Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Question On Role Of Igg And Gluten Sensitivity


Amyand2girls

Recommended Posts

Amyand2girls Rookie

Question: Can a person react to gluten with behavioral changes if they have only an IgG response to it? In other words, if they have a negative IgA, negative TtG, very low IgE response, but definitely had a strong response to gluten in the past...could IgG still be worth testing?

Longer story behind the question:

My daughter had a strong reaction to gluten that we discovered after a friend suggested a gluten-free-CF diet and she responded very well when she went off it a year and a half ago. When we read about NAET treatments healing allergies, we were willing to try it, and it was because of that that we ended up letting her eat gluten, to see if these crazy treatments worked...and she no longer woke up screaming that night...or the next night...but I felt sure that it would only be a matter of time and that it would slowly build up in her system...I felt like I was betraying her, feeding her stuff that I knew darn well messed up her body befpre. Then my doctor checked MY IgA gliaden levels and they were really high. So I thought, "Ah hah! A test I can give to Julia!" So we had her do both a saliva IgA gliaden test and then I decided I wanted a more traditional answer, so I badgered my pediatrician (my daughter is 4 1/2) into writing a script for a full celiac panel even though she didn't have any classical symptoms. He actually was fairly cooperative, clearing thinking I'm a kooky mom (which maybe I am) but willing to humor me. Earlier, we had already done IgE testing on the top 8 allergies, and she had a mild response to wheat and slightly stronger one to eggs.

So we did the testing, and her IgA gliaden was negative, her TTG was negative and her total IgA was normal...now I'm just stunned, because we tested the diet several times and it DEFINITELY had a response the night after eating even a small amount of gluten.

Now I'm reading about IgG and before I get too excited about her negative testing, it seems that it would be well worth the money to get an IgG panel that includes both gluten and gliaden, yes? Or is this a different kind of allergy/intolerance situation that wouldn't necessarily cause things like disturbed sleep, autistic-like behaviors, sensitive skin and hurting feet? This seems like the last block in place to saying whether or not she is okay with gluten. The main thing that still has me worried is that she developed purple smudges/circles under her eyes once she started eating gluten and casein again...even my mom is now suggesting we take her back off gluten. But you guys probably know how hard it is with little kids, to have opened that pandora box and then try to close it. So I'm pushing hard for answers as soon as possible, so I can my little one a clear answer.

Thanks for any help you can offer. I'm just stunned at the lack of knowledge that most of the doctors I've spoken to (well, all, really) have about anything in this area. The only one who has ever tested me for gliaden was my homeopathic doctor-- he says he sees it a lot more than people would expect.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,202
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    PatBurnham
    Newest Member
    PatBurnham
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.