Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Does Any Of This Sound Familiar?


wonkabar

Recommended Posts

wonkabar Contributor

Question about Dx...Zachary's ped has been extremely supportive about the dietary changes. However, he wasn't willing to Dx him with Celiac not having bloodwork or a biopsy to substantiate it. We're honestly okay with that. He's not a ped GI so that's not his area of specialty. That being said, at some point we'd like to know if Zachary does infact have celiac disease. It's a life-long issue, and we'd like to educated/prepare him for that the best we can. Fortunately he's so little he doesn't know any better at the moment. I don't know that taking him to another ped GI would make a difference at this point in his life. Any thoughts?? Thanks!

--Kristy

PS-We started limiting dairy yesterday (no milk, pudding, cheese or yogurt---just soy stuff) and I'm telling you I think he's already a little calmer...not as bouncy, less yelling and throwing stuff. We're anxious to see how he is over the weekend.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



tarnalberry Community Regular

To get him formally diagnosed, he's going to have to be eating gluten (and a lot of it) for a number of months. Determination of celiac disease is done by identifying the extensive damage it causes after it has been active for a while, so to get a dx, you have to cause all that damage first. It may be important enough to do the dx (that's a personal decision), but it will take a good amount of time to prepare for and may be difficult for him.

wonkabar Contributor
To get him formally diagnosed, he's going to have to be eating gluten (and a lot of it) for a number of months. Determination of celiac disease is done by identifying the extensive damage it causes after it has been active for a while, so to get a dx, you have to cause all that damage first. It may be important enough to do the dx (that's a personal decision), but it will take a good amount of time to prepare for and may be difficult for him.

That's my concern at the moment. We had the bloodwork done prior to going gluten-free...it came back negative. We're not willing to put him through a biopsy at this age; he's just 3. So putting him back on gluten right now would be problematic in that he just started preschool . We don't want his problems with gluten to interfere with preschool...he needs preschool right now far more than a formal Dx. We've had tremendous results to the dietary changes. At what age do you all think would be a little easier to deal with the Dx process??

--Kristy

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular
That's my concern at the moment. We had the bloodwork done prior to going gluten-free...it came back negative. We're not willing to put him through a biopsy at this age; he's just 3. So putting him back on gluten right now would be problematic in that he just started preschool . We don't want his problems with gluten to interfere with preschool...he needs preschool right now far more than a formal Dx. We've had tremendous results to the dietary changes. At what age do you all think would be a little easier to deal with the Dx process??

--Kristy

You've got the rest of his life for that--and maybe the standard and method of diagnosis will change in the next few years. But when development is lost because of eating gluten--that makes me really nervous. I wouldn't want to play "what-if," wondering if he would have done better had I not reintroduced something that poisoned him.

I'd at least wait until he's old/verbal/self-aware enough to give me really good feedback about what's going on inside his mind and body. However, I'm sure people will have just as good arguments for getting a Dx now! Tough choice, I guess.

wonkabar Contributor
You've got the rest of his life for that--and maybe the standard and method of diagnosis will change in the next few years. But when development is lost because of eating gluten--that makes me really nervous. I wouldn't want to play "what-if," wondering if he would have done better had I not reintroduced something that poisoned him.

I'd at least wait until he's old/verbal/self-aware enough to give me really good feedback about what's going on inside his mind and body. However, I'm sure people will have just as good arguments for getting a Dx now! Tough choice, I guess.

So glad you agree...that was my point exactly!! :) There is NO WAY that we'd even consider introducing gluten right now. I was talking about the future. He's at such a crucial stage developmentally (b/t 3 and 5), and there's no piece of bread worth jeopardizing his development. My husband and I are waiting for exactly what you said...him being able to tell us what/how he's feeling. We think we really need to know that in order to convey the right message to the doctors. We absolutely do want to proceed with the Dx process--but not until the time is right. I can certainly see and understand the argument for a Dx now, but I don't think anything would change reagarding treatment for him at the moment.

TCA Contributor

My pediatrician thinks that the results we see are Dx enough. Everyone has to make their own decisions, but for us, it's an easy one. If they decide they want to go back on gluten when old enough to decide for themselves, I will support them, but as long as we're the ones deciding for them, we're not worried about the formal Dx. My son will ask, " Does this make my tummy hurt?" with every new food that he tries right now. He's horrified of feeling bad again. If he does decide to try it later and it makes him feel that bad, I'll be surprised if he wants to put himself through getting a formal diagnosis. The Ped. GI said that he didn't want to give a formal Dx because he didn't have a positive biopsy, but he knows us very well and knows that we'll stick to the diet. He said he was afraid of some of the negative ramifications like getting insurance when he's older. In his opinion, though, it is celiac. The insurance thing is just another complication that we want to think about with him. My husband is diabetic and it's easy to be denied over almost anything.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - AlwaysLearning replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Gluten related ??

    2. - Colleen H replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Gluten related ??

    3. - Jmartes71 replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    4. - AlwaysLearning replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,090
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Jamie B
    Newest Member
    Jamie B
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • AlwaysLearning
      Get tested for vitamin deficiencies.  Though neuropathy can be a symptom of celiac, it can also be caused by deficiencies due to poor digestion caused by celiac and could be easier to treat.
    • Colleen H
      Thank you so much for your response  Yes it seems as though things get very painful as time goes on.  I'm not eating gluten as far as I know.  However, I'm not sure of cross contamination.  My system seems to weaken to hidden spices and other possibilities. ???  if cross contamination is possible...I am in a super sensitive mode of celiac disease.. Neuropathy from head to toes
    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.