Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com!
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Thoughts On "produced In Facility That Processes Wheat" Statement?


jrappene

Recommended Posts

jrappene Newbie

I was wondering what everybody thinks about the statement "produced in facility that processes wheat..."? Should I be as worried as I am? Please comment.

Jordan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Juliebove Rising Star
I was wondering what everybody thinks about the statement "produced in facility that processes wheat..."? Should I be as worried as I am? Please comment.

Jordan

I would probably buy that unless my daughter had a reaction to it and then I certainly would not. I would not buy a product that said it was made on shared lines with wheat or may contain traces of...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
irish daveyboy Community Regular
I was wondering what everybody thinks about the statement "produced in facility that processes wheat..."? Should I be as worried as I am? Please comment.

Jordan

'produced in a facility' that statement may mean another building within a production complex.

.

Even made on a line that produces Wheat products is normally safe, there are very strict clean-down

processes in a food facility..

.

I personally wouldn't be unduly worried.

.

what would set bells ringing is buying flours from an Asian Market, where rice flour is probably packed in a back room in 'Chinatown' next to wheat flour.

.

No safe practices here, no separate packing rooms, and as for clean-down in between runs - ha!

that's a laugh.

.

Branded products are always safer, always check if you're in doubt.

Lab test results for years may show NO CONTAMINATION in a facility that produces

Gluten Free as well as Wheat products.

.

Ask the Manufacturer!

.

If their Health and Safety Department can't give you an answer don't use the product.

.

Best Regards,

David

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dilettantesteph Collaborator

I think that those warnings are for those of us that are more sensitive to small amounts of gluten. If it doesn't bother you, I wouldn't worry about it. I wouldn't touch it myself because I am very sensitive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ang1e0251 Contributor

I used to disregard that and I was OK. But as time went by, I became more sensitive and was burned a couple of times by products I had been OK with before. So now I usually avoid those unless I read an endorsement here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TiffLuvsBread Rookie

I don't touch anything with that label right NOW because I'm only in week 4 of being gluten-free and I'm trying to be as strict as possible so I can be certain what gives me troubles and what does not. I want to introduce things on purpose only. In a few days when I start introducing things back into my diet (which I am NOT looking forward to, but have put it off for a while already) that is the first thing I'm going to start with. One of my favorite flax peanut butters from Trader Joe's has that warning so it's the first thing I'm going to try!

I expect to be OK with that but we'll have to see. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
larry mac Enthusiast

I make a mental note (for later just in case) and then don't worry about it. 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa16 Collaborator

This one is tough because companies are not legally requried to put that information on the label. They are volunteering it. So even if you buy the brand that doesn't say that, you still might be getting something from shared lines. I guess I feel better about a company who says this because I view them as trying to be more responsible towards consumers.

On the other hand, it certainly does make me think twice or three times about buying it. Take con-agra's crunch and munch (the sweet popcorn snack). I used to buy it and it didn't have this information on the label. However, they started putting this on the box and I stopped buying it. Or take gurley brand nuts. They do not say this on the package, whereas their main competitor in the cooking aisle does. I buy the gurleys, but for all I know, they are shared lines-- just not disclosed.

It definitely affects what I buy. Whether or not that is fair is another question. I am still trying to figure this out myself.

Irishdaveyboy-- I love your warning about the flours packed in Chinatown! I recently took a gluten-free cooking class where they used and advertised these flours because they were cheaper (and "finer") than the flours advertised as gluten-free in the grocery store. After sampling some of the baked good, I got sick. Mild case-- but still. Wow.

Cross contaminiation is our biggest enemy after gluten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lpellegr Collaborator

I won't eat something that's labeled as processed on the same lines as gluten-containing ingredients, but as for the facility containing wheat, well so does the house where I'm going to be consuming that product, since my kids eat normally. So far it has not been a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jrappene Newbie
I won't eat something that's labeled as processed on the same lines as gluten-containing ingredients, but as for the facility containing wheat, well so does the house where I'm going to be consuming that product, since my kids eat normally. So far it has not been a problem.

good point but I have at least some control over that unlike in a factory

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
still tiredofdoctors Rookie

While I know there are stringent rules for washing down the equipment, I still question whether flour dust is "looming" in facilities that process wheat products!

I'm somewhat paranoid about gluten, though - my only reaction is degeneration of the cerebellum - and it takes about 9 months before the next MRI shows how much - so I avoid any possible gluten ingestion like the plague!

I remember a long time ago someone whose husband was a Celiac but was a manager at Chick-Fil-A. While he didn't EAT any gluten, he ingested it through the flour dust that was in the air . . . that always stuck with me. That's why, when I read that statement, I think about him -- and the flour dust!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
psawyer Proficient

A notice about shared facilities or shared equipment is voluntary. If you see the notice, fine, but just because you don't see one you cannot assume that the manufacturing facility does not, in fact, process wheat or other gluten-containing grains. Call and ask, if you are concerned.

Also keep in mind that if you have gluten-containing products in your house, your house is a shared facility. Unless you have separate, dedicated dishes and cutlery, with their own dishwasher, your house has shared equipment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
still tiredofdoctors Rookie

Peter, you're right.

Our house is a dedicated gluten-free house. We ensure no cross-contamination. In fact, we only purchase items that state, "Produced in a dedicated gluten-free facility". My husband -- bless his heart -- is gluten-free, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Angels~Exist Newbie

Some products that say they are made on equipment that also processes wheat also have notices on them that say they are routinely tested to ensure gluten-free status. I don't know how reliable that is though. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
JesikaBeth Contributor

I too make a mental note of it, in case I have a bad reaction I know not to go with that particular product again, but otherwise I really don't pay much regard to that statement. I think that statement is probably moreso as a courtesy to the consumer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
darlindeb25 Collaborator

I never buy anything that states that. I also have very little in my diet that is processed, and live in a gluten free dedicated home.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Darn210 Enthusiast

We use those products. At this point, we have never had a problem. No symptoms and yearly blood screenings show antibody levels are OK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jerseyangel Proficient

I won't use anything that is marked "produced on the same equipment"--it seems every time I have, I get a reaction. I will buy from mainstream companies who state they will list any gluten in the ingredient list. Although there is undoubtedly gluten in the facility, I'll at least try, and note any problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      121,088
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Aventine
    Newest Member
    Aventine
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      I'll answer your second question first. The single best antibody test for monitoring celiac blood antibody levels is the tTG-IGA and it is very cost effective. For this reason, it is the most popular and often the only test ordered by physicians when checking for celiac disease. There are some people who actually do have celiac disease who will score negatives on this test anyway because of anomalies in their immune system but your wife is not one of them. So for her, the tTG-IGA should be sufficient. It is highly sensitive and highly specific for celiac disease. If your wife gets serious about eating gluten free and stays on a gluten free diet for the duration, she should experience healing in her villous lining, normalization in her antibody numbers and avoid reaching a celiac health crisis tipping point. I am attaching an article that will provide guidance for getting serious about gluten free living. It really is an advantage if all wheat products are taken out of the house and other household members adopt gluten free eating in order to avoid cross contamination and mistakes.  
    • Anmol
      Thanks this is helpful. Couple of follow -ups- that critical point till it stays silent is age dependent or dependent on continuing to eat gluten. In other words if she is on gluten-free diet can she stay on silent celiac disease forever?    what are the most cost effective yet efficient test to track the inflammation/antibodies and see if gluten-free is working . 
    • trents
      Welcome to the community forum, @Anmol! There are a number of blood antibody tests that can be administered when diagnosing celiac disease and it is normal that not all of them will be positive. Three out of four that were run for you were positive. It looks pretty conclusive that you have celiac disease. Many physicians will only run the tTG-IGA test so I applaud your doctor for being so thorough. Note, the Immunoglobulin A is not a test for celiac disease per se but a measure of total IGA antibody levels in your blood. If this number is low it can cause false negatives in the individual IGA-based celiac antibody tests. There are many celiacs who are asymptomatic when consuming gluten, at least until damage to the villous lining of the small bowel progresses to a certain critical point. I was one of them. We call them "silent" celiacs".  Unfortunately, being asymptomatic does not equate to no damage being done to the villous lining of the small bowel. No, the fact that your wife is asymptomatic should not be viewed as a license to not practice strict gluten free eating. She is damaging her health by doing so and the continuing high antibody test scores are proof of that. The antibodies are produced by inflammation in the small bowel lining and over time this inflammation destroys the villous lining. Continuing to disregard this will catch up to her. While it may be true that a little gluten does less harm to the villous lining than a lot, why would you even want to tolerate any harm at all to it? Being a "silent" celiac is both a blessing and a curse. It's a blessing in the sense of being able to endure some cross contamination in social settings without embarrassing repercussions. It's a curse in that it slows down the learning curve of avoiding foods where gluten is not an obvious ingredient, yet still may be doing damage to the villous lining of the small bowel. GliadinX is helpful to many celiacs in avoiding illness from cross contamination when eating out but it is not effective when consuming larger amounts of gluten. It was never intended for that purpose. Eating out is the number one sabotager of gluten free eating. You have no control of how food is prepared and handled in restaurant kitchens.  
    • knitty kitty
      Forgot one... https://www.hormonesmatter.com/eosinophilic-esophagitis-sugar-thiamine-sensitive/
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum community, @ekelsay! Yes, your tTG-IGA score is strongly positive for celiac disease. There are other antibody tests that can be run when diagnosing celiac disease but the tTG-IGA is the most popular with physicians because it combines good sensitivity with good specificity, and it is a relatively inexpensive test to perform. The onset of celiac disease can happen at any stage of life and the size of the score is not necessarily an indicator of the progress of the disease. It is likely that you you experienced onset well before you became aware of symptoms. It often takes 10 years or more to get a diagnosis of celiac disease after the first appearance of symptoms. In my case, the first indicator was mildly elevated liver enzymes that resulted in a rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross at age 37. There was no GI discomfort at that point, at least none that I noticed. Over time, other lab values began to get out of norm, including decreased iron levels. My PCP was at a complete loss to explain any of this. I finally scheduled an appointment with a GI doc because the liver enzymes concerned me and he tested me right away for celiac disease. I was positive and within three months of gluten free eating my liver enzymes were back to normal. That took 13 years since the rejection of my blood donation by the Red Cross. And my story is typical. Toward the end of that period I had developed some occasional diarrhea and oily stool but no major GI distress. Many celiacs do not have classic GI symptoms and are "silent" celiacs. There are around 200 symptoms that have been associated with celiac disease and many or most of them do not involve conscious GI distress. Via an autoimmune process, gluten ingestion triggers inflammation in the villous lining of the small bowel which damages it over time and inhibits the ability of this organ to absorb the vitamins and minerals in the food we ingest. So, that explains why those with celiac disease often suffer iron deficiency anemia, osteoporosis and a host of other vitamin and mineral deficiency related medical issues. The villous lining of the small bowel is where essentially all of our nutrition is absorbed. So, yes, anemia is one of the classic symptoms of celiac disease. One very important thing you need to be aware of is that your PCP may refer you to a GI doc for an endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel lining to confirm the results of the blood antibody testing. So, you must not begin gluten free eating until that is done or at least you know they are going to diagnose you with celiac disease without it. If you start gluten free eating now there will be healing in the villous lining that will begin to take place which may compromise the results of the biopsy.
×
×
  • Create New...