Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Eas Myoplex Beware


Jeremiah

Recommended Posts

Jeremiah Apprentice

I don't want anyone else to get burnt by EAS. For years now they have claimed their product is gluten-free, even though it is not, it contains oats. Is there any way to stop a company like this from making false claims?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



MySuicidalTurtle Enthusiast

What makes oats not gluten-free is cross-contamination. So, technically they are not using gluten ingredients but unless manufactured in a dedicated facility, the oats do have gluten on them. It is a fine line and they should defiantly not say they are gluten-free if they have cross-contaminated oats.

tarnalberry Community Regular

actually, it's not even quite true to say that it's only cross contamination that makes oats gluten free. oats are a more complicated question than just that.

gluten - *technically* - is the protein in a grain. period. celiacs have somewhat usurped the world to refer to only specific glutens, rather than all of them, but technically speaking, all grains have gluten - which is why you can see "corn gluten" on a package, and you don't have to worry that you're going to get sick, as a celiac, from it.

gliadin (the wheat gluten), horedin (the barley gluten), and secalin (the rye gluten) (and I may have switched the barley and rye gluten), are all known to cause the autoimmune response in celiacs. they all have the same 33-mer, the same section of 33 amino acids lines up and folded the same way that our body sees as badness.

avenin (the oat gluten), has a very similar segment of amino acids in it. approximately 10% of celiacs have an immune system that says "eh, close enough" and *also* has the exact same autoimmune response to oats. it's *not* cross contamination that they are reacting to, it's the protein itself. (there are a number of articles on pubmed from research on this where the researchers used oats grown in their own labs under very controlled conditions.)

imho, oats should be included in labeling considerations since *some* celiacs do react to them. but selling oats that are marketed as free of cross contamination is a good thing as well, for the majority of celiacs who do not.

either way, this issue - oats - is one reason why it is, also imho, VITAL to NEVER trust "gluten free" labels, and always read the ingredient list.

Jeremiah Apprentice
What makes oats not gluten-free is cross-contamination. So, technically they are not using gluten ingredients but unless manufactured in a dedicated facility, the oats do have gluten on them. It is a fine line and they should defiantly not say they are gluten-free if they have cross-contaminated oats.

6 years ago when I played basketball in college EAS claimed their Myoplex was gluten free, yet I would get cramped up and my brain felt like cabbage and I couldn't explain why. After several months, I quit taking their shakes and both symptoms went away. I would warn all celiacs beware, their products are NOT gluten-free. There is little more frustrating than believing you are eating gluten free and still feeling terrible. If this is happening to you, I'd suggest an elimination diet, I've found out too many times you can not trust the company's statements. Since they're not getting sick and their selling product they really don't care. (or at least it feels that way sometimes)

brigala Explorer

Many of us do not react to oats. I appreciate it when products containing oats are marked "gluten free" if they're either dedicated or tested for the presence of gluten.

We always have to read the label. I have to check all gluten-free foods for the presence of dates and certain tree nuts. Some people have to check it for oats, or MSG, or corn -- all ingredients that many Celiacs seem to have difficulty with. It doesn't mean it shouldn't be labeled gluten-free.

-Elizabeth

Jeremiah Apprentice
Many of us do not react to oats. I appreciate it when products containing oats are marked "gluten free" if they're either dedicated or tested for the presence of gluten.

We always have to read the label. I have to check all gluten-free foods for the presence of dates and certain tree nuts. Some people have to check it for oats, or MSG, or corn -- all ingredients that many Celiacs seem to have difficulty with. It doesn't mean it shouldn't be labeled gluten-free.

-Elizabeth

A great many celiacs, are not aware of all the possible pit-falls out there. (Especially new ones) They hear gluten-free and the instant assumption it is safe. (They don't have time to troll the boards looking for the absolute definition of gluten-free, which includes oats in most definitions) So they go on believing they are eating gluten-free, but don't understand why they are having problems. This post is for those people. I respect your opinion and you can say we respectfully agree to disagree.

tarnalberry Community Regular
Many of us do not react to oats. I appreciate it when products containing oats are marked "gluten free" if they're either dedicated or tested for the presence of gluten.

We always have to read the label. I have to check all gluten-free foods for the presence of dates and certain tree nuts. Some people have to check it for oats, or MSG, or corn -- all ingredients that many Celiacs seem to have difficulty with. It doesn't mean it shouldn't be labeled gluten-free.

-Elizabeth

The reason I disagree with this - specifically putting oats in a product labeled gluten free - is because it is GLUTEN (of the variety that celiacs react to) that is potentially a problem in the food item. MSG, corn, and other intolerances are all different issues - issues that may be related, but are not THE SAME IMMUNE RESPONSE, on a chemical level.

I'm looking for a label that means "celiac safe" not "90% celiac safe". :)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Jeremiah Apprentice
The reason I disagree with this - specifically putting oats in a product labeled gluten free - is because it is GLUTEN (of the variety that celiacs react to) that is potentially a problem in the food item. MSG, corn, and other intolerances are all different issues - issues that may be related, but are not THE SAME IMMUNE RESPONSE, on a chemical level.

I'm looking for a label that means "celiac safe" not "90% celiac safe". :)

I agree, most people with celiac disease, read gluten free and trust that it is. Unaware about the potential for oats to be harmful to them, in so called "gluten-free" declared foods.

bakingbarb Enthusiast
I agree, most people with celiac disease, read gluten free and trust that it is. Unaware about the potential for oats to be harmful to them, in so called "gluten-free" declared foods.

I am totally confused by you all...are you saying a product that says gluten free but contains oats isn't gluten free?

brigala Explorer
I am totally confused by you all...are you saying a product that says gluten free but contains oats isn't gluten free?

It sort of depends on how you look at it.

The gluten in oats is not the same as the gluten in rye, barley, and wheat. It's not unusual for a Celiac to react to oat gluten as if it were wheat gluten.

Rice, corn, and all other grains also contain gluten, but it is very different from wheat gluten. It is much more rare for Celiacs to have problem with rice gluten or corn gluten, so these aren't really considered "gluten" in the sense that relates to Celiacs.

For someone who has trouble with the gluten in oats, which is a substantial minority of Celiacs, anything with oats should not be considered gluten-free even if it says gluten-free on the package.

But, for those of us who have no problem with oats, there are many products out there that contain oats which come from dedicated sources (eliminating the possibility of contamination with wheat, rye, or barley gluten, which is the main problem with oats for most Celiacs).

Obviously from this thread, my opinion on this differs from that of some of the other people here. I eat oats and products containing oats if they are certified gluten-free; but I avoid oats that are not certified gluten-free because of the high degree of cross-contamination in oats. If there weren't oat-containing foods labeled gluten-free, I'd have to avoid all oats and oat-containing foods... and frankly that would be the pits. Some of my favorite gluten-free foods contain oats.

-Elizabeth

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

tarnalberry Community Regular
I am totally confused by you all...are you saying a product that says gluten free but contains oats isn't gluten free?

Oat gluten - avenin - is similar enough to wheat, rye, and barley gluten that 90% of celiacs do not react to it. 10% of celiacs do react to it, however. So, it's not exactly a black or white answer that can be had.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to Butch68's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Guinness, can you drink it?

    2. - MogwaiStripe replied to Midwestern's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      15

      Gluten Issues and Vitamin D

    3. - Butch68 posted a topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Guinness, can you drink it?

    4. - trents replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      17

      Taking Probiotics but Still Getting Sick After Gluten – Advice?


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,218
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    tiffhorn14
    Newest Member
    tiffhorn14
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      This is a very common question, and the most important thing to know is that no, Guinness is not considered safe for individuals with coeliac disease. While it's fascinating to hear anecdotes from other coeliacs who can drink it without immediate issues, this is a risky exception rather than the rule. The core issue is that Guinness is brewed from barley, which contains gluten, and the standard brewing process does not remove the gluten protein to a level safe for coeliacs (below 20ppm). For someone like you who experiences dermatitis herpetiformis, the reaction is particularly significant. DH is triggered by gluten ingestion, even without immediate gastrointestinal symptoms. So, while you may not feel an instant stomach upset, drinking a gluten-containing beer like Guinness could very well provoke a flare-up of your skin condition days later. It would be a gamble with a potentially uncomfortable and long-lasting consequence. Fortunately, there are excellent, certified gluten-free stouts available now that can provide a safe and satisfying alternative without the risk.
    • MogwaiStripe
      Interestingly, this thought occurred to me last night. I did find that there are studies investigating whether vitamin D deficiency can actually trigger celiac disease.  Source: National Institutes of Health https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7231074/ 
    • Butch68
      Before being diagnosed coeliac I used to love Guinness. Being made from barley it should be something a coeliac shouldn’t drink. But taking to another coeliac and they can drink it with no ill effects and have heard of others who can drink it too.  is this everyone’s experience?  Can I drink it?  I get dermatitis herpetiformis and don’t get instant reactions to gluten so can’t try it to see for myself. 
    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.