Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Going Crazy-Need Help Please


varthurs

Recommended Posts

varthurs Apprentice

I have been suffering terribly with stomach issues. I specifically asked my doctor to test me for Celiac. Last week I got the call from my Doctor that my blood test came back positive for Celiac Disease. Since I am PETRIFIED of having this biopsy, he told me I can just start eating gluten free. Even suggested I see a Nutritionist. I think it would be beneficial for me to have the biopsy, just to be 100% sure. Does anyone have an opinion about this? How accurate are the blood tests?

Also, when I decided I'd make an appt for gastro doctor, I called back to see if I should start eating gluten free. He told me I should. But now I am confused from my research. Can I eat gluten free before the biopsy? Not sure if it's the blood test that will get incorrect results from gluten free eating, or the biopsy.

Sorry, I am very overwhelmed and confused. Waiting until March 5th for appointment with gastro doctor is like an eternity. I am going CRAZY. And I want to feel better. NOW.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ciamarie Rookie

Is your gastro appointment for the actual biopsy, or just an initial appointment to see if a biopsy is needed which would be scheduled another time? I'm not positive, but 1 week on a gluten-free diet may not make a great deal of difference on the biopsy results, but generally you should continue to eat gluten until all testing is complete.

According to what I just saw on this other thread: it's possible to get a false negative on the blood test, but if it's positive then it's positive. If the dr. will diagnose you based on the blood test without the biopsy, that might be the way to go. In the end it's your decision, though.

Jai Rookie

depends how long you have to wait for the biopsy. However, a false negative biopsy is more common than a false positive blood test. Depends on the severity of villi damage....you can have symptoms even before the villi are severely damaged...

mushroom Proficient

Welcome to the board, varthurs. Some tests for celiac are more definitive than others. Do you know what blood tests your doctor ran and which were positive? The only test which could potentially falsely indicate celiac disease is the tTG, in which a positive result can possibly indicate other conditions besides celiac. But if you have a positive tTG and your symptoms disappear with a gluten free diet, well then I think you have your answer.

It is entirely your choice whether or not you have the biopsy, but if you do decide to have it you should continue eating gluten up until the time of the test to attempt to avoid a false negative. As a pp said, there is a 20% error rate which produces false negatives, either because the damage is not yet severe enough or not sufficiently widespread and is missed, or the doctor did not take enough samples, or the pathologist did not read it correctly.

If I were you and your doctor is willing to diagnose based on the blood test results, I think I would skip the biopsy for now (although there is really nothing much to be afraid of with this procedure - it is pretty routine and is done under sedation, not anesthesia). If your symptoms do not resolve on the diet it is a procedure that can always be done at a later stage, as other conditions which might be looked for through the scope do not require you to be eating gluten.

GottaSki Mentor

I agree with Mushroom. A positive tTG IgA is not possible without your immune system reacting to Gluten - while a negative result does not rule out Celiac Disease.

Going gluten-free seems like the best next step if you are certain you don't want an endo. I've gone back in forth about the need for my initial endoscope. Over the past few years I thought maybe it would have been enough to go gluten-free after the positive blood work. I now am grateful that I went ahead with the initial scope and a follow up a year later as the first test confirmed the celiac dx (so never gave a second thought to the need to be 100% gluten-free). The subsequent scope was helpful in putting the rest of my puzzle together as the damage to my digestive track became worse after 13 months of complete adherence to a gluten-free diet -- eventually I found that I was intolerant of many foods.

I likely would have figured this out without the scopes, but it was part of solving the puzzle for me.

Welcome and Good Luck to you!

PS...you do need to be eating gluten up until the endoscopy is complete should you decide to have one.

varthurs Apprentice

Thank you, all. I am not sure which exact blood tests were taken. I will try to get copies tomorrow.

49erlady Newbie

I just had the endo done 2 weeks ago. It was a breeze! My test came back positive for Celiac disease. Good luck!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,437
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.