Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Biocard reading a after ten minutes


Jencart

Recommended Posts

Jencart Newbie

Hello everyone

I am new to the site but suspect I have something going on due to all my symptoms and so purchased a biocard home testing kit. I read the result before 10 minutes and it was negative. Before I went to bed I had an urge to look again and sure enough there was a red line showing positive. This was however after the 10 minute limit. My question is has anyone done a similar thing and gone on to receive a positive result from the dr? Many thanks for any help and advice. 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Jmg Mentor

Hello and welcome :)

I haven't done the test, maybe someone else can advise further, this site has some experienced and helpful posters.  I do think you should see a doctor however and request a lab test. That's going to give you more certainty than any store bought test.

If you write down a note of your symptoms beforehand it can help in putting the case to the doctor. Above all, remember to stay eating gluten until your dr tells you all testing is complete, otherwise you can jeopardise getting an accurate result.

good luck!

 

 

Ennis-TX Grand Master

You should ask your doctor for a proper blood test, and be prepared for a follow up endoscope and biopsy to check for villi damage. You have to be consuming gluten for 12 weeks daily before the blood test, at least half a slice of bread a day. This is referred to as a gluten challenge. You will then after the blood test need to stay on gluten til the endoscope is done, they require you to be consuming gluten at least 2 weeks before the endoscope.

Even if you test negative for either of them there are many things to consider, some people do show up on the blood test for various reasons, the small intestine as the surface area of a tennis court.....chance of missing damage if it is spotty and only taking small samples. Some people do not have celiac but suffer from Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity, this can not be officially diagnosed and ends up just requiring you to avoid gluten like a celiac would (we have several members here with this also)

Mum of three Newbie

Hi, I did two tests after doctor told me he suspected celiac, after six years of several different problems and diagnosis. Both came back faint lines and both  i would say were after ten mins. See my post for pics. I had bloods taken by doctors on Friday and am awaiting the results. I'll let you know how they reflect on my home tests. I'd go and get tested by the doctors no matter what the home test displays I only did them to get an idea if my doctor could be right I'm still left guessing till my actual bloods come back. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,439
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Lillian Steele
    Newest Member
    Lillian Steele
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.