Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gluten-fee - How Quickly Will I Feel Better?


Jana315

Recommended Posts

Jana315 Apprentice

I know this question has probably been asked a thousand times, but my question is slightly different:

Last Monday, ate a bowl of cereal for breakfast and had or horrible "reaction" day long events....

Last Tuesday, went gluten-free with a very basic diet and felt 1000x better than I have in years!!! Honestly, I felt no reaction symptoms at all on Tuesday.

After Tuesday and was very excited to have found at least a part of why I've felt like the living dead lately, but I'm concerned about feeling SO MUCH better so quickly. Granted, I've had some set-backs since Tuesday - I do react to potatos and possibly other nightshades, so it is a learning process for me. I've only had a day or two of lesser symptoms and no other days as wonderful as Tuesday. I wish I had kept a diary for Tuesday because I'd like to feel that good everyday.

My question is:

With Celiac (I am considering testing), is it possible to feel better very quickly if I eat just the right thing for my digestive issues? (primarily, fuzzy head, fatigue, aches, stomach pain, bloating and more gas than a hot air balloon!).

If not, what other disorder/condition could I be experiencing? I've been thoroughly allergy tested for years by different clinics and am NOT allergic to wheat - or so they tell me, but a retrospective family analysis leads me to believe that my grandmother was celiac and I do have siblings who report feeling "much better" when they don't eat wheat.

Thanks In Advance for any insights or guidance.

Jana


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



MySuicidalTurtle Enthusiast

For me, it was like a new world for me right away. The symptoms were just gone! I was so lucky but it caused me loads of anxiety. I couldn't believe that my symptoms could be truly gone so fast. Everyone is different, though. If you want to be tested, you have to be eating gluten, though, to get best results.

caligirl2001 Newbie

Everyone is different. (I know, not very specific!) I felt much better within 24 hours. 48 was a huge difference. By the time I had been gluten-free for 6 weeks, it was like I was a whole new person. So if you feel better, stick with it! It is so worth it to have a life back!

Jana315 Apprentice

Thank you for the confirmation that I'm not insane! I really do feel so much better - not perfect yet, but world's better. I don't know if I have Celiac, but I cannot ever imagine going back to eating gluten & other foods that I have such an obvious reaction to. Definitely sticking to gluten-free & Nightshade-free diet.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to barb simkin's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      celiac, chocolate and alcohol

    2. - barb simkin replied to barb simkin's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      celiac, chocolate and alcohol

    3. - trents replied to barb simkin's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      celiac, chocolate and alcohol

    4. - barb simkin replied to barb simkin's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      celiac, chocolate and alcohol


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,333
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    BeitAryeh
    Newest Member
    BeitAryeh
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      So, you had both and endoscopy with biopsy and a colonoscopy. That helps me understand what you were trying to communicate. No, no! It never occurred to me that you were trying to mislead me. It's just that we get a lot of posters on the forum who are misinformed about what celiac disease is and how it is diagnosed so I need some clarification from you which you were so gracious to give.
    • barb simkin
      I had both the genetic genes for celiac.  My gastroenologist advised he also took a biopsy during one of my colonoscopies and endoscopy and advised I had celiac disease, along with stomach ulcers from my esophagus stomach down to my small bowel. I was shown the ulcers on the catscan and endoscopy report.  I also had polyps in 3 places throughout my large bowel. I was on a strict diet for months following.  I am sorry if I didnt define how I was diagnosed with celiac disease.  I am sorry if you think I was misleading you. I also had to pay $150.00 for the genetic testing.
    • trents
      So, I'm a little confused here. I understand you to say that you have not been officially diagnosed with celiac disease. Is this correct?  You have had genetic testing done to check for the potential for developing celiac disease and that was positive. Is this correct? I think you meant to type "gluten sensitivity" but you typed "gluten insensitivity". Just so we are clear about the terminology, there is celiac disease and there is NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). They are not the same but they have overlapping symptoms. Celiac disease causes damage to the small bowel lining but NCGS does not. NCGS is often referred to in short form as gluten sensitivity. However, people often use the terms celiac disease and gluten sensitivity interchangeably so it can be unclear which disease they are referring to. Genetic testing cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease but it can be used to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population has one or both of  the genes that have been most strongly connected with the potential to develop active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develops active celiac disease. This makes the genetic test useful for ruling out celiac disease but not for diagnosing it. A colonoscopy cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease because it doesn't permit the scope to go up into the small bowel where celiac disease does the damage. They use an endoscopy ("upper GI) for checking the small bowel lining for celiac damage.
    • barb simkin
      I did nor read the chocolate pkg as it was of fered to me and I ate 2 pcs. I do know that only very dark chocolate and and a very few others are gluten free. Most alcohols contain gluten. I have several yrs of not knowing my celiac condition as docs would not do the test. After looking on the internet about my sufferings I insisted on the gene trsting which showed positive for gluten insensitivity and a biopsy on my next colonoscopy that also showed positive which could not help the damage done to my small bowel. So I very rarely have a glass of wine
    • trents
      @barb simkin, are you sure the chocolate products are gluten-free and not "manufactured on equipment that also handles wheat products and tree nuts", i.e., cross-contamination? And what kind of alcoholic beverages are we talking about? Most beers are made from gluten-containing grains. Just checking.
×
×
  • Create New...