Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Positve Yet Inconclusive?


peetred

Recommended Posts

peetred Rookie

My doc ran the first bit of celiac testing for antibodies on my 2 year old son...

one of the antibodies came back elevated but the lab tells my doc that it is inconclusive (because the other three were normal). So, my doc admits he is confused about he results. He ran another full celiac panel and the nurse called this morning and told my husband that it was negative. I have heard a lot on here that the tests are not really reliable for children his age.

So, I am very confused. My son has gastrointeritus right now, but the doc told us to keep a food diary especially when he's feeling better. We have been doing lactose free for 2 weeks with no improvement (i think it's worse) in his bowel movements. I am just ready to try gluten-free to see what happens. What do you all think? At least then, I could take in the food diary and show the doc whether he was improving or not. <_<


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ursa Major Collaborator

Celiac testing is notoriously unreliable in children under six (and not a whole lot more reliable after that). There is no way that a doctor should say that it can't be celiac disease because the blood test was negative.

At your son's age trying the gluten-free diet is the ONLY reliable test for celiac disease. So, my advice is to start the gluten-free diet immediately. The food diary is an excellent idea, as it will help you determine if the diet is working or not, plus it will be good evidence to show your doctor if your son shows improvement on the diet.

mom2lucas Rookie
My doc ran the first bit of celiac testing for antibodies on my 2 year old son...

one of the antibodies came back elevated but the lab tells my doc that it is inconclusive (because the other three were normal). So, my doc admits he is confused about he results. He ran another full celiac panel and the nurse called this morning and told my husband that it was negative. I have heard a lot on here that the tests are not really reliable for children his age.

So, I am very confused. My son has gastrointeritus right now, but the doc told us to keep a food diary especially when he's feeling better. We have been doing lactose free for 2 weeks with no improvement (i think it's worse) in his bowel movements. I am just ready to try gluten-free to see what happens. What do you all think? At least then, I could take in the food diary and show the doc whether he was improving or not. <_<

Hi! My son is 2 years old as well. When he first started having his sintoms (huge belly, throwing up all the time) it took awhile before we convinced his doctor to ran the celiac panel on him, but when he did, with the exception of the Igg, everything else came back negative, so she dismissed him as not being celiac. But I took him to a Gastro Pedi and it only took her a second to look at him, and say he was very probably a celiac, and did the biopsy which came back positive. So, yes, blood tests are highly unreliable.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,888
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    ple63304
    Newest Member
    ple63304
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Daura Damm (a sponsor here) uses AN-PEP enzymes and filtering in their brewing process to reduce/remove gluten, and it actually tests below 10ppm (I've see a document where they claim 5ppm). 
    • trents
      This topic has come up before on this forum and has been researched. No GMO wheat, barley and rye are commercially available in the USA. Any modifications are from hybridization, not laboratory genetic modification. Better toleration of wheat, barley and rye products in other countries is thought to be due to use of heirloom varieties of these cereal grains as opposed to the hybrids used in the USA which contain much larger amounts of gluten.
    • Scott Adams
      Welcome to the forum @Ceekay! If you have celiac disease then you can't eat wheat in other countries because it would still contain gliadin, the harmful part of the grain. Have you been diagnosed with celiac disease?
    • Ceekay
      I can eat wheat products safely and without discomfort when traveling to Mexico, Outer Mongolia, and Japan. I feel that US wheat, barley, and rye are grown from genetically-modified seeds that have had something unhealthy done to them, that causes a bad reaction in many of us. 
    • Ceekay
      I think all barley and barley malt  have gluten. I would avoid it. The only gluten-free beer I've tried that tastes good is by Holidaily, a Colorado brewery. Their Fat Randy's IPA is great, except that it's almost impossible to find and grocers won't order it (they're at the mercy of their "food distributors," who seem to hate Holidaily). If you can find any Holidaily, try it--it's great. Never mind Spain -;)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.