Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

I'd Love To Eat A Normal Diet Again


DonnaEm

Recommended Posts

DonnaEm Newbie

I'm a 53 year old female with a 35 year history of Hashimotos. Most of my family have autoimmune disorders (Addisons, Graves, Psoriasis, Rheumatoid arthritis). About 5 years ago I started to become unwell, eventually ending up with daily diarrhoea, (massive amounts of floating, yellow stuff – sorry for the TMI) nausea, weight loss, bloating, abdominal pain, anaemia which didn’t respond to iron pills, dizzy spells, muscle pain and fatigue.

I consulted a doctor 2-3 times a year. I had heaps of tests and scans but repeatedly got told there was nothing wrong and I just needed to take my iron pills (I already was) and have a holiday! 

I finally worked out for myself that carbohydrates made me feel worse so I slowly excluded all bread, cake and biscuits from my diet which improved my digestive problems a bit but, overall, not a huge help. Finally, in desperation, I tried a different Dr.  He said that he thought he knew what the problem was and tested me for celiacs (which I’d never heard of). He never asked me about my diet.

The test was negative but I do carry the DQ2 (?) gene.  He advised me to try a gluten free diet anyway which I reluctantly did.  Within a few weeks I felt better than I had for years. I’ve been (99%) gluten-free for a year now and my former good health is mostly back which is great and I’m really grateful.

My questions: 1) could a celiacs test be negative if someone is still eating a small amount of gluten? (ie muesli a few times a week and pasta once a week)

2)  if I do not have celiacs then is it ok to eat normal food sometimes?  Bread is completely out but I do seem to be able to tolerate an occasional bit of pastry. Sometimes I would choose to eat "normal" food when out but is it causing damage if it does make me sick? 

 

I don’t really want to talk to the Dr about it – my faith in them is pretty low!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

Yes, results can be negative on celiac testing if you are not consuming gluten daily! You need to make sure you had the complete celiac panel. I have Hashi's and I tested positive on only the DGP IGA test. The others were all negative yet I had moderate to severe intestinal damage. If you do not have celiac disease, Non-Celiac Gluten Intolerance, or even a wheat allergy, then eat gluten! If you do have celiac disease, every gluten exposure sets off an autoimmune response and your intestines get damaged. It may even impact your Hashi's. It can certainly interfere with the absorption of your thyroid replacement medication (that should be gluten free too).

If you decide to go gluten-free because you really think you have celiac disease, then no cheating ever! If you are unsure, do the gluten challenge for two to three months and get re-tested. It migh help you adhere to the diet.

DonnaEm Newbie

Thank you very much for your reply and your advice. I didn't realise there was more than one test. I will consider my options.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,436
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Blozo
    Newest Member
    Blozo
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.