Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Glutamine & Candida


Emme999

Recommended Posts

Emme999 Enthusiast

Okay, anyone who's been on the board for as long as I have will know that I'm a HUGE proponent of glutamine to help our little villi grow. So, lately I was wondering how it affected Candida. Here is a little research that I found in the British Journal of Anaesthesia (2000, Vol. 84, No. 5 690-691):

Among 52 patients who were receiving parenternal nutrition (25 patients receiving glutamine, 27 controls). Of these patient gastrointestinal disease accounted for 12 of 25 of those who receive glutamine and 10 of 27 the control group. (Of course, these are people who are critically ill - parenternal means injected, infused, or implanted: describes drug administration other than by the mouth or the rectum, e.g. by injection, infusion, or implantation. So, they weren't receiving the glutmanine through their mouths!) But anyway - I thought this might be helpful to many of us who -a- have gastrointestinal disease and -b- have fungal infections.

Reduced fungal infection in critically ill patients randomized to a glutamine containing parenteral nutrition

Candida infections are an important cause of nosocomial infection that increase with time in intensive care. This may be related to a progressive state of hypo-immunity. Glutamine (gln) is an important nutrient for the immune system and has been shown to enhance the helper T subset 1 (Th1) lymphocyte responses and cell-mediated immunity.1 We report the incidence of bacterial and fungal infection that occurred during a randomized treatment study of glutamine supplemented parenteral nutrition (PN)

Data on those patients who received at least 5 days of parenteral nutrition were later extracted and analysed blind to the randomisation by one of the authors.

There was no difference in the total number of Gram-positive or Gram-negative organisms isolated. Only four patients in the glutamine group developed Candida infections and none died while nine control patients developed Candida infections and six died

Any post hoc sub-group analysis must be interpreted with caution, especially with small numbers. However selecting a minimum of 5 days we believe is valid to show a nutritional effect. Immune dysfunction is a feature of a prolonged ICU stay and therefore any effect will only be shown in such patients. These clinical observations with a reduction in incidence and death among the patients with Candida infections suggest that glutamine may exert profound immune benefits in long stay critically ill patients who are dependent on parenteral nutrition.

Sorry if this is difficult to read :huh: I'm just trying to cut & paste the relevant information. I mean, I'm not saying that any of us are more likely to die if we don't receive glutamine ;) - but I do believe that glutamine can help immunity (including prevention / assistance with Candida).

- Michelle :wub:

p.s. Sorry about all the research article stuff. But my major is "Health Promotion & Education" and I'm practicing on you ;)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,436
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Blozo
    Newest Member
    Blozo
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.