No popular authors found.
Ads by Google:

Categories

No categories found.


Get Celiac.com's E-Newsletter





Ads by Google:


Follow / Share


  FOLLOW US:
Twitter Facebook Google Plus Pinterest RSS Podcast Email  Get Email Alerts
SHARE:

Popular Articles

No popular articles found.
Celiac.com Sponsors:

Is DGP Serological Test the Wave of the Future for Celiac Disease Testing?

Celiac.com 03/11/2010 - Many people are confused about which tests provide the most accurate results for a celiac disease diagnosis. In a recent study by a team at the Department of Gastroenternology and Internal Medicine, St. Orsola-Malpigihi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy, researchers evaluated  current testing methods, and made some conclusions about celiac testing that may shed light on the subject for those of us overwhelmed by current conflicting information.

Duodenal biopsy is considered to be the universal 'gold standard' for celiac diagnosis. However, in recent years the importance of  serological testing has been been emphasized as a reliable marker for antibodies as well. The tTG antibodies of IgA class are currently recognized to be the most effective test for celiac screening, resulting in up to 95% accuracy.  Although, a new serological test, DGP, is now being investigated as a more reliable alternative to tTG.

Ads by Google:

A study was devised to compare the effectiveness of DGP antibodies with that of tTG antibodies, and used a meta-analysis of  eleven studies that were published between 1998 and 2008. The study analyzed the results of 937 patients with untreated celiac, and 1,328 control subjects. The analysis of the eleven studies showed that IgA tTG antibodies revealed a higher likelihood ratio (LR) than IgA DGP antibodies, and IgA tTG antibodies exhibited a lower LR than IgA DGP antibodies. The data between the two antibody tests validates that IgA tTG continues to display the most accurate diagnostic tests for a positive celiac diagnosis, as well as for excluding a negative celiac diagnosis.  However  IgG DGP antibody tests were shown to be more effective at identifying 'false negatives' and had more success in determining celiac in patients that had IgA deficiency, and in children under two years old.

The results of these tests clearly demonstrate that IgA DGP does not offer any advantages to the IgA tTG antibodies, and is actually less accurate and more expensive. However, IgG  DGP antibodies present an invaluable tool  in screening for celiac disease in cases where IgA tTG tests fail. Eventually, a new antibody screening will hopefully be designed which combines IgA tTG and IgG DGP, and reduces the number of tests currently used in celiac screening. However, intestinal biopsy is always required to confirm the presence of celiac disease no matter what serological tests are involved.

Source:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20136587

Celiac.com welcomes your comments below (registration is NOT required).












Related Articles



2 Responses:

 
acousticmom
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingemptyratingempty Unrated
said this on
01 Apr 2010 6:08:02 AM PDT
I could use some clarification here:

"The analysis of the eleven studies showed that IgA tTG antibodies revealed a higher likelihood (LR) ratio than IgA DGP antibodies, and IgA tTG antibodies exhibited a lower LR than IgA DGP antibodies."

 
Destiny
Rating: ratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfullratingfull Unrated ( Author)
said this on
01 Apr 2010 10:49:46 AM PDT
Likelihood ratio (LR) means that there is a likelihood that a given test result (in this case, tTG & DGP) would be expected in a patient with celiac disease compared with the likelihood that the same result would be expected to be found in a patient without celiac disease. Therefore, what the results are saying is that tTG shows both a higher and lower likelihood ratio than DGP, making it a more effective test for determining the presence of celiac as well as the absence of celiac disease.




Rate this article and leave a comment:
Rating: * Poor Excellent
Your Name *: Email (private) *:




In Celiac.com's Forum Now:


You could certainly try. Just remember that, if the mix doesn't have xanthum gum, you may need a little.

Maybe the 20 mg. was too strong for you and increasing symptoms? I have a very low threshold for most meds, and do better on child sized doses. If you tolerate the 10 mg., that may be the way to go just to get symptoms under control and get stabilized. Or maybe 10 mg. every other day, if tha...

I am sorry that you are all having to go through this. I know all too well the neuro issues she is going through. The world seems so hopeless under that gluten cloud. But it does lift. There isn't much a neurologist is going to be able to do except to encourage her to be as strict as possible. ...

Reviving this thread as I am in search of better care for my child, diagnosed this spring with off the charts antibodies. She experiences significant mood effects from gluten and all I get from her GI and ped are blank looks - they aren't familiar with the idea that it can affect one's mental or ...

This is one of my favorite recipes and I'm wondering if I could just switch out a gluten-free blend for the flour? 1 1/2 cups sugar 1 1/4 cups flour 3 1/2 tsp baking powder 1/2 tsp salt 2 tbs shortening Mix these all together add to mix: 1 egg 1/2 cup milk 1 tsp vanilla mix and pour in 9x13 w...