasing and/or consuming a product. The exception to this rule is our Slow Churned French Silk frozen dairy dessert, which contains gluten in the natural flavors." https://www.icecream.com/us/en/brands/edys-and-dreyers/faq It seems that Edy's and Dreyer's are more celiac-friendly than they were 10 years ago. Once I found enough information to make today's buying decision, I stopped researching.
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      probably not your situation @Mimiof2, but allow me to add one more to @trents list of celiac-mimics: "olmesartan-induced sprue-like enteropathy"  
    • knitty kitty
      My dad had an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.  Fortunately, it was discovered during an exam.  The doctor could feel my dad's heart beating in his stomach/abdomen.  The aneurysm burst when the doctor first touched it in surgery.  Since he was already hooked up to the bypass machine, my dad survived ten more years.  Close call! Triple A's can press on the nerves in the spinal cord causing leg pain.  I'm wondering if bowing the head might have increased the pressure on an aneurysm and then the nerves.   https://gulfcoastsurgeons.com/understanding-abdominal-aortic-aneurysm-symptoms-and-causes/ Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Presenting as a Claudication https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4040638/
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      You have an odd story there. To me, the mechanical trigger suggests a mechanical problem and lower leg pain is a classic sciatica symptom. The fact that the clear mechanical linkage is no longer there does not take away from the fact that it was - maybe something shifted and the simple alignment is no longer there. There's also a good chance I am wrong and it's something else entirely. @Scott Adams's mention of shingles is interesting. It seems possible but unlikely to me, but who knows. However, I am writing here to reinforce the idea of getting the shingles vaccine. Ask anyone who has ever had shingles and they will bend your ear telling you how bad it is. I watched my wife go through it and it scared the bejeebers out of me. Even if you had the chicken pox vaccine, you really want to get the shingles vaccine.
    • HectorConvector
      Oddly this effect has gone now, just happened yesterday evening, the nerve pain is now back to its usual "unpredictable" random self again - but that was the only time I ever had some mechanical trigger for it, don't know why! There's no (or wasn't) actual pain in my neck - it was inside the leg, but when I looked down, now though, the leg pain just comes and goes randomly as before again.
×
×
  • Create New...