Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How Many Of You/your Children Were Preemies?


skipper30

Recommended Posts

Gcbec Newbie

My first child was born 27 weeks weighed 1 lb 8 oz, due to me having pre-eclampsia turning eclampsia. I also have other autoimune problems which was found to be the cause of all the problems in my pregnancy. Now, what came first I dont know, but as far as I know my 9 year old doesnt have celiac. Although she has never been tested, I have not seen any symptoms. (forgot had sever hypremisis as well saw someone else with that it was horrible)

My second was born at 33 weeks, 6 lbs. I started pre term contractions at 16 weeks, had 2nd pulmonary embolism at 26 weeks, and gestational diabetes. Finally induced again because of pre eclampsia. This is the one I have 1 positive test and know he has celiac. (hypremisis again)

Now whether or not it is from being premature, I dont think so, but I think if the mom has celiac that would effect premature birth. Just because of the autoimune response, malobsorption, and diet. Had I had diagnosis of celiac, it might have prevented my children from premature births who knows. Very interseting I never thought of it.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Guest ~jules~

Both of my boys were exactly 2 weeks early to the day. Michael was only 6 lbs, and Sean was 6lb 9oz. I had normal pregnancies, except constant nausea the whole time, not just in the first trimester. I don't remember anything happening until after I had my second child, I had post-pardum pretty bad though. Myself I was a day late 7 lbs. I think my trigger was stress.

LL04 Newbie

I find this all very interesting. I, myelf as a baby was a whole month late and was very sickly. I know now that I had celiac disease but it went undiagnosed my whole life.

I have 4 children and had terrible hyperemisis (severe vomiting) for the full nine months of pregnancy with the first 3 of them. I was hospitalized with each one and each time I weighed exactly the same or less when I gave birth than I did before I got pregnant. I had not yet been diagnosed with celiac disease with any of them. Suprisingly my kids didn't seem any worse for the wear because of the nasty pregnancies. The first two came right on their due dates, the third 6 days late and the last 3 days early. There were no complications, the labours were wonderfully quick and they were all healthy 7 or so pounders (except the first at 6lbs 6ozs, but still healthy). However, my first got croup so many times in the first year that he became allergic to amoxicillin, but that's it. No other grief at all. All of them have been tested for celiac disease and are negative (and yes, what does that really mean??!!), but my middle two, a girl 9 and a boy 5, both display symptoms of celiac disease, especially the boy. I breastfed all of them for at least a year or more.

I have northern european ancestery as does my husband so we are prime candidates for celiac disease, which I do have and he hasn't yet been tested for. I am positive my brother has it but he refuses to get tested and other than that we can't trace our family history to know if anyone else has had it. Sooooo.....our children are PRIME candidates. You would think that after being sick so much and having so many antibiotics that it would have been a catalyst for our first boy to get it but he is now healthier than most kids I know and he never gets sick now, not even really any colds!

It would really be interesting if we could see what would have happened if any of them had been premature? Would that have made a difference with the first?

This is such a great question but one I'm afraid will probably not be answered in our lifetime. Research into Celiac's is just finally gaining momentum so I believe it will be a long way off before anyone even begins to probe the possibility of premature births and celiac's having some sort of connection.

Maybe I'm wrong....maybe someone is already looking into this.....???

kevsmom Contributor

My teenage son was born 3 weeks early. He weighed 8 lbs. 1 oz. I hate to think about what he would have weighed if he waited until his due date! I am diabetic, and it is not unusual for diabetics to have large babies. He had constant ear infections from the time he was 3 weeks old he was 15 months old and had tubes put in. He just had a negative endoscopy (yeah!)

Cindy

Becky6 Enthusiast

I was late.

My dd was born at 33 weeks weighing 2 lbs 12 oz and 15". I had severe preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome.

abc Rookie

My last baby - now almost 9mos - was born 6 weeks premature. He had all the normal preemie probs, but came home from NICU after 8 days (just in time for Christmas!) He is now a whopping 21.5 pounds, so no eating issues there.

I also had trouble getting pregnant with my first child, and am curious about infertility and celiac. I am still awaiting test results as to whether I am gluten intolerant...but it could explain the "unexplained" infertility and the "unexplained" prematurity?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Mmoc replied to Mmoc's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Blood tests low iGA 4 years later digestive issues

    2. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to Clear2me's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Gluten free nuts

    3. - trents replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    5. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Latest Research
      6

      Study Estimates the Costs of Delayed Celiac Disease Diagnosis (+Video)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LizzieE
    Newest Member
    LizzieE
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Mmoc
      Thank you kindly for your response. I have since gotten the other type of bloods done and am awaiting results. 
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      I wanted to respond to your post as much for other people who read this later on (I'm not trying to contradict your experience or decisions) > Kirkland Signature Super Extra-Large Peanuts, 2.5 lbs, are labeled "gluten free" in the Calif Costcos I've been in. If they are selling non-gluten-free in your store, I suggest talking to customer service to see if they can get you the gluten-free version (they are tasty) > This past week I bought "Sliced Raw Almonds, Baking Nuts, 5 lbs Item 1495072 Best if used by Jun-10-26 W-261-6-L1A 12:47" at Costco. The package has the standard warning that it was made on machinery that <may> have processed wheat. Based on that alone, I would not eat these. However, I contacted customer service and asked them "are Costco's Sliced Almonds gluten free?" Within a day I got this response:  "This is [xyz] with the Costco Member Service Resolutions Team. I am happy to let you know we got a reply back from our Kirkland Signature team. Here is their response:  This item does not have a risk of cross contamination with gluten, barley or rye." Based on this, I will eat them. Based on experience, I believe they will be fine. Sometimes, for other products, the answer has been "they really do have cross-contamination risk" (eg, Kirkland Signature Dry Roasted Macadamia Nuts, Salted, 1.5 lbs Item 1195303). When they give me that answer I return them for cash. You might reasonably ask, "Why would Costco use that label if they actually are safe?" I can't speak for Costco but I've worked in Corporate America and I've seen this kind of thing first hand and up close. (1) This kind of regulatory label represents risk/cost to the company. What if they are mistaken? In one direction, the cost is loss of maybe 1% of sales (if celiacs don't buy when they would have). In the other direction, the risk is reputational damage and open-ended litigation (bad reviews and celiacs suing them). Expect them to play it safe. (2) There is a team tasked with getting each product out to market quickly and cheaply, and there is also a committee tasked with reviewing the packaging before it is released. If the team chooses the simplest, safest, pre-approved label, this becomes a quick check box. On the other hand, if they choose something else, it has to be carefully scrutinized through a long process. It's more efficient for the team to say there <could> be risk. (3) There is probably some plug and play in production. Some lots of the very same product could be made in a safe facility while others are made in an unsafe facility. Uniform packaging (saying there is risk) for all packages regardless of gluten risk is easier, cheaper, and safer (for Costco). Everything I wrote here is about my Costco experience, but the principles will be true at other vendors, particularly if they have extensive quality control infrastructure. The first hurdle of gluten-free diet is to remove/replace all the labeled gluten ingredients. The second, more difficult hurdle is to remove/replace all the hidden gluten. Each of us have to assess gray zones and make judgement calls knowing there is a penalty for being wrong. One penalty would be getting glutened but the other penalty could be eating an unnecessarily boring or malnourishing diet.
    • trents
      Thanks for the thoughtful reply and links, Wheatwacked. Definitely some food for thought. However, I would point out that your linked articles refer to gliadin in human breast milk, not cow's milk. And although it might seem reasonable to conclude it would work the same way in cows, that is not necessarily the case. Studies seem to indicate otherwise. Studies also indicate the amount of gliadin in human breast milk is miniscule and unlikely to cause reactions:  https://www.glutenfreewatchdog.org/news/gluten-peptides-in-human-breast-milk-implications-for-cows-milk/ I would also point out that Dr. Peter Osborne's doctorate is in chiropractic medicine, though he also has studied and, I believe, holds some sort of certifications in nutritional science. To put it plainly, he is considered by many qualified medical and nutritional professionals to be on the fringe of quackery. But he has a dedicated and rabid following, nonetheless.
    • Scott Adams
      I'd be very cautious about accepting these claims without robust evidence. The hypothesis requires a chain of biologically unlikely events: Gluten/gliadin survives the cow's rumen and entire digestive system intact. It is then absorbed whole into the cow's bloodstream. It bypasses the cow's immune system and liver. It is then secreted, still intact and immunogenic, into the milk. The cow's digestive system is designed to break down proteins, not transfer them whole into milk. This is not a recognized pathway in veterinary science. The provided backup shifts from cow's milk to human breastmilk, which is a classic bait-and-switch. While the transfer of food proteins in human breastmilk is a valid area of study, it doesn't validate the initial claim about commercial dairy. The use of a Dr. Osborne video is a major red flag. His entire platform is based on the idea that all grains are toxic, a view that far exceeds the established science on Celiac Disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and a YouTube video from a known ideological source is not that evidence."  
    • Wheatwacked
      Some backup to my statement about gluten and milk. Some background.  When my son was born in 1976 he was colicky from the beginning.  When he transitioned to formula it got really bad.  That's when we found the only pediactric gastroenterologist (in a population of 6 million that dealt with Celiac Disease (and he only had 14 patients with celiac disease), who dianosed by biopsy and started him on Nutramegen.  Recovery was quick. The portion of gluten that passes through to breastmilk is called gliadin. It is the component of gluten that causes celiac disease or gluten intolerance. What are the Effects of Gluten in Breastmilk? Gliaden, a component of gluten which is typically responsible for the intestinal reaction of gluten, DOES pass through breast milk.  This is because gliaden (as one of many food proteins) passes through the lining of your small intestine into your blood. Can gluten transmit through breast milk?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.