Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Has Anyone Read Anything Suggesting Gliadin Can Act As A Neurotoxin?


TotalKnowledge

Recommended Posts

TotalKnowledge Apprentice

The highly unreliable wikipedea has produced the following article.

Open Original Shared Link

Which would suggest to me that the protein gliadin may be a mild neurotoxin, of which some people can metabolize while others can't. This would make sense as to how it effects different people differently based not only on how well your body breaks gliadin down and when present, how your body responds to gliadin.

I am going to do some more research into this and see what I can find. It could be a new way of looking at autoimmune problems in patients with gluten sensitivity.

Has anyone read any scientific research on this?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



CMG Rookie

I have read/heard this with respect to both gliadin and casein (milk protein). I have not read scientific research, but first heard about the theory and studies from a developmental psychologist who evaluated my daughter for ADHD. Some doctors believe that this opiate effect is the reason so many with autism, aspergers and adhd respond positively to the Gluten-free Casein-free diet.

TotalKnowledge Apprentice

It certainly makes more sense to me that this would be an underlying factor, and that all of the co-morbid conditions, disease and other problems all have a common underlying reason. This view point has wide ranging implications not only in the way some medical conditions are approached but also in way that the Human species has developed. It is generally accepted that the rise of culture, technology and the way we track history shadows the development of wheat, barley and rye as a means for humans to survive periods when food was scarce. It would be ironic to say the least if this same crop is the underlying reason that drove innovation due to it being toxic to at least a portion of the population.

It would be interesting to study cultures that do not, or did not include these substances compared to societies after their introduction.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,207
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    WAB19
    Newest Member
    WAB19
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.