Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Is A Follow-up Endoscopy Needed 6 Months After Initial Diagnosis?


mellamella

Recommended Posts

mellamella Newbie

I was diagnosed in Aug '07. I am feeling and doing well living gluten free. Last week I had a 6 month follow-up with myGI guy. Blood work was repeated and all came-back normal. He has scheduled me for another upper endoscopy. I think this is really not necessary. He is a major doctor in a major city and explained to me that this is his protocal for definative diagnosis. I would love to hear who else has had a repeat upper endoscopy, and what exactly was the time frame for doing so? Thanks for your input!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



johnsoniu Apprentice
I was diagnosed in Aug '07. I am feeling and doing well living gluten free. Last week I had a 6 month follow-up with myGI guy. Blood work was repeated and all came-back normal. He has scheduled me for another upper endoscopy. I think this is really not necessary. He is a major doctor in a major city and explained to me that this is his protocal for definative diagnosis. I would love to hear who else has had a repeat upper endoscopy, and what exactly was the time frame for doing so? Thanks for your input!

I was just dx'd last month and had my follow up consult and blood work last Thursday.

He said everything looked good on the blood work, asked how the stools were, and said he'd see me in 6 months. Said he might take another endoscopy in a year or so, but it would depend on how I was feeling then.

I would think if your original scope showed a lot of damage( I had a lot), he may want to look to see how things were progressing, but if you're feeling well it kinda seems redundant. Better safe than sorry I guess. Or he just might be using you as a guinea pig to source in his next research paper. For which you'll receive no royalties B)

psawyer Proficient

I had both an endoscopy and a colonoscopy in June of 2000. My colon was normal, but the small intestine showed severe damage to the villi.

Since it has been seven years, and I am over 50, my primary care physician believes that a colonoscopy every seven to ten years is indicated. Since the preparation overlaps and the extra effort is small, she also wants another endoscopy to see if my villi have completely healed (an indication of just how gluten-free I have really been).

The double procedure is scheduled for July 10. The actual procedure is not a big deal, but the purging of the digestive tract in preparation is a royal pain in the @$$. For a diabetic (like me), there are extra challenges as you try to manage blood sugar and insulin levels during the final 24 hours.

Six months seems, to me, a bit soon. Depending on how long you went without a diagnosis (while eating gluten) and your age when you went gluten-free, it may take longer that to heal the villi. But if your blood work is now negative, that is a strong sign that the gluten-free diet is working and the villi should be on the road to recovery.

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular

What will he do if your villi have or have not improved? It's not like you can go MORE gluten-free!

If the outcome is not going to change by having an invasive procedure, why have it?

pinky Apprentice

my doctor had me do a follow-up endoscopy after 1 year to see if the gluten-free diet was working. then blood work also every year, but only the one endoscopy.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,666
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    bailey1023
    Newest Member
    bailey1023
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • Scott Adams
      Welcome to the community! Generally, for a gluten challenge before celiac disease blood tests, Tylenol (acetaminophen) is considered safe and should not interfere with your antibody results. The medications you typically need to avoid are those like ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin) or naproxen (Aleve) that can cause intestinal irritation, which could potentially complicate the interpretation of an endoscopy if you were to have one. However, it is absolutely crucial that you confirm this with either your gastroenterologist or your surgeon before your procedure. They know the specifics of your case and can give you the definitive green light, ensuring your surgery is comfortable and your celiac testing remains accurate. Best of luck with your surgery tomorrow
    • Xravith
      Thank you for the advice. I’ve actually never checked for nutritional deficiencies, but for as long as I can remember, I’ve always taken vitamin and mineral supplements — otherwise my symptoms get worse. This week I stopped eating gluten to confirm whether my symptoms are really caused by it. Starting next week, I’ll reintroduce gluten — it’s sad to go back to how I was before — but at least I’ll be able to take the necessary tests properly. I think the diagnostic process will be long, but at least I’m happy that I finally decided to address this doubt I’ve had for years.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.