Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Life Insurance


scaredparent

Recommended Posts

scaredparent Apprentice

I have a 24 mo old with undiagnosed celiac disease. He had a positive dietary change. He has been gluten-free for about 7 mo and is doing very well. But here is my question. We are getting ready to test my 7 yr old to see if she has celiac disease? My mom has chones and I told her that she should be tested and she blew up at me because she said "that I am trying to blame her for my childrens problems" she says that because she was diagnosed with chones that she can't get life insurance and I want to know is if you are diagnosed with celiac disease do you also have trouble getting life insurance? Is it better just to go with a dietary change and if you get better you know you have celiac disease if you don't then you don't have celiac disease. I don't want to make it so my children can't get life insurance be cause of a diagnoses in his medical history. Should I test my daughter or just put her on a gluten-free diet and hope for the best?

Thanks in advance


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ianm Apprentice

You bring up a good point. With our health care and insurance system looking for any reason to weed potential problem people out getting tested is not something to be taken ligthly. I have never been tested and never will because I am concerned that my insurance provider can use that against me. I was denied life insurance many years ago for another health reason once. I have not had any problems with insurance for the last few years because it has been over 5 years since that problem has occured. Celiac is something that never goes away.

Merika Contributor

You can always go to a different doc, pay out of pocket and get an accurate diagnosis. Then just forget to report it to the insurance company. I think an accurate diagnosis is a worthwhile pursuit, regardless of if you have it covered by insurance or not.

With kids, it is a tricky question. You don't want to screw up there insurance options (though WHY gluten-free-celiac people should be penalized is beyond me...). On the other hand, it may be really important with kids that a medical condition be marked in the doc's chart, at school, at camp, and so on. No one will listen to your child or teenager about gluten if they end up in an urgent situation, and that's assuming the kid will remember to tell them in the first place. Also, you may need proof for school reasons.....I don't know.

Merika

Also, it is my understanding that insurance companies don't care if you are "gluten-intolerant" but do care if you are "celiac". I think it's worth considering marking your official charts as gluten-intolerant, and keeping the celiac diagnosis under wraps. It IS lying, though, so decide on your own conscience :)

Merika Contributor

PS. Why is it that Americans believe the only way to access medical care is through the insurance provider? We can go to whoever we want, whenever we want. We live in a free country. We just need is the $$ to pay the doctor. Some docs even give discounts if you just pay and don't use insurance.

Merika

Ps. please don't flame that not everyone can afford, yadda yadda....not everyone can, but MOST of us as families have multiple cars, televisions, etc. It's all about priorities...

(note to scaredparent: this isn't aimed at you, it just got me thinking....) :)

lovegrov Collaborator

Life insurance really should not be a problem. My doctor, who has celiac disease himself, recently increased his coverage and when I looked into it, a broker told me that if I had a negative blood test I could get increased insurance at the regular price. Other health matters cropped so I put it on the back burner.

My job provides health insurance no matter what pre-existing conditions you have so I've never had to test that, but I would think you could also get that.

richard

jenvan Collaborator

Life insurance shouldn't be a problem. I have a policy. And remember, if you have had continual coverage and are not applying for a self-employed insurance policy, you shouldn't be denied the insurance.

You can also do one of the mail-in labs for a test also.

Does anyone actually know how much insurance companies check up on things like blood tests and if they really catch the "smaller" items, not just surgeries, heart attacks, diabetes, etc. ?

lovegrov Collaborator

With compuetrization, they know a lot more than you think.

richard


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



scaredparent Apprentice

We have insurance and the reason being that if we didn't we would spend about 6000 dollars a month alone on meds. That doesn't include dr appt. My husband only brings home about 1100 dollars a month you do the math. We could not survive with out insurance.

drjmarkusic Newbie

I'm a dr. and there are diagnostic codes we use which end up in a centralized data base. When HIPAA went into effect in May a few years back it sure messed some things up.

jimbo Newbie

I recently applied for life insurance - they did blood work beforehand and my numbers were all wacked out (I hadn't been "officially" diagnosed yet, so wasn't dieting yet). Coverage was a lot more expensive than my wifes "normal" policy, but I was told that if my next blood test comes back normal, they will re-write policy...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,207
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    WAB19
    Newest Member
    WAB19
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.