Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Do I Really Need A Biopsy?


BlueBridie

Recommended Posts

BlueBridie Newbie

Hi There,

I'm new, but have posted a few replies already. I do however have some questions regarding my diagnosis.

My doctor ran many food allergy tests, and when the results came back he told me everything was normal except I had high protein levels indicating inflammation, and the test for Celiac Disease was positive. He did mention that Drs usually send patients with positive results to a specialist to get a biopsy, but he suggested I just 'google Celiac and start a Gluten Free diet immediately'. So I did. That was 8 days ago, and although I'm still having some trouble, I actually feel better (and have discovered what 'normal' poop is!!)

My husband, bless him, was very upset to hear that I won't be eating Gluten any more, particularly as I've been lactose intolerant for years (although I'm told this may go away) and has suggested that I should ask to see a specialist to get a proper definite diagnosis.

What should I do? I trust my Dr and if he tells be he's certain I have it, I'm happy. But I would hate to find out after several years of being Gluten free that I'm actually not, or worse, having to do a 'gluten challenge' which sound very unpleasant!

If I do request to see a specialist, and if I get a biopsy quickly, surely being gluten free for a week or two wouldn't make that much difference to the results? Would it?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



LDJofDenver Apprentice

Hi There,

I'm new, but have posted a few replies already. I do however have some questions regarding my diagnosis.

My doctor ran many food allergy tests, and when the results came back he told me everything was normal except I had high protein levels indicating inflammation, and the test for Celiac Disease was positive. He did mention that Drs usually send patients with positive results to a specialist to get a biopsy, but he suggested I just 'google Celiac and start a Gluten Free diet immediately'. So I did. That was 8 days ago, and although I'm still having some trouble, I actually feel better (and have discovered what 'normal' poop is!!)

My husband, bless him, was very upset to hear that I won't be eating Gluten any more, particularly as I've been lactose intolerant for years (although I'm told this may go away) and has suggested that I should ask to see a specialist to get a proper definite diagnosis.

What should I do? I trust my Dr and if he tells be he's certain I have it, I'm happy. But I would hate to find out after several years of being Gluten free that I'm actually not, or worse, having to do a 'gluten challenge' which sound very unpleasant!

If I do request to see a specialist, and if I get a biopsy quickly, surely being gluten free for a week or two wouldn't make that much difference to the results? Would it?

My doctor also told me that I did not need the small bowel biopsy. He said all my bloodwork was positive for it, plus I had a first-degree relative with it, so he said it was unnecessary (at least in terms of using it as a diagnostic tool).

However, a few months later I referred myself to a GI doc, just for a consultation and the first thing out of their mouths was that I needed to have an endoscopy!

They said it is not just for diagnostic purposes, that they biopsy for specific markers, and level of damage to villi. Plus, you may have some related esophageal issues if you've suffered with celiac disease long enough, have had acid reflux because of it, or many years of being sick (vomiting). I did, and was unaware and am now on prescription Prilosec.

I'd suggest a consultation with a G.I. doc and go from there, on their recommendation (GI docs often have a different take on things than your GP). Unlike blood tests, you most likely will not have to eat gluten again for your endoscopy, as the damage doesn't heal very quickly in the small intestine.

Skylark Collaborator

Hi, there.

If you had anti-endomysial antibodies in your blood, you need to be off gluten no matter what. Even if you have a normal biopsy, people with those antibodies usually eventually end up with intestinal damage. The celiac blood tests should fall to normal in six months to a year of eating gluten-free, so you can follow it up that way with your normal doctor.

If you want to go with the GI specialist he will almost certainly want to scope you and biopsy. They like to have a look around and check for other kinds of damage. A couple weeks gluten-free won't reverse any celiac damage, but you really should go back on gluten if you feel like you need positive results to convince your husband.

By the way, a lot of celiacs are lactose intolerant and find they can digest lactose again once their villi heal.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,723
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    twestcds
    Newest Member
    twestcds
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Idnam
      They do work for me. I am feeling much better now that I am watching my histamine intake and only take the DAO once  a day.   I had acid reflux for 12 years and was prescribed PPI's.  which I refused to take. Ranitidine was prescribed as an option that I did use only as and when I had chest pain. They were prescribed for me to reduce the acid in my body.
    • Yaya
      This is difficult for me to deal with.  B complex is what stands between me and migraines.  Whenever I stop B for just a few days, I get a migraine.  All my adult life I would get a violent migraine for 3 days like clockwork until a doctor told me to try B complex and it worked.  The only time I get a migraine is when I've run out of B.  This has worked for me for over 15 years.  I am soon to be 79.   My cardiologist has me stop all vitamins for about 3 days and I always have a migraine when I go in for the bloodwork.   D level is nearly at optimal.  I don't take A, I get enough from food.   What a dilemma!
    • Scott Adams
      I think the best approach is to lean how to read product labels, especially the allergen warnings, and these lists might be helpful:      
    • Scott Adams
      It looks like you are referring to this product: https://shop.kingarthurbaking.com/items/gluten-free-bread-flour Their site says: "Made with gluten-free wheat starch to give baked goods incredible taste and texture, it’s ideal for classic yeasted recipes like artisan boules, bagels, cinnamon rolls, and burger buns", and it is true that Codex quality wheat starch is gluten-free, and does make better baked goods. However, it also contains very low levels of gluten (under 20ppm), and some celiacs do react to this level, so if you are super sensitive it's best to avoid it. They also make this very similar product, which doesn't include any wheat ingredient, and is certified gluten-free: https://shop.kingarthurbaking.com/items/gluten-free-bread-flour Although labeling products in the USA as "gluten-free" that contain such wheat starch is relatively new, it has been offered in Europe for decades. You can read more about studies on it here: https://www.celiac.com/celiac-disease/miscellaneous-information-on-celiac-disease/gluten-free-diet-celiac-disease-amp-codex-alimentarius-wheat-starch/
    • DebJ14
      Our Functional Medicine doctor has always ordered the Spectracell Test for Micronutrient Deficiencies.  It tests the intracellular levels of the nutrients, not blood levels.  When high dose, targeted supplementation did not resolve the deficiencies after retesting at 6 months and then a year, he ordered genetic tests.  I have a genetic inability to process Vitamin D, B12 and antioxidants, so I am on high doses of those for life.  The rest of the initial deficiencies resolved within 6 months to a year and a good multi vitamin is sufficient to address those.  My husband has historically had high homocysteine levels and his low folate, B 12 and B6  levels are because of his MTHFR gene mutation.  Always good to get to the root cause!
×
×
  • Create New...