Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood Test Positive...biopsy Needed Or Not?


GraceAnew

Recommended Posts

GraceAnew Newbie

I hope this hasn't already been discussed, but I wasn't finding anything related to what I was looking for...

I recently had blood work done for allergies and celiac sprue because I was having so many problems, it was getting work and was becoming more apparent that it was food related (sugar and wheat). I was told I have absolutely no allergies but the celiac test came back positive. I live in a rural area and the NP that I went to see had never had anyone test positive before for it, so she had to go look celiac up! Based on what she read, she wanted me to come back in to get more autoimmune testing done. So, tomorrow I'm going to ask her about other testing, but... What are your opinions, those of you who have been through all this already?

  • Do I NEED to have a biopsy done? I've been reading mixed opinions. A lot of medical sites say you can't switch your diet until you've gotten a positive blood test and then a biopsy and THEN you can change your diet. (I'd rather not get a biopsy if it's not needed!) I've already removed most gluten though because I couldn't handle the pain anymore...
  • Are there other things I should be asking about?
  • Is this something that I can keep working with the NP with or do I HAVE to see a specialist? I'm a little concerned I should be getting other kinds of tests done but she might not know about... I put off going to the doctor for a long time for fear of being blown off or getting misdiagnosed over and over. She brought up Celiac right away at the initial appointment. So, I have some confidence in her that she "thinks outside of the typical medical doctor box" and is willing to work with me and listen.

Thanks for any and all advice you can lend!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



DonaldandAlanda Evans Apprentice

I personally declined the biopsy. I was at the point where I was sick of medical procedures, and wanted to start the road to recovery. Every single blood test there is for Celiac, I was positive.......and that was enough for myself and my doctor. I have an appointment at the 3 month mark to re check my antibody levels to see if they have gone down. If they haven't gone down ,or if my symptoms are still severe I will then have to biopsy to rule other things out. It's really personal choice.

nora-n Rookie

Here in europe, we do get the biopsy done.

That is because the biopsy is the official standard for the diagnosis.

Here in this country we get about 200$ a month if diagosed, so we need an official diagnosis.

Also, one needs something to compare with just in case there are complications.

The risk of bowel cancer is greater with celiac. (but decreases to normal on the gluten free diet)

So one needs to get looked at, and get a baseline to compare to.

That is what it is like here.

Here only children get sedated, and the procedure is very quick but a little bit uncomfortable.

nora

tarnalberry Community Regular

I'm not sure what about getting biopsies taken from your intestines is supposed to allow you to automatically prevent your arm from stuffing bread in your face. Is there some strange switch in the intestines I don't know about?

Seriously, the idea that it is impossible to choose your food until you have a medical procedure is a little ridiculous. My husband doesn't like tomatoes, cheese, or chocolate, and won't eat anything that has any of those ingredients. He was able to do all that without a medical test, based on taste alone! I never had a biopsy, but I haven't had any problem with finding random gluten in my mouth or the like.

Yes, yes, I'm being a bit snarky here - not at you, but at the advice you've been given.

Not every doctor believes that biopsy is the gold standard, but many do. Not everyone finds that they need a lot of followup testing (particularly if they can remain gluten free), but not every doctor will do or know how to do followup testing either.

It's really up to you. Are there some potential advantages? Sure. Are they the same for everyone? No.

I certainly don't regret not getting a biopsy. And if my child turns out to have celiac, I will get her tested (or just take her gluten free) regardless of what a doctor says about MY celiac status.

GraceAnew Newbie

Thanks everyone! The NP didn't think a biopsy was needed either. I'm glad. I just have to wait and see what the results are on my other autoimmune testing. I'm hoping it's negative.

Now to start tossing out the gluten that's still hanging out around here...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,336
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    DME
    Newest Member
    DME
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Autoimmune diseases tend to cluster. Many of them are found close together on the chromosomes. 
    • Rejoicephd
      Just giving another update... I was referred to rheumatology, and they suspect that I may also be dealing with fibromyalgia (it has not been formally diagnosed, but just suggested at this point).  So, I am continuing with the anti-inflammatory diet and vitamins and still working to keep getting rid of all these hidden gluten sources, but I also do have another possible explanation for some of the issues that I'm dealing with.
    • Scott Adams
      I would pressure the lab to do the IgA control test for free so that you won't write a poor review about their testing services. You could get this done at any time, whether or not you are gluten-free, however, the celiac disease Tissue Transglutaminase tTG-IgA test must be done after you've been eating lots of gluten for around 6 weeks. This way you could salvage the results of your tTG-IgA test, as long as you were eating lots of gluten beforehand.
    • Scott Adams
      Given your strong reactions it would be wise not to eat things offered to you without reading the ingredient labels. It's possible there was indeed gluten or some allergen in the chocolates--barley malt is a common ingredient in some chocolates.
    • trents
      Yes, an IgG panel is the logical next step. However, you would still need to be consuming normal amounts of gluten to ensure valid IgG testing. Since it has only been a week that you have been off gluten, there is still likely time to restore antibodies to detectable levels before the blood draw. IgG antibody tests are not quite as specific for celiac disease as are the IGA tests but they are certainly valuable in the case of IGA deficiency. They also seem to have a little more "staying power" in the sense of detecting celiac disease in the case of those who may have already started a gluten-free diet as long as they haven't been on it for an extended period of time. But don't rely on that. Get back on gluten if you can possibly endure it if you intend to go forward with IgG testing. This might be helpful:   
×
×
  • Create New...