Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Confused: Endoscopy with 10 biopsies taken?


Haveaniceday

Recommended Posts

Haveaniceday Apprentice

Just before beginning my endoscopy the specialist told me he would be taking 4 biopsies (first and second portions of the duodenum), during the procedure he ended up taking 10, including at the bulb. However visually everything is within normal parameters.

I am just really curious as to why the Dr would have suddenly opted to take so many biopsies with everything looking normal. I can understand 6 or even 8, but 10 is over double what was intended and obviously the fewer that can be taken the lesser the risk of complications after.

I am not worried about confirmation of diagnosis neither is my doctor, my blood work markers were in the high positive range across the tests in the panel, and I have direct relatives with celiac. (26/f)

 

Thanks!

*I am not too anxious about any possible result, purely just really curious about what would motivate that


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GFinDC Veteran

Hi,

My guess is the GI didn't see clear evidence of celiac damage visually through the endoscope.  So he / she may have taken more biopsy samples from various spots hoping to get an area that will show damage under a microscope.  Sometimes damage is severe enough to see through the endoscope with the naked eye.  Sometimes a microscope is needed to see it.  If the damage was clear they could get a biopsy from a damaged spot easily.  When it's not real clear its a guessing game to decide where to take a biopsy sample.

The endoscope can only reach about 5 feet into the small intestine.  So it can't see or sample the remaining 17 feet.  There may be more damage further in or not.  I think most of the time samples are examined in a lab and and the results sent to the doctor.  That process seems to run about 7 to 10 days.  You should keep eating gluten until they give you the test results and tell you to go gluten-free or not.  There have been cases where labs lose samples or contaminate them by accident and the the tests have to be redone.  So it's better to wait to go gluten-free until you know the lab results are back.  Going off gluten and then going back on for more testing can be real unpleasant.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,602
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Karen Baumann
    Newest Member
    Karen Baumann
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Alibu
      I was tested back in 2017 and my TTG-IGA was mildly elevated (an 11 with reference range <4) but my EMA was negative and biopsy was negative. Fast forward to 2 weeks ago where I was like y'know what, I still have so many symptoms and I'm always so sick, I should repeat this, thinking it was not going to be positive.  I also found out through 23 and me that I do have the HLA-DQ2.5 gene so I thought it would be good to repeat given my ongoing symptoms. Well my blood work came back with a ttg-iga level of 152.6 with a reference range of <15 and my EMA was positive and EMA titer was 1:10 with reference range of <1:5. I guess I'm nervous that I'm going to do the...
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @linnylou73! Are you claiming this based on a reaction or based upon actual testing?
    • linnylou73
      Sams club membermark columbian coffee is either cross contaminated or the pods contain gluten
    • KimMS
    • Scott Adams
      This varies a lot from person to person. I include foods that are not certified gluten-free but are labelled "gluten-free", while super sensitive people only use certified gluten-free. Both types of products have been found to contain gluten, so there are no guarantees either way: It you are in the super sensitive group, eating a whole foods based diet where you prepare everything is the safest bet, but it's also difficult. Eating out is the the most risky, even if a restaurant has a gluten-free menu. I also include items that are naturally gluten-free, for example refried beans, tuna, pasta sauces, salsas, etc., which have a low overall risk of contamination.
×
×
  • Create New...