Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Do I Really Need A Biopsy?


BlueBridie

Recommended Posts

BlueBridie Newbie

Hi There,

I'm new, but have posted a few replies already. I do however have some questions regarding my diagnosis.

My doctor ran many food allergy tests, and when the results came back he told me everything was normal except I had high protein levels indicating inflammation, and the test for Celiac Disease was positive. He did mention that Drs usually send patients with positive results to a specialist to get a biopsy, but he suggested I just 'google Celiac and start a Gluten Free diet immediately'. So I did. That was 8 days ago, and although I'm still having some trouble, I actually feel better (and have discovered what 'normal' poop is!!)

My husband, bless him, was very upset to hear that I won't be eating Gluten any more, particularly as I've been lactose intolerant for years (although I'm told this may go away) and has suggested that I should ask to see a specialist to get a proper definite diagnosis.

What should I do? I trust my Dr and if he tells be he's certain I have it, I'm happy. But I would hate to find out after several years of being Gluten free that I'm actually not, or worse, having to do a 'gluten challenge' which sound very unpleasant!

If I do request to see a specialist, and if I get a biopsy quickly, surely being gluten free for a week or two wouldn't make that much difference to the results? Would it?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



LDJofDenver Apprentice

Hi There,

I'm new, but have posted a few replies already. I do however have some questions regarding my diagnosis.

My doctor ran many food allergy tests, and when the results came back he told me everything was normal except I had high protein levels indicating inflammation, and the test for Celiac Disease was positive. He did mention that Drs usually send patients with positive results to a specialist to get a biopsy, but he suggested I just 'google Celiac and start a Gluten Free diet immediately'. So I did. That was 8 days ago, and although I'm still having some trouble, I actually feel better (and have discovered what 'normal' poop is!!)

My husband, bless him, was very upset to hear that I won't be eating Gluten any more, particularly as I've been lactose intolerant for years (although I'm told this may go away) and has suggested that I should ask to see a specialist to get a proper definite diagnosis.

What should I do? I trust my Dr and if he tells be he's certain I have it, I'm happy. But I would hate to find out after several years of being Gluten free that I'm actually not, or worse, having to do a 'gluten challenge' which sound very unpleasant!

If I do request to see a specialist, and if I get a biopsy quickly, surely being gluten free for a week or two wouldn't make that much difference to the results? Would it?

My doctor also told me that I did not need the small bowel biopsy. He said all my bloodwork was positive for it, plus I had a first-degree relative with it, so he said it was unnecessary (at least in terms of using it as a diagnostic tool).

However, a few months later I referred myself to a GI doc, just for a consultation and the first thing out of their mouths was that I needed to have an endoscopy!

They said it is not just for diagnostic purposes, that they biopsy for specific markers, and level of damage to villi. Plus, you may have some related esophageal issues if you've suffered with celiac disease long enough, have had acid reflux because of it, or many years of being sick (vomiting). I did, and was unaware and am now on prescription Prilosec.

I'd suggest a consultation with a G.I. doc and go from there, on their recommendation (GI docs often have a different take on things than your GP). Unlike blood tests, you most likely will not have to eat gluten again for your endoscopy, as the damage doesn't heal very quickly in the small intestine.

Skylark Collaborator

Hi, there.

If you had anti-endomysial antibodies in your blood, you need to be off gluten no matter what. Even if you have a normal biopsy, people with those antibodies usually eventually end up with intestinal damage. The celiac blood tests should fall to normal in six months to a year of eating gluten-free, so you can follow it up that way with your normal doctor.

If you want to go with the GI specialist he will almost certainly want to scope you and biopsy. They like to have a look around and check for other kinds of damage. A couple weeks gluten-free won't reverse any celiac damage, but you really should go back on gluten if you feel like you need positive results to convince your husband.

By the way, a lot of celiacs are lactose intolerant and find they can digest lactose again once their villi heal.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,897
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Jennbo
    Newest Member
    Jennbo
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Judy M
      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
    • trents
      You state in an earlier post that you don't have celiac disease. Here in this post you state you will "be doing another test". What will this test be looking for? What kind of celiac disease testing have you had done? If you have used a Entero Labs it sounds like you have had stool testing done for celiac disease which is not widely accepted as a valid celiac disease diagnostic testing method. Have you had blood antibody testing for celiac disease done and do you realize that for antibody testing to be valid you must have been eating generous amounts of gluten for a period of weeks/months? 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.