Jump to content
  • You are not alone. Join Celiac.com for trusted gluten-free answers and forum support.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

Sunbeam Mixmaster


Suzie

Recommended Posts

Suzie Rookie

I was in Penney's yesterday and noticed a Sunbeam Mixmaster stand mixer with a 450 watt motor. It looked almost exactly like the KitchenAid at about half the cost. Does anyone out there have a Sunbeam and does it work as well as the KitchenAid?

Sue


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Nancym Enthusiast

Here's what I would do, I'd go to google and put in the name of the thing you're interested in and "reviews". There are a lot of sites that review products now! Its helped save me from buying some stinkers.

happygirl Collaborator

I have a Sunbeam Mixmaster and I love it! My mom has her original one (like 30 years old) and my grandma has one....so I got one when I got married. It is great!

larry mac Enthusiast

Hey Sue,

I have a Sunbeam Mixmaster, Heritage Series, Legacy Edition, in Antique White (cream, almond?). It's a beautiful mixer, and I really like it. Got it for Christmas two years ago and it has performed well for it's intended purposes. Those would be mixing cake mixes, making whipped cream, merangue, other light duties. You can not make real bread with it (a moot point now, ironically), as it will overheat and shut off, 450 watts notwithstanding. Also, when making cookies, muffins, and even some of our breads, the thicker batters "fill and climb up " the beaters, a minor nuisance. I've alleviated that problem somewhat by using the wire wisk beaters, instead of the regular beaters. BTW, the regular beaters are the same as the beaters on a hand held mixer. The wisk beaters are not the same as on the Kitchenaid.

Some pros:

~ Like you said, half the cost of the Artisan. When I bought it, I figured I wouldn't be using it all that much, and therefore couldn't justify the Kitchenaids cost (actually only one of several factors in decision).

~ The bowl rotates, making it very convenient to scrape down the sides while your mixing, you just hold the spatula in one place. Also, since the beaters are on one side only, you have plenty of room to add ingredients while it's mixing.

~ It comes with a large bowl, and a small bowl.

~ It's smaller than the Kitchenaid Artisan mixer (the comparable tilt-head model), and much smaller than the Professional Kitchenaid.

~ The speed controls are more convenient, in my opinion. I've also always liked the retro look, the jet engine look.

Now, I've never had or used the Kitchenaid. But I've done a ton of research, have friends who own one, and watch a lot of cooking shows. I'm going to take the liberty of making some comparisons, and if anyone that owns one would like to make comments, please feel free to chime in.

~ It has a paddle beater. The beater moves around the bowl in an eliptical orbit, instead of just spinning. Product doesn't get stuck in the paddle like I mentioned above (I'm guessing). I'm thinking the paddle beater would be perfect for our bread batters. Of course it has a wire wisk and a dough hook also. (edit: most cookbook recipes that specify a stand mixer say "using a paddle beater in a heavy duty mixer...")

~ It has a real gear drive. This is a mechanical transmission. First gear, second gear, etc. Lots of torque, durabilty. The Sunbeam has an electrical control, like a fan. That's why it won't go really slow (another minor nuisance), and it can bog down and overheat, no torque.

Yes it's more expensive, but you only buy a stand mixer once (unless you buy a Mixmaster and then decide to buy a Kitchenaid)!

Best regards, lm

I was in Penney's yesterday and noticed a Sunbeam Mixmaster stand mixer with a 450 watt motor. It looked almost exactly like the KitchenAid at about half the cost. Does anyone out there have a Sunbeam and does it work as well as the KitchenAid?

Sue

lorka150 Collaborator

like happygirl, my mum and gramma both used their sunbeams their whole life. (and still do)

Michi8 Contributor

My mom had a sunbeam that lasted her almost 40 years. She replaced it with a Kitchenaid. I have a Kitchenaid, and prefer the design over Sunbeam (though I'm not clear on whether the Sunbeam design has changed much over those years.) I find it does a very thorough job with little to no need to scrape the bowl down, and it's powerful enough to handle any task. The one I have is the Ultra Power...not as powerful as the Artisan, but more powerful than the Classic.

Michelle

hannahsue01 Enthusiast

Everybody has there favorite mixer I am sure. Like said above some mixers can not handle the breads. My grandma blew the moter out of her Oaster mixer a few months back making buns. Therefor I wanted to get a mixer for our family that would last for years to come and hopefully never need to be replaced. I did some research first and diceded to get the KitchenAid Professional 600 Stand Mixer. It has a 575 watt moter wich was the highest that I could find on any household mixer. It has all steal gears and transmission wich most don't. It also is sapossed to stop itself before it over heats or grinds any gears.....this is the biggest reason I chose this mixer being I didn't want one to burn up on me and have to buy a new one. We have had it for a few months now and love it. It is the most powerful mixer that we or anyone else who has seen it have ever encountered.....you would swear the thing is getting ready for take off when set ont he highest speed. It retailes for $500 but we were able to get it at Kohl's for $300 with sales......so far it has been worth every penny.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Suzie Rookie

Does anyone out there have a Sunbeam Mixmaster 400 watt stand mixer? I'm wondering if they are OK for gluten-free baking.

Thanks.

Sue

Suzie Rookie

Does anyone out there have a Sunbeam Mixmaster heavy duty--say 450 watt? I saw one in Penney's the other day at half the cost of a KitchenAid. Opinions?

Thanks.

Sue

larry mac Enthusiast
Does anyone out there have a Sunbeam Mixmaster heavy duty--say 450 watt? I saw one in Penney's the other day at half the cost of a KitchenAid. Opinions?

Thanks.

Sue

Hi Sue,

Since nobody else is commenting on this topic right now, I think I'll throw some more thoughts out there (please see my first post above). Maybe we can spur some further debate from the Kitchenaid and Mixmaster users.

I'm of the opinion that too often people put way too much emphasis on "watts". I believe there are much more important factors to consider. Lets talk about bread making. Real bread making requires a strong, tough mixer (if, that is, your going to use the mixer to knead the dough in lieu of hand kneading). You need watts, sure. But you also need torque. The way to get usable torque is to have gear drive, like a kitchenaid has. Mixmasters don't have gear drive, they have electronic speed control. That's one big reason they are less expensive. Even if you had more watts, without an effective means to control and deliver those watts to the beaters, your starting out at a disadvantage.

I have a mixmaster, a really nice one. I like it a lot. It does not have gear drive, nor will it make real bread. Of course, that is not a requirement now that we don't eat real bread, is it? Makes great whipped cream, meringues, and cakes. It has some serious design flaws that make it less than perfect for making anything thicker than cake batters. Generally, I would say that cookies, muffins, and even gluten free bread "dough" are thicker than cake batters. I make all three a lot, and the Mixmaster manages ok. Here's where the "less than perfect" part comes in. The beaters just seem to suck for these dense products. As soon as I add enough ingredients to make the batters thick, it gets stuck inside the beaters and then starts climbing up the beaters. I have to stop mixing and redistribute the product a couple times to ensure thorough mixing, or keep it from actually getting up on the motor body. Also, the recipes for normal (wheat) cookies, muffins, pancakes etc. say not to overmix or you'll end up with tough product. The gluten-free recipes more often say to mix 4-5 minutes. So I'm using the mixer more where before, I might just mix quickly by hand.

Here's the part where I can only speculate, but I'm guessing that the paddle beater on a Kitchenaid is designed to eliminate this problem. Add the gear drive and the eliptical orbit design, and you've probably got a far superior machine. I think it's probably fairly obvious, but frankly, I'm starting to get a little frustated with mine. It was fine before with only the occasional use, but the last month I've used it 3 times a week or more and am not as happy with it as I once was.

I'm starting to wonder if my mother's has lasted for 40 years because she hardly ever used it! (that's a joke, maybe, ha ha)

best regards, lm

Michi8 Contributor
Here's the part where I can only speculate, but I'm guessing that the paddle beater on a Kitchenaid is designed to eliminate this problem. Add the gear drive and the eliptical orbit design, and you've probably got a far superior machine. I think it's probably fairly obvious, but frankly, I'm starting to get a little frustated with mine. It was fine before with only the occasional use, but the last month I've used it 3 times a week or more and am not as happy with it as I once was.

I'm starting to wonder if my mother's has lasted for 40 years because she hardly ever used it! (that's a joke, maybe, ha ha)

best regards, lm

The single paddle makes a big difference. Very sturdy, doesn't get too mucked up (the batter/dough stays in the bowl, rather than climbing the paddle) and is very easy to scrape off. Now the paddle does have its limits. With Sunbeam's beaters, you can mix and whip with them, which the paddle doesn't do, but with the Kitchenaid you also get a wire wisk attachment and a dough hook. All three tools do a good job. :)

Michelle

tiffjake Enthusiast
I was in Penney's yesterday and noticed a Sunbeam Mixmaster stand mixer with a 450 watt motor. It looked almost exactly like the KitchenAid at about half the cost. Does anyone out there have a Sunbeam and does it work as well as the KitchenAid?

Sue

I had one, got it at Walmart. Hated it. Took it back. I don't cook much, maybe that was my problem. I found it harder to use than hand mixers. Messier too.

happygirl Collaborator

In general, stand mixers and hand mixers are used for different things (although, some things you could use either).

Michi8 Contributor
In general, stand mixers and hand mixers are used for different things (although, some things you could use either).

A stand mixer can be used for anything a hand mixer will do, but it doesn't work the other way 'round. :) Of course, you could always choose to mix everything by hand instead, and forgo buying a mixer of any sort. :P

Michelle

Suzie Rookie

Thanks everyone for all your help. Looks like the KitchenAid is the mixer I would need. Now to try to justify spending that kind of money. ;)

I was in Penney's yesterday and noticed a Sunbeam Mixmaster stand mixer with a 450 watt motor. It looked almost exactly like the KitchenAid at about half the cost. Does anyone out there have a Sunbeam and does it work as well as the KitchenAid?

Sue

Michi8 Contributor
Thanks everyone for all your help. Looks like the KitchenAid is the mixer I would need. Now to try to justify spending that kind of money. ;)

(Suzie @ Jan 12 2007, 01:09 PM)

I was in Penney's yesterday and noticed a Sunbeam Mixmaster stand mixer with a 450 watt motor. It looked almost exactly like the KitchenAid at about half the cost. Does anyone out there have a Sunbeam and does it work as well as the KitchenAid?

Sue

Does that mean you just answered your own question? LOL! :lol:

Michelle

Edit: Okay, scratch my response...I miss-read what you wrote (thought you were buying the Sunbeam in response to your post about seeing one for sale cheaper than a Kitchenaid...I thought it was funny!) After re-reading, I see your choosing the Kitchenaid. Good choice! Of course, do some shopping around for the best price. Check with Kitchenaid too...sometimes they have bonus deals for buying their products. ;)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,187
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442

    Dennis E. Schertz
    Newest Member
    Dennis E. Schertz
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • CC90
      Hi Cristiana   Yes I've had the biopsy results showing normal villi and intestinal mucosa.  The repeat endoscopy (requested by the gastro doc) would be to take samples from further into the intestine than the previous endoscopy reached.      
    • Wheatwacked
      Transglutaminase IgA is the gold-standard blood test for celiac disease. Sensitivity of over 90% and specificity of 95–99%. It rarely produces false positives.  An elevated level means your immune system is reacting to gluten.  Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS) does not typically cause high levels of tTG-IgA. Unfortunately the protocols for a diagnosis of Celiac Disease are aimed at proving you don't have it, leaving you twisting in the wind. Genetic testing and improvement on a trial gluten free diet, also avoiding milk protein, will likely show improvement in short order if it is Celiac; but will that satisfy the medical system for a diagnosis? If you do end up scheduling a repeat endoscopy, be sure to eat up to 10 grams of gluten for 8 - 12 weeks.  You want  to create maximum damage. Not a medical opinion, but my vote is yes.
    • trents
      Cristiana asks a very relevant question. What looks normal to the naked eye may not look normal under the microscope.
    • cristiana
      Hello @CC90 Can I just ask a question: have you actually been told that your biopsy were normal, or just that your stomach, duodenum and small intestine looked normal? The reason I ask is that when I had my endoscopy, I was told everything looked normal.  My TTG score was completely through the roof at the time, greater than 100 which was then the cut off max. for my local lab.  Yet when my biopsy results came back, I was told I was stage 3 on the Marsh scale.  I've come across the same thing with at least one other person on this forum who was told everything looked normal, but the report was not talking about the actual biopsy samples, which had to be looked at through a microscope and came back abnormal.
    • trents
      My bad. I should have reread your first post as for some reason I was thinking your TTG was within normal range. While we are talking about celiac antibody blood work, you might not realize that there is not yet an industry standard rating scale in use for those blood tests so just having a raw number with out the reference scale can be less than helpful, especially when the test results are marginal. But a result of 87.4 is probably out of the normal range and into the positive range for any lab's scale. But back to the question of why your endoscopy/biopsy didn't show damage despite significantly positive TTG. Because they took the trouble to take seven samples, it is not likely they missed damage because of it being patchy. The other possibility is that there hasn't been time for the damage to show up. How long have you been experiencing the symptoms you describe in your first post? Having said all that, there are other medical conditions that can cause elevated TTG-IGA values and sometimes they are transient issues. I think it would be wise to ask for another TTG-IGA before the repeat endoscopy to see if it is still high.  Knitty kitty's suggestion of getting genetic testing done is also something to think about. About 35% of the general population will have one or both genes that are markers for the potential to develop active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develop celiac disease. So, having a celiac potential gene cannot be used to definitively diagnose celiac disease but it can be realistically used to rule it out if you don't have either of the genes. If your symptoms persist, and all testing is complete and the follow-up endoscopy/biopsy still shows no damage, you should consider trialing a gluten free diet for a few months to see if symptoms improve. If not celiac disease, you could have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). 
×
×
  • Create New...