Jump to content
  • You are not alone. Join Celiac.com for trusted gluten-free answers and forum support.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

I Got My Enterolab Results!


Spidey Sense

Recommended Posts

Spidey Sense Newbie

I got my enterolab results back today. I couldn't believe that they came via email on a Sunday!

So here we go:

Gluten Sensitivity Testing

Fecal Antigliadin IgA 5 Units (Normal Range <10 Units)

Fecal Antitissue Transglutaminase IgA 9 Units (Normal Range <10 Units)

Microscopic Fecal Fat Score: 96 Units (Normal Range < 300 Units)

HLA-DQ Gene Molecular analysis: HLA-DQB1*0301, 0501

Serologic equivalent: HLA-DQ 1,3 (Subtype 5,7)

HLA gene analysis reveals that you have a genotype that predisposes to gluten sensitivity (HLA-DQ1,3 especially that involving DQB1*0501, 0301). This genotype also can predispose to microscopic colitis and other autoimmune syndromes.

I was gluten free 2-3 weeks before the test, but I suppose that isn't long enough to really change the results... so I guess I'm not gluten sensitive. I am still going to NOT eat gluten for the next few months because I can see improvements in how I feel. My horrible gut pain and nausea is gone after eating some meals- it has been very wonderful. I figured out that a salad with cherry tomatoes and ham chunks does not upset my tummy at all... whereas grits does. So now that I got wheat out of my diet, I can start to pin point my other food allergies/ intolerances. I am relieved not to have Celiac, but I am dissapointed that I still haven't figured this thing out.

-Wendy


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



snoopylian Apprentice

You have the same genes I have - mine are - HLA-DQB1*0501, 0301 - :o) maybe we're sisters. lol

Anyway, I / we have two genes predisposing us to gluten sensitivity. (I know this because when I got my results I emailed them back and confirmed that interpretation). The difference between celiac and gluten sensitivity is that celiac is confirmed damage, via biopsy, to the villi in the intestine. Gluten sensitive individuals can have all the same things happen to them as celiacs just without the visible damage to the villi.

Quote from my results -

" Two copies also means

there is an even stronger predisposition to gluten sensitivity than having

one gene and the resultant immunologic gluten sensitivity or celiac disease

may be more severe".

go to: Open Original Shared Link - I had to print this out and read it a couple of times because he lost me when he got technical.

My daughter is almost 4' 8" and she is fully grown (I'm 5' 2", my sis is 5' 5'). Her stool test came back at 8, but remember - I gave her one gluten sensitivity gene. She was seen by an ped endo for two years and they couldn't find anything wrong with her (they never checked celiac or gluten sensitivity).

As for being gluten free affecting your test no that wasn't long enough to affect the stool test. My son was gluten free for three to four months and his test came back at 34.

Spidey Sense Newbie

That is cool that we have the same genes. I wonder what the chances of that are :-)

I read thru the page that you linked me to, and there is a lot of information to absorb in one sitting. I just find it fascinating that doctors don't automatically screen for celiac.

One good thing that has come out of our new eating habits is my boyfriend Ian's irritable bowel has cleared up quite a bit. He's had irritable bowel for as long as I've known him- 7 years now. I didn't understand what he was going thru until 3 years ago when all my GI symptoms started. Aren't we a miserable couple!

Now for dinner and breakfast he has gluten-free food, and we can actually go for walks after dinner instead of staying close to the bathroom. If only he would stop eating pizza for lunch...

-Wendy

julie5914 Contributor

Wendy, have you been tested for gall bladder trouble? Just something else to rule out with stomach pain and fullness. Another is ovarian trouble. Good luck finding it out - I know it is frustrating - I was diagnosed with IBS without them testing for anything at all, so when I told other doctors that I had been told that, they were just like oh, ok, insted of, well it might be something else... Man, I hope it is something else, cause there is just no hope with IBS, you know?

Spidey Sense Newbie

Julie, I did have a sonogram of my gall bladder to check for stones, but all was fine with that. I had some general blood work that came back today, and my white blood cell count was low- I'm not sure what that means. I also have mild anemia and a higher than normal fasting blood glucose level.

Right now I am still assuming that I feel sick from the foods that I eat. Salads work great for me, so I will eat salads at work so I don't drive my boss nuts, and then I will experiement in the evening at home.

gf4life Enthusiast

Wendy,

2-3 weeks *shouldn't* effect the results of the stool test, but it could if there were other factors. Such as if you might be IgA deficient, or if you were on a low gluten diet before being completely gluten-free, or if you had minimal damage and healed very quickly.

You have genes that can cause gluten sensitivity and your symptoms lessen (or go completely away!) on the gluten-free diet, then you should stay gluten-free. You could still be gluten intolerant even with the negative results.

You can have a bloodtest (total serum IgA) that can tell you if you have IgA deficiency. It can also cause other food allergies/intolerances, since IgA is the immunoglobulin that protects all of the mucous lined body parts, like the eyes, mouth, throat, lungs, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary tract. So if you have frequent infections or any problems with these parts of your body, then you should be tested. You can read more about it here:

Open Original Shared Link

God bless,

Mariann

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to cristiana's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      1

      Low iron/high normal haemoglobin

    2. - cristiana posted a topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      1

      Low iron/high normal haemoglobin

    3. - Scott Adams replied to JForman's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      11

      7yo struggling!

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,170
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442

    yvonne jacobs
    Newest Member
    yvonne jacobs
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      Not sure what you mean by "poor iron levels" if 30 is normal (upper end of normal range) and you are 29. (at least, that's how I read your post. Seems to me that your iron (ferritin) is normal, whereas before it was too high (40). At any rate, your post made me curious, so I copy pasted "Does it actually matters if my iron levels are poor, if my hemoglobin is normal" into the google search bar. According to Dr google, it does matter and they had a lot to say about it.
    • cristiana
      Hello All I think I started a thread on this subject some time ago, but now can't find it.  Or possibly it was someone else's thread that I hijacked - and that's why I can't find it! Anyway, I have a rather complicated issue with iron and I'm wondering what to do about it.  Or even if it matters. Pre-menopause, when I was first diagnosed with coeliac,  my ferritin levels were dreadful and I had to supplement.  It soon became apparent that I had to stop, as once my iron anemia cleared up, my hemoglobin levels reached high normal, verging on a condition known as polycythemia.   High normal in my lab is 15.5 for women, and my level has hovered between 15 and 15.5 The highest my ferritin levels have ever been is 40 (30 being normal) since I started my gluten-free journey - I reached that level about three years ago., about a year post menopause.  18 months later my ferritin had gone down to 29, which I think I can explain because I've been avoiding red meat.  This was a conscious decision as I have  discovered that I can keep my hemoglobin levels at safe levels so long as I don't consume too much iron.  My gastroenterologist also told me not to supplement it.     I have recently had a colonoscopy and have done a FIT test to detect bleeding, both came back normal.  So I feel that the reduced iron consumption is probably the reason for this new deficiency.  But I have two questions: A. Does it actually matters if my iron levels are poor, if my hemoglobin is normal?  (I do feel a bit tired, but surely if my hemoglobin levels are normal I shouldn't?) B. Would my last TTG blood result of 10 (cut off point for normal levels at my lab)  be affecting my absorption of iron? Thanks! Cristinaa  
    • Scott Adams
      This would definitely be an interesting study. We did an article on this a while back:  
    • Scott Adams
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      For people of European ancestry, 2% is about average, depending on which study you look at. For Asian ancestry it can be higher. For full Sub-Saharan African ancestry it is zero, but in practice they tend to have trace amounts due to migration back into Africa. While each individual may have 1-3% Neanderthal DNA, it is not always the same DNA that is Neanderthal. Estimates are 20-70% for which parts of the human genome might be Neanderthal in any given individual. Another way of saying this is that 20-70% of the Neanderthal genome survives in the human population. The HLA genotypes that confer susceptibility to celiac (necessary but not sufficient) are known to be of human in origin. There are some other genes known to be associated with a higher probability for getting celiac (with the right HLA genotype) that are associated with Neanderthal DNA. However, there is no correlation between quantity of Neanderthal DNA and probability of getting celiac. Neanderthal DNA is associated with other autoimmune diseases. Lupus, Crohn's disease, and rheumatoid arthritis are probably the most strongly associated diseases.
×
×
  • Create New...