Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Endomysial Vs. Transglutaminase Test


Dcoughli

Recommended Posts

Dcoughli Newbie

Hi - this is my first time writing but I am at wits end in finding an answer. My daughter has been on "watch" for Celiac for 2 years. She is 8 years old and two years ago starting having stomach aches around dinner, she is often in the bathroom, stools are somewhat normal. Her Endomysial test is normal but the Transglut tests was 97 2 years ago, 44 last year and now is 89, all well above normal range. She had a scope 2 years ago that was normal. I am concerned given the non-treatment of this disease that we are waiting for a positive biospsy. She has since had an Impedance Probe test (last week) because she has so much gas in her she feels like she is going to vomit, so we are checking for reflux.

I have an appt on Tues to go over the lab and probe results and most likely will have another scope procedure for biopsies. What questions should I be asking? We took the new genetic test to rule her out and could not. She has not changed clothing size for over a year, he is 52 inches and 59 lbs.

Any guidance or comments are appreciated.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Emme999 Enthusiast

Here's a little info on the tests:

The tTG is extremely sensitive. This is from the book "Dangerous Grains" (my fav. book to quote )

"The tTG test usually identifies about 98% of those who have celiac disease, and it is a very specific test that can be used to rule out celiac disease in 95% of patients. This test appears to be superior to endomysium antibody testing, not only because it is less costly but also because it is a little better at identifying celiac disease and because interpretive bias is reduced by the use of computer scanning."

As for EMA Testing:

"This test is very sensitive, and it will identify 90% or more of those patients with flat intestinal walls, but some evidence suggests that it is less reliable for identifying cases with milder intestinal damage. ... However, a negative EMA blood test has limited value for excluding celiac disease. This test is also limited by the need for individual observation and evaluation of stained blood cells."

I hope that helps :)

Good luck!

- Michelle

Guest jhmom

Hi and welcome to the board! I am sorry to hear your daughter is sick, I know it's hard to deal with when our children are not well no matter how old they are ;)

My daughter is 9 (almost 10) and has had problems pretty much since day one. I started getting sick in 2002 and after going the "traditional doctor" route and getting nowhere because all my tests/procedures came back normal I decided to get tested through Enterolab. When my test came back positive I decided to have my daughter tested too. I didn't want to put her through all the tests I went through, her test came back positive too. After going gluten-free she was like a new child, she didn't complain after eating, she wasn't grumpy all the time and seemed to have more energy.

My suggestion to you is, since your daughter's blood tests are positive I would put her on a gluten-free diet. I know some people swear by biopsies but I personally do not think they are necessary if labs are positive or if you improve on a gluten-free diet.

I wish you luck and hope your daughter feels better soon! :)

Lesliean Apprentice

When a blood test, especially EMA or tTG comes back positive I think you can conclude the diagnosis is positive for Celiac disease. The biopsy is no longer always recommended as some doctors think it is like waiting for the heart attack to verify the EKG test that measured heart irregularities. The tTG test already shows a reaction to gluten.

Here is a website to look at: Open Original Shared Link

Here is another concerning biopsy reliability.

https://www.celiac.com/st_prod.html?p_prodid=25

Good luck and best wishes for your daughter's good health.

Leslie

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,209
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Deeknip
    Newest Member
    Deeknip
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Fayeb23
      Thank you that’s really helpful, hopeful won’t have to have a biopsy.
    • RMJ
      That means the normal range (i.e. not celiac disease) would be a result less than 14.99.  Your result is WAY above that. Some gastroenterologists would diagnose that as celiac disease even without a confirming biopsy because it is more than ten times the top of the normal range.
    • Redanafs
      Hi everyone. Back in 2022 I had blood work drawn for iga ext gliadin. Since then I’ve developed worse stomach issues and all other health issues. My doctor just said cut out gluten. He did no further testing. Please see my test results attached. I just need some direction cause I feel so ill and the stomach pain is becoming worse. Can this test show indications for other gastrointestinal diseases?
    • Fayeb23
      Thank you. These were the results TTG ABS NUMERICAL: > 250.0 U/mL [< 14.99]  Really don’t understand the results!
    • Scott Adams
      Clearly from what you've said the info on Dailymed is much more up to date than the other site, which hasn't been updated since 2017. The fact that some companies might be repackaging drugs does not mean the info on the ingredients is not correct.
×
×
  • Create New...