Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Endoscopy - How Many Tissue Samples Needed?


trying4faith

Recommended Posts

trying4faith Apprentice

Hi all,

I have been told your blood work shows elevated gliadin, you may have a wheat allergy, but don't appear to be celiac disease.

Then three months later, your bloodwork is normal (after 2.5 weeks gluten-free) so you don't have celiac (all 5 titers done).

And -

Your endoscopy was inconclusive. Gastritis, elevated leukocytes, and possible early onset of celiac disease. The doctor only removed three samples of the duodenum. I've read more are required.

Since I've been gluten-free for two months now (everything eaten is either fresh or labeled gluten-free) and am still having the same symptoms intermittently, maybe it isn't celiac disease?

Can someone tell me two things:

1. Can being off gluten for 2.5 weeks throw off the blood test?

2. How many tissue samples are required for an accurate test? Any medically documented literature out there to back that up?

Thanks.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Carriefaith Enthusiast
Since I've been gluten-free for two months now (everything eaten is either fresh or labeled gluten-free) and am still having the same symptoms intermittently, maybe it isn't celiac disease?

I am kind of confused from your post... So you had an inconclusive biopsy and a + blood test?

If you are still having symptoms, you may need more time to heal... Some people need 1-2 years to feel better! and I'm in that category!

1. Can being off gluten for 2.5 weeks throw off the blood test?

2. How many tissue samples are required for an accurate test? Any medically documented literature out there to back that up?

Being off gluten may give a false-negative result on a blood test. The blood tests look at the antibodies in your blood that are produced from injesting gluten, so essentially... if you're not eating gluten, those antibodies won't be there.

I'm not a doctor and haven't seen medical literature but I think that more biopsys would give the doctor a better chance of finding celiac since the damage can be patchy. I think 3-5 would be good enough... but no less than that.

cy7878 Newbie

6 pieces is usually what is recommended in looking for celiac disease.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,213
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Sassy620
    Newest Member
    Sassy620
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Fayeb23
      Thank you that’s really helpful, hopeful won’t have to have a biopsy.
    • RMJ
      That means the normal range (i.e. not celiac disease) would be a result less than 14.99.  Your result is WAY above that. Some gastroenterologists would diagnose that as celiac disease even without a confirming biopsy because it is more than ten times the top of the normal range.
    • Redanafs
      Hi everyone. Back in 2022 I had blood work drawn for iga ext gliadin. Since then I’ve developed worse stomach issues and all other health issues. My doctor just said cut out gluten. He did no further testing. Please see my test results attached. I just need some direction cause I feel so ill and the stomach pain is becoming worse. Can this test show indications for other gastrointestinal diseases?
    • Fayeb23
      Thank you. These were the results TTG ABS NUMERICAL: > 250.0 U/mL [< 14.99]  Really don’t understand the results!
    • Scott Adams
      Clearly from what you've said the info on Dailymed is much more up to date than the other site, which hasn't been updated since 2017. The fact that some companies might be repackaging drugs does not mean the info on the ingredients is not correct.
×
×
  • Create New...