Do You Have Celiac Disease and Have Questions Or Need Help?
Join Celiac.com's forum / message board and get your questions answered! Our forum has nearly 1 MILLION POSTS, and over 62,000 MEMBERS just waiting to help you with any questions about celiac disease and the gluten-free diet. We'll see you there!
Follow / Share
|Get Email Alerts|
- Safe Gluten-Free Food List (Safe Ingredients)
- Unsafe Gluten-Free Food List (Unsafe Ingredients)
- Gluten-Free Alcoholic Beverages
- Celiac Disease Symptoms
- The Gluten-Free Diet 101 - A Beginner's Guide to Going Gluten-Free
- Interpretation of Celiac Disease Blood Test Results
- Is Buckwheat Flour Really Gluten-Free?
Down Syndrome and Celiac Disease
In 1994 I was diagnosed with celiac disease, which led me to create Celiac.com in 1995. I created this site for a single purpose: To help as many people as possible with celiac disease get diagnosed so they can begin to live happy, healthy gluten-free lives. Celiac.com was the first site on the Internet dedicated solely to celiac disease. In 1998 I foundedÂ The Gluten-Free Mall, Your Special Diet Superstore!, and I am the co-author of the book Cereal Killers, and founder and publisher of Journal of Gluten Sensitivity.View all articles by Scott Adams
November 1993. European Journal of Pediatrics. Authors Hilhorst MI. Brink M. Wauters EA. Houwen RH. Institution: Department of gastro-enterology, Wilhelmina Childrens Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands. The frequency of celiac condition is 43 times greater in children with Down syndrome than in children without Down syndrome. It should be strongly considered in all children with Down syndrome who have either persistent diarrhea or failure to thrive.
Leyden University Medical School just finished a large scale investigation. 198 families with a child with DS aged between 1 and 9 years were approached. 115 decided to have their child participate. The first researcher, Elvira George, made home visits and collected blood and urine for testing. A. o. values of anti-endomysium (EmA) were determined. Only if one of the investigated blood or urine values was significantly different from the norm the child was referred to the hospital to take a biopsy. That was the case with 43 of the 115 children. In 9 cases no biopsy was taken, in six because the parents refused it and in 3 because the childs condition didnt allow for it. Of the 34 children that had a biopsy taken eight, or rather 7 % (!) of the original 115, had the intestinal appearance typical for celiac disease (according to international standards).
Retrospectively, five of these eight children had complaints that were compatible with celiac disease, that were considered to be caused by DS as such until then. Three children were free of complaints. Their diagnosis was a complete surprise. In addition, it was proven that the value for EmA was the strongest indicator of a positive biopsy. If EmA was positive there always was celiac disease upon biopsy.
Needless to say that all (so far but one) concerned children were put on a totally gluten free diet. It was reported that their complaints decreased rapidly. Celiac disease is considered to put people involved at risk for particular intestinal cancers, if they do not keep their diet. Therefore, the diet has to be maintained lifelong. This aspect makes testing for celiac disease so important in an at risk population as children with DS are. Even without complaints one in fourteen of our children might have it! It is postulated that the children who had different blood values, but no positive biopsy still can develop celiac disease in the future.
Presently, the complete study is in the process of being published in the international literature. So, Im afraid Im only able to give a you a reference to a pre-publication:Reference:
- George, E. et al. The high frequency of celiac disease in DS: screening methods. Gastroenterology 1995; 108 (Supp 4): A 16.iv
Celiac.com welcomes your comments below (registration is NOT required).
Down Syndrome: Celiac Disease Prevalent in Children With Down Syndrome
Am J Med Gen 2001;98:70-74.... [READ MORE]