Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Ok Here Are The Numbers On William's Test...


rgeelan

Recommended Posts

rgeelan Apprentice

TTG IGA was 40 (strong positive)

TTG IGG was <20 (negative)

Gliadin IGA was <20 (negative)

Someone help me inturprit these. Still waiting on the 2nd blood tests but just curious other peoples take on the first test.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mat4mel Apprentice

Hi,

From what I have read (and I'm not an expert) I think that the ttg IgA is *the* most accurate for Celiac's.. so it being a strong positive, I would say he definitely has Celiac.

What about his biopsy-- they said it was not celiacs, but gluten allergy? How do they tell the difference? I am just curious because I am debating whether or not to do a gluten challenge and biopsy with my 2 1/2 yr old.

Mel

tarnalberry Community Regular

I think the answer depends on what you're looking for. I'm presuming he was eating plenty of gluten before the test in my analysis... If you're looking for a sign whether or not to take him gluten-free, I'd say that's it. If you're looking for proof if he should stay gluten-free, I would say the test is indicative of that but not quite "case-closed" conclusive. The question on where to go from there depends on two things: you're acceptance of the results of the diet as an answer, and your need for a diagnosis given by his doctor and written in his permanent files. There are pros and cons for getting a formal diagnosis (school accomodations and family medical history are pros, possible effects on getting affordable health insurance or life insurance later in life can be cons). And which route you go depends on your doctor as well. Some doctors require a biopsy, some don't.

rgeelan Apprentice

We got William's 2nd blood tests back today and it was TTG IGA 9.6 which is a strong positive again from a different 'more reliable' lab according to the specialist. He said he is 100% certain that William has Celiac. The biopsy showed damage but they didnt think it was to the point of Celiac yet but his blood tests have come back strongly positive twice and so the specialist is convinced. We are switching pediatritions and the specialist will request that the formal diagnosis is Celiacs.. I am waiting on my blood tests to come back also then we will decide to test Emma...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,998
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Evey25
    Newest Member
    Evey25
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • The Logician
      To Trent’s, yes, from what i’ve read it is not uncommon for digestive systems to become less tolerant to gluten over time. Many types of sensitivity or allergies arise in older people who never had a problem. I don’t see why you are focusing on anything but the fact that after years of my sensitivity to gluten, for whatever reason , it has disappeared after a bout of antibiotics. What i’ve read is antibiotics can make gluten sensitivity worse. In any event, in my case, if I can still eat all the wheat products I want with no reaction after a month or more since my hospital stay this is something that should be investigated. Time will tell.
    • The Logician
      I had a UTI, blood cultures are standard to insure that the infection does not get in the bloodstream which can lead to sepsis and death. In my case there was bacteria in my blood which necessitated 48 hours of antibiotic IV
    • Wends
      Hi Cameo674. just read your post. Well wishes to a correct diagnosis so that you can get on track to healing and feeling better. Personally I know it’s good to have the eosinophilic disorder ruled out too, as this can show anti-ttg igA antibodies too. But usually without the anti-gliadin antibodies unless gliadin is an allergen for you. Thanks for posting the link to look up SNPs rs… numbers on another post. Was useful. Looking at your result, ”Celiac Associated HLD-DQ Typing: DQA1* Value: 05; DQA1*DQA11 Value: 05; DQB1* Value: 02; DQB1-DQB11 Value: 02; Celiac Gene Pairs Present Value: Yes; Celiac HLA Interpretation Value: These genes are permissive for celiac disease.  However, these genes can also be present in the normal population. Testing performed by SSOP.  So google failed me.  I think these results basically say I have genes, but everybody has these genes so this test was just to confirm that there is a vague possibility?  Maybe this test result explains why I do not have the horrible symptoms most individuals with celiac have?  I told the GI my assumption is that I am just gluten intolerant since I do not have the pain? So maybe this test explains why I have antibodies?” To me it reads.that you carry the high risk HLADQ2.5 haplotype.      
    • AnnaNZ
      Hello. Do you mind saying what symptoms led the doctors to test for bacteria in your blood?
    • trents
      So you you ate wheat products every single day for 50 years without a problem but then in the 90's you discovered that wheat was your problem. That's confusing to me. It seems contradictory. Did you have a problem or not?
×
×
  • Create New...