Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Glutamine & Candida


Emme999

Recommended Posts

Emme999 Enthusiast

Okay, anyone who's been on the board for as long as I have will know that I'm a HUGE proponent of glutamine to help our little villi grow. So, lately I was wondering how it affected Candida. Here is a little research that I found in the British Journal of Anaesthesia (2000, Vol. 84, No. 5 690-691):

Among 52 patients who were receiving parenternal nutrition (25 patients receiving glutamine, 27 controls). Of these patient gastrointestinal disease accounted for 12 of 25 of those who receive glutamine and 10 of 27 the control group. (Of course, these are people who are critically ill - parenternal means injected, infused, or implanted: describes drug administration other than by the mouth or the rectum, e.g. by injection, infusion, or implantation. So, they weren't receiving the glutmanine through their mouths!) But anyway - I thought this might be helpful to many of us who -a- have gastrointestinal disease and -b- have fungal infections.

Reduced fungal infection in critically ill patients randomized to a glutamine containing parenteral nutrition

Candida infections are an important cause of nosocomial infection that increase with time in intensive care. This may be related to a progressive state of hypo-immunity. Glutamine (gln) is an important nutrient for the immune system and has been shown to enhance the helper T subset 1 (Th1) lymphocyte responses and cell-mediated immunity.1 We report the incidence of bacterial and fungal infection that occurred during a randomized treatment study of glutamine supplemented parenteral nutrition (PN)

Data on those patients who received at least 5 days of parenteral nutrition were later extracted and analysed blind to the randomisation by one of the authors.

There was no difference in the total number of Gram-positive or Gram-negative organisms isolated. Only four patients in the glutamine group developed Candida infections and none died while nine control patients developed Candida infections and six died

Any post hoc sub-group analysis must be interpreted with caution, especially with small numbers. However selecting a minimum of 5 days we believe is valid to show a nutritional effect. Immune dysfunction is a feature of a prolonged ICU stay and therefore any effect will only be shown in such patients. These clinical observations with a reduction in incidence and death among the patients with Candida infections suggest that glutamine may exert profound immune benefits in long stay critically ill patients who are dependent on parenteral nutrition.

Sorry if this is difficult to read :huh: I'm just trying to cut & paste the relevant information. I mean, I'm not saying that any of us are more likely to die if we don't receive glutamine ;) - but I do believe that glutamine can help immunity (including prevention / assistance with Candida).

- Michelle :wub:

p.s. Sorry about all the research article stuff. But my major is "Health Promotion & Education" and I'm practicing on you ;)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,159
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Greymo
    Newest Member
    Greymo
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Let me hasten to add that if you will be undergoing an endoscopy/biopsy, it is critical that you do not begin efforts to reduce gluten beforehand. Doing so will render the results invalid as it will allow the small bowel lining to heal and, therefore, obscure the damage done by celiac disease which is what the biopsy is looking for.
    • Scott Adams
      This article, and the comments below it, may be helpful:    
    • Scott Adams
      That’s a really tough situation. A few key points: as mentioned, a gluten challenge does require daily gluten for several weeks to make blood tests meaningful, but negative tests after limited exposure aren’t reliable. Dermatitis herpetiformis can also be tricky to diagnose unless the biopsy is taken from normal-looking skin next to a lesion. Some people with celiac or DH don’t react every time they’re exposed, so lack of symptoms doesn’t rule it out. Given your history and family cancer risk, this is something I’d strongly discuss with a celiac-experienced gastroenterologist or dermatologist before attempting a challenge on your own, so risks and benefits are clearly weighed.
    • Greymo
      https://celiac.org/glutenexposuremarkers/    yes, two hours after accidents ingesting gluten I am vomiting and then diarrhea- then exhaustion and a headache. see the article above- There is research that shows our reactions.
    • trents
      Concerning the EMA positive result, the EMA was the original blood test developed to detect celiac disease and has largely been replaced by the tTG-IGA which has a similar reliability confidence but is much less expensive to run. Yes, a positive EMA is very strong evidence of celiac disease but not foolproof. In the UK, a tTG-IGA score that is 10x normal or greater will often result in foregoing the endoscopy/biopsy. Weaker positives on the tTG-IGA still trigger the endoscopy/biopsy. That protocol is being considered in the US but is not yet in place.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.