Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

4 Year Old Daughter Test Results, Need Help Interpreting..


SandyES00

Recommended Posts

SandyES00 Newbie

My daughter is about 4.5 and has a history of chronic constipation, fatigue and irritability.  We went to a GI who tested her for celiac disease and were told that they were all negative.  I was looking at them today and it's not like they were zero or anything and was wondering if anyone here could provide some feedback on them.

 

Tis Transglutaminase IgA  4 (Negative is less than 20)

 

Serum IgA  126 (reference range of 25-160mg/dl)

 

IgG Titer  Negative

 

Anyone have any thoughts?  I would appreciate any help you can provide.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nvsmom Community Regular

Welcome to the board.  :)

 

It appears that your daughter's tTG IGA (tissue transglutaminase immunoglobulin A) was positive for celiac disease.  :(  If the normal reference range is 0-2 for that lab, then her result of 4 was double the normal range.  That's a pretty significant positive result and probably indicates celiac disease.... I don't know what her GI was thinking if he said that was normal...

 

The tTG IgA is specific to celiac disease 95% of the time.  That means that 95% of positive results are caused by celiac disease.  5% of the positives, which are generally weak positives (like a 2.2), are caused by other health issues like T1 diabetes, chronic liver disease, crohn's, colitis, thyroiditis, or a serious infection; it generally doesn't produce a positive test result for no reason.  Since your daughter has celiac disease symptoms, and a high positive (if I've read what you typed correctly) then I would say she probably has celiac disease.

 

 

This report has more information on the tests on pages 10-13: Open Original Shared Link

 

The serum IgA is a control test, and your daughter's result was fine.  About 5% of celiacs are deficient in IgA which will cause false negative test results in all IgA based celiac tests (like the tTG IgA or DGP IgA).  If your daughter was low in IgA (like at a 20) her tTG IgA would have been low, like at a 0.4 (for example).  Her tTG IgA was accurate.

 

I don't know what an IgG titre is... the only celiac disease tests that are titres (where they keep diluting the sample until they can not detect the antibody) is the endomysial antibody titre, which is usually IgA based (EMA IGA).  It could have been an EMA IgG titre, but they usually only run that if the patient is deficient in IgG and their tTG IGG was positive.... I don't know what that IgG titre is, but my guess is that it wasn't a celiac disease test.

 

Below are all the celiac disease tests.  You might want your daughter to do more of them if you need further confirmation of her diagnosis.

  • tTG IgA and tTG IgG (tissue transglutaminase) - most common celiac disease tests (you had one done)
  • DGP IgA and DGP IgG (deaminated gliadin peptides) - newer tests that are superior at detecting celiac disease in young children and  cases of early celiac disease.
  • EMA IgA (endomysial antibodies) - tends to detect more advanced disease
  • AGA IgA and AGA IgG (antigliadin antibodies) - older and less reliable tests that have largely been replaced by the DGP tests
  • endoscopic biopsy - 6+ samples taken

The blood tests require the patient to be eating gluten in the 2-3 months prior to testing so don't make her gluten-free yet.  The biopsy only requires 2-4 weeks of gluten.

 

Keep in mind that none of these tests have a sensitivity of 100% - they will not catch all celiacs.  Most have a sensitivity that can go as low as 75% (missing 1 in 4 celiacs).  Even the biopsy can miss up to 1 in 5 celiacs.  A negative result, therefore, does not cancel out a positive result.  A positive is usually a positive for a reason.  :(

 

Keep in mind that celiac disease is genetic.  Her siblings and you, her parents, will need to be tested for celiac disease every couple of years now, or as soon as symptoms present.  Celiac can develop at any time in life, so you all need to be aware of your risk.

 

Best wishes.  I hope she is feeling better soon.

SandyES00 Newbie

So Sorry, I mis-typed, the negative range is less than 20

nvsmom Community Regular

So Sorry, I mis-typed, the negative range is less than 20

 

Ah.  LOL  So that means that she is negative in only one test. It really is not uncommon for a celiac to be negative in some tests yet positive in others, especially if they are in the early years of the disease, which your daughter would be if she has celiac disease.  

 

If you suspect celiac disease, there are still four to six blood tests she could have done, plus the biopsy.  The DGP tests are often the best for detecting celiac disease in young children, you may want to try that route.  

 

You could also try the genetic tests which would tell you if she is indeed in the high risk population.  30% of the world has the DQ2 or DQ8 genes, and 97% of celiacs have those genes.  If she does not have the DQ2 or 8 genes, her chances of being a celiac become quite small.  Negative genetic tests would not rule out any risk of having non-celica gluten sensitivity (NCGS) though.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,027
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    EmmaGraceeee
    Newest Member
    EmmaGraceeee
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Your experience is both shocking and critically important for the community to hear, underscoring the terrifying reality that cross-contamination can extend into the most unexpected and invasive medical devices. It is absolutely devastating that you had to endure six months of sickness and ultimately sustain permanent vision loss because a doctor dismissed your legitimate, life-altering condition. Your relentless research and advocacy, from discovering the gluten in MMA acrylic to finding a compassionate prosthodontist, is a testament to your strength in a system that often fails celiac patients. While the scientific and medical consensus is that gluten cannot be absorbed through the skin or eyes (as the molecules are too large to pass through these barriers), your story highlights a terrifying gray area: what about a substance *permanently implanted inside the body*, where it could potentially shed microparticles or cause a localized immune reaction? Your powerful warning about acrylic lenses and the drastic difference with the silicone alternative is invaluable information. Thank you for sharing your harrowing journey and the specific, severe neurological symptoms you endure; it is a stark reminder that celiac is a systemic disease, and your advocacy is undoubtedly saving others from similar trauma.
    • Scott Adams
      Those are driving distance from me--I will try to check them out, thanks for sharing!
    • Scott Adams
      I am so sorry you're going through this bad experience--it's difficult when your own lived reality of cause and effect is dismissed by the very professionals meant to help you. You are absolutely right—your violent physical reactions are not "what you think," but undeniable data points, and it's a form of medical gaslighting to be told otherwise, especially when you have a positive HLA-DQ2 gene and a clear clinical picture. Since your current "celiac specialist" is not addressing the core issue or your related conditions like SIBO and chronic fatigue, it may be time for a strategic pivot. Instead of trying to "reprove" your celiac disease to unwilling ears, consider seeking out a new gastroenterologist or functional medicine doctor, and frame the conversation around managing the complications of a confirmed gluten-free diet for celiac disease. Go in and say, "I have celiac disease, am strictly gluten-free, but I am still suffering from these specific complications: SIBO, chronic fatigue, dermatological issues, and high blood pressure linked to pain. I need a partner to help me address these related conditions." This shifts the focus from a debate about your diagnosis to a collaborative plan for your current suffering, which is the help you truly need and deserve to work toward bouncing back.
    • NanCel
      Hello, no I had to have them re done and then used a liner over the top.  Many dentists are not aware of the celiac effects.  Best of luck.   There is other material, yet, very expensive.
    • sleuth
      He is not just a psychiatrist.  He is also a neuroscientist.  And yes, I have already read those studies.   I agree with benfotiamine.  This is short term while glutened/inflammation occurs.  As I had already mentioned, these symptoms no longer exist when this phase passes.  And yes, I know that celiac is a disease of malnutrition.  We are working with a naturopath.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.