Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood Test Positive...biopsy Needed Or Not?


GraceAnew

Recommended Posts

GraceAnew Newbie

I hope this hasn't already been discussed, but I wasn't finding anything related to what I was looking for...

I recently had blood work done for allergies and celiac sprue because I was having so many problems, it was getting work and was becoming more apparent that it was food related (sugar and wheat). I was told I have absolutely no allergies but the celiac test came back positive. I live in a rural area and the NP that I went to see had never had anyone test positive before for it, so she had to go look celiac up! Based on what she read, she wanted me to come back in to get more autoimmune testing done. So, tomorrow I'm going to ask her about other testing, but... What are your opinions, those of you who have been through all this already?

  • Do I NEED to have a biopsy done? I've been reading mixed opinions. A lot of medical sites say you can't switch your diet until you've gotten a positive blood test and then a biopsy and THEN you can change your diet. (I'd rather not get a biopsy if it's not needed!) I've already removed most gluten though because I couldn't handle the pain anymore...
  • Are there other things I should be asking about?
  • Is this something that I can keep working with the NP with or do I HAVE to see a specialist? I'm a little concerned I should be getting other kinds of tests done but she might not know about... I put off going to the doctor for a long time for fear of being blown off or getting misdiagnosed over and over. She brought up Celiac right away at the initial appointment. So, I have some confidence in her that she "thinks outside of the typical medical doctor box" and is willing to work with me and listen.

Thanks for any and all advice you can lend!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



DonaldandAlanda Evans Apprentice

I personally declined the biopsy. I was at the point where I was sick of medical procedures, and wanted to start the road to recovery. Every single blood test there is for Celiac, I was positive.......and that was enough for myself and my doctor. I have an appointment at the 3 month mark to re check my antibody levels to see if they have gone down. If they haven't gone down ,or if my symptoms are still severe I will then have to biopsy to rule other things out. It's really personal choice.

nora-n Rookie

Here in europe, we do get the biopsy done.

That is because the biopsy is the official standard for the diagnosis.

Here in this country we get about 200$ a month if diagosed, so we need an official diagnosis.

Also, one needs something to compare with just in case there are complications.

The risk of bowel cancer is greater with celiac. (but decreases to normal on the gluten free diet)

So one needs to get looked at, and get a baseline to compare to.

That is what it is like here.

Here only children get sedated, and the procedure is very quick but a little bit uncomfortable.

nora

tarnalberry Community Regular

I'm not sure what about getting biopsies taken from your intestines is supposed to allow you to automatically prevent your arm from stuffing bread in your face. Is there some strange switch in the intestines I don't know about?

Seriously, the idea that it is impossible to choose your food until you have a medical procedure is a little ridiculous. My husband doesn't like tomatoes, cheese, or chocolate, and won't eat anything that has any of those ingredients. He was able to do all that without a medical test, based on taste alone! I never had a biopsy, but I haven't had any problem with finding random gluten in my mouth or the like.

Yes, yes, I'm being a bit snarky here - not at you, but at the advice you've been given.

Not every doctor believes that biopsy is the gold standard, but many do. Not everyone finds that they need a lot of followup testing (particularly if they can remain gluten free), but not every doctor will do or know how to do followup testing either.

It's really up to you. Are there some potential advantages? Sure. Are they the same for everyone? No.

I certainly don't regret not getting a biopsy. And if my child turns out to have celiac, I will get her tested (or just take her gluten free) regardless of what a doctor says about MY celiac status.

GraceAnew Newbie

Thanks everyone! The NP didn't think a biopsy was needed either. I'm glad. I just have to wait and see what the results are on my other autoimmune testing. I'm hoping it's negative.

Now to start tossing out the gluten that's still hanging out around here...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to JudyLou's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    2. - JudyLou posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    3. - marzian commented on Scott Adams's article in Diagnosis, Testing & Treatment
      5

      A Future Beyond the Gluten-Free Diet? Scientists Test a New Cell Therapy for Celiac Disease (+Video)

    4. - Jmartes71 posted a topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      0

      Medications

    5. - Scott Adams replied to GlutenFreeChef's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Blood Test for Celiac wheat type matters?

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,140
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Staticgypsy
    Newest Member
    Staticgypsy
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @JudyLou! There are a couple of things you might consider to help you in your decision that would not require you to do a gluten challenge. The first, that is if you have not had this test run already, is to request a "total IGA" test to be run. One of the reasons that celiac blood antibody tests can be negative, apart from not having celiac disease, that is, is because of IGA deficiency. If a person is IGA deficient, they will not respond accurately to the celiac disease blood antibody tests (such as the commonly run TTG-IGA). The total IGA test is designed to check for IGA deficiency. The total IGA test is not a celiac antibody test so I wouldn't think that a gluten challenge is necessary. The second is to have genetic testing done to determine if you have the genetic potential to develop celiac disease. About 30-40% of  the general population have the genetic potential but only about 1% actually develop celiac disease. So, genetic testing cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease but it can be used to rule it out. Those who don't have the genetic potential but still have reaction to gluten would not be diagnosed with celiac disease but with NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).  Another possibility is that you do have celiac disease but are in remission. We do see this but often it doesn't last.
    • JudyLou
      Hi there, I’m debating whether to consider a gluten challenge and I’m hoping someone here can help with that decision (so far, none of the doctors have been helpful). I have a history of breaking out in a horrible, burning/itchy somewhat blistering rash about every 8 years. This started when I was in my early 30’s and at that point it started at the ankles and went about to my knees. Every time I had the rash it would cover more of my body, so my arms and part of my torso were impacted as well, and it was always symmetrical. First I was told it was an allergic reaction to a bug bite. Next I was told it was eczema (after a biopsy of the lesion - not the skin near the lesion) and given a steroid injection (didn’t help). I took myself off of gluten about 3 weeks before seeing an allergist, just to see if it would help (it didn’t in that time period). He thought the rash looked like dermatitis herpetiformis and told me to eat some bread the night before my blood tests, which I did, and the tests came back negative. I’ve since learned from this forum that I needed to be eating gluten daily for at least a month in order to get an accurate test result. I’m grateful to the allergist as he found that 5 mg of doxepin daily will eliminate the rash within about 10 days (previously it lasted for months whether I was eating gluten or not). I have been gluten free for about 25 years as a precaution and recommendation from my doctor, and the pattern of breaking out every 8 years or so remains the same except once I broke out after just one year (was not glutened as far as I know), and now it’s been over 9 years. What’s confusing to me, is that there have been 3 times in the past 2 years when I’ve accidentally eaten gluten, and I haven’t had any reaction at all. Once someone made pancakes (they said they were gluten-free, they were not) and I ate several. I need to decide whether to do a gluten challenge and get another blood test. If I do, are these tests really accurate? I’m also concerned that I could damage my gut in that process if I do have celiac disease. My brother and cousin both had lymphoma so that’s a concern regarding a challenge as well, though there is a lot of cancer in various forms in my family so there may be no gluten connection there. Sorry for the ramble, I’m just doubting the need to remain gluten free if I don’t have any reaction to eating it and haven’t had a positive test (other than testing positive for one of the genes, though it sounds like that’s pretty common). I’d appreciate any thoughts or advice! 
    • Jmartes71
      Hello, just popped in my head to ask this question about medications and celiac? I have always had refurse reaction to meds since I can remember  of what little meds my body is able to tolerate. I was taking gabapentin 300mg for a week,  in past I believe 150? Any ways it amps me up not able to sleep, though very tired.However I did notice it helped with my bloating sibo belly.I hate that my body is that sensitive and medical doesn't seem to take seriously. Im STILL healing with my skin, eye, and now ms or meningioma ( will know in April  which)and dealing with this limbo nightmare. I did write my name, address ect on the reclamation but im not tech savvy and not sure if went through properly. I called my city representative in Stanislaus County and asked if theres a physical paper i can sign for proclamation for celiac and she had no clue about what I was saying, so I just said I'll go back on website. 
    • Scott Adams
      I'm not saying that some celiacs won't need it, but it should be done under a doctor's supervision because it can cause lots of problems in some people.
    • Jmartes71
      I also noticed I get debilitating migraines when I smell gluten, wheat and its not taken seriously when it affects one in every way.Im still begging to properly be heard.I also noticed tolerance level is down the drain with age and life changes. I have been told by incompetent medical that im not celiac or that sensitive. Diagnosed in 1994 by gi biopsy gluten-free ever since along with other lovely food allergies. Prayers
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.