Jump to content
  • Sign Up
Celiac.com Sponsor:


Celiac.com Sponsor:


  • Join Our Community!

    Get help in our celiac / gluten-free forum.

  • Jefferson Adams

    Clinical Disease Risk Predictors Better Than SNP-derived Predictors

    Jefferson Adams


    Reviewed and edited by a celiac disease expert.

      Detailed AUROC comparisons reveal that most SNP-derived risk predictions are not as good as clinically based disease risk predictors. 


    Caption: Crystal balls. Image: CC BY-ND 2.0--oberbayer

    Celiac.com 01/13/2020 - Numerous genetic studies have identified many highly significant SNPs related to hundreds of diseases or medical conditions. However, very little is known about how GWAS-identified SNPs or combinations of SNP biomarkers can predict the risk for certain diseases, such as celiac disease.

    A team of researchers recently set out to assess the extent to which GWAS-identified SNPs or combinations of SNP biomarkers can predict disease risk.



    Celiac.com Sponsor:




    The research team included Jonas Patron, Arnau Serra-Cayuela, Beomsoo Han, Carin Li, and David Scott Wishart. They are variously affiliated with the Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, and the Department of Computing Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

    Currently, one of the most common ways researchers gauge the performance of any given predictive biomarker is to calculate the area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve, aka AUROC.

    To create ROC curves and calculate the AUROC using summary-level GWAS data, the team has developed an R package called G-WIZ.

    The team made initial tests of G-WIZ using AUROC values gleaned from patient-level SNP data, as well as reported AUROC numbers. The research team found that G-WIZ predicts the AUROC with greater than 97% accuracy. Next, the team used summary data from GWAS Central to determine the ROC curves and AUROC values for 569 different GWA studies spanning 219 different conditions.

    Armed with this data, the team found a number of GWA studies with SNP-derived risk predictors that have very high AUROCs, above 0.75, while the average GWA study produces a multi-SNP risk predictor with an AUROC of just 0.55.

    Detailed AUROC comparisons reveal that most SNP-derived risk predictions are not as good as clinically based disease risk predictors. Being able to accurately predict risk for certain diseases will help clinicians to better identify patients for potential testing and diagnosis, so knowing the best predictive methods is highly useful information.

    The team’s data, including ROC curves, AUROCs, explained heritability, have been placed in a public database called GWAS-ROCS. 

    Interested parties may download the G-WIZ code for free at github.com.

    Read more at PLOSONE.com

     

     


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    It is so interesting to also know that certain SNPs will show potential for reactivity in response to additional genetic diseases.  There are Celiac mutations that will show in addition to Hemochromotosis genetic conditions.  It makes sense...Iron overload in addition to anemia conditions.  It's as if a population carries "self-help" as an evolutionary model for survival.  I don't think data models look for this.

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Join the conversation

    You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • About Me

    Jefferson Adams is Celiac.com's senior writer and Digital Content Director. He earned his B.A. and M.F.A. at Arizona State University, and has authored more than 2,500 articles on celiac disease. His coursework includes studies in science, scientific methodology, biology, anatomy, medicine, logic, and advanced research. He previously served as SF Health News Examiner for Examiner.com, and devised health and medical content for Sharecare.com. Jefferson has spoken about celiac disease to the media, including an appearance on the KQED radio show Forum, and is the editor of the book "Cereal Killers" by Scott Adams and Ron Hoggan, Ed.D.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor:

  • Forum Discussions

    Personallyu Well, actually there are plenty of studies showing the ingredients in GliadinX in fact does break down gluten by 50-85% before it reaches the small intestine. I believe the reason Scott recommends using it when you are ...
    I’ve been gluten free going on 14 years and as you all know accidents happen along the way especially when you are eating at someone else’s house or restaurants. ive been getting these attacks throughout the years and after having another one ...
    Have your doctors check for Mast Cell Activation Syndrome, which is still pretty new and not well known (not an IgE response, but similar in terms of symptoms).    It can be extreme or mild.   My triggers are insect bites and medications lik...
×
×
  • Create New...