Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Is there any way I don’t have Celiacs?


Joshmitchell

Recommended Posts

Joshmitchell Apprentice

I think I’m in denial, but I really don’t want to have celiacs.  Not that anyone does, obviously.   I don’t particularly get sick when I eat gluten. I went back on gluten for a month for my endoscopy and I felt no different than when I was off gluten. My endoscopy showed no damage.
 

Here are my latest blood results:  IgA was 220. Standard range  is up 400
Gliadin IgA 29. Standard range is up to 15

Gliadin Igg .6 standard is  less than 15

transglutaminase IgA .5 standard is less than 15

Transglutaminase IGG is .8 standard is less than 15.

Endomysial was negative. 
 

And I had  both dq2 and dq8 markers for celiacs. I think I know the answer, but is there any chance I don’t have celiacs?  


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



RMJ Mentor

It is possible that you don’t have celiac disease, especially if the only positive test was gliadin IgA and not deamidated gliadin peptide IgA (DGP). The gliadin IgA test is older and not considered as accurate as the DGP test.  You could try to get the test for DGP IgA.

However, I looked at your other posts.  Your mother has celiac disease, and your positive antibody level was lower, but still positive, when not eating gluten.  Both of those would make it more likely that you do have celiac disease. 

 

RMJ Mentor

I think I edited my post AFTER you liked it!  I went back and looked at information from your other posts, which make it more likely that you do have celiac disease or a gluten issue.

Joshmitchell Apprentice
1 minute ago, RMJ said:

It is possible that you don’t have celiac disease, especially if the only positive test was gliadin IgA and not deamidated gliadin peptide IgA (DGP) The gliadin IgA test is older and not considered as accurate as the DGP test.  

You could try to get the test for DGP IgA - while eating gluten.

You could see if your gliadin IgA levels are lower when you don’t eat gluten. If they are that would indicate that your body reacts to gluten.

If you don’t get sick when you eat gluten, why were you tested in the first place?

Thanks. I originally got tested because I went to the doctor after a few severe bouts of heartburn, which may or may not be a symptom of gluten issues. But because I mentioned my mother had celiacs, they went ahead and ran the panel.  So if My DGP test is high, then that’s a pretty good determinant for celiacs? I also heard that the endomysial test was a good indicator. But that one came back negative, as I mentioned. I think I’ll ask my GI if he can do the DGP test you mentioned. Would I need to be back on gluten for a month or so? 

Scott Adams Grand Master

The fact that you mother has celiac disease means you have a ~44% chance of also having it, and if you have a high DGP result on top of this it's almost certain that you also have it, especially given your symptoms. You would need to be back on gluten for ~8 weeks, and eat a couple of sliced of wheat bread per day before getting blood tests.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,341
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Jim Caputo
    Newest Member
    Jim Caputo
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      My reaction to a gluten bolus exposure is similar to yours, with 2-3 hours of severe abdominal cramps and intractable emesis followed by several hours of diarrhea. I don't necessarily equate that one large exposure to gluten with significant intestinal lining damage, however. I think it's just a violent reaction to a what the body perceives to be a somewhat toxic substance that I am no longer tolerant of because I have quit exposing myself to it regularly. It's just the body purging itself of it rather than an expression of significant damage. Before diagnosis, when I was consuming gluten daily, I had little to no GI distress. I was, for the most part, a "silent celiac". The damage to my small bowel lining didn't happen all at once but was slow and insidious, accumulating over a period of years. The last time I got a big shot of gluten was about three years ago when I got my wife's wheat biscuits mixed up with my gluten-free ones. There was this acute reaction after about two hours of ingestion as I described above. I felt washed out for a few days and fully recovered within a week or so.  Now, I'm a 74-year-old male. So, I'm not worried about being pregnant. And I don't want to contradict your physicians advice. But I just don't think you have done significant damage to your small bowel lining by one episode of significant gluten ingestion. I just don't think it works that way.
    • Skydawg
      Wondering about some thoughts on how long to wait to try to get pregnant after a gluten exposure?  I have been diagnosed for 10 years and have followed the diet strictly. I have been cross contaminated before, but have never had a full on gluten exposure. I went to a restaurant recently, and the waiter messed up and gave me regular bread and told me it was gluten free. 2 hours later I was throwing up for the whole evening. I have never had that kind of reaction before as I have never had such a big exposure. My husband and I were planning to start trying to get pregnant this month. My dr did blood work to check for electrolytes and white blood cells, but did not do a full nutritional panel. Most of my GI symptoms have resolved in the past 2 weeks, but I am definitely still dealing with brain fog, fatigue and headaches. My dr has recommended I wait 3 months before I start to try to get pregnant.   I have read else where about how long it can take for the intestine to fully heal, and the impacts gluten exposure can have on pregnancy. I guess I am really wondering if anyone has had a similar experience? How long does it take to heal after 1 exposure like that, after following the diet so well for 10 years? Is 3 months an okay amount of time to wait? Is there anything I can do in the meantime to reduce my symptoms? 
    • ShadowLoom
      I’ve used tinctures and made my own edibles with gluten-free ingredients to stay safe. Dispensary staff don’t always know about gluten, so I double-check labels or just make my own.
    • Scott Adams
      It's great to hear that there are some good doctors out there, and this is an example of why having a formal diagnosis can definitely be helpful.
    • RMJ
      Update: I have a wonderful new gastroenterologist. She wants to be sure there’s nothing more serious, like refractory celiac, going on. She ordered various tests including some micronutrient tests that no one has ever ordered before.  I’m deficient in folate and zinc and starting supplements for both. I’m so glad I decided to go to a new GI!
×
×
  • Create New...